Advertisement

BMC Ecology

, 19:49 | Cite as

Assemblages of certain benthic molluscs along the southwestern Atlantic: from subtidal to deep sea

  • Valeria Teso
  • Diego UrteagaEmail author
  • Guido Pastorino
Open Access
Research article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Conservation ecology and biodiversity research

Abstract

Background

We analyse the distribution of Gastropods and Chitons from shallow to deep waters along the southwestern Atlantic Ocean off Argentina and discuss possible factors determining the observed biogeographic patterns.

Results

Three major biogeographic groups are defined on the basis of Gastropod and Chiton species associations, i.e., continental shelf (< 350 m), upper continental slope (> 350–2000 m) and lower continental slope (2000–3000 m). Bathymetry appears as the main factor modifying large-scale distribution of the fauna at a. In this scenario, species associations are determined by marine currents that clearly occur at a particular and well defined depth. No arrangement of species by geographic location was found in assemblages from the continental shelf and upper continental slope.

Conclusions

We hypothesize that depth and marine currents are the main factor affecting the distribution of Gastropods and Chitons along the SW Atlantic between 200 and 3000 m depth.

Keywords

Biogeography MPA Namuncurá/Burdwood Bank Continental shelf Mar del Plata Submarine Canyon 

Abbreviations

AABW

Antarctic Bottom Water

AAIW

Antarctic Intermediate Water

BB

Burdwood Bank

BBCSS

Burdwood Bank Continental Shelf and Slope

BC

Brazil Current

BMC

Brazil-Malvinas Confluence

LCDW

Lower Circumpolar Deep Water

MC

Malvinas Current

MCS

Mar del Plata Continental Shelf

MSC

Mar del Plata Submarine Canyon

NADW

North Atlantic Deep Water

NMDS

non-metric multidimensional scaling

UCDW

Upper Circumpolar Deep Water

TF

off Tierra del Fuego

Background

Over the past two decades several works have reported patterns of biogeography of benthic communities from diverse regions around the world. These patterns have been attributed to different factors e.g., depth, type of substratum, salinity, latitude, shelf area, food supply, etc. [8, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 30, 38; among others]. Many of these studies were focused on molluscs, probably because they constitute one of the most abundant and diverse groups in the marine realm and were used successfully to explain general biogeographic patterns of benthic invertebrates as a whole [1, 6, 10, 32, 36, 37].

The diversity of marine currents of different geographical provenances in a certain area is important to understand the distribution and origins of the recent fauna. In this sense, the southwestern Atlantic at ~ 38° S is strongly influenced by the Malvinas current (MC), Brazil current (BC) and the Brazil-Malvinas Confluence (BMC) on the continental shelf [20, 27, 40; among others]. Other currents affect the continental slope depending on depth. In this way, Piola and Matano [26], Violante et al. [39] and Voigt et al. [40] among others, recognized the Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW) at ~ 500 to 1000 m depth; the Upper Circumpolar Deep Water (UCDW) at ~ 1000 to 2000 m; the North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) at 2000 to 3000 m; the Lower Circumpolar Deep Water (LCDW) at 3000 to 4000 m and the Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) at > 4000 m depth. The southwestern Atlantic shelf extends from Cape Frio, Brazil (~ 22° S) to Tierra del Fuego and Burdwood Bank, Argentina (~ 55° S). It is the largest continental shelf in the southern hemisphere and one of the most energetic oceanic regions of the world [20, 26].

Ecological studies of benthic marine communities off Argentina were mostly based on faunas from shallow water areas. Benthic shallow-water communities off Mar del Plata (~ 38° S) in Buenos Aires province are one of the better studied zones in this country [21, 29, 42]. General approaches on the Argentine continental shelf at large were seldom taken. Nevertheless, Bastida et al. [7] reported benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages of this area up to 192 m depth and Balech and Ehrlich [4] studied the fauna of the Argentine shelf stressing the already known Argentine and Magellanic biogeographic provinces. Undoubtedly because shallow-water areas are easier to sample, biodiversity and biogeography of these areas are better known than deep-water ones (a list with all these references is available in Additional file 1).

In contrast, publications addressing the ecology of deeper benthic communities off Argentina are scarce. Most papers are reports of diversity and species richness of several groups of invertebrates. Those made by Riemann-Zürneck [28] (Cnidarians); Allen and Sanders [3] (Bivalves); López-Gappa [18] (Bryozoans); Zamponi [41]; Linse et al. [17] (Molluscs); López-Gappa, et al. [19] (Amphipods); Barnes and Griffiths [5] and Allen [2] (bivalves) establish the starting point of deep-waters studies in this area. In addition, Stuart and Rex [35] reported some bathymetric patterns of deep-sea Gastropods in the vicinity of the Rio de la Plata estuary off Uruguay and Argentina. Bremec and Schejter [9] mentioned benthic diversity from ~ 43° S, 59° W at ~ 300 m depth and Fraysse et al. [13] reported the geographic and bathymetric distribution of asteroidean echinoderms off Tierra del Fuego and Burdwood Bank at 785 m depth.

As molluscs are one of the most abundant and better known groups of benthic invertebrates, in this study we analyse the distribution of the Gastropods and chitons from shallow to deep water (up to 3000 m) along the southwestern Atlantic Ocean off Argentina and discuss possible factors determining the observed biogeographic patterns.

Methods

Three areas off Argentina were covered: (1) along 38° S, from ~ 40 m to 2900 m depth; (2) Burdwood Bank and vicinity at ~ 80 and 1000 m depth; (3) off Tierra del Fuego between ~ 40 and 330 m depth (Fig. 1). Invertebrates in general and molluscs in particular were sampled on board of the R/V “Puerto Deseado” from 10 stations off Buenos Aires Province during October 2009; 41 stations in the Mar del Plata Submarine Canyon on August 2012, May and September 2013; 48 stations off Tierra del Fuego in March 2011, March–April 2014, November 2014, March–April 2016 and May 2017; and 64 stations in the Burdwood Bank area in March 2013, November 2014, March–April 2016 and May 2017. All material was collected using three different sampling gear: bottom net trawl, modified Agassiz dredge and Rauschert dredge, then preserved in ethanol 96%. Special care was taken to include only those species collected alive and with taxonomic status resolved. According with these restrictions we agree with Scarabino et al. [32], who suggested that inferred ranges of geographic or bathymetric distribution of shelly marine invertebrates are distorted by unresolved/non-reviewed taxonomy and, living/dead status not specified in records, among several other reasons.
Fig. 1

Map showing all sampling localities, dashed lines represent isobates

The database was built by determining the presence/absence of species in the sampled area. All the species were arranged in seven sections defined by the marine currents reported by Matano et al. [20], Preu et al. [27], Voigt et al. [40] and Pérez et al. [25]. These regions are: Mar del Plata Continental Shelf (MCS) (38–300 m), Mar del Plata Submarine Canyon (MSC) (300–1000 m), (1000–2000 m), (2000–3000 m); Burdwood Bank (BB) (80–200 m); Burdwood Bank Continental Shelf and Slope (BBCSS) (200–1000 m) and off Tierra del Fuego (TF) (40–324 m). Hierarchical agglomerative clustering was undertaken using group-average link on Sorensøn association coefficients calculated from a presence/absence species matrix [10]. A non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was then performed using the similarity matrix. Multivariate analyses were completed using PRIMER v6.0 software [11].

Results

A total of 52 species of 19 families of Gastropods and Chitons were found and included in this study in 163 stations (dataset available in Additional file 2). Hierarchical agglomerative clustering of areas according to marine currents based on presence/absence matrix separates three groups corresponding to continental shelf (< 350 m) (Group C), upper continental slope (> 350–2000 m) (Group B) and lower continental slope (2000–3000 m) (Group A) (Fig. 2). As expected, the groups of the NMDS resembled those identified by clustering with a significant stress value of 0.01 (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2

Hierarchical agglomerative clustering of sections based on presence/absence matrix of Gastropods and Chitons with depths

Fig. 3

Non-metric multidimensional scaling of sections, stress value = 0.01

Cluster analysis of species separates four groups and the NMDS ordination (Fig. 4) showed similar results to those of the dendrogram, with a significant stress value of 0.08. The Group A was represented by the Gastropods Laubierina peregrinator Warén & Bouchet, 1990, Tractolira germonae Harasewych, 1987, Tractolira tenebrosa Leal & Bouchet, 1985, Theta lyronuclea (A. H. Clarke, 1959) and Scaphander sp. and were exclusive of the lower continental slope. The Group B and C belong to the continental shelf, and Group B was integrated only by Chaetopleura angulata (Spengler, 1797) and Chaetopleura isabellei (d’Orbigny, 1841), two chitons, which were exclusive to the MCS area. Cluster D was similar to the upper continental slope area and was subdivided in three subgroups: D1 including species aggregated in BBCSS (200–1000 m) and one species, Volvarina dozei (Mabille & Rochebrune, 1889), found in all areas except BB; D2 species of MSC (1000–2000 m) and D3 species of the upper continental slope areas. Group C and D appear closer to each other than to Group A.
Fig. 4

Hierarchical agglomerative clustering of 53 species of Gastropods and Chitons based on presence/absence matrix in the sampled area

The most diverse families were the Gastropods: Volutids with nine species, Buccinids and Muricids with eight species each one. Species richness in each group is shown in Fig. 5. In Cluster A all families were represented in similar numbers except for Volutidae and Naticidae that predominated. In Cluster C Muricidae and Volutidae were the most abundant, while in Cluster B, Buccinidae, Muricidae and Volutidae are in majority.
Fig. 5

Species richness of families of Gastropods and Chitons analysed

Discussion

Gastropod and chiton species composition defined three major biogeographic groups, i.e., continental shelf (< 350 m), upper continental slope (> 350–2000 m) and lower continental slope (2000–3000 m). Within the upper continental slope group, samples from MSC (350–2000 m) grouper together, due to a probably secondary geomorphological factor. According to the former grouping by depth Troncoso et al. [37] described a bathymetric pattern from deep-water stations (depth > 438 m) to shallow water ones (depth < 410 m) in the Antarctic Peninsula. Later, Aldea et al. [1] reported three bathymetric boundaries in the same area up to 2000 m depth and Saiz et al. [30] found a depth gradient from deeper stations of the western sector of the Bellingshausen sea to the eastern shallow water stations closer to the Antarctic Peninsula in benthic assemblages. In addition, Carranza et al. [10] reported two major groups of megabenthic Gastropods in the inner and outer shelves up to 850 m depth in the Uruguayan and northern Argentine shelves.

The causes of bathymetric zonation are complex, and several biological and physical factors may act together to produce the obtained patterns. The studied area is dominated by the action of intermediate and deep-water currents, including—from top to bottom—AAIW, UCDW, NADW, LCDW and AABW [26, 39, 40; among others]. All these water masses have different depths, densities, salinities and temperatures, and transport diverse sediments that could be responsible for the macrobenthic assemblages. Carranza et al. [10] suggested dissimilar tolerances to salinity and depth and different water masses as possible factors determining variations between Gastropod assemblages in the inner and outer shelf off Uruguay. In a different approach Troncoso et al. [37] considered that depth and percentage of coarse sand could be the environmental variables that explain the distribution of molluscan clusters in the Bellingshausen sea. Allen [2] reported food supply and high pressure on the physiology of body functions as the main environmental factors that control the occurrence and evolution of the bivalves in the deep-sea Atlantic.

Several macrobenthic assemblages of shallow and intermediate waters were associated by several authors with ecoregions or biogeographic provinces. Linse et al. [17] defined three biogeographic provinces of molluscan fauna in the southern ocean up to 1000 m depth. In addition, Barroso et al. [6] reported four regions working with prosobranch Gastropods from Brazil down to 200 m depth. In agreement with these previous authors, Hernández-Âvila et al. [15] also detected changes in species composition in relation to ecoregions and depth in the Caribbean.

In this work, species seem to be arranged by the characteristics of the water mass they inhabit, instead of by their geographic position as proposed by Linse et al. [17], Barroso et al. [6] and Hernández-Âvila et al. [15; among others]. However, this is not applicable to Group A because of the lack of samples between 2000 and 3000 m depth at high latitudes. Group A is composed by species living only below 2000 m depth in the Mar del Plata Submarine Canyon area. Laubierina peregrinator, Theta lyronuclea and Scaphander sp. were recently reported in this area [23, 31, 34]. While the particular larval biology of tonnoideans as L. peregrinator, with teleplanic larvae could explain the extraordinary distribution of some of these species, others have no clear explanation. The term teleplanic was coined by Scheltema [33] and followed by several authors after studying larvae from different unrelated groups as Gastropods, Echinoderms or Crustaceans among others. It refers to those larvae that delay settlement and have adaptations for a long planktonic life rendering thus a possible widespread geographic distribution.

Species Group C (38–350) and D (350–2000 m) are defined by a larger bathymetric range than species Group A. Furthermore, certain overlap of species involving C and D is recorded (see Additional file 2). In this way, some proximity between C and D is to be expected.

Within Cluster C1 there are two species that were grouped and collected exclusively in the BB i.e.: Microdeuthria michaelseni (Strebel, 1905) and Tonicia lebruni Rochebrune, 1884. However, M. michaelseni was recorded off Buenos Aires Province and Tierra del Fuego between 56 and 293 m [24]. In Group C2 there are three species that were found exclusively in TF, however Trophon plicatus (Lightfoot, 1786) was reported from Peninsula Valdés to TF [22] and Argeneuthria cerealis (Rochebrune & Mabille, 1885) from Puerto San Julián, Santa Cruz to TF [24]. According to our data there are no endemic species from the Burdwood Bank; yet, studies in the intermediate regions between ~ 52° S and off Mar del Plata are necessary to confirm this.

The distribution of shallow-water molluscs studied in this work follows the traditional scheme of biogeographic provinces (i.e. Argentine and Magellanic) reported by previous authors [4, 7; among others]. Some exceptions are the Gastropods Adelomelon ancilla (Lightfoot, 1786) and Trochita pileus (Lamarck, 1822), which are fairly common in both provinces. Bastida et al. [7] described a third area—according to the sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates—extending along the Argentine continental shelf between 100 and 200 m depth. In our work, molluscs were grouped by bathymetry and species distributed between 100 and 200 m depth were clustered in Group C including those from the continental shelf (350 m). A possible explanation for the differences in this third area could be attributed to differences in sampling bathymetry, as Bastida et al. [7] only collected macroinvertebrates from shallow water areas up to 200 m depth instead of 3000 m.

Conclusions

Our results showed that species were aggregated in agreement with marine currents occurring at a particular and well-defined depth with certain variability according to latitude. Thus, bathymetry appears as the main factor modifying large-scale distribution of the fauna. More samples of deep-sea species (i.e. 1000–3000 m) at 53ºS–56ºS are required to compare with the species in Group A. Furthermore, fieldwork needs to be carried out between 39º S and 53º S, following shallow and deep currents (i.e. MC, BC, AAIW, UCDW, NADW, LCDW, AABW) in order to assess the species distribution patterns between the northern and southern areas analysed herein, and eventually increase the knowledge of the factors that contribute to global-scale benthic patterns.

This is the first comparative report of biogeography of Gastropods and Chitons along the Argentine continental shelf including species up to ~ 3000 m depth.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the members of the Laboratorio de Ecosistemas Costeros, Plataforma y Mar Profundo from the MACN that collaborated in the collection of the samples, to G. Palomo for her statistical advice and to P. Penchaszadeh form advice in the initial steps of this work. Two reviewers and M. Griffin kindly helped to improve the initial manuscript. This work is the contribution N° 27 to the Area Marina Protegida Namuncurá (Ley 26.875). We acknowledge Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) of Argentina, from which all the authors belong as members of the “Carrera del Investigador Científico y Técnico”. This contribution was supported by project PICT 2016-0211 from the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Argentina).

Authors’ contributions

VT and GP conceived the ideas; VT, DU and GP collected and identified the samples; VT, DU and GP processed and analysed the data; VT wrote the manuscript with assistance from all the authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This contribution was partially supported by project PICT 2016-0211 to VT from the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Argentina). This funding afforded the cost of samples shipping, supplies and dredge repair.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for sampling, care and experimental use of organisms for the study have been followed and all necessary approvals have been obtained.

All specimens were collected on board of the r/v Puerto Deseado that belong to the National Scientific and Technical Research Council of Argentina (CONICET), the institution were all the authors belong as researchers. This is not an experimental research so there is no law or ethic violation in any way.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

12898_2019_263_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Additional file 1. Description of data: Bibliographic references to publications referring to biodiversity and biogeography studies in shallow waters of southwestern Atlantic.
12898_2019_263_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (24 kb)
Additional file 2. Description of data: Stations where invertebrate material was sampled with latitude, longitude and depth.

References

  1. 1.
    Aldea C, Olabarria C, Troncoso J. Bathymetric zonation and diversity gradient of Gastropods and bivalves in West Antarctica from the South Shetland Islands to the Bellingshausen Sea. Deep-Sea Res I. 2008;50:350–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen JA. Bivalvia of the deep Atlantic. Malacology. 2008;50:57–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allen JA, Sanders HL. The zoogeography, diversity and origin of the deep-sea protobranch bivalves of the Atlantic: the epilogue. Prog Oceanogr. 1996;38:95–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balech E, Ehrlich MD. Esquema Biogeográfico del Mar Argentino. Rev de Invest y Desarro Pesq. 2008;19:45–75.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barnes DKA, Griffiths HJ. Biodiversity and biogeography of southern temperate and polar bryozoans. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2008;17:84–99.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barroso CX, Lotufo TM, Matthews-Cascon H. Biogeography of Brazilian prosobranch Gastropods and their Atlantic relationships. J Biogeogr. 2016;43:2477–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bastida R, Roux A, Martínez DE. Benthic communities of the argentine continental-shelf. Oceanol Acta. 1992;15:687–98.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brandt A, Linse K, Schüller M. Bathymetric distribution patterns of Southern Ocean macrofaunal taxa: Bivalvia, Gastropoda, Isopoda and Polychaeta. Deep-Sea Res I. 2009;56:2013–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bremec C, Schejter L. Benthic diversity in a submarine canyon in the Argentine sea. Rev Chil de Hist Nat. 2010;83:453–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carranza A, Scarabino F, Brazeiro A, Ortega L, Martínez S. Assemblages of megabenthic Gastropods from Uruguayan and northern Argentinean shelf: spatial structure and environmental controls. Cont Shelf Res. 2008;28:788–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clarke KR, Warwick RM. Changes in marine communities: an approach to statistical analyses and interpretation. Plymouth: Nat Environ Res Counc; 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cunha MR, Paterson GLJ, Amaro T, Blackbird S, de Stigter HC, Ferreira C, et al. Biodiversity of macrofaunal assemblages from three Portuguese submarine canyons (NE Atlantic). Deep-Sea Res II. 2011;58:2433–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fraysse C, Calcagno J, Pérez AF. Asteroidea of the southern tip of South America, including Namuncurá marine protected area at Burdwood Bank and Tierra del Fuego Province Argentina. Polar Biol. 2018;41:2423–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Griffiths HJ, Barnes DKA, Linse K. Towards a generalized biogeography of the Southern Ocean benthos. J Biogeogr. 2009;36:162–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hernández-Ávila I, Guerra-Castro E, Bracho C, Rada M, Ocaña FA, Pech D. Variation in species diversity of deep-water megafauna assemblages in the Caribbean across depth and ecoregions. PLoS ONE. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201269.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levin LA, Etter RJ, Rex MA, Gooday AJ, Smith CR, Pineda J, et al. Environmental influences on regional deep-sea species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 2001;32:51–93.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Linse K, Griffiths HJ, Barnes DKA, Clarke A. Biodiversity and biogeography of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic mollusca. Deep-Sea Res II. 2006;53:985–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    López-Gappa J. Species richness of marine Bryozoa in the continental shelf and slope off Argentina (South-West Atlantic). Divers Distrib. 2000;6:15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    López-Gappa J, Alonso GM, Landoni NA. Biodiversity of benthic Amphipoda (Crustacea: Peracarida) in the Southwest Atlantic between 35º S and 56º S. Zootaxa. 2006;1342:1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matano RP, Palma ED, Piola AR. The influence of the Brazil and Malvinas currents on the southwestern Atlantic shelf circulation. Ocean Sci Discuss. 2010;7:1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Olivier SR, Bastida R, Torti M. Sobre el ecosistema de las aguas litorales de Mar del Plata. Niveles tróficos y cadenas alimentarias pelágico-demersales y bentónico-demersales. Inst de Biol Mar, Ser Contrib. 1968;58:1–45.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pastorino G. A revision of the genus Trophon Montfort, 1810 (Gastropoda: Muricidae) from southern South America. Nautilus. 2005;119:55–82.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pastorino G. First report of the family Laubierinidae Warén and Bouchet, 1990 (Gastropoda: Tonnoidea) in the southwestern Atlantic. Molluscan Res. 2016;36:108–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pastorino G. Revision of the genera Pareuthria Strebel, 1905, Glypteuthria Strebel, 1905 and Meteuthria Thiele, 1912 (Gastropoda: Buccinulidae) with the description of three new genera and two new species from Southwestern Atlantic waters. Zootaxa. 2016;4179:301–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pérez LF, Hernández-Molina FJ, Esteban FD, Tassone A, Piola AR, Maldonado A, et al. Erosional and depositional contourite features at the transition between the western Scotia Sea and southern South Atlantic Ocean: links with regional water-mass circulation since the Middle Miocene. Geo-Mar Lett. 2015;35:271–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Piola AR, Matano RP. Brazil and Falklands (Malvinas) currents. In: Steele JH, Thorpe SA, Turekian KK, editors. Ocean currents: a derivative of the encyclopedia of ocean sciences, vol. 1. London: Academic Press; 2001. p. 340–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Preu B, Hernández-Molina F, Violante R, Piola A, Paterlini C, Schwenk T, et al. Morphosedimentary and hydrographic features of the northern Argentine margin: the interplay between erosive, depositional and gravitational processes and its conceptual implications. Deep-Sea Res I. 2013;75:157–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Riemann-Zürneck K. Zur Biogeographie des Südwestatlantik mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Seeanemonen (coelenterata: actiniaria). Helgol Wiss Meeresunters. 1986;40:91–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Roux A, Bastida R, Lichtschein V, Barreto A. Investigaciones sobre las comunidades bentónicas de plataforma a través de una transecta frente a Mar del Plata. Spheniscus. 1988;6:19–52.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saiz J, García FJ, Manjón-Cabeza M, Parapar J, Peña Cantero Á, Saucède T, et al. Community structure and spatial distribution of benthic fauna in the Bellingshausen Sea (West Antarctica). Polar Biol. 2008;31:735–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sánchez N, Pastorino G. The North Atlantic Conoidean Gastropod Theta lyronuclea (Raphitomidae) in Southwestern Atlantic deep-waters. Malacolgia (in press)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scarabino F, Zelaya DM, Orensanz J, Ortega L, Defeo O, Schwindt E, et al. Cold, warm, temperate and brackish: bivalve biodiversity in a complex oceanographic scenario (Uruguay, southwestern Atlantic). Am Malacol Bull. 2015;33:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Scheltema RS. The dispersal of larvae of shoal-water benthic invertebrate species over long distances by ocean currents. In: Fourth Crisp D, editor. Fourth European Marine Biology Symposium. Cambridge: Univ Press; 1971. p. 7–28.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Siegwald J, Oskars T, Pastorino G, Malaquias MAE. A new Scaphander species from the deep sea of Argentina. Molluscan Forum of the Malacol Soc of Lond, Abstr. 2018:19Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stuart CT, Rex MA. Bathymetric patterns of deep-sea Gastropod species diversity in 10 basins of the Atlantic Ocean and Norwegian Sea. Mar Ecol. 2009;30:164–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Troncoso JS, Aldea C. Macrobenthic mollusc assemblages and diversity in the West Antarctica from the South Shetland Islands to the Bellingshausen Sea. Polar Biol. 2008;31:1253–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Troncoso JS, Aldea C, Arnaud P, Ramos A, García F. Quantitative analysis of soft-bottom molluscs in the Bellingshausen Sea and around Peter I Island. Polar Res. 2007;26:126–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Valdovinos C, Navarrete SA, Marquet PA. Mollusc species diversity in the Southeastern Pacific: why are there more species towards the pole? Ecography. 2003;26:139–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Violante RA, Paterlini CM, Pastor Costa I, Hernández-Molina FJ, Segovia LM, Cavallotto JL, et al. Sismoestratigrafia y evolución geomorfológica del talud continental adyacente al litoral del este bonaerense, Argentina. Lat Am J Sedimentol Basin Anal. 2010;17:33–62.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Voigt I, Henrich R, Preu BM, Piola AR, Hanebuth TJJ, Schwenk T, et al. A submarine canyon as a climate archive—interaction of the Antarctic Intermediate Water with the Mar del Plata Canyon. Mar Geol. 2013;341:46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zamponi M. La corriente de Malvinas:¿ una vía de dispersión para cnidarios bentónicos de aguas frías. Rev R Acad Galega de Cienc. 2008;27:183–203.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zamponi MO, Belem MJC, Schlenz E, Acuña FH. Distribution and some ecological aspects of Corallimorpharia and Actiniaria from shallow waters of the South American Atlantic coasts. Physis. 1998;55:31–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratorio de Ecosistemas Costeros, Plataforma y Mar ProfundoMuseo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”Ciudad de Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations