Advertisement

BMC Urology

, 19:108 | Cite as

Clinical and morphological effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in patients with interstitial cystitis associated with fibromyalgia

  • Gerardo Bosco
  • Edoardo Ostardo
  • Alex Rizzato
  • Giacomo Garetto
  • Matteo PaganiniEmail author
  • Giorgio Melloni
  • Giampiero Giron
  • Lodovico Pietrosanti
  • Ivo Martinelli
  • Enrico Camporesi
Open Access
Research article
  • 101 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Voiding dysfunction

Abstract

Background

Interstitial Cystitis (IC) is a debilitating disorder of the bladder, with a multifactorial and poorly understood origin dealing with microcirculation repeated damages. Also Fibromyalgia (FM) is a persistent disorder whose etiology is not completely explained, and its theorized alteration of pain processing can compromise the quality of life. Both these conditions have a high incidence of conventional therapeutic failure, but recent literature suggests a significant beneficial response to Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT). With this study, this study we evaluated the effects of HBOT on quality of life, symptoms, urodynamic parameters, and cystoscopic examination of patients suffering from both IC and FM.

Methods

We structured an observational clinical trial design with repeated measures (questionnaires, urodynamic test, and cystoscopy) conducted before and 6 months after a therapeutic protocol with hyperbaric oxygen for the treatment of patients suffering from both IC and FM. Patients were exposed to breathing 100% oxygen at 2 atm absolute (ATA) in a multiplace pressure chamber for 90 min using an oro-nasal mask. Patients undertook a cycle of 20 sessions for 5 days per week, and a second cycle of 20 sessions after 1 week of suspension.

Results

Twelve patients completed the protocol. Changes after HBOT were not significant, except for hydrodistension tolerance (mean pre-treatment: 409.2 ml; mean post-treatment: 489.2 ml; p < 0.05). A regression of petechiae and Hunner’s ulcers was also noted 6 months after the completion of HBOT.

Conclusions

Our study showed no improvement of symptoms, quality of life, and urodynamic parameters, except for hydrodistension, and a slight improvement in cystoscopic pattern. However, to date, we could not demonstrate the significance of overall results to justify the use of HBOT alone in patients with IC and FM. This observation suggests that additional studies are needed to better understand if HBOT could treat this subset of patients.

Trial registration

NCT03693001; October 2, 2018. Retrospectively registered.

Keywords

Hyperbaric medicine Interstitial cystitis Fibromyalgia 

Abbreviations

ATA

Atmospheres Absolute

FM

Fibromyalgia

HBOT

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy

IC

Interstitial cystitis

ICPI

Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index

ICSI

Interstitial Cystitis Symptoms Index

PUF

Pelvic pain, Urgency and Frequency scale

SSS

Symptom Severity Scale

VEGF

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

WPI

Widespread Pain Index

Background

Interstitial Cystitis (IC) is a rare, chronic, and disabling condition of the bladder that mainly affects females [1, 2, 3]. The specific etiology of IC is currently unknown but seems multifactorial, with interactions among autoimmune, neuroendocrine, allergic, and infectious pathways [4, 5]. Theories suggested that IC could derive from an abnormally increased number of mast cells, or could be related to an alteration of the glycosaminoglycan layer protecting urothelium from urine [6]. The activation of the inflammatory response induces alterations in the deep layers of bladder, such as fibrous substitution of the muscular tunic, thinning and discontinuity of the mucosa layer, capillary proliferation, and blood vessel degeneration [7].

Initial presentation of IC is subtle. The possible presence of infection (due to urothelium damage), an increase in void frequency, and a pain resistant to analgesia are early symptoms that make the diagnosis more challenging because of overlapping with those present in bacterial cystitis and several other diseases [8]. Unfortunately, patients spend about 5 to 10 years and a mean of 8 consults from different specialists before a correct diagnosis [9], while recurrent inflammation results in scar tissue development. The subsequent reduction of both bladder compliance and capacity, in conjunction with the gradual loss of functionality, determine chronic urinary tract symptoms [10], thus prompting cystoscopy and urometry that finally make the late diagnosis. Since the primary cause of IC is still hypothesized, conventional treatments – such as physical therapy, antidepressants, pentosan sulfate, immunosuppressants, intravescical therapy with lidocaine heparin and bicarbonate, and surgery [11] – mainly aim to alleviate symptoms. The effectiveness of most treatments does not exceed 60%, and symptoms return even after a period of improvement or recovery [9].

A pilot study showed that 76% of patients with histologically confirmed IC have another medical condition, such as Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FM), Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, and Irritable Bowel Syndrome [12]. FM is a persistent and debilitating disorder that compromises the quality of life, affecting 2–4% of the population with a 9:1 female to male ratio [13]. There is no agreement on the specific etiology of FM, even if some authors suggest that an abnormal brain activity regarding pain processing could be the leading cause [13]. Patients suffering from FM typically present with a triad of widespread chronic pain of long duration (> 3 months), sleep disturbance, and fatigue. Nonetheless, the possible association with other key symptoms such as allodynia, hyperalgesia, general muscular tension, nerve pain, cognitive impairment, and mood disturbance makes the diagnosis quite challenging because of several overlaps with other rheumatologic conditions [13, 14]. All these symptoms are included in the 2010 Fibromyalgia Diagnostic Criteria published by the American College of Rheumatology [15, 16].

Several integrated programs were proposed for FM, mainly targeting symptoms management using both pharmacological and physical exercise or behavioral therapy, but there is no consensus about these treatments, that have still limited effectiveness [13].

Recently, an increasing amount of literature suggested the efficacy of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) in patients with IC or FM. For instance, van Ophoven and colleagues reported an improvement of symptoms and bladder capacity in patients affected by IC and treated with HBOT [5], results confirmed also by Tanaka in patients with a form of IC resistant to conventional therapy [4]. On the other side, Yildiz and colleagues found a significant reduction of Visual Analogue Scale scores in patients affected by FM and a significant increase in pain threshold [17]. Moreover, the work of Efrati and colleagues demonstrated a decrease in symptoms of FM and positive changes in brain activity [13], concluding that HBOT plays an important role in FM management. However, no study has investigated the possible role of HBOT in patients affected from IC associated with FM (IC/FM) so far.

The aim of our study was to investigate the response of IC/FM patients subjected to HBOT. In detail, we evaluated the effectiveness of HBOT in IC/FM refractory to conventional therapy, focusing on changes in quality of life, pain modulation, modifications in bladder endoscopic and urometric patterns.

Methods

Subjects

Patients were enrolled and considered eligible for the study after a medical screening carried out at the ATiP Center of Hyperbaric Medicine (Padova, Italy), in order to exclude possible contraindications to HBOT (Fig. 1). No incentives were offered to increase the enrollment and compliance to the study. The inclusion criteria were: (a) pain in bladder filling that improves with urination; (b) pain (suprapubic, pelvic, urethral, vaginal, or perineal); (c) presence of glomerulation (grade II/III) (or bleeding +/− at the cystodistension) and positive histologic findings at biopsy [18]; (d) reduced capacity; (e) increased visceral sensitivity; (f) normal or reduced compliance; (g) symptoms refractory to conventional therapy; and (h) diagnosis of FM according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology guidelines [15, 16]. These criteria were based on those of the European Society for the Study of Interstitial Cystitis (ESSIC), including patients with an ESSIC disease staging ≥2C [18].
Fig. 1

Flow-chart of experimental design. Eligibility and recruitment of patients. Details are reported in the text

The exclusion criteria were: (a) pregnancy (diagnosed or within the previous year); (b) age less than 18 years; (c) benign or malignant bladder tumors; (d) radiation cystitis; (e) symptomatic bladder diversions; (f) herpes in active phase; (g) bladder and urethral stones; (h) urinary frequency less than 10 times a day; (i) presence of symptoms less than 12 months; and (l) bladder capacity > 400 ml with no sensitive urgency.

Experimental protocol

The experimental protocol received the approval by the local Human Ethical Committee (n° HEC-DSB 07/16) of the Department of Biomedical Science at University of Padova and adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients involved in the study read and signed an informed consent, were free to renounce the study at any time, and every precaution was taken to protect their privacy. All the patients were informed about the methods and aims of the study.

We structured an observational clinical trial design with repeated measures conducted before and 6 months after a therapeutic protocol with hyperbaric oxygen for the treatment of patients suffering from IC/FM. The authors confirmed that all ongoing and related trials for this intervention were retrospectively registered in the clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT03693001). This study was not registered before enrollment of participants started because IC is an approved indication for HBOT in Italy and HBOT sessions were already planned in the therapeutic schedule of the enrolled patients. The whole study, comprehensive of recruitment and follow up after the experiment, took place between January and September 2018. This period seemed adequate for an evaluation over time of the treatment results on the most relevant symptoms of the pathology, i.e. pain, frequency of urination, urgency and evaluation of bladder capacity [1, 5]. Patients were exposed to breathing 100% oxygen at 2 atm absolute (ATA) in a multiplace pressure chamber (Galeazzi, Zingonia, Italy) for 90 min using an overboard demand regulator while breathing through an oral-nasal mask. Each patient undertook a daily cycle of 20 sessions, 5 days a week. After 1 week of suspension, a second identical cycle of 20 sessions was performed.

The primary outcome was the modification in symptoms, assessed through several questionnaires that were administered to patients before (PRE) and 6 months after (POST) HBOT: (a) three-day voiding diary, (b) widespread pain index (WPI), (c) symptom severity scale (SSS), (d) Pelvic pain, Urgency and Frequency symptom scale (PUF), and (e) O’Leary-Sant questionnaire.

Questionnaires

Three-day voiding diary

It is a sheet for each 24-h period. Patients specified their bedtime and wake-up time directly in the upper part of the sheet. Later, they started recording all fluid intake (i.e., the total amount of fluids drank during a given time period) and urinary events (i.e., the amount of urine voided each time over a 24-h period). Moreover, the voiding diary presents specific fields to indicate either the amount of urine drained via catheter and/or each time the pad was changed. Patients write each time they had involuntary urine loss (even a small amount). As final outcomes, mean and maximum urine volume were considered.

Widespread pain index

WPI is a clinical diagnostic criterion proposed for patients with FM that do not rely on counting tender points [15]. It considers not only pain but also other FM-related symptoms assessing their severity [15]. Physician asked the patient to indicate the location of any pain experienced during the week before the exam. As a result, WPI pointed out a total amount ranging from 0 to 19 points corresponding to the possibly-painful 19 body areas (i.e., areas of the shoulders, arms, hips, legs, jaws, chest, abdomen, back, and neck) [14].

Symptom severity scale

SSS focuses on 3 physical symptoms, as well as somatic symptoms in general [16]. In detail, symptoms are measured on the basis of a 0–3 severity scale considering fatigue, waking unrefreshed, and cognitive symptoms. The investigated period is the week before the questionnaire administration [14]. Later, the items are combined into a 0–12 scale assessing the somatic symptoms in general. The greater the amount, the more severe the symptomatology.

Pelvic pain, urgency and frequency symptom scale

Pelvic pain, Urgency and Frequency scale (PUF) is an eight-item questionnaire, largely used to evaluate symptoms of IC. It is organized in two subscales: symptom severity and level of bother. Total scores range from 0 to 35 (symptom subscale 0–23 and bother subscale 0–12). The higher the scores, the more severe the level of symptoms [19]. Scores > 12 indicate significant symptoms; scores of ≥15 have an 84% sensitivity in diagnosing IC based on positive potassium testing, which indicates abnormal permeability of bladder epithelium [1]. Also, the PUF was previously reported in persons with FM [20].

O’Leary-Sant index

The O’Leary-Sant index – also named Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI) – was proposed as a uniform outcome measure in IC [21]. The Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI) was later developed from the ICSI as a corresponding problem index [22]. It measures the symptoms of the lower urinary tract and their influence on quality-of-life in subjects with IC. Test-retest reliability analysis and validation via administration to IC patients and asymptomatic controls resulted in a questionnaire with 8 items outlining two indexes: the symptom and the problem index [21, 23].

Cystoscopy, hydrodistension, and urodynamic evaluation

As secondary outcome, modifications in bladder endoscopic and urometric patterns were searched. Patients were assessed before (PRE) and 6 months after (POST) HBOT through cystoscopy, hydrodistension, and urodynamic examination. Hydrodistension was performed without sedation, applying a maximal filling pressure of 20–25 mmHg for 10 min. Petechiae were graded at PRE according to Nordling [24], and the improvement in lesions was defined as a downgrade found at POST. Urodynamic testing allows recording of bladder sensitivity, capacity, and compliance as well as urethral and detrusor activity during filling. PRE and POST cystoscopy, hydrodistension, and urodynamic testing were performed by the same urologist, and urodynamic evaluation followed current International Continence Society standards.

Statistical analysis

Data were coded on a master sheet using a LibreOffice Calc spreadsheet (ver. 6.0.1.1, The Document Foundation, Berlin, Germany). A Two-tailed t-test for dependent means was used to analyze differences between pre and post-treatment means of questionnaires and quantitative data from Urodynamic testing, with a significance level of .05. Qualitative data from cystoscopy were analyzed descriptively.

Results

Thirty-three patients were initially enrolled for the study, and no contraindications to HBOT were found after medical screening. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, twenty patients were considered eligible for the study. However, 8 patients withdrew during the study (1 had problems with compensation maneuvers in the chamber; 3 because of the long travel needed to reach the hyperbaric facility; 4 did not provide a reason), and twelve patients concluded the study (M = 1; F = 11; mean age ± SD: 57 ± 10.57 years; mean duration of illness ± SD: 10,6 ± 9,33 years).

HBOT did not result in a statistically significant improvement both in questionnaires and in urodynamic testing, except for hydrodistension (mean pre-treatment: 409.167 ml; mean post-treatment: 489.167 ml; p < .05) (Table 1).
Table 1

Changes after hyperbaric oxygen treatment

 

PRE

POST

P value

WPI

7.08 ± 5.14

5.75 ± 4.00

.46

SS

8.16 ± 2.88

7.50 ± 4.25

.60

PUF

22.83 ± 6.20

20.41 ± 6.69

.24

OS

13 ± 5.86

11.08 ± 5.17

.12

Mean urine volume (ml)

193.83 ± 89.61

201.27 ± 91.16

.75

Max urine volume (ml)

425.00 ± 257.30

383.33 ± 187.9

.47

Hydrodistension (ml)

409.16 ± 196.30

489.16 ± 149

.04

1st desire

103.50 ± 48.61

114.75 ± 37.33

.31

Strong desire

247.33 ± 99.79

245.41 ± 113.7

.91

Compliance

41.85 ± 27.06

44.18 ± 24.99

.74

Cystomanometric Capacity (ml)

318.10 ± 126.50

310.33 ± 133.5

.73

Urethral functioning (tension)

68.41 ± 25.69

75.33 ± 23.17

.47

After 20 HBO treatments, no statistically significant changes in assessed items were detected, except for hydrodistension (p < .05). WPI Widespread Pain Index, SS Symptom Severity score, PUF Pelvic Pain and Urinary Urgency Frequency, OS O’Leary Sant symptoms and problems index. Hydrodistension: derived from cystoscopy; 1st desire, voiding pain, compliance, cystomanometric capacity, and urethral functioning: derived from urodynamic testing

Cystoscopy performed after the treatment detected a reduction of petechiae and a regression of Hunner’s ulcers (initially detected in only one patient), while glomerulations remained the same (Table 2).
Table 2

Alterations observed in patients during cystoscopy before and 6 months after HBOT

 

PRE

POST

Petechiae

11 patients

7 patients

Glomerulations

8 patients

8 patients

Hunner’s ulcers

1 patient

no patients

After HBOT, there was a reduction of petechiae among treated patients, while no change was recorded regarding glomerulations. Of note, the only one patient presenting with Hunner’s ulcers experienced a regression of the lesion.

Discussion

HBOT is emerging as a novel treatment in patients with IC and FM, as suggested by recent experiences in both the urologic and rheumatologic fields. In fact, hyperbaric oxygen is known to increase anti-inflammatory defenses over time and to promote neovascularization [25]. These mechanisms have been recently confirmed by Minami, who reported a reduction in H2O2-induced inflammation, edema, and fibrosis on the bladder of mice treated with HBOT [26]. On a molecular level, Thom demonstrated mobilization of bone marrow stem cells in response to hyperoxia, to hyperoxia and concluded that species that oxidative stress is the fundamental key mechanism of action of HBOT, exerting its effects on transcription through reactive oxygen and nitrogen species production over several treatments [27]. Similarly, Minami and coll. demonstrated a decrease in mRNA expression of inflammatory biomarkers and an increase in endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) after HBOT [26]. Overall, HBOT results in enhanced perfusion and wound healing in ischemic tissues [25, 27].

HBOT is now widely used in urology for the treatment of radiation cystitis, cyclophosphamide-induced cystitis, emphysematous cystitis, or pelvic radiation disease, and the interest in treatment IC is currently growing [28]. The molecular mechanisms of IC development are still not well known, but current literature identifies a plausible cause in microcirculation. For instance, Tamaki and coll. suggested that an important pathophysiology way could result from a reduced blood flow in bladder’s walls during its filling phase [29]. Concordantly, Lee J.D. and Lee M. verified that, in the bladder of IC patients, the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α is increased both in muscle and urothelium of bladder, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) expression is higher in umbrella cells (apical cells) [6]. Both these studies could explain a hypoxic/ischemic damage, and therefore a possible useful role of HBOT in IC, as previously demonstrated on an ischemia/reperfusion model on muscle mice by Bosco and coll. [30].

As hypothesized by Efrati and coll., HBOT induced an improvement of symptoms in patients with FM by increasing brain oxygenation, promoting neoangiogenesis and restoring normal patterns of pain processing [13].

Besides these recent evidences that favor HBOT in patients with IC and FM, no literature is available about such a treatment in patients with both the diseases, probably because of the rarity of this overlap in the general population.

Surprisingly, our results showed an isolated statistically significant improvement in hydrodistension, but no significant improvement in scores evaluating symptoms and life quality or other parameters at urodynamic testing (Table 1). These findings prompt several considerations, since no previous study has investigated the usefulness of HBOT in IC/FM patients.

With regard to FM, these findings do not support previous works that used HBOT to treat patients with FM alone [13, 17]. On the other hand, from the perspective of IC, our sample mostly included patients with non-ulcerative IC (11 out of 12) and our results are consistent with those of van Ophoven [5], Tanaka [4], and Wenzler [31] that demonstrated few effects on this subset of patients. Overall, this inconsistency may be due to the considerable delay in diagnosis of an IC/FM overlap and the conventional therapy administration, thus leading to resistance or failure to treatments. Another possible explanation for these results resides within the complicated medical management of these patients. In fact, since patients with FM have altered pathways of pain processing, an overlap with IC could probably worsen symptoms, and HBOT alone may be not sufficient to treat an overlap of both these diseases.

In IC, urothelial alteration and deficiency of glycosaminoglycans may lead to a thinning of the mucosa up to the presence of Hunner’s ulcers and/or fascicular fibrosis [29]. Cystoscopy usually documents these alterations by highlighting a bladder wall with inflamed areas, hemorrhagic areas, and fibrosis of the inner mucosal lining. If compared with non-ulcerative IC, Hunner’s ulcers are characterized by histological findings of pancystitis, increase in plasma cells, expansion of clonal B-cells, and epithelial denudation [32]. According to our findings, glomerulations remained the same but there was a reduction of petechiae in most of the patients, thus suggesting possible improvement in oxygenation of apical tissues (Table 2). Expression of VEGF was not among the goals of our study but, according to literature, a reduction in petechiae could be linked with a reduction in VEGF expression in apical cells [6]. We also assisted to a regression of Hunner’s ulcers after HBOT, a finding that matches those observed in recent studies by Tanaka [4] and by Wenzler [31] (Table 2).

The results of this study are promising but are subjected to a number of limitations. First, given the rarity of IC/FM overlap, we were able to enroll only 20 patients and 12 completed the study. Given the limited number of participants and the absence of a control group, results should be interpreted carefully. However, our sample size is greater than or similar to those of others previously cited studies, and a wider study – possibly multicentric – could help the scientific community to overcome this impasse. Second, since FM can overlap with several other conditions, the patients could have suffered from other diseases than IC and FM. In the future, a more precise stratification could be useful to draw conclusion on a larger sample of patients. Third, this study evaluated HBOT alone on patients, without tracking any other interventions such as education therapy, diet, or psychotherapy. Since the key of complex syndromes management resides in a multidisciplinary approach, we think that future trials should evaluate HBOT not alone but together with conventional treatments, in order to quantify its usefulness as an adjuvant therapy.

Conclusions

Patients with both IC and FM suffer from a complex and rare syndrome with a high level of therapeutic failure. According to literature, HBOT seems to be clinically effective in treating these two diseases when separated. Our study showed a statistically significant improvement of hydrodistension alone, but no significant improvement in symptoms, quality of life, and other urodynamic parameters in this subset of patients. Moreover, HBOT resulted in an improved cystoscopic pattern, with a healing of petechiae and Hunner’s ulcers. Anyway, our results cannot justify HBOT alone in IC/FM patients. This is a spur to expand the sample and promote trials in the same field to better understand how HBOT could treat this rare subset of patients, especially as an adjuvant to conventional treatments.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank ATIP Centro di Medicina Iperbarica (Padova, Italy) and OTI Services (Marghera, Italy) for covering the cost for HBO treatments. Additionally, we are thankful to AICI (Associazione Italiana Cistite Interstiziale) that supported the recruitment of patients.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GB, EO, GpG, EC, and LP. Performed the experiments: GB, GG, EC, and IM. Analyzed the data: GM and MP. Contributed materials: IM and GG. Wrote the paper: MP, GB, AR, and EC. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

Not Applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The experimental protocol received the approval by the local Human Ethical Committee (n° HEC-DSB 07/16) of the Department of Biomedical Science at University of Padova and adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the authors confirmed that all ongoing and related trials for this intervention are registered in the clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT03693001). Patients involved in the study read and signed an informed consent, were free to renounce the study at any time, and every precaution was taken to protect their privacy.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Parsons CL, Dell J, Stanford EJ, Bullen M, Kahn BS, Waxell T, et al. Increased prevalence of interstitial cystitis: previously unrecognized urologic and gynecologic cases identified using a new symptom questionnaire and intravesical potassium sensitivity. Urology. 2002;60:573–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang CC, Miller JL, Omidpanah A, Krieger JN. Physical examination for men and women with urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a MAPP (multidisciplinary approach to the study of chronic pelvic pain) network study. Urology. 2018;116:23–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clemens JQ, Meenan RT, Rosetti MC, et al. Prevalence and incidence of interstitial cystitis in a managed care population. J Urol. 2005;173:98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tanaka T, Nitta Y, Morimoto K, Nishikawa N, Nishihara C, Tamada S, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis resistant to conventional treatments: long-term results of a case series in Japan. BMC Urol. 2011;11:11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Ophoven A, Rossbach G, Oberpenning F, Hertle L. Hyperbaric oxygen for the treatment of interstitial cystitis: long-term results of a prospective pilot study. Eur Urol. 2004;46:108–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee J-D, Lee M-H. Increased expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and vascular endothelial growth factor associated with glomerulation formation in patients with interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2011;78:971.e11–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Loran OB, Siniakova LA, Seregin AV, Mitrokhin AA, Plesovskiĭ AM, Vinarova NA. Hyperbaric oxygenation in the treatment of patients with interstitial cystitis: clinical and morphological rationale. Urologiia. 2011;3:3–5.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mathers MJ, Lazica DA, Roth S. Non-bacterial cystitis: principles, diagnostics and etiogenic therapy options. Aktuelle Urol. 2010;41:361–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Binder I, Rossbach G, Van Ophoven A. Die komplexität chronischer beckenschmerzen am beispiel der interstitiellen zystitis. Teil 2: Therapie. Aktuelle Urologie. 2008;39:289–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sutherland AM, Clarke HA, Katz J, Katznelson R. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a new treatment for chronic pain? Pain Pract. 2016;16:620–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    He D-L. AB098. Progress in diagnosis and treatment of bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis. Transl Androl Urol. 2015;4(Suppl 1).  https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.s098.
  12. 12.
    Nickel JC, Tripp DA, Pontari M, Moldwin R, Mayer R, Carr LK, et al. Interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome and associated medical conditions with an emphasis on irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome. J Urol. 2010;184:1358–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Efrati S, Golan H, Bechor Y, Faran Y, Daphna-Tekoah S, Sekler G, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy can diminish fibromyalgia syndrome--prospective clinical trial. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0127012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arnold LM, Clauw DJ, McCarberg BH. FibroCollaborative. Improving the recognition and diagnosis of fibromyalgia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86:457–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles M-A, Goldenberg DL, Katz RS, Mease P, et al. The American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:600–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wolfe F, Häuser W. Fibromyalgia diagnosis and diagnostic criteria. Ann Med. 2011;43:495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yildiz Ş, Kiralp M, Akin A, Keskin I, Ay H, Dursun H, et al. A new treatment modality for fibromyalgia syndrome: hyperbaric oxygen therapy. J Int Med Res. 2004;32:263–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van de Merwe JP, Nordling J, Bouchelouche P, Bouchelouche K, Cervigni M, Daha LK, et al. Diagnostic criteria, classification, and nomenclature for painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis: an ESSIC proposal. Eur Urol. 2008;53:60–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brewer ME, White WM, Klein FA, Klein LM, Waters WB. Validity of pelvic pain, urgency, and frequency questionnaire in patients with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. Urology. 2007;70:646–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jones KD, Maxwell C, Mist SD, King V, Denman MA, Gregory WT. Pelvic floor and urinary distress in women with fibromyalgia. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015;16:834–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Leary MP, Sant GR, Fowler FJ, Whitmore KE, Spolarich-Kroll J. The interstitial cystitis symptom index and problem index. Urology. 1997;49(5A Suppl):58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lubeck DP, Whitmore K, Sant GR, Alvarez-Horine S, Lai C. Psychometric validation of the O’leary-Sant interstitial cystitis symptom index in a clinical trial of pentosan polysulfate sodium. Urology. 2001;57(6 Suppl 1):62–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ito T, Tomoe H, Ueda T, Yoshimura N, Sant G, Hanno P. Clinical symptoms scale for interstitial cystitis for diagnosis and for following the course of the disease. Int J Urol. 2003;10(Suppl):S24–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nordling J, Anjum FH, Bade JJ, et al. Primary evaluation of patients suspected of having interstitial cystitis (IC). Eur Urol. 2004;45(5):662–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Camporesi EM, Bosco G. Mechanisms of action of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2014;41:247–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Minami A, Tanaka T, Otoshi T, Kuratsukuri K, Nakatani T. Hyperbaric oxygen significantly improves frequent urination, hyperalgesia, and tissue damage in a mouse long-lasting cystitis model induced by an intravesical instillation of hydrogen peroxide. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(1):97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thom SR. Oxidative stress is fundamental to hyperbaric oxygen therapy. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106:988–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gandhi J, Seyam O, Smith NL, Joshi G, Vatsia S, Khan SA. Clinical utility of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in genitourinary medicine. Med Gas Res. 2018;8:29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tamaki M, Saito R, Ogawa O, Yoshimura N, Ueda T. Possible mechanisms inducing glomerulations in interstitial cystitis: relationship between endoscopic findings and expression of angiogenic growth factors. J Urol. 2004;172:945–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bosco G, Yang Z, Nandi J, Wang J, Chen C, Camporesi EM. Effects of hyperbaric oxygen on glucose, lactate, glycerol and anti-oxidant enzymes in the skeletal muscle of rats during ischaemia and reperfusion. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2007;34:70–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wenzler DL, Gulli F, Cooney M, Chancellor MB, Gilleran J, Peters KM. Treatment of ulcerative compared to non-ulcerative interstitial cystitis with hyperbaric oxygen: a pilot study. Ther Adv Urol. 2017;9:263–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maeda D, Akiyama Y, Morikawa T, KunitaA OY, Katoh H, et al. Hunner-type (classic) interstitial cystitis: a distinct InflammatoryDisorder characterized by Pancystitis, with FrequentExpansion of clonal B-cells and EpithelialDenudation. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0143316.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerardo Bosco
    • 1
  • Edoardo Ostardo
    • 2
  • Alex Rizzato
    • 1
  • Giacomo Garetto
    • 3
  • Matteo Paganini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Giorgio Melloni
    • 4
  • Giampiero Giron
    • 5
  • Lodovico Pietrosanti
    • 5
  • Ivo Martinelli
    • 5
  • Enrico Camporesi
    • 6
  1. 1.Environmental and Respiratory Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biomedical SciencesUniversity of PadovaPadovaItaly
  2. 2.Unità Operativa di UrologiaAzienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria degli AngeliPordenoneItaly
  3. 3.ATIP Centro di Medicina IperbaricaPadovaItaly
  4. 4.Department of StatisticsHarvard School of MedicineBostonUSA
  5. 5.OTI Services, Centro di Medicina IperbaricaVeneziaItaly
  6. 6.TEAMHealth Research InstituteTGHTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations