Advertisement

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

, 19:282 | Cite as

Effects of erythropoietin for precaution of steroid-induced femoral head necrosis in rats

  • Yong-Qing Yan
  • Qing-Jiang Pang
  • Ren-Jie Xu
Open Access
Research article
  • 233 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Orthopedics and biomechanics

Abstract

Background

Steroids such as glucocorticoid have been widely used for their excellent anti-inflammatory, anti-immune, and anti-shock properties. However, the long-term use in high doses has been found to cause necrosis of femoral head and other serious adverse reactions. Thus, it is of great importance to safely use these medications on patients without inducing bone necrosis.

Methods

In this preclinical study, we examined the effects of erythropoietin (EPO) to attenuate the induction of steroid-induced femoral bone necrosis using rats to build up the in-vivo models. Rats were randomly divided into three groups: negative control group (group A), disease group (group B), and EPO group (group C). 20 mg/kg methylprednisolone was administrated into group B and group C for 6 weeks with two intramuscular injections per week per rat. Group C was further given daily intraperitoneal injections of rHuEPO during this period. Group A received only injection of saline at the same schedule. 12 weeks after the initial drug administration, the rats’ femoral tissues were harvested for HE staining, immunohistochemistry studies for PECAM-1(also CD31) expression and Western Blotting for VEGF expression.

Results

Histology studies showed that compared with the disease group, EPO group had significant improvement and bone morphology being much closer to the negative control group. Immunohistochemical studies revealed that EPO group had statistically much more expression of PECAM-1 than the other groups did. Western Blot demonstrated that the EPO group had significantly higher VEGF expression than the disease group.

Conclusion

Results suggested that simultaneous injection of EPO could partially prevent steroid-induced ANFH.

Keywords

Erythropoietin Steroid Necrosis Rat Femoral head 

Abbreviations

ANFH

Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head

BMP

Bone Morphogenetic Protein

DAB

Diaminobenzidine

EPO

Erythropoietin

GC

Glucocorticoid

HE staining

Hematoxylin-Eosin Staining

HPF

High power Field

JAK-STAT

The Janus Kinase-Signal Transducer And Activator of Transcription

LSD

Least—Significant Difference

mTOR

The Mammalian Target of Rapamycin

NFATC1

Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells C1

one-way ANOVA

One-way Analysis of Variance

PAGE

Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis

PBS

Phosphate Buffered Saline

PECAM-1(also CD31)

Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule

PVDF

Polyvinylidene Fluoride

rHuEPO

Recombinant Human Erythropoietin

TNF-α

Tumor Necrosis Factor α

VEGF

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

MAPK

Mitogen Activated Protein Kinases

Background

Osteonecrosis is often observed in hips, knees, shoulders, and ankles, in which avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH) is the most common one. Approximately 80% of patients suffering from ANFH progress to a collapse of the femoral head, resulting in impaired hip joint function and permanent disability if did not receive appropriate treatments [1].

Glucocorticoid (GC) administration is the most common non-traumatic cause of ANFH [2]. About 25% of patients receiving hormone therapy would eventually develop osteonecrosis [3], therefore early prevention is of most importance. However, the exact pathogenesis remains to be fully elucidated. There are several hypotheses including fat embolization, intramedullary pressure changes, coagulation disorders, circulatory impairment and cell dysfunction and apoptosis [4, 5, 6]. Amongst these mechanisms, the vascular hypothesis, in which local microvascular impairment leads to a decrease in blood flow in the femoral head, has become more widely accepted [7, 8, 9, 10, 11].

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a glycoprotein excreted by the kidneys. Its main function is to stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of reticulocytes. Further studies proved that erythropoietin could also promote angiogenesis [12]. Studies have shown that erythropoietin is a multifunctional factor that exerts extensive protective effects in a variety of non-hematopoietic organs [13, 14, 15, 16], which can promote cell regeneration and vessel formation; resist inflammation, oxidation, and apoptosis; and accelerate vessel formation, cell proliferation, and cell protection [17, 18, 19]. Recently, erythropoietin has been reported to be capable of promoting bone healing [20]. To summarize, apoptosis of bone cells, microcirculation impairment and cell dysfunction could be possible mechanisms in ANFH. And EPO can inhibit cell apoptosis promoting angiogenesis and proliferation which might counteract side effect of GCs. Therefore, we hypothesize that EPO might have some positive effects on preventing steroid-induced ANFH.

Methods

Materials

Human erythropoietin (10,000 U, Shenyang Sunshine Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Shenyang, China); Goat polyclonal to PECAM-1 Antibody (1:50, Santa Cruz, CA, USA); Rabbit anti-sheep SP immunohistochemical staining kit and citrate antigen retrieval solution (pH 6.0) (Fuzhou Maixin Biotech. Co., Ltd., Fuzhou, China); Hematoxylin (Sigma, St. Louis, USA); PVDF membranes (Millipore Company, MA, USA); Polylysine solution (0.1%) and DAB Horseradish Peroxidase Color Development Kit (Beijing Golden Bridge Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China); Prestained Color Protein Molecular Weight Marker (Fermentas, Waltham, MA, USA); Tris-Hcl/SDS solutions (1.5 mM, pH 8.8; and 0.5 mM, pH 6.8, Sangon Biotechnology, Shanghai, China); Acrylamide/Bis solution (30%, Bio-Rad, California, USA); BeyoECL Plus kit, SDS-PAGE Sample Loading Buffer (5×), Western blot, IP cell lysates, PMSF together with BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China); Skim milk powder (Yili Group, Inner Mongolia, China); VEGF Antibody (Abcam, Cambridge Science Park, UK); β-actin Antibody, goat anti-Rabbit IgG-HRP, and goat anti-Mouse IgG-HRP (Bioworld, Minnesota, USA).

Eighteen SD male rats and eighteen SD female rats were supplied by Hangzhou hi-biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China).

Animal models

The adoption of 36 rats in this study was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and complied with NIH animal usage guidance. These eighteen male rats and eighteen female rats were randomly assigned into three groups (6 male rats and 6 female rats for each group) using a random number table: the negative control group, disease group, and EPO group. Methylprednisolone (20 mg/kg bodyweight) was muscularly intramuscularly injected into one of the hind legs of each rat from both group B and Group C twice a week for 6 weeks. Every rat from the Group C was further given a daily intraperitoneal injection of rHuEPO (500 u/d/kg-bodyweight) during these 6 weeks. The group A only received injection of saline at the same schedule. Rats were housed in cages together for 12 weeks (including 6 weeks after completing treatment) and had freely available food as well as water for the whole period.

The animals were sacrificed after 12 weeks. Under general anesthesia a lethal dose of pentobarbital (80 mg/kg BW) was injected. Femurs of both hind legs were dissected under sterile conditions and further investigations were conducted (72 femurs in total). Some harvested femoral tissues from each group were dehydrated accordingly and embedded in wax before being sliced into thin slices for HE stain (6 femurs for each group) and immunohistochemistry studies (12 femurs for each group). The rest samples (3 femurs for each group) were used for Western blot experiments.

Histological examination

Some tissue slices embedded in wax from each rat were de-waxed using xylene and then gradually re-hydrated using ethanol. The rehydrated tissue slices were stained for 8–10 min with 2% Hematoxylin solution and then for 1–2 min with 2% eosin solution. The stained tissue slices were dehydrated by ethanol. The dehydrated tissue slices were washed with xylene for three times before being blocked for observation under the microscope.

Immunohistochemistry

Some tissue slices embedded in wax from each rat were de-waxed using xylene and then gradually re-hydrated using ethanol. The re-hydrated tissue slices were washed with 0.3% H2O2 methanol solution and then with phosphate buffer. The resulting tissue slices were incubated in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) at 20 °C for 15 min. The slices were further incubated with rabbit anti-rat CD31 polyclonal antibodies according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Briefly, the incubation with the primary antibody was conducted at 4 °C for 16 h, and the following incubation with the secondary antibody was conducted at room temperature for 20 min. DAB Horseradish Peroxidase Color Development Kit was used to develop the coloring and Hematoxylin was used to stain the cell Nuclei. The negative control slices were treated with the same procedure mentioned above except that these samples were incubated with PBS instead of the primary antibody before being incubated with the secondary antibody. The stained tissue slices were dehydrated using ethanol. The dehydrated tissue slices were washed with xylene for three times before being blocked for observation under the microscope. Three different visual fields were randomly selected for each immunohistochemical slice under the magnification of 400× to count positive expression of blood vessels.

Western blot

Some harvested femoral heads were ground in a grinding mortar in the presence of liquid N2. After the liquid N2 evaporated from the mortar, 300 μL single detergent lysate (containing 3 μL PMSF) was added for further grinding at 4 °C for 30 min. The supernatant was sampled and stored at − 80 °C after the lysate was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Electrophoresis was performed for the collected supernatant samples using acrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gels in 15% PAGE gel electrophoresis. After the electrophoresis, the resulting PAGE gels were harvested and trimmed to strips according to the Marker. After the gel strips were washed with distilled water, wet transfer method was used for transferring separated proteins to PVDF transfer membranes. The resulting PVDF membranes were blocked through incubation in TBST containing 5% skim milk powder at room temperature for 2 h, followed by incubation with the primary antibodies at 4 °C for overnight and then the secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. TBST was used to wash the PVDF membranes three times (10 min each) before the PVDF membranes were incubated with BeyoECL Plus kit for 5 min. After the fluorescent bands became obvious, the excess substrate solution was blotted using filter paper. The PVDF membranes were covered with plastic wrap and then pressed with X-ray film before detection and visualization.

Statistical analysis

All numerical data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed with PASW Statistics for Windows18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), and differences between groups were tested with one-way ANOVA followed by Post hoc LSD method. A P value of < 0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference.

Results

Observation of HE staining results

Figure 1 showed the representative optical images of HE stained femoral head bone slices in the negative control group (group A), disease group (group B), and EPO group (group C). Group A: an integral circular or oval arched structure and high connectivity without osteoclasts, narrowed bone trabeculae, or fractures was observed in bony trabeculae of Fig. 1a and b. Group B: on contrast, bony trabeculae were obviously sparse, narrowed and fractured with decreased connectivity (Fig. 1c and d). The arch structure partially disappeared and became irregular in shape (marked with an arrow in Fig. 1c). Some cell nuclei had shrunken, dissolved or disappeared (marked with an arrow in Fig. 1d), while more osteoclasts were present. Group C: Fig. 1e and f clearly showed that there were significant improvements observed on the rats from the group C as compared with the group B (Fig. 1e and f). The bony trabeculae were relatively regular in shape. The connectivity was markedly superior to that in group B. Some bony trabeculae had become coarse. The fracture rate was obviously decreased, while connection and repair had occurred in the defects.
Fig. 1

Representative optical images of HE stained femoral head bone slices from rats in negative control group (a and b), disease group (c and d), and EPO group (e and f). Magnification 100× for (a, c and e) (scale bars 100 μm), and 250× for (b, d, and f) (scale bars 50 μm)

Immunohistochemical expression of PECAM-1

Figure 2a-c showed the representative images of immunohistochemical slices for rats in group A, B and C. Immunohistochemical staining for PECAM-1 was clearly and selectively present in the blood vessel endothelial cells. Positivity was indicated by the presence of yellow particles. In group A, PECAM-1expression was strong, and the blood supply of the femoral head was sufficient (Fig. 2a). The rats in group B (Fig. 2b) had statistically significantly lower blood vessel density in the femoral heads than those in the group A (p < 0.01, Fig. 2d, Table 1). However, the blood vessel density in the femoral heads of the rats receiving EPO injection was statistically significant higher than those of the group B (p < 0.05, Fig. 2c, Table 1).
Fig. 2

Representative optical images of immunohistochemical femoral head bone slice from rats (a, b and c) in negative control group (a), disease group (b), and EPO group (c); and the expression of CD31 in the femoral head bone determined from immunohistochemistry (d). Scale bar: 50 μm. * for p < 0.05, and ** for p < 0.01

Table 1

Immunohistochemistry results

 

Group A

Group B

Group C

counts/HPF (\( \overline{x}\pm s \))

26.83 ± 7.02

13.41 ± 4.27

17.28 ± 4.03

F

61.397

p

< 0.01

Multiple Comparison

Group A-B

Group B-C

Group A-C

p (LSD)

< 0.01**

0.03*

< 0.01

Expression of VEGF in western blot

Figure 3a revealed the expression of VEGF in the femoral heads for all three groups of rats determined by Western blot. The data was quantified and normalized according to the control protein of β-actin (Fig. 3b). The rats in group B had apparently less expression of VEGF in their femoral heads. The injection of methylprednisolone at 20 mg/kg bodyweight caused a statistically significant decrease on the secretion of VEGF in the Group B as compared with the group A (p < 0.05, Table 2). This observed decrease was rescued by the co-administration of rHuEPO at 500 u/d/kg-bodyweight (p < 0.05, Table 2). Indeed, the ratio of VEGF/β-actin for group C was slightly larger than that for the control group, although the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05, Table 2).
Fig. 3

The expression of VEGF in the femoral head bones harvested from all three groups of rats: Western blot images (a), and Intensity ratios of VEGF to β-actin shown in A (b). * for p < 0.05

Table 2

Western blotting results

 

Group A

Group B

Group C

VEGF/β-actin (\( \overline{x}\pm s \))

0.570 ± 0.022

0.446 ± 0.048

0.584 ± 0.005

F

7.025

p

0.027

Multiple Comparison

A-B

B-C

A-C

p (LSD)

0.022

0.014

0.742

Discussion

In this study, we successfully induced ANFH in the rats of disease group by intramuscularly injecting methylprednisolone. Obvious cell apoptosis and avascular necrosis were observed in the HE stained slices of disease group [21, 22], while results of EPO group resembled that of the negative control group.

Sufficient blood supply is reported critical for bone regeneration and skeletal tissue engineering [23]. Some scholars have revealed two main mechanisms, angiogenesis and vasculogenesis responsible for the formation of new blood vessels, also known as neovascularization [23]. Regarding EPO, both of these mechanisms might play roles in the present studies, which could promote bone regeneration via an improved microenvironment and nutrient supply [24]. In this study, the simultaneous injection of EPO clearly slowed down the progress of ANFH. There was evidenced with the observation on HE stained slices of femoral heads in the EPO group of rats. PECAM-1 is highly expressed in vascular endothelial cells, which was used in the immunohistochemical study to define the blood vessel density. The results revealed that the blood vessel density in the femoral heads of the disease group was significantly lower than those in the EPO group, while the results were similar in the control group and the EPO group. For disruption of bone blood supply and essential nutrient supply are the direct cause of femoral head necrosis [11], the effect could be inferred that EPO promotes neovascularization. Besides neovascularization, other mechanisms and signaling pathways may be involved in the protective function of EPO. Shiozawa et al. [25] reported EPO promoting the production of BMPs in hematopoietic stem cells by activating the Jak-Stat signaling pathways as well as enhancing bone formation by activating mesenchymal cells to osteoblasts. Kim [26] found that EPO increased the osteoclast numbers and decreased the bone resorption activity in model by increasing the expression of NFATc1 while decreasing cathepsin K expression in mTOR signaling pathway. Hu et al. [27] discovered EPO could inhibit p38MAPK, reduce the TNF-α level, alleviate the inflammatory injury, and alleviate inhibit apoptosis.

Reducing the cell apoptosis, restoring the bone blood supply and nutrient supply are essential in successful treatment or management of ANFH [28, 29]. VEGF is an angiogenic factor which has a critical role in bone formation and bone healing [30]. In addition to angiogenesis, studies indicated that VEGF and endothelial cells induces osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells [31]. In this work, the disease group had apparently less expression of VEGF in their femoral heads, which matches other researchers’ results. Li et al.[10] found that dexamethasone, could reduce the synthesis of VEGF protein by inhibiting the bone marrow multipotent cell. Recent studies have proved that VEGF may play a role in bone formation and bone repair [32]. Based on the reports of this study and other scholars, we speculate the possible mechanisms including: (1) EPO increases VEGF expressions and formation of blood vessels, which leads to promoting bone formation and osteoblast differentiation; (2) Besides, EPO might perform osteogenic action and inhibit apoptosis mediated via multiple signaling pathway, which is based on reports of other scholars and remains to be further researched.

Reports questioning the promoting functional effects of EPO in bone have also been published [33]. Despite the controversy of how EPO affects bone tissue, most scholars hold the view that the effect of EPO on bone tissue is site specific and dose-dependent [34]. So in this research, 20 IU/mL EPO was applied, which was demonstrated effective both in vivo and vitro [35].

Conclusions

In summary, this study suggested the use of rHuEPO at the same time with steroid has achieved a certain precaution effect for steroid-induced ANFH. However, its long-term effect and preventive mechanism require further research and observation.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Medjaden Bioscience and Dr. Lloyd Luo from Siena University Hospital, Italy offered help in translating and improving.

Funding

This study was financially supported by Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY12H06002); Ningbo Clinical Key Specialty (Project No: 2013–88) and Ningbo Natural Science Foundation (2013A610255), Suzhou Science and Technology Development Plan (SYSD2010146), and Young medical key talent of Jiangsu Province (QNRC2016242).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

YQY, QJP and RJX conceived and designed the research. YQY and RJX performed the experiments, collected data and conducted research. YQY, QJP and RJX analyzed and interpreted data. YQY wrote the initial manuscript. YQY, QJP and RJX revised the manuscript. RJX was primarily responsible for the final content. All authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal welfare and experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and were approved by the animal ethics committee of Suzhou Municipal Hospital.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None of the authors associated with this study have any conflicts of interest to report.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Kuroda Y, Matsuda S, Akiyama H. Joint-preserving regenerative therapy for patients with early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Inflammation & Regeneration. 2016;36(1):1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang G, Wei Y, Zhao G, Xia J, Wang S, Wu J, Chen F, Chen J, Shi J. Microarray-based screening of differentially expressed genes in glucocorticoid-induced avascular necrosis. Mol Med Rep. 2017;15(6):3583–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mont MA, Hungerford DS. Non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(3):459–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calder JD, Buttery L, Revell PA, Pearse M, Polak JM. Apoptosis--a significant cause of bone cell death in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(8):1209–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bekler H, Uygur AM, Gökçe A, Beyzadeoğlu T. The effect of steroid use on the pathogenesis of avascular necrosis of the femoral head: an animal model. Acta Orthop Traumato. 2007;41(1):58–63.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moriishi T, Maruyama Z, Fukuyama R, Ito M, Miyazaki T, Kitaura H, Ohnishi H, Furuichi T, Kawai Y, Masuyama R, et al. Overexpression of Bcl2 in osteoblasts inhibits osteoblast differentiation and induces osteocyte apoptosis. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27487.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lafforgue P. Pathophysiology and natural history of avascular necrosis of bone. Joint Bone Spine. 2006;73(5):500–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Samara S, Dailiana Z, Chassanidis C, Koromila T, Papatheodorou L, Malizos KN, Kollia P. Expression profile of osteoprotegerin, RANK and RANKL genes in the femoral head of patients with avascular necrosis. Exp Mol Pathol. 2014;96(1):9–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feng Y, Yang S, Xiao B, Xu W, Ye S, Xia T, Zheng D, Liu X, Liao Y. Decreased in the number and function of circulation endothelial progenitor cells in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head. BONE. 2010;46(1):32–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li J, Fan L, Yu Z, Dang X, Wang K. The effect of deferoxamine on angiogenesis and bone repair in steroid-induced osteonecrosis of rabbit femoral heads. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2015;240(2):273–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Powell C, Chang C, Naguwa SM, Cheema G, Gershwin ME. Steroid induced osteonecrosis: an analysis of steroid dosing risk. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9(11):721–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ribatti D, Presta M, Vacca A, Ria R, Giuliani R, Dell'Era P, Nico B, Roncali L, Dammacco F. Human erythropoietin induces a pro-angiogenic phenotype in cultured endothelial cells and stimulates neovascularization in vivo. BLOOD. 1999;93(8):2627–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D'Andrea AD, Lodish HF, Wong GG. Expression cloning of the murine erythropoietin receptor. CELL. 1989;57(2):277–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Erbayraktar S, Yilmaz O, Gokmen N, Brines M. Erythropoietin is a multifunctional tissue-protective cytokine. Curr Hematol Rep. 2003;2(6):465–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brines ML, Ghezzi P, Keenan S, Agnello D, de Lanerolle NC, Cerami C, Itri LM, Cerami A. Erythropoietin crosses the blood-brain barrier to protect against experimental brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(19):10526–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Celik M, Gökmen N, Erbayraktar S, Akhisaroglu M, Konakc S, Ulukus C, Genc S, Genc K, Sagiroglu E, Cerami A. Erythropoietin prevents motor neuron apoptosis and neurologic disability in experimental spinal cord ischemic injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(4):2258–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Westenfelder C, Biddle DL, Baranowski RL. Human, rat, and mouse kidney cells express functional erythropoietin receptors. Kidney Int. 1999;55(3):808–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ogilvie M, Yu X, Nicolas-Metral V, Pulido SM, Liu C, Ruegg UT, Noguchi CT. Erythropoietin stimulates proliferation and interferes with differentiation of myoblasts. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(50):39754–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Juul SE, Ledbetter DJ, Joyce AE, Dame C, Christensen RD, Zhao Y, DeMarco V. Erythropoietin acts as a trophic factor in neonatal rat intestine. GUT. 2001;49(2):182–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holstein JH, Menger MD, Scheuer C, Meier C, Culemann U, Wirbel RJ, Garcia P, Pohlemann T. Erythropoietin (EPO): EPO-receptor signaling improves early endochondral ossification and mechanical strength in fracture healing. Life Sci. 2007;80(10):893–900.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xi H, Tao W, Jian Z, Sun X, Gong X, Huang L, Dong T. Levodopa attenuates cellular apoptosis in steroid-associated necrosis of the femoral head. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13(1):69–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mutijima E, De MV, Deprez M, Malaise M, Hauzeur JP. The apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes in femoral head osteonecrosis: its specificity and its distribution. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(12):1791–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hankenson KD, Dishowitz M, Gray C, Schenker M. Angiogenesis in Bone Regeneration. Injury. 2011;42(6):556–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Joshi D, Tsui J, Ho TK, Selvakumar S, Abraham DJ, Baker DM. Review of the role of erythropoietin in critical leg ischemia. Angiology. 2010;61(6):541–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shiozawa Y, Jung Y, Ziegler AM, Pedersen EA, Wang J, Wang Z, Song J, Wang J, Lee CH, Sud S, et al. Erythropoietin couples hematopoiesis with bone formation. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10853.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim J, Jung Y, Sun H, Joseph J, Mishra A, Shiozawa Y, Wang J, Krebsbach PH, Taichman RS. Erythropoietin mediated bone formation is regulated by mTOR signaling. J Cell Biochem. 2012;113(1):220–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hu L, Yang C, Zhao T, Xu M, Tang Q, Yang B, Rong R, Zhu T. Erythropoietin ameliorates renal ischemia and reperfusion injury via inhibiting tubulointerstitial inflammation. J Surg Res. 2012;176(1):260–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weinstein RS. Glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis. Endocrine. 2012;91(4):225–43.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Assouline-Dayan Y, Chang C, Greenspan A, Shoenfeld Y, Gershwin ME. Pathogenesis and natural history of osteonecrosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2002;32(2):94–124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carlevaro MF, Cermelli S, Cancedda R, Cancedda FD. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in cartilage neovascularization and chondrocyte differentiation: auto-paracrine role during endochondral bone formation. J Cell Sci. 2000;113(1):59–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zheng LZ, Cao HJ, Chen SH, Tang T, Fu WM, Huang L, Chow DHK, Wang YX, Griffith JF, He W. Blockage of Src by specific siRNA as a novel therapeutic strategy to prevent destructive repair in steroid-associated osteonecrosis in rabbits. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(11):2044–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hu K, Olsen BR. Osteoblast-derived VEGF regulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation during bone repair. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(2):509.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Singbrant S, Russell MR, Jovic T, Liddicoat B, Izon DJ, Purton LE, Sims NA, Martin TJ, Sankaran VG, Walkley CR. Erythropoietin couples erythropoiesis, B-lymphopoiesis, and bone homeostasis within the bone marrow microenvironment. Blood. 2011;117(21):5631–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shiozawa Y, Taichman RS. Bone: elucidating which cell erythropoietin targets in bone. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11(5):263–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    JH R. The effect of erythropoietin on bone. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2014;85(353):1–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics, Ningbo No.2 HospitalZhejiangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of OrthopaedicsSuzhou Municipal Hospital/The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversitySuzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital, Orthopaedic InstituteSoochow UniversitySuzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations