Advertisement

Avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity treated with the suture bridge technique: a case report

  • Tomonori Tetsunaga
  • Hirosuke Endo
  • Tomoko TetsunagaEmail author
  • Kazuki Yamada
  • Takayuki Furumatsu
  • Toshifumi Ozaki
Open Access
Case report
  • 111 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Orthopedics and biomechanics

Abstract

Background

In cases of avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity in which the bone fragments are substantially displaced, nonunion may cause pain in the ischial area. Various surgical procedures have been reported, but achieving sufficient fixation strength is difficult.

Case presentation

We treated a 12-year-old male track-and-field athlete with avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity by suture anchor fixation using the suture bridge technique. The boy felt pain in the left gluteal area while running. Radiography showed a left avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity with approximately 20-mm displacement. Union was not achieved by conservative non-weight-bearing therapy, and muscle weakness persisted; therefore, surgery was performed. A subgluteal approach was taken via a longitudinal incision in the buttocks, and the avulsed fragment was fixed with five biodegradable suture anchors using the suture bridge technique.

Conclusions

Although the majority of avulsion fractures of the ischial tuberosity can be treated conservatively, patients with excessive displacement require surgical treatment. The suture bridge technique provided secure fixation and enabled an early return to sports activities.

Keywords

Injury Ischial avulsion Surgical repair Suture bridge 

Abbreviations

CT

Computed tomography

MMT

Manual muscle testing

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

ROM

Range of motion

SLR

Straight leg raising

Background

Pelvic apophyseal avulsion fracture is a category that includes a few types of avulsion fractures. Avulsion fractures of the anterior inferior iliac spine, anterior superior iliac spine, and iliac crest are comparatively common, but avulsion fractures of the ischial tuberosity are rarely described in the literature [1]. However, this fracture is frequently observed in athletes during growth spurts. The underlying mechanism involves damage to the vulnerable epiphyseal plate before epiphyseal arrest, caused by sudden and forceful eccentric contraction of the hamstrings and is attributed to sprinting or jumping. Bone union must be achieved, and range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength should be restored before full return to sports activities. However, patients with substantial displacement, sciatic nerve complications, or nonunion after conservative treatment require surgical treatment with adequate fixation. We report a case in which suture anchor fixation using the suture bridge technique was applied for the treatment of avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity.

Case presentation

A 12-year-old boy presented with a left avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity. Informed consent was obtained from this patient and his family. The patient’s family history and previous medical history were unremarkable. The patient was a track-and-field athlete who felt severe pain in his left buttock while running. He visited a local hospital, where plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) of the pelvis showed an avulsion fracture of the left ischium (Fig. 1). The fragment was displaced 20 mm. No neurological deficit was present. Complete non-weight-bearing therapy was performed as a conservative treatment, but the patient’s symptoms continued, and he visited our hospital two months after injury. During the preoperative assessment, he complained of pain in the gluteal area during walking. The patient also described muscle weakness of the hamstrings, and straight leg raising (SLR) was limited to 80°/60°. The results of a blood test were all within normal ranges. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at two months postinjury revealed a displacement of approximately 20 mm, with fluid accumulation between the avulsed fragments (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

a Preoperative radiography reveals left ischial epiphyseal fracture. b CT shows 20 mm of displacement. c Anteroposterior preoperative three-dimensional CT (3D-CT). d Posteroanterior preoperative 3D-CT

Fig. 2

MRI two months postinjury reveals effusion at the area of epiphysiolysis and shows that the muscles have not been directly injured. a T1-weighted MRI. b T2-weighted short TI inversion recovery (STIR)

At eight weeks postinjury, we performed open reduction and anchor fixation because of non-union and displacement of the fragment after conservative therapy (Fig. 3). Following administration of general anesthesia, the patient was placed in a prone position. A 10-cm incision was made longitudinally around the ischial tuberosity, and subgluteal approach was used. The plane between the gluteus maximus and the hamstring muscles were divided. The inferior edge of the gluteus maximus was elevated to identify the ischial tuberosity. The avulsed fragment was distally displaced. The hamstrings were fully mobilized distally to reduce the avulsed fragment without excessive strain. Three suture anchors were placed in the exposed ischium (Fig. 3d). Two holes were drilled 1 cm distal to the proximal edge of the fragment, each in line with the distal suture anchors. Three drill holes were made through the avulsed fragment, taking into account the anchor locations. The fragment was reduced with the hip extended and the knee flexed and fixed with five biodegradable suture anchors (HEALIX ADVANCE 5.5; DePuy Synthes, Tokyo, Japan) using the suture bridge technique (Fig. 3e, f).
Fig. 3

a Surgery is performed with the patient in the prone position, with hips and knees slightly flexed. b A longitudinal skin incision is made around the ischial tuberosity. c A subgluteal approach from the inferior margin of the gluteus maximus (arrow head) is used to reach the fracture segments, exposing the ischial tuberosity (white arrow) and the displaced fragment (black arrow). d Three anchor holes are made in the area of epiphysiolysis. e, f The fragment is reduced (e) then fixed using the suture bridge technique (f)

A Snyder sling (Hashimoto Artificial Limb Manufacture Co., Okayama, Japan) was used to restrict knee movement to within 45° of flexion in postoperative week 3 and to within 10° of flexion in week 5, while passive assistive hamstring stretches were performed; then, active ROM exercises were started from week 6 (Fig. 4). The next day after surgery, he started non-weight-bearing walking with crutches. One-third weight-bearing was permitted from week 6, and full weight-bearing was permitted from week 8. Union was confirmed on radiography and CT in week 9 (Fig. 5), and the patient was therefore permitted to start jogging and gradually building up training with squats and jumps involving quick hamstring stretching. The patient returned to competitive athletics in week 13. At the final follow-up, no bilateral difference was evident in hip ROM, at 120°/120° flexion or 30°/30° internal rotation. The SLR test was 80°/80°, and no pain was experienced in the ischial tuberosity during jogging. The manual muscle testing (MMT) score was 5 for both the gluteus maximus and hamstring muscles. Assessment when the patient returned to competition found no restriction of hip joint ROM, and his visual analog pain score was zero. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) [2] at the final follow-up was 80 points (100%).
Fig. 4

The Snyder sling is used postoperatively to limit knee extension

Fig. 5

Postoperative imaging of the pelvis. a Plain radiography. b, c Postoperative CT

Discussion and conclusions

Since the first description by Berry in 1912 [3], avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity before epiphyseal arrest has been reported [1, 4, 5]. The mechanically vulnerable unfused apophysis can be injured as a result of traction force imposed by intense muscle contractions of the hamstrings during sports activities. This injury occurs most commonly during hurdles and high jump, possibly because of the eccentric contraction of the hamstrings when the leg is forced into hyperflexion of the hip with the knee fully extended [6, 7, 8].

Conservative treatment is the standard primary treatment modality for avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity [9, 10], but nonunion, fibrosis, overgrowth, buttock pain, and muscle weakness tend to occur [5, 11, 12, 13]. Avoca and Okay therefore reported that although patients with < 20 mm displacement might be successfully treated with conservative methods [14], surgical treatment is recommended if the displacement is ≥20 mm [15, 16]. Surgical treatment is also recommended for patients with sciatic nerve complications [17].

Wood et al. reported that a delay in surgical repair renders the repair more technically challenging, may increase the likelihood of sciatic nerve involvement, increases the need for postoperative bracing, and reduces postoperative outcomes in terms of hamstring strength and endurance [7]. In this case, we used a longitudinal incision. One disadvantage of the longitudinal incision is that this incision is cosmetically inferior to a transverse incision along the gluteal crease [4, 18]. However, the longitudinal incision enabled extension of the skin incision on demand, providing a good view for mobilization of the hamstrings. In addition, we did not expose the sciatic nerve in this case, avoiding the potential risk of sciatic nerve disturbance [8].

The surgical techniques reported previously include the use of a reconstruction plate, lag screws, and suture anchors [4, 19, 20, 21]. Kaneyama et al. reported the use of fixation with a cancellous screw and washer assembly [4]. Watts et al. attempted a minimally invasive surgical procedure involving percutaneous fixation using two cannulated cancellous screws but failed to reduce the fracture adequately [19]. Surgical techniques using suture anchors have recently been reported [21, 22, 23]. Biedert et al. reported the use of single-row suture anchor fixation in patients with displacement ≥20 mm, with a good final outcome [22]. However, they also reported that one patient needed operative revision one day after primary repair because of suture loosening. We consider that irrespective of whether screw fixation or suture anchor fixation is used, the shell-shaped avulsed fragment is difficult to fix using only one or two devices. An in vitro biomechanical analysis by Hamming et al. found that fixation with two anchors was mechanically insufficient and recommended fixing the avulsed fragment with five anchors [23]. This report appears to represent the first description of using the suture bridge technique with five suture anchors to treat avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity. The suture bridge technique is a rotator cuff repair technique that was first described by Park et al. in 2007 [24], with improved pressurized contact between the tendon and tuberosity compared with the double-row technique. In the present case, fixation using the suture bridge technique enabled stronger pressure between bone fragments over a wider area than that provided by simple suture anchor fixation.

The postoperative orthosis used in this case was a Snyder sling, a sling originally used to treat Perthes disease [25]. The Snyder sling is a variable angle brace, and we extended the knee in accordance with the state of hamstring stretching. We were thus able to gradually increase stretching stress on the hamstrings as bone union was achieved, eventually enabling a smooth return to sports activities. Skaara et al. reported that minor pain and limitations to activities of daily living were observed after surgical repair using the suture anchor technique, that isokinetic hamstring strength in the operated leg was significantly lower than that in the nonoperated leg and that a majority of patients did not trust the operated leg completely during physical activity [21]. In the present case in which the patient was treated with the suture bridge technique, the LEFS at the final follow-up was 100%. Although reports of surgical techniques and postoperative physical therapy for avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity are rare, good results may be achieved by combining good surgical therapy with aggressive physical therapy interventions to reduce stretching stress on the ischial tuberosity.

In conclusion, although the majority of avulsion fractures of the ischial tuberosity can be treated conservatively, patients with excessive displacement require surgical treatment. The suture bridge technique is a useful technique that provides sufficient strength for avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank American Journal Experts for English language editing.

Funding

This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI, Grant Number JP17K16691 (publication cost). The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data concerning the case are presented in the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

All the authors (TT1, HE, TT2, KY, TF and TO) took part in the conception and design of the study. TT1 and HE participated in the surgical and medical treatment. TT1, HE and TT2 contributed to manuscript drafting and interpretation of data. KY, TF and TO revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors (TT1, HE, TT2, KY, TF and TO) read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were part of the standard medical care, and the need for ethics approval and consent to participate was waived.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient and parent for the publication of this report and any accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Schuett DJ, Bomar JD, Pennock AT. Pelvic Apophyseal avulsion fractures: a retrospective review of 228 cases. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015;35:617–23.  https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0000000000000328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL. The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic rehabilitation research network. Phys Ther. 1999;79:371–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berry J. Fracture of the tuberosity of the ischium due to musclar action. JAMA. 1912;59:625–7.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaneyama S, Yoshida K, Matsushima S, Wakami T, Tsunoda M, Doita M. A surgical approach for an avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity: a case report. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:363–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wootton JR, Cross MJ, Holt KW. Avulsion of the ischial apophysis. The case for open reduction and internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:625–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller SL, Gill J, Webb GR. The proximal origin of the hamstrings and surrounding anatomy encountered during repair. A cadaveric study J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:44–8.  https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.F.00094.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wood DG, Packham I, Trikha SP, Linklater J. Avulsion of the proximal hamstring origin. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2365–74.  https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.00685.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saka G, Kucukdurmaz F, Saglam N, Akpinar F. A tuber ischium avulsion fracture treated with modified subgluteal approach: a case report. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46:403–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kujala UM, Orava S, Karpakka J, Leppavuori J, Mattila K. Ischial tuberosity apophysitis and avulsion among athletes. Int J Sports Med. 1997;18:149–55.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-972611.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milch H. Ischial apophysiolysis; a new syndrome. Clin Orthop. 1953;2:184–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin TA, Pipkin G. Treatment of avulsion of the ischial tuberosity. Clin Orthop. 1957;10:108–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pruner RA, Johnston CE 2nd. Avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity. Orthopedics. 1990;13:357–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rogge EA, Romano RL. Avulsion of the ischial apophysis. Clin Orthop. 1957;9:239–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Akova B. Okay E. avulsion of the ischial tuberosity in a young soccer player: six years follow-up. J Sports Sci Med. 2002;1:27–30.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boyd KT, Peirce NS, Batt ME. Common hip injuries in sport. Sports Med. 1997;24:273–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kujala UM, Orava S. Ischial apophysis injuries in athletes. Sports Med. 1993;16:290–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muscato M, Lim-Dunham J, Demos TC, Lomasney LM. Avulsion fracture of the apophysis of the ischial tuberosity. Orthopedics. 2001;24(1127):98–200.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miller SL, Webb GR. The proximal origin of the hamstrings and surrounding anatomy encountered during repair. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90 Suppl 2 Pt 1:108–116. doi:  https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.01281.
  19. 19.
    Watts CD, Hartzler RU, Cross WW. Open reduction and percutaneous fixation of a rare hamstring avulsion fracture. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2014-205256.
  20. 20.
    Gidwani S, Jagiello J, Bircher M. Avulsion fracture of the ischial tuberosity in adolescents--an easily missed diagnosis. BMJ. 2004;329:99–100.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7457.99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Skaara HE, Moksnes H, Frihagen F, Stuge B. Self-reported and performance-based functional outcomes after surgical repair of proximal hamstring avulsions. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2577–84.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513499518.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Biedert RM. Surgical management of traumatic avulsion of the ischial tuberosity in young athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2015;25:67–72.  https://doi.org/10.1097/jsm.0000000000000088.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hamming MG, Philippon MJ, Rasmussen MT, Ferro FP, Turnbull TL, Trindade CA, et al. Structural properties of the intact proximal hamstring origin and evaluation of varying avulsion repair techniques: an in vitro biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:721–8.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514560878.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park MC, ElAttrache NS, Tibone JE, Ahmad CS, Jun BJ, Lee TQ. Part I: footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007;16:461–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Snyder CH. A sling for use in Legg-Perthes disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1947;29:524–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsOkayama UniversityOkayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations