Advertisement

BMC Women's Health

, 19:4 | Cite as

Factors associated with breast cancer screening awareness and practices of women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • S. AbejeEmail author
  • A. SemeEmail author
  • A. TibeltEmail author
Open Access
Research article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Breast cancer and breast health

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is a global health problem being the most common cancer of women in both developed and under-developed countries. Public and individual awareness can play a vital role in the prevention, early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. However evidence is sparse on awareness and practice of breast cancer screening methods used among women of reproductive age in Ethiopia. The present study was designed to determine factors associated with breast cancer screening awareness and practices of women in Addis Ababa.

Methods

A facility based cross-sectional study was conducted among women who came for maternal and child health care services to selected public health centers. The participants were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Following data collection, data entry and analysis was done using Epi-Info version 7and SPSS Version 21 respectively. Cross tabulation of each independent variable with the dependent variable with their 95% confidence interval was done and those variables associated at binary logistic regression with a significance level of 0.2 were entered into multiple logistic regression.

Results

About half (53%) of women have heard about breast cancer and 35.5% of women are aware of at least one breast cancer screening method. Among those who are informed about breast cancer screening, 97% indicated that screening improves the chance of survival. Among the common screening methods; self-breast examination, clinical-breast examination and mammographic examination were practiced by 24.3%, 7.6% and 3.8% of respondents, respectively. Women who had high level of income were about 3 times more likely to be aware about breast cancer screening methods, [AOR = 2.5; 95%CI (1.04–-5.91)], while women who attended secondary and tertiary school were 2 and 4 times more likely to practice breast cancer screening methods [AOR = 2.46; 95% CI (1.12–-5.38)] and [AOR = 4.00; 95% CI(1.48–-10.86)] respectively.

Conclusion

This study has showed that self-reported breast cancer screening coverage is low. About two-thirds of women had no information about breast cancer screening methods.

Keywords

Breast cancer screening Awareness and pPractice 

Abbreviations

AAU

Addis Ababa University

AOR

Adjusted Odds Ratio

BC

Breast Cancer

BCS

Breast Cancer Screening

BSE

Breast Self-Examination

CBE

Clinical Breast Examination

CI

Confidence interval

IRB

Institutional Review Board

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is a proliferation of malignant cells that arises in the breast tissue and the term represents a range of diseases from non-invasive to metastatic carcinoma [1]. It is the most common cause of cancer death worldwide for females, and the second most common cancer among all other cancers, with over 2 million new cases in 2018 [2]. It is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women, with an age-adjusted incidence rate of 28 per 100,000 women and the second leading cause of death among women [3]. For 2018 Ethiopia, the diagnosed breast cancer incidences were15,244 (22.6%) of all cancers among men and women cancers and it accounts for 32.9%of all women cancers diagnosed. All over, the most common adult cancers were: cancers of the breast and cervix [4].Breast cancer was by far the commonest cancer and the Addis Ababa cancer registry reports that it accounts for 34% of all female cancer cases, followed by cervical cancer accounting 16% of cases [5, 6]. The disease remains a public health concern in developing and low middle income countries (DLMIC) [7, 8].

Evidence shows poor awareness of breast cancer symptoms, prevention mechanisms, risk factors and treatment options have usually been associated with patient delay in seeking help, making treatment less effective and minimal survival rate [9, 10, 11]. Screening is the most effective method to reduce mortality and morbidity from breast cancer. Screening methods like that of self-breast examination, clinical breast examination and mammography have been defined as activities facilitating the early screening and improvement of women’s health and is said to be good for early detection of breast cancer [12].

Screening is a relatively available resource for early detection though awareness about breast cancer screening is very low [13] and globally more than half the breast cancer deaths occur in low middle income countries [11]. Despite the ongoing arguing points on the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening, many experts believe that the benefits of breast cancer screening outweigh the harm [7].

There were only a limited number of studies undertaken on the awareness and practices of breast cancer screening methods among women of reproductive age in Ethiopia [14, 15]. There is scarcity of evidence on the effect of breast cancer screening in countries in which the population has limited breast cancer awareness where women typically present with late-stage breast cancer. Studies showed that when combined with appropriate treatment, early detection through breast cancer screening activities that include breast self-examination (BSE), clinical breast examination (CBE), and mammography, has been shown to decrease cancer mortality rates due to breast cancer by 25–30% [16]. This study is aimed to identify factors associated with the awareness and practices of women with regard to breast cancer screening.

Methods

Study setting and study design

The study was conducted in public health centers in Addis Ababa which is the largest and the capital city of Ethiopia. It covers an estimated area of 174.4 km2; with an estimated density of 5535.8 people per square kilometer. Based on the2007census of the Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia, the total population estimate of Addis Ababa for the year 2015 was 3.55 million and the proportion of males and females was 49 and 51%, respectively. The number of females in the reproductive age group constitutes 35.5% of the total population. There were 84 public health centers in Addis Ababa city administration [17].A facility based cross-sectional study was conducted on women who came to maternal and child health departments of to public health centers for any kind of medical consultation, diagnosis, follow up or treatment from January to February 2015.

Sample size, sampling procedure and ethical considerations

Data were collected from a total of 633 respondents. This sample size was based on the assumption that the population proportion with awareness of breast cancer screening would be 50% (no previous similar study), with a design effect of 1.5 due to the multistage sampling of study participants, a precision of 0.05, standardized normal distribution curve value for 95% confidence level (1.96) and a 10% non-response rate.

Recruitment of study participants was done based on sampling focused on health centers where women get maternal and child health care services. Out of the ten sub-cities four sub-cities were selected randomly. Then 10 health centers were taken from four sub-cities by a simple random sampling method where the study was conducted. The study participants were aged between 20 and 49 years and were recruited proportionally from each of the health centers using the information from patient flow, 1 month prior to the data collection. At the time of data collection all the voluntary women who came to the maternal and child health care service were interviewed consecutively according to their order of arrival until the required sample size was obtained. Data collection was conducted by experienced and trained nurses.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of The School of Public Health (SPH) at The College of Health Sciences of Addis Ababa University (AAU).Following the approval of the IRB, Addis Ababa Health Bureau was informed about the study through a support letter from the SPH in AAU. Written permission was obtained from Addis Ababa Health Bureau to respective health facilities. Verbal informed consent was obtained from each study participant prior to data collection.

Data collection

Data collection procedures

Data was collected by using a structured questionnaire after performing a thorough literature review. The questionnaire was prepared in English and then translated into Amharic. The later version was translated back to English, to ensure its consistency. There was a pre-test on 5% of the total sample size at health centers different from the selected health centers to see for the accuracy of responses, language clarity, appropriateness of the tools and the necessary amendments were done based on the findings of the pretest which were used for the actual data collection.

Data quality management

To maintain data quality, ten data collectors and 1 supervisor who were health professionals were selected based on their experience of data collection and were trained for 3 days. The questionnaire was developed by the principal investigator based on questions used in previous peer reviewed published articles. The collected data was reviewed and checked for mistakes, legibility of handwriting, completeness and consistency by the principal investigator and supervisor on a daily basis during data collection. Any mistake or ambiguity was cleared on the spot.

Data analysis procedures

The data collection instruments were coded and data were manually checked and entered using Epi-Info version 7.0. It was cleaned and edited accordingly and exported to SPSS version 21.0 for analysis. Data were rechecked for missing values before analysis.

To identify factors associated with the awareness and practices of participants of breast cancer screening, multiple questions were asked with 26 questions for assessing the general awareness of breast cancer and 6questions for assessing awareness regarding breast cancer screening. For each correct or positive answer a score of “1”was given while “0”was given for every wrong or negative answer. A mean score was calculated separately for awareness and practice variables. Any score greater or equal to the mean score was defined as high score and hence labeled as “aware” for the awareness variable. Any score which was less than the mean score was defined as a low score and hence labeled as “un aware” for the awareness. Thus, any score greater than the mean awareness of breast cancer generally was labeled as knowledgeable/aware and any score below the mean awareness was labeled as not knowledgeable or as “un aware”. Respondents who practiced any of the screening methods included in the questionnaire were labeled to have “good practice”. Respondents who never used any of the screening methods were labeled to have “poor practice”.

Descriptive statistics, numerical summary measures, frequencies, proportions, distributions were used to check for normality and also diagrams for describing the study population in relation to relevant variables. Cross tabulation and logistic regression analysis were carried out to determine the association between independent variables and the awareness and practice of breast cancer screening among the study participants with a 95% confidence interval. Those variables associated at binary logistic regression with a significance level (p = 0.20) were entered into multiple logistic regression to identify important determinants by controlling possible confounding effect. Statistical significance was declared at p-value of 0.05 and the predictors of outcome variable were identified accordingly. The reported variables were those significantly associated on adjusted odds ratio.

Results

Socio demographic characteristics of the study population

A total of 633 women who visit the health centers were interviewed. Majority of the respondents 422(66.7%) were orthodox Christians, 90(14.2%) Muslims, 82(12.9%) Protestants, 36(5.7%) Catholics and 3(0.5%) are others. One hundred eighty three (28.9%) of the women attended secondary school, 264(41.7%) attended primary school and 186(29.4%) attended college. Of all the respondents 482(76.1%) were married and 118(18.6%) have never been married. One hundred and sixty (25.3%) were housewives while 136(21.5%) were government employee and the rest 337(53.2) were merchants, self-employed, private employee or others.

Thirty six (5.7%) reported that they have a family history of breast illness while only 16 (2.5%) of them mentioned that they have family history of breast cancer.

Awareness about breast cancer

From the total study participants, 336 women (53.1%) had heard about breast cancer. Among these 259 (77.1%) of them mentioned that breast cancer is non-communicable. Breast lump was mentioned by the majority (61.3%) as being a common sign and symptom of breast cancer. Smoking was recognized as a common risk factor for breast cancer and nearly 41% of the respondents mentioned initiating breast feeding and no smoking as the main preventive measures for breast cancer (Table 1).
Table 1

General awareness about breast cancer among women in Addis Ababa

 

Mentioned variables

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE (%)

SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS

Breast lump

206

61.3

Breast pain

170

50.6

Discharge

114

33.9

Nipple retraction

72

21.4

Redness and engorgement

52

15.5

Itching

16

4.8

RISK FACTORS

Smoking

150

44.6

Alcohol

110

32.7

Aging

71

21.1

Being female

72

21.4

Packed food

53

15.8

Not to breast feed

32

9.5

Early menarche

13

3.9

Late menopause

16

4.8

PREVENTIVE MEASURES

Initiate Breast feeding

137

40.8

No smoking

140

41.7

Not drinking alcohol

124

36.9

Regular screening

86

25.6

Physical Exercise

72

21.4

Combat obesity

62

18.5

Avoid OCP

53

15.8

Avoid packed foods

43

12.8

Wearing bra

5

1.5

Awareness about breast cancer screening methods

Among all the respondents 225(35.5%) of women are aware of at least one method of breast cancer screening. Self-breast examination was identified by 88.9% of those women who knew about breast cancer screening (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Awareness of breast cancer screening methods among women in Addis Ababa. NB: percent do not add up to 100% (multiple responses)

Practices of breast cancer screening methods

Among those women who have heard of breast cancer screening; SBE, CBE and mammographic examination was practiced by 154 (68%), 48(21%) and 24 (11%), respectively. (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Practices of breast cancer screening methods among women in Addis Ababa. NB: percent do not add up to 100% (multiple responses)

Among those who are aware of breast cancer screening methods 64(28.4%) of them has reported that they performed SBE 6–12 times and 82 (36.4%) conducted 3–5 times a year. Most of them 159(70.7%) mentioned they started SBE when they were20 years or above, and 85(55.2%)reported they did SBE within the preceding month of the data collection.

Among those who have heard of breast cancer screening the commonest reason mentioned for undergoing CBE was having symptoms on breasts and wanted to check 19(39.6%) for each and having family history of BC 7(14.6%). Most 34(70.8%) of respondents have undergone CBE long time ago and only 10(20.8%) undergone CBE once a year.

Among those who were aware of BCS the commonest reason for not undergoing CBE was not having symptoms and lack of attention 153 (86%) and 19(11%) respectively.

Among those women who have heard of breast cancer screening the commonly mentioned reason for undergoing mammographic examination was they wanted to check 11(45.8%) and 7(29.2%) having symptoms.

While among those who have heard of breast cancer screening and those who do not undergo mammographic examination the commonly mentioned reason for not undergoing mammographic examination was not having symptom and not thinking to have breast cancer which counted 152(75.6%) and 24(11.9%) respectively.

Factors associated with awareness and practice of breast cancer screening

Cross tabulation and logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine the association between independent variables and the awareness and practice of breast cancer screening among the study participants.

Educational status, occupational status, income, husband education and family history of breast illness were found to be significantly associated with the awareness of women on BCS methods on binary logistic regression while income and family history of breast illness remained significantly associated with their awareness on BCS on multivariate logistic regression.

In a multivariate logistic regression analysis those who had high level of income were about 3 times more likely to be aware about breast cancer screening compared to those with low income, [AOR = 2.48; 95%CI (1.04–5.91)]. Those who had no family history of breast illness were 66% less likely to be aware about breast cancer screening compared to those who had family history of breast illnesses, [AOR = 0.34; 95% CI of (0.13–0.95)](Table 2).
Table 2

Association between socio-demographic factors and the awareness of women on breast cancer screening in Addis Ababa

Variables

Mean Awareness of Screening

COR(95%CI)

AOR(95%CI)

unaware

Aware

Educational status

 Primary or less

54

30

1.0

 

 Secondary

50

52

1.87(1.04–3.38)*

1.350 (0.66–2.75)

 Tertiary

36

114

5.7 (3.18–10.21)**

1.83 (0.77–4.33)

Occupation

 Merchant

14

8

1.0

 

 Government Employed

28

91

5.69 (2.16–14.95)**

2.58 (0.85–7.80)

 Private employed

18

25

2.43 (0.84–7.01)*

1.68 (0.53–5.32)

Income

 Low income

40

47

1.0

1.0

 High income

29

66

1.94 (1.06–3.55)*

2.48 (1.04–5.90)**

Husband education

 Primary education

27

12

1.0

1.0

 Secondary education

50

49

2.21 (1.01–4.84)**

1.56 (0.68–3.56)

 Tertiary education

38

73

4.32 (1.97–9.48)**

1.92 (0.78–4.74)

Family history of breast illness

 No

133

170

0.34 (0.15–0.82)*

0.34 (0.13–0.95)**

 Yes

7

26

1.0

1.0

NB: * for p-value < 0.2 and ** for p-value < .05

On the other hand factors like educational status, religion, occupation, income, educational status of husband, occupation of husband, family history of breast illness, family history of breast cancer, and general knowledge of breast cancer were found to be significantly associated with the practice of breast cancer screening methods on binary logistic regression analysis while general knowledge of breast cancer and educational status of the women were found to be significantly associated with the practice of breast cancer screening methods on multivariate logistic regression analysis.

On multivariate logistic regression analysis those women who attended secondary school and tertiary school were 2 times and 4 times more likely to practice breast cancer screening methods compared to those who attended primary school and less [AOR = 2.46; 95% CI (1.12–5.38)] and [AOR = 4.00; 95% CI(1.48–10.86)] respectively. And those women who lack awareness of breast cancer were 99% less likely to practice breast cancer screening methods as compared to those who had good awareness of breast cancer [AOR = 0.01; 95%CI (0.00–0.03)](Table 3).
Table 3

Association between socio-demographic factors and practices of breast cancer screening methods among women in Addis Ababa

Variables

Practices of screening methods

COR (95%CI)

AOR(95%CI)

Those who did not practice

Those who practiced

Educational status

 Primary and less

230

34

1.0

1.0

 Secondary

118

65

3.73 (2.33–5.97)**

2.46 (1.12–5.38)**

 Tertiary

60

126

14.21 (8.85–22.81)**

4.00 (1.48–10.86)**

Income

 Low income

159

55

1.0

1.0

 Middle income

177

97

1.58 (1.07, 2.35)**

0.93 (0.39–2.21)

 High income

72

73

2.93 (1.87–4.58)**

1.99 (0.75–5.29)

occupation

 Merchant

82

20

1.0

1.0

 Government employed

53

50

3.90 (2.07–7.21)**

2.21 (0.70–6.96)

 Private employed

84

46

2.25 (1.22–4.12)**

2.08 (0.69–6.29)

 Self employed

81

37

1.87(1.00–3.50)**

1.48 (0.49–4.41)

Husband education

 Primary education

136

14

1.0

1.0

 Secondary education

115

59

4.98 (2.65–9.39)**

1.64 (0.66–4.07)

 Tertiary education

74

84

11.03 (5.86–20.76)**

1.50 (0.54–4.14)

Family history of breast illness

 No

402

195

0.10 (0.04–0.24)**

0.24 (0.05–1.15)

 Yes

6

30

1.0

1.0

Knowledge of breast cancer

 Not knowledgeable

322

7

0.01 (0.00–0.02)**

0.01 (0.00–0.03)**

 Knowledgeable

86

218

1.0

1.0

NB: * for p-value < 0.2 and ** for p-value < .05

Discussion

This study assessed the factors associated with breast cancer screening awareness and practices of women. The study also described the awareness of breast cancer, demographic characteristics that affect breast cancer screening. It was identified that factors such as family history of breast cancer, income level associated with the awareness of breast cancer screening.

A high level of awareness about breast cancer screening is important for success of prevention intervention. Evidence shows awareness of breast cancer screening varied from 10 to 80% [18], this study showed 89% of participants know about SBE.

Our study showed 53.1% of the women are aware of breast cancer. A study conducted in an urban area of India showed that 56% of women were aware of breast cancer; while a study conducted in Iran showed 61% of women knew about breast cancer [13, 19]. In all studies more than half of the study participants knew about breast cancer, which might indicate that there was a slightly higher health seeking behavior for breast cancer screening in study participants.

This study showed that over half of the study participants had an awareness score of greater than or equal to the mean awareness score for breast cancer symptoms such as: breast lump, breast pain and discharge as a common symptom for breast cancer. This was higher than in a study conducted in Northern Ethiopia [15]. The difference could be attributed to the urban nature of this study area since they would have better access to information on breast cancer.

This study revealed that 31.6% of participants were able to correctly identify breast self-examination (BSE) but was less compared to a study from Nigeria. This could be due to the socio-demographic differences between the two study areas. What was striking in this study was that 14.5% of women (knew) mammography as a method for breast cancer screening and which was higher than the study done in Ethiopia and Nigeria [15, 20], this could be due to the time of the study. There was better awareness in the current study period compared to the previous studies.

Our study showed that factors like family history of breast cancer and income is associated with the awareness of women about breast cancer, in which family history of breast illness perhaps gave them a chance to have an information and increases health seeking behavior. When a family has better income it will also increase access to education and information. These findings were contrary to study conducted in Northern Ethiopia [15], but consistent with community based study in Tunisia [21]. In other studies education, cultural factors, psychosocial and socio-demographic factors were identified as barriers for breast cancer screening [15, 22]. Successful breast cancer screening program in low-middle income countries needs the identification of potential barriers and the development of effective strategies to address them.

SBE, CBE and mammographic examinations were practiced by 24.3, 7.6 and 3.8%, respectively. This is lower than the study done in Nigeria. And this could be due to the differences in socio-economic factors between the study areas. And the main reason mentioned for not having clinical breast examination (CBE) was not having symptoms 86.4% which was similar to the study done in Benin Nigeria [22].

Majority of the participants in this study (86.4%) mentioned absence of symptoms as the main reason for not undergoing CBE and this is similar to the study of north Ethiopia [15]. The similarity could be due to the health seeking behavior of the two study areas were similar and this showed women do not practice unless they have symptoms.

This study showed only (3.8%) had mammographic examination slightly higher than the study of North Ethiopia; while the main reasons for non-practice of mammographic examination were not having symptoms, lack of attention to BC, and its expense 75.6, 11.9 and 6.5% respectively. While in the study of north Ethiopia the main reasons given by the women for not having mammographic examination were, doubt about its importance 33.8%, lack of awareness about it is 31.9% and unavailability of the service 14.0% [15]. And this difference could be due to the relatively better availability of mammography in urban city. In this study it was found that those who had higher income (> 1500 Ethiopian birr) were 3 times more likely to be aware about breast cancer screening methods as compared to those who had low income. Logically, being knowledgeable about the methods has to lead the respondents to practice the screening methods, the binary regression showed there is an association but the adjusted odds ratio was not significant and we believe only being aware about the methods is not enough to initiate the practice and there also might be other confounding factors.

A limitation of the study is the cross-sectional nature of the data made it impossible to reach at the causal relationship between the different independent and outcome variables. Lack of literatures from developing countries hinders further discussion and comparison.

Conclusion

This study highlights the need to address the awareness and practice of breast cancer screening among women. Differences in awareness related outcomes analyzed according to socio-demographic and other factors noted in the results suggest potential target groups for future. These suggest that local and national activity might work in collaboration to address a wide range of challenges identified in this study.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledged Addis Ababa Health Bureau, study health centers, Ethiopian Public Health Association and other responsible bodies. Our appreciation also goes to the data collectors and supervisor.

Funding

We are grateful to Packard Foundation and Ethiopian Public Health Association.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

SAA is participated in the conception and design of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual points. AS contributed in revising the data and manuscript for important intellectual points. ATD contributed in critically revising the manuscript for important logical points and grammatical corrections. All authors read and prepared the manuscript and accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from IRB of School of Public Health in AAU. Following the endorsement by the IRB, a written permission was presented to Addis Ababa regional health bureau and study health centers. Informed verbal consent was obtained during a data collection. Furthermore confidentiality was assured throughout the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Simpson JF, Wilkinson EJ. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM, editors. Malignant neoplasia of the breast: infiltrating carcinomas; 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer Journal for clinicians. 2018;68(6):394-424.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Are C, Rajaram S, Are M, Raj H, Anderson BO, Chaluvarya Swamy R, et al. A reveiw of global cancer burden: trends, challenges, strategies, and a role for surgeons. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107(2):221–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferlay J, E.M., Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Pineros M, Znaor A, Soerjomataram I, Bray F, Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer 2018.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Registry, A.A.C., Top 10 female cancer in Addis Ababa, 2015.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Memirie ST, Habtemariam MK, Asefa M, Deressa BT, Abayneh G, Tsegaye B, Abraha MW, Ababi G, Jemal A, Rebbeck TR, Verguet S. Estimates of Cancer Incidence in Ethiopia in 2015 Using Population-Based Registry Data. Journal of Global Oncology. 2018;28;4:1–11.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al-Foheidi M, Al-Mansour MM, Ibrahim EM. Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries. Med Oncol. 2013;30:471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pharmaceuticals A. Findings from first-ever initiative on sustainable breast cancer treatment in the developing world; 2010.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Martz M, Niksic M, Bonaventure A, Valkov M, Johnson CJ, Esteve J, Ogunbiyi OJ, Azevedo E Silva G, Chen WQ, Ester S, Engholm G, Stiller CA, Monnereau A, Woods RR, Visser O, Lim GH, Aitken J, Weir HK, Coleman MP. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-2014 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37513025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. CONCORD Working Group. 2018;391(10125):1023 1075.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    CH, Y., Breast health in developing countries 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferlay J, S.I., Ervik M, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide. IARC Cancer Base 2012. 1.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berkiten A, Sahin NH, Sahin FM, Yaban ZS, Acar Z, Bektas H. Meta analysis of studies about breaset self examination beetween 2000-2009 in Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:3389–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Somdatta P, Baridalyne N. Awareness of breast cancer in women of an urban resettlement colony. Indian J Cancer. 2008;45:149–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Assefa, M., Assessment of types and treatment pattern of cancer in TASH radiotherapy center: retrospective study. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of AAU 2011.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Befikadu Legesse TG. Knowledge on breast cancer and its prevention among women household heads in Northern Ethiopia, vol. 4; 2014. p. 9.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mai V, Sullivan T, Chiarelli AM. Breast cancer screening program in Canada:successes and challenges. Salud Publica Mex. 2009;13(Suppl 2):s228–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bureau, A.A.C.A.H., C. Administrator, Editor 2014: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ibrahim NA, Odusanya OO. Knowledge of risk factors, beliefs and practices of female healthcare professionals towards breast cancer in a tertiary institution in Lagos, Nigeria. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Montazeri A, et al. Breast cancer in Iran: need for greater women awareness of warning signs and effective screening methods. Asia Pac Fam. 2008;7:6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Okobia MN, Bunker CH, Okonofua FE, Osime U. Knowledge, attitude and practice of Nigerian women towards breast cancer: . A cross-sectional study. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2006;4:11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    El Mhamdi S, Bouanene I, Mhirsi A, Sriha A, et al. Women’s knowledge, attitude and practice about breast cancer screening in the region of Monastir (Tunisia). Australian Journal of Primary Health. 2011;19(1):68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Azubuike S, Okwuokei S. Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Women Towards Breast Cancer in Benin City, Nigeria. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013;3(2):155–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Ministry of HealthAddis AbabaEthiopia
  2. 2.Department of Public HealthAddis Ababa University College of Health SciencesAddis AbabaEthiopia
  3. 3.Addis Ababa University, College of Health Sciences, School of MedicineAddis AbabaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations