Advertisement

BMC Veterinary Research

, 15:113 | Cite as

H3N2 canine influenza virus and Enterococcus faecalis coinfection in dogs in China

  • Liwei Zhou
  • Haoran Sun
  • Shikai Song
  • Jinhua Liu
  • Zhaofei Xia
  • Yipeng SunEmail author
  • Yanli LyuEmail author
Open Access
Case report
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Virology

Abstract

Background

In May 2017, 17 dogs in a German Shepherd breeding kennel in northern China developed respiratory clinical signs. The owner treated the dogs with an intravenous injection of Shuang-Huang-lian, a traditional Chinese medicine, and azithromycin. The respiratory signs improved 3 days post-treatment, however, cysts were observed in the necks of eight dogs, and three of them died in the following 2 days.

Case presentation

Quantitative real-time PCR was used to detect canine influenza virus (CIV). All of the dogs in this kennel were positive and the remaining 14 dogs had seroconverted. Two of the dogs were taken to the China Agricultural University Veterinary Teaching Hospital for further examination. Two strains of influenza virus (A/canine/Beijing/0512–133/2017 and A/canine/Beijing/0512–137/2017) isolated from the nasal swabs of these dogs were sequenced and identified as avian-origin H3N2 CIV. For the two dogs admitted to the hospital, hematology showed mild inflammation and radiograph results indicated pneumonia. Cyst fluid was plated for bacterial culture and bacterial 16 s rRNA gene PCR was performed, followed by Sanger sequencing. The results indicated an Enterococcus faecalis infection. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed and dogs were treated with enrofloxacin. All 14 remaining dogs recovered within 16 days.

Conclusions

Coinfection of H3N2 CIV and Enterococcus faecalis was detected in dogs, which has not been reported previously. Our results highlight that CIV infection might promote the secondary infection of opportunistic bacteria and cause more severe and complicated clinical outcomes.

Keywords

Canine influenza virus H3N2 Enterococcus faecalis Coinfection 

Abbreviations

CAdV

Canine adenovirus

CAUVTH

China Agricultural University Veterinary Teaching Hospital

CDV

Canine distemper virus

CIV

Canine influenza virus

CPIV

Canine parainfluenza virus

PCR

Polymerase chain reactions

qPCR

quantitative real-time PCR

SIV

Swine influenza virus

Background

Canine influenza virus (CIV) causes acute respiratory infection in dogs [1]. CIV of different origins and subtypes can infect dogs, however, two major subtypes, equine-origin H3N8 and avian-origin H3N2 CIVs, have established stable lineage in canine population. Avian H3N2 CIV was first identified in dogs in southern China in 2006 [2], and the following year, three H3N2 strains were isolated from dogs with severe respiratory disease in Korea [3]. Since then, H3N2 CIVs have been isolated from nasal swabs of dogs experiencing respiratory clinical signs in several regions of China and South Korea [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. In addition, H3N2 CIV has been transmitted to the United States, and was first isolated in the February–March 2015 outbreak in Chicago [9].

CIV infections are usually associated with upper respiratory tract clinical signs, including coughing and rhinorrhea. Severe disease, such as high fever, pneumonia or bronchopneumonia, and death have occasionally been reported [10]. Natural infections of CIV, especially in kenneled dogs, are likely to be associated with other respiratory pathogens, such as canine distemper virus (CDV), canine adenovirus type 2 (CAdV type 2), or canine parainfluenza virus (CPIV), which may increase the severity of disease [11].

Enterococcus faecalis is a Gram positive, non-spore-forming, facultative anaerobic bacterium, inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals, and also widely distributed in the environment [12, 13]. E. faecalis does not cause disease in healthy humans or animals, despite the nosocomial pathogenicity of Enterococci [14]. In dogs, there have only been a few reports of disease caused by E. faecalis, but the bacteria have been isolated from cases of urinary tract infections [15, 16, 17], periodontitis [18] and endocarditis [19].

CIV coinfection with respiratory bacterial pathogens may increase the pathogenicity [20]. Here, we report coinfection of CIV and E. faecalis in dogs for the first time. This case study emphasizes the importance of timely detection and effective treatment of CIV, to reduce the risk of secondary infections and improve outcomes.

Case presentation

In May 2017, all 17 dogs (aged 2–18 months old) in a German Shepherd breeding kennel in Beijing, developed coughing and rhinorrhea about 4 days after the introduction of a new dog. The breeder administered intravenous Shuang-Huang-lian (60 mg/kg/day) and azithromycin (10 mg/kg/day). Shuang-Huang-Lian, a traditional Chinese medicine formulation comprising alcohol-water extracts of three herbs (Lonicerae Japonicae Flos, Scutellariae Radix, and Fructus Forsythiae), is widely used in China to treat respiratory infection as antimicrobial agents [21, 22]. Respiratory signs reduced 3 days post-treatment, however, cysts of various sizes (ranging from 5 to 10 cm in diameter), were observed by breeder in the ventral neck of eight dogs, and three of them died in the following 2 days. Two dogs with cysts and respiratory clinical signs (dog No.1 and No.2) were taken to the China Agricultural University Veterinary Teaching Hospital (CAUVTH) for examination.

Several diagnostic tests, including a general clinical examination, hematology and serum biochemistry, were performed for the two dogs (Table 1). Hematology showed mild increase in leukocyte, which indicated the animals had inflammation (Table 1). Thoracic radiographs revealed pneumonia (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Clinical data of dog No.1 and No.2 in this report

Dog ID

Species, age (months), sex

General examination

Hamaetology

Serum chemistry

Index

Result

Reference interval

1

German Shepherd dog, 4, female

38.9°C, rough breathing sounds, a cyst in the neck (10 cm in diameter)

HCT

35.5%

37.3–61.7

Normal

MCV

57.3 fL

61.6–73.5

WBC

17.01 × 10^9/L

5.05–16.76

LYM

5.18 × 10^9/L

1.05–5.10

MONO

6.96 × 10^9/L

0.16–1.12

2

German Shepherd dog, 4, male

38.8°C, rough breathing sounds, a cyst in the neck (5 cm in diameter)

RBC

5.53 × 10^12/L

5.65–8.87

Normal

HCT

33.7%

37.3–61.7

MCV

60.9 fL

61.6–73.5

WBC

16.93 × 10^9/L

5.05–16.76

MONO

1.49 × 10^9/L

0.16–1.12

Dog No.1 and No.2 were admitted to the China Agricultural University Veterinary Teaching Hospital on the 4th day post-onset of respiratory signs.All abnormal results of hematology are in the table

Fig. 1

Lateral (a) and ventrodorsal (b) radiographs of the thorax of dog No. 1. There is a typical bronchial pattern evidenced by tram lines (black arrow) and ring shadows (white arrow), as well as a mild increase in interstitial opacity (unstructured interstitial pattern)

Nasopharyngeal secretions were collected from dog No.1 and No.2 and four different commercial quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assays (Beijing Anheal Laboratory Co., Ltd., China) were used for CDV, CAdV type 2, CPIV and CIV detection. The samples were CIV-positive, but negative for CDV, CPIV and CAdV type 2.

Nasopharyngeal secretions from all 12 dogs remaining in the kennel were collected for virus detection as previously described, and all dogs were confirmed CIV-positive. Two samples from dog No.1 and No.2 were inoculated into the allantoic cavity of 9- to 11-day-old embryonated chicken eggs for virus propagation and isolation. Allantoic fluids were harvested after two blind passages and both presented haemagglutinating activity. Subsequently, viral nucleic acid was extracted and the HA and NA genes were amplified by RT-PCR, using universal primers for influenza A virus [23]. Phylogenetic analysis of HA and NA genes clearly demonstrated a close genetic relationship between the two isolates (A/canine/Beijing/0512–133/2017 and A/canine/Beijing/0512–137/2017) and were both avian-origin canine H3N2 (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic trees for the a HA and b NA genes of H3N2 CIVs. Unrooted phylogenetic trees were generated by the maximum likelihood method using Mega 6. The reliability of the tree was assessed using bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates. Analysis was based on nucleotides 10–1698 of the HA gene and 1–1410 of the NA gene. Virus isolated from dog No.1 and No.2 in the present study are labeled with a triangle. The subtype of viruses that were not H3N2 are shown in parentheses following the virus name. Virus sequences referred to in the tree were obtained from GenBank

Serum samples were collected from 14 remaining dogs on the 4th day and 2 weeks post-onset of respiratory signs, respectively. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) tests were undertaken using the A/canine/Beijing/0512–137/2017 strain, and the samples collected 2 weeks post-onset were antibody-positive, while samples from day 4 were all negative, indicating seroconversion.

Dog No.1 was selected from 8 dogs with cysts for more investigation. Cyst fluid from dog No.1 was sampled using a fine needle aspiration. Cytological examination identified suppurative inflammation associated with numerous cocci (Fig. 3). Subsequently, 20 μL of cyst fluid was plated on sheep blood agar plates for bacterial culture. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, non-hemolytic small colonies (0.5–1 mm in diameter), appeared on the plates. To identify the species, bacteria from a single colony was cultured and whole genome DNA was extracted for PCR amplification of the 16 s rRNA gene [24]. Sequencing of the 16 s rRNA gene identified E. faecalis. Furthermore, antimicrobial susceptibility tests were carried out to provide guidance for clinical medication, and the results showed multidrug resistance, with sensitivity to enrofloxacin and norfloxacin (Table 2).
Fig. 3

Cytological examination of the cyst fluid from dog No.1. Large numbers of degenerative neutrophils (short arrow), with numerous intracellular and extracellular cocci (long arrow). Wright & Giemsa

Table 2

Antimicrobial susceptibility test of clinical E. faecalis isolate from dog No.1

Antimicrobial agents

Result

Penicillin

Resistant

Ampicillin

Resistant

Cefalexin

Resistant

Ceftriaxone

Resistant

Vancomycin

Resistant

Erythromycin

Resistant

Tetracyclines

Resistant

Chloramphenicol

Resistant

Florfenicol

Intermediate

Enrofloxacin

Sensitive

Norfloxacin

Sensitive

Clindamycin

Resistant

Amikacin

Intermediate

Doxycycline

Resistant

Treatment with subcutaneous 5% enrofloxacin (10 mg/kg/day), was administered for 5 days. Eight dogs without cysts recovered 1 week post-onset of respiratory signs, and a reduction in cyst size was observed in the remaining five dogs. All dogs recovered within 11 to 16 days of treatment.

Discussion and conclusion

Influenza A virus infection can cause respiratory symptoms in humans and many animals. Secondary bacterial infections, which are a common complication of influenza virus infection, may significantly increase the severity of the disease and result in poorer outcomes. In humans, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae are the three most frequently reported bacteria secondary to influenza infection. Other less common bacteria include Nocardia [25], Mycoplasma pneumoniae [26], Mycobacterium tuberculosis [27], Legionella pneumophila [28], and Campylobacter jejuni [29]. Choi et al. performed a retrospective analysis of 636 swine influenza virus (SIV) cases in pigs and found that Pasteurella multocida and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae were the most common bacteria associated with SIV [30]. In addition, artificial infection tests demonstrated that coinfection of SIV with Haemophilus parasuis or Bordetella bronchiseptica aggravated lung injury in pigs [31]. In birds infected with influenza virus, Mycoplasma gallisepticum, Escherichia coli, Riemerella anatipestifer, Pasteurella multocida and other common bacteria have been detected [32, 33]. In dogs, however, apart from one study that isolated Staphylococcus pseudointermedius and Mycoplasma from the lungs of H3N2 CIV-infected dogs [34], few other bacterial coinfections have been reported.

In this case report, we describe a CIV outbreak in a breeding kennel in northern China. This is the first time that CIV coinfection with E. faecalis in dogs has been reported worldwide. In our case, all 17 dogs in the kennel were infected by CIV after the introduction of a new dog. Though the new dog showed no observable clinical signs when it was introduced into the kennel, it was among the first few dogs that showed respiratory symptoms. Previous study showed that clinically healthy dogs can carry respiratory pathogens and could act as sources of infection for susceptible dogs [35]. Therefore, the new dog might be the source of CIV infection. Additionally, 8 of the infected dogs developed cysts. We observed numerous cocci with similar morphology from cyst fluid using cytological examination, and cyst fluid was cultured and 16 s rRNA sequencing was performed. Then, E. faecalis was successfully identified, therefore, the dogs were treated with enrofloxacin and cyst sizes reduced. 16 s rRNA sequencing is a cost-effective and efficient method to identify the species of bacteria, however, direct detection of the cyst fluid using metagenomics could be more accurate and comprehensive in identifying the pathogen that co-infected the dogs with CIV. In general, CIV infections are self-limiting, with high morbidity and low mortality. Animal experiments showed that the mortality rate of H3N2 CIV infection is low [3, 7]. In our case report however, three dogs died from coinfection of CIV and E. faecalis, therefore we hypothesize that E. faecalis infection increased the severity of the disease.

The increased risk of secondary bacterial infections in patients with influenza virus infection may be associated with a variety of factors. For example, an inflammatory response to viral infection may up-regulate expression of molecules that bacteria utilize as receptors, like platelet activating factor receptor can be served as attachment molecule for S. pneumoniae, one of the pathogens complicating influenza infection [36]. In addition, virus infection causes sustained desensitization to bacterial toll-like receptor ligands, affecting the normal bacterial clearance mechanism [37]. In our case report, the E. faecalis was similar to the Staphylococcus pseudointermedius [20] cited in other research as common commensal bacteria in dogs, which could cause opportunistic infections. There is no evidence that CIV infection increases the risk of E. faecalis infection in dogs, however, one study found that mice experimentally infected with H3N2 CIV, followed by Staphylococcus pseudointermedius 72 h later, resulted in increased bacterial colonization [20]. Meanwhile, studies have shown that immunosuppression enhanced E. faecalis colonization [38]. According to the breeder of the dogs in our case report, this was not the first time that he administered the same medical management for dogs experiencing respiratory clinical signs, however, no similar infection had occurred previously. We speculate that CIV infection affects the normal immune mechanism in dogs, making it more susceptible to opportunistic infections, such as E. faecalis. Therefore, in addition to symptomatic treatment, we recommend the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in dogs with CIV infection, to control other possible infections.

Currently, CIV vaccines are rarely used in China, which has caused difficulties in preventing and controlling the epidemic of canine influenza. We emphasize that once dogs develop signs of upper respiratory disease, they should be tested for the presence of CIV infection and be quarantined from other susceptible dogs. In the meantime, since coinfection of CIV with bacteria may affect pathogenicity and disease progression, it is of great importance to recognize secondary bacterial infection as a major clinical complication of influenza infection during disease assessment.

We described a CIV outbreak in a breeding kennel and have confirmed H3N2 CIV and E. faecalis co-infection. CIV and E. faecalis co-infected dogs had more severe consequences and longer duration compared with those with CIV infection, suggesting CIV infection might promote the secondary infection of opportunistic bacteria and cause more severe and complicated clinical outcomes. This emphasizes the importance of preventing bacterial exposure and improving health care during CIV infection.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Yanyun Chen, Rongquan Dai, Qiong Zhang and Haixia Zhang for their advice in the case analysis. The authors thank the kennel owner for allowing us to publish this case report.

Funding

This work was supported by Beijing Science and Technology Program (Z171100001517008), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672573), Beijing New-star Plan of Science and Technology (Z161100004916115), and by grants from the Chang Jiang Scholars Program.

Availability of data and materials

All the data and materials used in this report are included in the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

YS and YL were responsible for the study design. LZ and HS wrote the report. SS and LZ analyzed and interpreted the data. JL and ZX revised the manuscript. All authors read, commented and approved the final article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the kennel owner for the publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee YN, Lee HJ, Lee DH, Kim JH, Park HM, Nahm SS, Lee JB, Park SY, Choi IS, Song CS. Severe canine influenza in dogs correlates with hyperchemokinemia and high viral load. Virology. 2011;417(1):57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li S, Shi Z, Jiao P, Zhang G, Zhong Z, Tian W, Long LP, Cai Z, Zhu X, Liao M. Avian-origin H3N2 canine influenza a viruses in southern China. Infect Genet Evol. 2010;10(8):1286–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Song D, Kang B, Lee C, Jung K, Ha G, Kang D, Park S, Park B, Oh J. Transmission of avian influenza virus (H3N2) to dogs. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14(5):741–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun Y, Sun S, Ma J, Tan Y, Du L, Shen Y, Mu Q, Pu J, Lin D, Liu J. Identification and characterization of avian-origin H3N2 canine influenza viruses in northern China during 2009-2010. Virology. 2013;435(2):301–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin Y, Zhao YB, Zeng XJ, Lu CP, Liu YJ. Complete genome sequence of an H3N2 canine influenza virus from dogs in Jiangsu, China. J Virol. 2012;86(20):11402.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aznarte-Mellado C, Sola-Campoy PJ, Robles F, Rejón CR, Herrán RDL, Navajas-Pérez R. Identification and genetic characterization of avian-origin H3N2 canine influenza viruses isolated from the Liaoning province of China in 2012. Virus Genes. 2014;49(2):342–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Teng Q, Zhang X, Xu D, Zhou J, Dai X, Chen Z, Li Z. Characterization of an H3N2 canine influenza virus isolated from Tibetan mastiffs in China. Vet Microbiol. 2013;162(2–4):345–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee E, Kim EJ, Kim BH, Song JY, Cho IS, Shin YK. Molecular analyses of H3N2 canine influenza viruses isolated from Korea during 2013-2014. Virus Genes. 2016;52(2):204–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ieh V, Glaser AL, Toohey-Kurth K, Newbury S, Dalziel BD, Dubovi EJ, Poulsen K, Leutenegger C, Kje W, Brisbane-Cohen L. Spread of canine influenza A(H3N2) virus, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(12):1950–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dubovi EJ. Canine influenza. Vet Clin North Am Small An Pract. 2008;38(4):827–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B FR: Infectious diseases of the dog and cat, 4Th: Elsevier; 2012.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prieto AMG, Schaik WV, Rogers MRC, Coque TM, Baquero F, Corander J, Willems RJL. Global emergence and dissemination of enterococci as nosocomial pathogens: attack of the clones? Front Microbiol. 2016;7:e193.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fisher K, Phillips C. The ecology, epidemiology and virulence of Enterococcus. Microbiology. 2009;155(6):1749–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arias CA, Murray BE. The rise of the Enterococcus: beyond vancomycin resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(4):266.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kukanich KS, Lubbers BV. Review of enterococci isolated from canine and feline urine specimens from 2006 to 2011. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2015;51(3):148–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wong C, Epstein SE, Westropp JL. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in urinary tract infections in dogs (2010- 2013). J Vet Intern Med. 2015;29(4):1045.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marques C, Belas A, Franco A, Aboim C, Gama LT, Pomba C. Increase in antimicrobial resistance and emergence of major international high-risk clonal lineages in dogs and cats with urinary tract infection: 16 year retrospective study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Semedolemsaddek T, Tavares M, Braz BS, Tavares L, Oliveira M. Enterococcal infective endocarditis following periodontal disease in dogs. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e146860.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tessier-Vetzel D, Carlos C, Dandrieux J, Boulouis HJ, Pouchelon JL, Chetboul V. Spontaneous vegetative endocarditis due to Enterococcus faecalis in a rottweiler puppy. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2003;145(9):432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kalhoro DH, Gao S, Xie X, Liang S, Luo S, Zhao Y, Liu Y. Canine influenza virus coinfection with Staphylococcus pseudintermedius enhances bacterial colonization, virus load and clinical presentation in mice. BMC Vet Res. 2016;12(1):1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Committee. SP. Chinese Pharmacopoeia: Chemical Industry Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gao Y, Fang L, Cai R, Zong C, Chen X, Lu J, Qi Y. Shuang-Huang-Lian exerts anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative activities in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated murine alveolar macrophages. Phytomedicine. 2014;21(4):461–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hoffmann E, Stech J, Guan Y, Webster RG, Perez DR. Universal primer set for the full-length amplification of all influenza a viruses. Arch Virol. 2001;146(12):2275–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lindsay B, Pop M, Antonio M, Walker AW, Mai V, Ahmed D, Oundo J, Tamboura B, Panchalingam S, Levine MM. Survey of culture, GoldenGate assay, universal biosensor assay, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing as alternative methods of bacterial pathogen detection. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(10):3263–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kalenahalli KJ, Kumar NA, Chowdary KV, Sumana MS. Fatal swine influenza a H1N1 and mycoplasma pneumoniae coinfection in a child. Tuberk Toraks. 2016;64(3):246–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tan CK, Kao CL, Shih JY, Lee LN, Hung CC, Lai CC, Huang YT, Hsueh PR. Coinfection with mycobacterium tuberculosis and pandemic H1N1 influenza a virus in a patient with lung cancer. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2011;44(4):316–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sawai T, Yoshioka S, Matsuo N, Suyama N, Kohno S. A case of community-acquired pneumonia due to influenza a virus and Nocardia farcinica co-infection. J Infect Chemother. 2014;20(8):506–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rizzo C, Caporali MG, Rota MC. Pandemic influenza and pneumonia due to legionella pneumophila: a frequently underestimated coinfection. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(1):115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kahar-Bador M, Nathan AM, Soo MH, Mohd NS, Abubakar S, Lum LC, Syed HS, Sam IC. Fatal influenza A (H3N2) and campylobacter jejuni coinfection. Singap Med J. 2009;50(3):112–3.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Choi YK, Goyal SM, Han SJ. Retrospective analysis of etiologic agents associated with respiratory diseases in pigs. Can Vet J. 2003;44(44):735–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pomorskamól M, Dors A, Kwit K, Czyżewskadors E, Pejsak Z. Coinfection modulates inflammatory responses, clinical outcome and pathogen load of H1N1 swine influenza virus and Haemophilus parasuis infections in pigs. BMC Vet Res. 2017;13(1):376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sid H, Benachour K, Rautenschlein S. Co-infection with multiple respiratory pathogens contributes to increased mortality rates in Algerian poultry flocks. Avian Dis. 2015;59(3):440–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Capua I, Marangon S. The avian influenza epidemic in Italy, 1999—2000: a review. Avian Pathol J Wvpa. 2000;29(4):289–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Watson CE, Bell C, Toohey-Kurth K. H3N2 canine influenza virus infection in a dog. Vet Pathol. 2017;54(3):527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schulz BS, Kurz S, Weber K, Balzer HJ, Hartmann K. Detection of respiratory viruses and Bordetella bronchiseptica in dogs with acute respiratory tract infections. Vet J. 2014;201(3):365–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Peltola VT, Mccullers JA. Respiratory viruses predisposing to bacterial infections: role of neuraminidase. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23(1 Suppl):S87–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Didierlaurent A, Goulding J, Patel S, Snelgrove R, Low L, Bebien M, Lawrence T, Rijt LSV, Lambrecht BN, Sirard JC. Sustained desensitization to bacterial toll-like receptor ligands after resolutionof respiratory influenza infection. J Exp Med. 2008;205(2):323–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Guiton PS, Hannan TJ, Ford B, Caparon MG, Hultgren SJ. Enterococcus faecalis overcomes foreign body-mediated inflammation to establish urinary tract infections. Infect Immun. 2013;81(1):329–39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Veterinary MedicineChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Animal Epidemiology of the Ministry of Agriculture and State Key Laboratory of AgrobiotechnologyCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations