The global burden of premature mortality due to the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) using standard expected years of life lost, 2012 to 2019
It has been 8 years since the first case of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was reported in Saudi Arabia and the disease is still being reported in 27 countries; however, there is no international study to estimate the overall burden related of this emerging infectious disease. The present study was conducted to assess the burden of premature mortality due to Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) worldwide.
In this retrospective analysis, we have utilized publicly available data from the WHO website related to 1789 MERS patients reported between September 23, 2012 and May 17, 2019. To calculate the standard expected years of life lost (SEYLL), life expectancy at birth was set according to the 2000 global burden of disease study on levels 25 and 26 of West model life tables from Coale-Demeny at 82.5 and 80 years for females and males, respectively.
Overall, the total SEYLL in males and females was 10,702 and 3817.5 years, respectively. The MERS patients within the age range of 30–59 year-olds had the highest SEYLL (8305.5 years) in comparison to the patients within the age groups 0–29 (SEYLL = 3744.5 years) and ≥ 60 years (SEYLL = 2466.5 years). The total SEYLL in all age groups in 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 were 71.5, 2006.5, 3162, 4425.5, 1809.5, 878, 1257.5 and 909 years, respectively. The most SEYLL related to MERS-CoV infection was in the early four years of the onset of the pandemic (2012 to 2015) and in the last four years of the MERS-CoV pandemic (216 to 2019), a significant reduction was observed in the SEYLL related to MERS-CoV infection in the MERS patients.
We believe that the findings of this study will shed light about the burden of premature mortality due to MERS infection in the world and the results may provide necessary information for policy-makers to prevent, control, and make a quick response to the outbreak of MERS-CoV disease.
KeywordsStandard expected years of life Premature mortality Burden of disease Worldwide
Percentage of case fatality rate
the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus
Severe acute respiratory syndrome
United Arab Emirates
World Health Organization
Various indexes of premature death are proposed according to years of life lost. Standard expected years of life lost (SEYLL) is a valid measure that is widely used for prioritizing and identifying the causes of premature death [1, 2]. The SEYLL as one component of the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) is used to emphasize premature mortality by estimating the average years a person would have lived if he or she had not died prematurely [3, 4].
In order to determine and estimate the relative importance of the different causes of death and the extent of public health problems, other epidemiological mortality indexes such as percentage of case fatality rate (CFR%), disease or cause-specific mortality rate, and proportionate mortality are used frequently . Despite their usefulness, they often fail to calculate the overall burden of premature mortality related to a common and rare disease in certain populations .
The SEYLL approach has been used by most of the studies about the burden of the disease up to now [1, 7, 8], but to the best of our knowledge, previous studies have neglected or had not estimated the burden of premature mortality for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection. In the last decade, we have seen the emergence of coronaviruses, which are responsible for acute respiratory infections with a high mortality rate .
MERS-CoV is an emerging novel beta coronavirus belonging to lineage C and the first case of this infection was reported in 2012 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia [10, 11]. Since then, 27 countries were affected by MERS-CoV and have reported MERS cases to the world health organization (WHO) [9, 12].
Policy-makers face the challenge over-controlling and preventing the disease, since all of the decisions must be made according to summary indexes that quantify the burden of disease at the population level including SEYLL. Furthermore, previous studies on burden of premature mortality [1, 8, 13, 14] based on SEYLL were mostly from a single population. In the present study, in addition to recalling the importance of using SEYLL to estimate the burden of premature mortality for emerging diseases, we for first time present the estimates of the global burden of premature mortality in laboratory-confirmed MERS-CoV cases.
We retrieved the data related to laboratory-confirmed MERS-CoV cases from September 23, 2012 until May 17, 2019 for this retrospective analysis from the disease outbreak news in the WHO website:(http://www.who.int/csr/don/archive/disease/coronavirus_infections/en/). The WHO received all the case reports (describing details case-by-case) of MERS-CoV in a narrative format on behalf of the national-international health regulation focal point of 27 countries of the world. Data will be updated periodically on the mortality and the incidence of the MERS cases. We have retrieved the main epidemiologic information of each MERS patient.
Sample characteristics and distribution of deaths among 1789 MERS patients, September 23, 2012 until May 17, 2019
(n = 1789)
(n = 588)
(n = 1201)
United Arab Emirates
Republic of Korea
Exposure with a morbid case in the previous 14 days
Exposure to a camel in 14 days ago
Travel history to an endemic country
Admission in hospital
Need for admission in negative.
pressure isolate room or ICU
Health care personnel
For the present study, data related to a total of 1789 MERS cases (1517 from Saudi Arabia, 87 from United Arab Emirates, 57 from Republic of Korea, 25 from Oman, 26 from Jordan, 26 from Qatar, and 51 from other 21 countries) including 558 deaths (the overall %CFR of the pandemics with MERS-CoV was 31.1% [558/1789]) with complete data were used in the analysis. The %CFR for 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 were 55.5% [5/9], 61.0% [72/118], 50.2% [96/191], 32.7% [193/590], 39.4% [77/195], 18.6% [43/230], 30.3% [62/305], and 26.4% [40/151], respectively.
The descriptive results on demographic characteristics of the population can be found in Table 1. The MERS patients had a mean age of 50.6 (±S.D. 18.4 years), with an age range of between 2 and 109 years. Most of the global MERS cases were within the age range of 20–79 years old (92.8% [1661/1789]). Males (72.4% [1295/1789]) seem to be more affected than females (27.6% [494/1789]). About 83.2% [1488/1789] MERS cases were admitted to hospital and among them, 64% [1145/1789] needed admission in negative pressure isolate room or ICU. Also, 60.8% [1088/1789] MERS cases had one or more comorbidity (p > 0.05 for all).
Distribution of deaths and SEYLL among 588 MERS cases by age groups and year (September 23, 2012 until May 17, 2019)
Age Groups (year)
0–29 yr (n = 65)
30–59 yr (n = 242)
≥60 yr (n = 281)
n = 5
n = 72
n = 96
n = 193
n = 77
n = 43
n = 62
n = 40
n = 588
As noted in some of the previous articles [6, 13, 16, 17], the estimation of the SEYLL not only plays an important role in the evaluation of the extent of public health problems, but also in estimating the social and economic loss. Indeed, the commonly used SEYLL enables the severity of the specific infection and also the relative importance of the different causes of death to be determined. The results of this study indicate that after 8 years since the start of MERS-CoV pandemic, the overall %CFR associated with it is still high (31.1%). Perhaps one of the reasons for this is the lack of a vaccine or specific treatment for fighting against this infection till now and all treatments are supportive and often they are based on the patient’s clinical condition.
Our finding shows that 60.8% of MERS patients had one or more comorbidity. Most of the previously published studies of MERS-CoV declared that comorbidities could have a substantial impact on MERS prognosis and severity of disease [12, 18, 19, 20]. Until more is understood about MERS-CoV infection, we believe that patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and end-stage renal diseases should be considered at a higher risk for MERS-CoV infection and in the triage, these patients seem to be prioritized for treatment.
The available data indicates that in all age groups, male MERS cases had a higher SEYLL (10,702 years) in comparison to the female MERS cases (3817.5 years). Previous research has demonstrated a significant difference in mortality related to MERS between men and women [9, 21].. In line with our finding, Maniecka-Bryla et al. found that men diagnosed with the respiratory system disease in comparison to women had a higher SEYLL . We would like the SEYLL to decrease over time; however, with a bird’s-eye view to Fig. 1, this pattern is changing since mid-2018 and the burden of MERS-CoV infection in MERS patients has begun to increase in women. For the men at the same time, the downward trend of SEYLL associated with MERS-CoV infection had continued. The findings in the current study can be considered as a warning to public health authorities.
We also found that MERS patients within the age group 30–59 year-olds had the highest SEYLL (8305.5 years) in comparison to those in age groups 0–29 (SEYLL = 3744.5 years) and ≥ 60 years (SEYLL = 2466.5 years). This important issue that individuals in active age of their life had the highest SEYLL should be considered by health policy-makers in implementation of appropriate prevention and control measures to reduce the burden of premature mortality due to MERS CoV in the affected populations. Furthermore, the values of SEYLL indicate that diseases of the respiratory system play an important socio-economic role in the health status of the population worldwide.
According to the data (Fig. 1), the trend of SEYLL by year and sex in all involved countries in the world from September 23, 2012 to May 17, 2019 has decreased. It is apparent that the SEYLL values were higher in men than women for all years of the study. Overall, the highest SEYLL related to MERS-CoV infection was in the early four years of the onset of the infection (2012 to 2015) and then in mid-2015 the SEYLL in MERS cases declined rapidly and in the last four years of the MERS-CoV pandemic (216 to 2019), there has been a significant reduction in the burden of mortality related to MERS-CoV infection in morbid cases. In the literature review, we did not find any studies comparing these indices, however, this pattern was also reported during the epidemic of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) [23, 24]. The remarkable reduction in the burden of premature mortality due to MERS-CoV indicates the technical guidance on surveillance of MERS patients, also suggests standardized approach and activities for health care providers to control and prevent MERS-CoV in involved countries. Although, these measures by WHO and other related national and international organizations should continue.
The current study suffered from some limitations. Of the total cases worldwide (Since September 2012, WHO has been notified of 2449 laboratory-confirmed cases of infection with MERS-CoV.), only the details of 1789 cases were investigated in the current study. It should be noted that of 186 MERS-CoV cases in the Republic of Korea, only details related to 57 cases were published in the disease outbreak news on the WHO website. The lack of complete details for all MERS cases potentially increases the occurrence of the selection and measurement bias in the results. Another limitation of this study is choosing a life expectancy for the SEYLL measure. This index does not take into account the biological and genetic differences between men and women.
In the future, we may assess the burden of premature mortality due to the MERS-CoV infections globally to better understand the risks of this new infection for public health and also to provide a helpful recommendation for controlling and preventing it. Recommendations might change and be updated as the additional data becomes available. Indeed, despite the above limitations, such studies might be useful to implement the educational programs, to access the health care and early awareness of changes in the pattern of this relatively new infection, to reduce the higher mortality rates not only for MERS-CoV but also for the other emerging pathogens in the worldwide.
The analysis of SEYLL related to MERS infection in the current study presents this important issue that the loss resulting from the premature mortality has social and economic implications. These findings are also useful for policy-makers because the infection prevention and control measures are critical to prevent the possible spread of MERS-CoV infection in the affected communities.
The authors take this opportunity to thank all the WHO personnel as well as reporting countries with confirmed MERS cases for data collection and sending the data to WHO. This paper on behalf of Jamal Ahmadzadeh is dedicated to Kazhal Mobaraki for her sincerity and honesty in behavior, and for her endeavor in motivating me to do the research.
Conceived, development, and design of methodology in the study: JA and MS. Helped to data collection: JA, SS, and KM. Analyzed and interpretation of data: JA, KM, and SS. Wrote the paper: JA, KM,SS and MS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
As an epidemiological analysis of WHO data, this study did not need financial support.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable [Based on a statement declared by the University of Sheffield, the research ethics approval not required for a project which will only use publicly available anonymized data obtained from large national data sets. URL: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.86061!/file/ethics_FAQ.pdf].
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 2.Yen EY, Singh RR. CS-32 SLE-YPLL (years of potential life lost) as a measure of relative burden of premature mortality. In: Arch Dis Child. 2018.Google Scholar
- 3.Marshall R. Standard expected years of life lost as a measure of disease burden: an investigation of its presentation, meaning and interpretation. Handbook Dis Burdens Qual Life Measures. 2010:401–13.Google Scholar
- 5.Gordis L: Chapter 4: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease: Mortality In: Epidemiology. 4th edn. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2008: 42–45.Google Scholar
- 6.Mobaraki K, Ahmadzadeh J. The comparison trend of suicide in Hamadan province in 2006 to 2010: a death registry system-based study. J Urmia Univ Med Sci. 2019;30(1):41–8.Google Scholar
- 11.Widjaja I, Wang C, van Haperen R, Gutiérrez-Álvarez J, van Dieren B, Okba NM, Raj VS, Li W, Fernandez-Delgado R, Grosveld F. Towards a solution to MERS: protective human monoclonal antibodies targeting different domains and functions of the MERS-coronavirus spike glycoprotein. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8(1):516–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Murray CJ, Lopez AD, Organization WH: The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020: summary. 1996.Google Scholar
- 16.Aghazadeh-Attari J, EntezarMahdi R, Ahmadzadeh J, Mobaraki K, Mansorian B, Karimi H, Mirghaffarzadeh S, Hajimohammadian M, Mohebbi I. The Burden of Premature Mortality Related to Suicide in West Azerbaijan From 2014 to 2016. Crisis. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000581.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.