Advertisement

Reliability of four tests to assess body posture and the range of selected movements in individuals with spinal muscular atrophy

  • Agnieszka StępieńEmail author
  • Maria Jędrzejowska
  • Katarzyna Guzek
  • Witold Rekowski
  • Jolanta Stępowska
Open Access
Research article
  • 141 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Rehabilitation, physical therapy and occupational health

Abstract

Background

The majority of individuals with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) experience progressive skeletal deformities which may affect the quality of life and mobility. To date, no studies have evaluated the reliability of tests assessing body posture and joint mobility in SMA patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of Cervical Rotation test (CR), Supine Angle of Trunk Rotation test (SATR), Hip Extension test (HE) and Pelvic Obliquity test (PO) developed to evaluate the musculoskeletal system in SMA individuals.

Methods

Thirty individuals (12 girls and 18 boys) aged 4–15 with SMA type II (n = 24) and III (n = 6) confirmed by genetic examinations were qualified for the study. The participants were examined twice by three physiotherapists on the same day. The examination included four tests, i.e. CR, SATR, HE and PO tests aimed at assessing ranges of rotation in the cervical spine, chest deformities, ranges of hip extension and pelvis position while sitting. Statistical calculations were made with the use of statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics version 20. Reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).

Results

Intraobserver reliability was excellent for CR (ICC range 0.839–0.911), SATR (ICC range 0.918–0.939 - the upper part of the sternum; ICC range 0.951–0.975 - the lower part of the sternum), HE (ICC range 0.988–0,991) and PO (ICC range 0.896–0.935) tests.

The interobserver ICC reached the excellent values in CR (ICC range 0.912–0.920), SATR (ICC = 0.888 - the upper part of the sternum, ICC = 0.951 - the lower part of the sternum), HE (ICC range 0.922–0.923) and PO (ICC = 0.928) tests.

Conclusions

CR, SATR, HE and PO tests are reliable and may be used for examining individuals with SMA. The application of these tests provides a possibility to detect early changes in the musculoskeletal system in children and adolescents and to assess the effectiveness of the implemented pharmacotherapy and rehabilitation.

Keywords

Spinal muscular atrophy Reliability Scoliosis Chest deformity Pelvic obliquity Cervical rotation Hip mobility 

Abbreviations

CR

Cervical Rotation test

HE

Hip Extension test

ICC

Interclass correlation coefficient

PO

Pelvic Obliquity test

SATR

Supine Angle of Trunk Rotation test

SATRL

Supine Angle of Trunk Rotation Lower test

SATRU

Supine Angle of Trunk Rotation Upper test

SMA

Spinal muscular atrophy

Background

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a rare genetic disease related to the mutations of SMN1 gene which manifests itself with a progressive impairment and atrophy of muscles resulting from the loss of motor cells of the spinal cord [1, 2]. The majority of patients experience limitations in the activities of daily living, progressive skeletal deformities, range of motion limitations and deterioration in breathing parameters [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12].

Proper functional assessment of patients and early implementation of treatment may lengthen life and improve the quality of life [7, 8, 13]. Various functional scales [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20] and the Six-Minute Walk Test [21] are used to assess motor abilities of individuals with SMA. Moreover, ranges of motion in limbs and muscle strength are measured, while breathing capability test and X-Ray examination serve as a valuable completion of the evaluation [4, 6, 7, 22, 23].

No studies have evaluated the reliability of tests assessing body posture and joint mobility in SMA patients, despite the fact they experience numerous skeletal deformities. One of the symptoms typical of SMA patients is scoliosis which is accompanied by improper head position, chest deformity and oblique position of pelvis [3, 8, 9, 12]. Difficulties in treating scoliosis are also caused by hip joint dislocations [12, 24] and increasing contractures [7, 10, 23].

Although in the literature we can find numerous studies regarding the diagnostics and treatment of idiopathic scoliosis, there are few references to the assessment and treatment of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. A radiological examination is recognized as the objective tool for assessing the spine, pelvis and hip joints in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. Monitoring is recommended at least once a year, mainly in individuals with scoliosis and those who have lost the ability of ambulation [13, 25].

The method to detect early symptoms of spinal, chest, pelvic and hip disorders without an X-ray image has not been described. Measurement of the angle of trunk rotation recommended for patients with idiopathic scoliosis and applied in screening studies [26, 27] cannot be used in the majority of SMA patients due to difficulties in maintaining a sitting and standing position or bending forward. The lack of proper tests assessing postural parameters in everyday clinical practice limits also a possibility of monitoring changes in the musculoskeletal system in SMA patients with scoliosis and makes it difficult to plan proper treatment and document the effectiveness of the applied procedures.

Therefore, we decided to put forward tests used in our daily practice to examine the cervical spine, chest, pelvis and hip joints. We observe that limitation of cervical rotation, chest deformity, pelvic obliquity and uneven ranges of motion in the hip joints are often related to scoliosis in SMA patients. These impairments may affect the basic vital functions such as breathing and swallowing, and maintaining the body against gravity. The proposed tests don’t give information about all progressive deformations in the skeletal system. None of the tests is intended for direct assessment of scoliosis and hip dislocation.

The aim of this study was to determine the intra- and interrater reliability of four measurements: Cervical Rotation test (CR), Supine Angle of Trunk Rotation test (SATR), Hip Extension test (HE) and Pelvic Obliquity test (PO).

Some of these tests have been used in the past by other researchers, but their reliability has not been studied in SMA patients.

Methods

Participants

Patients with SMA type II and type III confirmed genetically, aged 4–15, were qualified for the study. Individuals after spine or hip surgery, patients who could not lie flat on their backs or sit without assistance were not qualified. This study recruited the total of 30 SMA patients participating in the conference and workshops organised by the SMA Foundation for patients and their families. Parents of all participants signed the consent form to participate. This study was approved by the Senate Ethics Committee of the University of Physical Education in Warsaw (SKE 01–03/2016).

Study protocol

The research was conducted by three physiotherapists with several years of experience in working with SMA individuals. Each of them carried out the examination independently according to the established protocol. Prior to the study, the physiotherapists had undergone training regarding the performance of CR, SATR, HE and PO tests included in the protocol.

Physiotherapists performed all the tests in each of the study participants in separate locations in two separate rounds with at least 30-min intervals. After finishing the first round, the measurements were repeated in the second round. In total, each physiotherapist performed two measurements in each of the tests in each participant. During the intervals the participants rested. Each examiner was blinded to the previous measurements and the measurements of other two observers. The results were recorded in separate forms.

The SATR and PO tests were conducted with the use of a scoliometer (Orthopedic Systems Inc. OSI 1995) while the measurements in CR and HE tests were performed with the use of Rippstein’s plurimeter (Rippstein, Switzerland). Values in degrees were obtained. Previous studies have confirmed the reliability of measurements of trunk position with the use of a scoliometer [28, 29, 30] and the measurements of ranges of motion with the use of a plurimeter [31, 32, 33]. The performance of CR, SATR, HE and PO tests is presented below.

Cervical rotation test (CR)

The range of passive rotation of the cervical spine was assessed in a supine position with upper limbs parallel to the sides of the body. Patients with contractures in elbows had their forearms supported. Lower limbs were slightly bent and a roll was placed under knees. The physiotherapist helped a patient to perform head rotation (without lateral flexion) at the same time stabilising ribs in the sternal area on the side opposite to the direction of rotation. The Rippstein’s plurimeter was reset to zero in relation to the surface. The arm of the plurimeter was placed on the corpus mandibulae (Fig. 1a, b). The degree values of inclination above the level were marked with “-” (limitation of rotation), while those below the level were marked with “+”.
Fig. 1

Cervical Rotation test (CR): a rotation to the left, b rotation to the right

Supine angle of trunk rotation test (SATR)

The measurement of the angle of trunk rotation was performed in a supine position. Head was kept symmetrically. The scoliometer was placed on the sternum and ribs perpendicularly to the longitudinal body axis in two places, i.e. at the 2nd-3rd rib below the sternal angle (SATR upper – SATRU) (Fig. 2a) and in the lower part of the sternum, where corpus sterni connects with processus xiphoideus (SATR lower – SATRL) (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2

Supine Angle of Trunk Rotation test (SATR): a an upper part of the sternum (SATRU), b a lower part of the sternum (SATRL)

The hip extension test (HE)

The passive range of hip extension was measured in a standard supine position [34]. First, the lower limbs were flexed towards the chest until the sacral bone moved. Then, one limb was stabilised, while the other one was lowered below the edge of the table. The Rippstein plurimeter in a starting position parallel to the floor was placed on the thigh above the base of patella (Fig. 3). The values of extension below the level were marked with “+”, while the values above zero (limitation of extension) were marked with “-”.
Fig. 3

Hip Extension test (HE) – the range of hip extension in the right hip

Pelvic obliquity test (PO)

PO test was performed in a sitting position with supported lower limbs. The physiotherapists marked points on the posterior superior iliac spines (Fig. 4a) and then placed a lower edge of the scoliometer on the points (Fig. 4b).
Fig. 4

Pelvic Obliquity test (PO): a Points marked on the posterior superior iliac spines, b The measurement of the oblique pelvis position

Statistical analyses

Statistical calculations were made with the use of statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics version 20. The means, standard deviations, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) [35] and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. When assessing reliability, the following criteria were taken into account: the coefficient value lower than 0.40 – poor reliability, between 0.40 and 0.59 – fair reliability, between 0.60 and 0.74 – good reliability, between 0.75 and 1.00 – excellent reliability [36]. The level of significance was set at 0.05.

Results

The study group of 30 participants included 24 individuals with SMA type II and 6 with SMA type III aged 4–15 (mean age 7.9 ± 3.1, body mass 25.0 ± 9.8, body height 125.2 ± 16.3). There were 12 girls and 18 boys. At the time of the examination, 3 of the 6 patients with type III SMA were able to walk. In 14 individuals, scoliosis had been diagnosed. In one case, the results of PO test were not included in the statistical analysis due to imbalance in the sitting position during measurements.

Intraobserver reliability was excellent in all the tests. High values of the ICC, ranging between 0.839 and 0.991, were obtained. The lowest value of the ICC was noted in the CR test, while the highest value was noted in the HE test (Table 1).
Table 1

Intraobserver reliability for CR, SATR, HE, PO tests - intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence intervals

Test

Observer

ICC for one observer

95% confidence interval

CRleft

1

0.901

0.802–0.951

2

0.891

0.784–0.947

3

0.839

0.689–0.920

CRright

1

0.908

0.817–0.955

2

0.904

0.809–0.953

3

0.911

0.822–0.957

SATRU

1

0.920

0.839–0.961

2

0.918

0.834–0.960

3

0.939

0.877–0.971

SATRL

1

0.975

0.949–0.988

2

0.951

0.900–0.977

3

0.951

0.900–0.976

HEleft

1

0.990

0.979–0.995

2

0.988

0.974–0.994

3

0.991

0.980–0.998

HEright

1

0.988

0.975–0.994

2

0.989

0.978–0.995

3

0.991

0.980–0.955

PO

1

0.929

0.855–0.966

2

0.896

0.791–0.950

3

0.935

0.867–0.969

ICC intraclass correlation coefficient, CRleft/right cervical rotation to left/right, SATRU anterior angle of trunk rotation upper part, SATRL anterior angle of trunk rotation lower part, PO pelvic oblique, HEleft/right hip extension on the left/right

Interobserver reliability was also excellent, which was indicated by the value of ICC ranging between 0.888 and 0.993 in CR, SATR,HE and PO tests. The lowest value of the ICC was noted in SATRU test, while the highest value was observed in HE test (Table 2).
Table 2

Interobserver reliability for CR, SATR, PO, HE tests - intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence intervals

Test

ICC for three observers

95% confidence interval

CRleft

0.912

0.846–0.954

CRright

0.920

0.807–0.941

SATRU

0.888

0.738–0.917

SATRL

0.951

0.912–0.974

HEleft

0.993

0.988–0.997

HEright

0.992

0.986–0.996

PO

0.928

0.873–0.963

ICC intraclass correlation coefficient, CRleft/right cervical rotation to left/right, SATRU anterior angle of trunk rotation upper part, SATRL anterior angle of trunk rotation lower part, PO pelvic oblique, HEleft/right hip extension on the left/right

Mean values obtained in CR, SATR, HE and PO tests are included in Table 3.
Table 3

Mean values obtained in CR, SATR, HE and PO tests

Test

Mean values /one observer (o) ± SD

Mean values / three observers (o) ± SD

CRleft

1. 22.7 ±  6.0

 

2. 22.2 ±  6.5

22.2 ±  6.0

3. 21.7 ±  5.6

 

CRright

1. 21.9 ±  6.1

 

2. 21.4 ±  5.9

21.5 ±  6.0

3. 21.3 ±  6.0

 

SATRU

1. 2.8 ±  2.0

 

2. 2.4 ±  1.8

2.5 ±  2.0

3. 2.4 ±  2.1

 

SATRL

1. 3.1 ±  3.6

 

2. 3.0 ±  3.1

3.0 ±  3.2

3. 2.8 ±  3.0

 

HEleft

1. -15.0 ±  21.6

 

2. -14.6 ±  21.1

−14.9 ±  21.2

3. -15.1 ±  20.8

 

HEright

1. -13.3 ±  21.3

 

2. -14.0 ±  21.3

−13.6 ±  21.4

3. -13.4 ±  21.6

 

PO

1. 5.0 ±  3.5

 

2. 4.5 ±  3.0

4.7 ±  3.2

3. 4.6 ±  3.0

 

CRleft/right cervical rotation to left/right, SATRU anterior angle of trunk rotation upper part, SATRL anterior angle of trunk rotation lower part, PO pelvic oblique, HEleft/right hip extension on the left/right, SD standard deviation, (o) degrees

Discussion

Early detection of disorders in the musculoskeletal system makes it possible to implement appropriate prevention or treatment adapted to individual needs. It is particularly significant in children and youth who are in their development period. Individuals with SMA experience numerous disorders in the musculoskeletal system. A radiological examination is the basic method of assessment; however, there is a lack of other reliable tests to assess these disorders. The purpose of the present study was to assess the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of four tests which can be used to evaluate body posture and selected ranges of motion in SMA individuals.

The obtained results indicate that CR, SATR, HE and PO tests may be applied in the functional diagnostics of children and adolescents with SMA. It is difficult to refer the findings to other results as, to date, no studies have evaluated the reliability of similar tests in SMA patients. In the past, researchers revealed high reliability of a few functional scales and tests [14, 17, 18, 20, 21]. The reliability of the muscle strength test with the use of hand dynamometer was also assessed [22].

One of important aims of rehabilitation for individuals with SMA which are included in current recommendations is to prevent limitations in ranges of motion [13]. Two of the tests suggested in our study, i.e. CR and HE tests, are used to measure ranges of rotation in the cervical segment of the spine as well as hip extension.

Ranges of rotation in the cervical spine in SMA individuals have not been assessed by other researchers. The CR test provides a possibility to measure rotational mobility and detect compensation of scoliosis in the cervical spine. Asymmetric head position usually resulting from spinal deformities and improper pelvis position [7, 8] may lead to movement limitations in the cervical spine. Improper head position and limitation of rotational movements of the cervical spine may be one of the reasons for swallowing difficulties described in SMA patients [37].

Regular measurements of the range of hip extension are particularly significant for patients who undergo supported standing. Ranges of motion in hip joints in SMA subjects have been studied extensively. The measurements were most often performed with the use of goniometer [7, 10, 23]. Some researchers have indicated the necessity to assess mobility in limb joints and to implement stretching exercises in SMA patients due to frequent mobility limitations [8, 10, 13, 23].

Nobody has assessed the reliability of measurements of hip extension in SMA individuals. Van Dillen et al. [38] evaluated intra-rater reliability of the measurements of hip extension in a supine position with a knee bent at 80o with the use of goniometer in the group of 35 healthy individuals and obtained the value of ICC between 0.70 and 0.89. Pandya et al. [39] assessed reliability of the measurements of hip extension in the group of 105 boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The intra-rater reliability in this group was excellent and inter-rater reliability was good. In HE test, carried out in the same position but with the use of plurimeter, high level of both intraobserver and interobserver reliability were revealed.

A proper chest shape is one of the factors determining breathing. Deformities of the chest and improper pelvis position associated with scoliosis in SMA patients have been described in the literature. However, radiological assessment was the only diagnostic test applied in research [3, 8, 9, 10]. It is worth noting that an X-ray recommended in the case of clear symptoms of scoliosis is rarely recommended for early diagnosis of pelvic asymmetry or the first symptoms of chest deformity. The SATR and PO tests presented in this research provide such an opportunity.

The SATR test was proposed to assess deformities of the anterior part of the chest. An improper chest position is most commonly related to scoliosis, ribs deformity or an improper breathing mechanism. The SATR test makes it possible to assess chest deformity in individuals at various stages of functioning, which is particularly significant due to breathing disorders and frequent respiratory tract infections in SMA patients [4, 5, 6, 7, 11]. The biggest angle values in the test were noted in our study in patients with scoliosis. Therefore, the SATR test may be considered as one of the intermediary tests assessing spinal deformity.

Pelvic obliquity constitutes a serious problem in orthopaedic treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis [3, 7, 8, 12]. The PO test makes it possible to detect slight symptoms of an improper pelvis position and to implement early prevention procedures.

The tests presented in this paper provide an additional opportunity to perform an initial examination of a patient and to diagnose early disorders of the musculoskeletal system. They also make it possible to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic and treatment procedures. It may be expected that new ways pharmacological treatment will change a natural course of the disease. Therefore, it seems even more significant to implement new unified methods of functional assessment in clinical practice as they objectify treatment results and allow us to detect complications at an early stage. We believe that tests presented in our manuscript, useful in everyday practice, will be a clinical supplement to the radiological diagnostics.

The most significant limitation of this study was a short interval between the first and the second series of measurements. Carrying out the tests in a longer period was not possible for organizational reasons.

Conclusions

The CR, SATR, HE and PO tests are reliable and may be used for examining SMA patients. The tests provide an additional method in early diagnostic of some important aspects of the musculoskeletal system in order to plan physiotherapeutic procedures and to assess treatment effectiveness. It is significant to refer the values of these tests performed in the group of SMA patients to the values obtained from healthy individuals.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to all the participants and their parents for participating in the research. We want to express our gratitude to the SMA Foundation Poland for cooperation and help. We also thank to Ms. Iwona Skorupa MSc, PT and Ms. Magdalena Maciejewska MSc, PT for their significant contribution to the organization of the project.

Funding

The work (costs of translation) was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in 2017 as a research project of the University of Physical Education in Warsaw (DS-258).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

AS concept of the study, data collection, preparation of the manuscript. MJ concept of the study, critical review of the manuscript. KG data collection, preparation of the manuscript, review of references. WR preparation of the datasets, statistical analyzed and interpretation the patient data. JS data collection, review of references. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by Senate Ethics Committee of the University of Physical Education in Warsaw (SKE 01–03/2016).

Parents of all participants signed the consent form to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Lefebvre S, Buirglen L, Reboullet S, Clermont O, Burlet P, Viollet L, et al. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell. 1995;80:155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D’ Amico A, Mercuri E, D Tiziano F, Bertini E. Spinal muscular atrophy. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rodillo E, Marini ML, Heckmatt JZ, Dubowitz V. Scoliosis in spinal muscular atrophy: review of 63 cases. J Child Neurol. 1989;4:118–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter GT, Abresch RT, Fowler WM, Johnson ER, Kilmer DD, McDonald CM. Profiles of neuromuscular diseases. Spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;74(5):150–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robinson D, Galasko CS, Delaney C, Williamson JB, Barrie JL. Scoliosis and lung function in spinal muscular atrophy. Eur Spine J. 1995;4:268–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chng SY, Wong YQ, Hui JH, Wong HK, Ong HT, Goh DY. Pulmonary function and scoliosis in children with spinal muscular atrophy types II and III. J Paediatr Child Health. 2003;39:673–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang CH, Finkel RS, Bertini ES, Schroth M, Simonds A, Wong B, et al. Consensus statement for standard of Care in Spinal Muscular Atrophy. J Child Neurol. 2007;22:1027–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mullender MG, Blom NA, De Kleuver M, Fock JM, Hitters WM, Horemans AM, et al. A Dutch guideline for the treatment of scoliosis in neuromuscular disorders. Scoliosis. 2008;3:14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Canavese F, Sussman MD. Strategies of hip management in neuromuscular disorders: Duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, Charcot-Marie-tooth disease and arthrogryposis multiplex Congenita. Hip Int. 2009;19(6):46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fujak A, Kopschina C, Gras F, Forst R, Forst J. Contractures of the lower extremities in spinal muscular atrophy type II. Descriptive clinical study with retrospective data collection. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2011;13:27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hull J, Aniapravan R, Chan E, Chatwin M, Forton J, Gallagher J, et al. British Thoracic Society guideline for respiratory management of children with neuromuscular weakness. Thorax. 2012;67(1):1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fujak A, Raab W, Schuh A, Richter S, Forst R, Forst J. Natural course of scoliosis in proximal spinal muscular atrophy type II and IIIa: descriptive clinical study with retrospective data collection of 126 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mercuri E, Finkel RS, Muntoni F, Wirth B, Montes J, Main M, et al. Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: part 1: recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation orthopedic and nutritional care. Neuromuscul Disord. 2018;28(2):103–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iannaccone ST, Hynan LS. American spinal muscular atrophy randomized trials (AmSMART) group. Reliability of 4 outcome measures in pediatric spinal muscular atrophy. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(8):1130–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Main M, Kairon H, Mercuri E, Muntoni F. The Hammersmith functional motor scale for children with spinal muscular atrophy: a scale to test ability and monitor progress in children with limited ambulation. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2003;7:155–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barois A, Mayer M, Desguerre I, Chabrol B, Berard C, Cuisset JM, et al. Spinal muscular atrophy. A 4-year prospective, multicenter, longitudinal study (168 cases). Bull Acad Natl Med. 2005;189:1181–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nelson L, Owens H, Hynan LS, Iannaccone ST, AmSMART Group. The gross motor function measure is a valid and sensitive outcome measure for spinal muscular atrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2006;16:374–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mercuri E, Messina S, Battini R, Berardinelli A, Boffi P, Bono R, et al. Reliability of the Hammersmith functional motor scale for spinal muscular atrophy in a multicentric study. Neuromuscul Disord. 2006;16:93–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krosschell KJ, Maczulski JA, Crawford TO, Scott C, Swoboda KJ. A modified Hammersmith functional motor scale for use in multi-center research on spinal muscular atrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2006;16:417–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Finkel RS, Glanzman AM, Main M, Bertini E, Mercuri E. The CHOP INTEND: a reliable motor scale for infants with neuromuscular disease. Neuromuscul Disord. 2006;16:9–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dunaway YS, Montes J, Kramer SS, Marra J, Salazar R, Cruz R, et al. Six-minute walk test is reliable and valid in spinal muscular atrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2016;54(5):836–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Merlini L, Mazzone ES, Solari A, Morandi L. Reliability of hand-held dynamometry in spinal muscular atrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2002;26:64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang HY, Ju YH, Chen SM, Lo SK, Jong YJ. Joint range of motion limitations in children and young adults with spinal muscular atrophy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1689–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sporer SM, Smith BG. Hip dislocation in patients with spinal muscular atrophy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:10–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Birnkrant DJ, Bushby K, Bann CM, Alman BA, Apkon SD, Blackwell A, Case LE, et al. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 2: respiratory, cardiac, bone health, and orthopaedic management. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(4):347–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grivas TB, Vasiliadis ES, Koufopoulos G, Segos D, Triantafyllopoulos G, Mouzakis V. Study of trunk asymmetry in normal children and adolescents. Scoliosis. 2006;1:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Negrini S, Aulisa AG, Aulisa L, Circo AB, de Mauroy JC, Durmala J, et al. 2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis. 2012;7:3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Amendt LE, Ause-Ellias KL, Eybers JL, Wadsworth CT, Nielsen DH, Weinstein SL. Validity and reliability testing of the Scoliometer. Phys Ther. 1990;70(Suppl):108–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Korovessis PG. Scoliometer is useful instrument with high reliability and repeatability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(3):307–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bonagamba GH, Coelho DM, Oliveira A. Inter and intra-rater reliability of the scoliometer. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010;14(5):432–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Green S, Buchbinder R, Forbes A, Bellamy N. A standardized protocol for measurement of range of movement of the shoulder using the Plurimeter-V inclinometer and assessment of its intrarater and interrater reliability. Arthritis Care Res. 1998;11(1):43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Watson L, Balster SM, Finch C, Dalziel R. Measurement of scapula upward rotation: a reliable clinical procedure. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:599–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    De Groef A, Van Kampen M, Vervloesem N, Clabau E, Christiaens MR, Neven P, et al. Inter-rater reliability of shoulder measurements in middle-aged women. Physiotherapy. 2016;103(2):222–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry. 3th ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 2003.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):284–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    van den Engel-Hoek L, de Swart BJ, Erasmus CE, de Groot IJ. Is head balance a major determinant for swallowing problems in patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 2? J Child Neurol. 2008;23(8):919–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Van Dillen LR, McDonnell MK, Fleming DA, Sahrmann SA. Effect of knee and hip position on hip extension range of motion in individuals with and without low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30:307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pandya S, Florence JM, King WM, Robison JD, Oxman M, Province MA. Reliability of goniometric measurements in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Phys Ther. 1985;65(9):1339–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of RehabilitationJózef Piłsudski University of Physical EducationWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Neuromuscular UnitWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations