Advertisement

BMC Public Health

, 19:460 | Cite as

Religious affiliation and major depressive episode in older adults: a cross-sectional study in six low- and middle- income countries

  • Julian A. Fernández-Niño
  • Ietza BojorquezEmail author
  • Carolina Becerra-Arias
  • Claudia I. Astudillo-Garcia
Open Access
Research article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Global health

Abstract

Background

The relationship of religious affiliation and mental health is complex, and being part of a minority religious group could have negative effects on mental health. In this study, we assessed the association between religious affiliation and major depressive episode (MDE) in older adults (> = 60 years) from China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia and South Africa.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Study on global Ageing and adult health (SAGE), with six nationally-representative community-based samples (n = 21,410). Religious affiliation was self-reported by participants, and we defined MDE based on ICD-10 classification. We estimated the association of MDE with religious affiliation versus no religious affiliation, and minority versus majority affiliation.

Results

We observed no association between having a religious affiliation (vs. no affiliation) and the odds of MDE in older adults. In most cases minorities had higher odds of MDE as compared with the majority religion, but the associations were only significant for Muslims in Ghana and for Muslims, Hindus and Other in South Africa.

Conclusions

While the results were significant only for two countries, we observed higher odds of MDE among minorities in most of them. Older adults who are members of religious minorities might be at risk for mental health problems, and there is a need for public health interventions aimed at them.

Keywords

Religion Major depressive episode Depression Older adults Minority groups 

Abbreviations

MDE

Major depressive episode

RA

Religious affiliation

SAGE

Study on global Ageing and adult health

WHODAS

World Health Organization’s Disability Assessment Schedule

Background

A major depressive episode (MDE) is characterized by a combination of depressive symptoms and significant distress or impairment in social life [1]. MDE is the defining component of major depressive disorder, a mental health problem that affects 10–20% of older adults worldwide [2], was the fourth cause of years lived with disability (YLD) for this age group in 2017 [3], and is a growing public health issue in low- and middle-income countries [4]. While MDE and other types of depressive symptoms are not in themselves enough to define a psychiatric disorder such as major depressive disorder, they are part of a range of conditions that impact on well-being. In older adults, MDE increases the risk of suicidal ideation, suicide attempt and suicide [5, 6]. Older adults with depressive symptoms also have a poorer prognosis in other chronic pathologies [7] and increased disability [8].

The etiology of major depressive disorder includes the interactions of diverse biological, psychological and social factors [9], of which religion can be one. Various studies have found inverse associations between religion and depression, with participants reporting a religious affiliation, being involved in church-related activities and with stronger religious beliefs generally having better mental health indicators [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. On the other hand, aging is accompanied by several significant changes such as widowhood and retirement, and social networks tend to decrease over time. Religious affiliation and beliefs could be particularly important to face these social stressors and relevant life changes at this age [15]. In older adults, religion has been associated with better quality of life [16] and lower risk of depression [17, 18, 19, 20].

However, the relationship between religion and depression is complex, with differing associations depending on which indicator of religious involvement is measured. As an example, in one study feeling that one received guidance from religion was associated with lower odds of developing depression, but religious attendance was not [11]. Other studies found that attendance was inversely associated with depression [21, 22]. By contrast, positive associations between religion and depressive symptoms have also been reported [13, 23, 24, 25], and also U-shaped associations between organizational religious activity and depressive symptoms, and between private religious involvement and depressive symptoms [26]. Still others have failed to find an association between religion-related beliefs and behaviors and depression [21, 27]. It has also been reported that religion-related aspects have a different association with depressive symptoms, depending on the specific religious affiliation (including no affiliation) of individuals [28].

The potential protective effect of religion on mental health might be due to an increase in social networks and social contact through participation in church activities [9], and to the sense of transcendence associated with religious beliefs [14]. On the other hand, a possible explanation for the findings of a positive association between religion and depressive symptoms could be that religious affiliation can also be accompanied by conflict, either with the family or with the larger society, resulting in stress and depressive symptoms [29, 30].

One religion-related aspect that might be associated with mental health is the experience of being a member of a religious minority (defined as a religion with less members than others in a given country) [31] The health of minorities (by national origin, sexual orientation, ethnicity, etc.) can be affected by stigma, discrimination and outright violence [32, 33], and discrimination has well known negative effects on mental health [34, 35], making discrimination a source of health inequity. Religion and ethnicity can also be conflated, minority groups can be marginalized for both reasons, and ethnic conflict can be intertwined with religious conflict [36, 37]. Thus, religious minority members can experience open or covert discrimination and even physical violence, but the study of the health effects of being a minority religion member is relatively recent [33]. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies of the association of minority religion membership and MDE in older adults, but one survey in this age group in China found that Christians (a religious minority) had higher odds of suicide attempt in the past 12 months, as compared with those without a religious affiliation (Buddhist and Muslim affiliations had no association with suicide attempt) [38]. Similarly, a study of adolescents in Pakistan reported that religious minority members had more depressive symptoms [39] and lower self-esteem [40] than members of the majority religion. On the other hand, a study with data of 10 Catholic-majority countries found that minority religion members that were actively engaged with their religious tradition had better mental health than those who weren’t, but when Catholics represented 90% or more of the population, the opposite was true [33]. Exploring the associations between minority religious affiliation and mental health in a diversity of settings is important to increase our understanding of these relationships.

In this article, we investigate the association between religious affiliation (RA) and MDE in older adults in six lower- and middle-income countries: China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia and South Africa. The countries were part of the Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE), and together they represent a variety of politic and economic contexts, and are also diverse in terms of the current state and historical evolution of religious faiths. In China, the majority of the population declare having no religious affiliation. There are no major inter-faith conflicts, but Tibetan Buddhists and Muslim groups have clashed with the government. In Ghana, Christians are the religious majority, and there are some tensions between them and the Muslim minority. In India, the relationship between the Hindu majority and Muslims has been difficult and even violent at some points, and Muslims have been victims of discrimination by the government. In Mexico, the relationship between members of the Catholic majority and religious minorities (mainly Evangelical Christian) is mostly peaceful, with some violent conflicts over land ownership between Catholics and Evangelical Christian groups in rural areas. In Russia, since the end of the Soviet Union, Orthodox Christianism returned to a prominent position as the main religion in the country. Finally, in South Africa Christianism is the majority religion, with few interfaith conflicts in the recent past.

The objectives of this analysis were: 1) To explore the association between RA and MDE, with the hypothesis that having a RA, versus having no RA, would be protective for mental health; 2) To explore the association between minority RA and MDE, with the hypothesis that having a minority RA, versus having a majority RA, would be a risk factor for mental health problems.

Methods

Sample and data collection

Data came from the first wave of SAGE, conducted in 2007–2010, with a sample of 34,124 participants 50 years old or older, and 8340 participants between 18 and 49 years old. The study included six low- and middle-income countries: China, Ghana, India, Mexico, the Russian Federation and South Africa. In this article, we analyze data from older adult participants (aged 60 or older [41]) (n = 21,410). The SAGE sampling design included various sampling stages, and was stratified, designed to be representative at the national level for each country included. The ultimate sampling unit were households. All household members aged 50 years or older, and one randomly selected member 18–49 years of age, responded the study questionnaire. The cognitive status of older adults was evaluated by interviewers before applying the questionnaire. When a cognitive impairment was identified, a proxy respondent was utilized and depressive symptoms were not fully evaluated (the proxy respondent only answered if the older adult had been sad). Cognitive limitations were identified in 1.8% of the sample. For this analysis, only questionnaires responded by the older adult him/herself were employed. All data collection procedures were standardized, and staff was previously trained to conduct procedures. Wave 0 of SAGE corresponded to the World Health Survey of 2002–2004 [42]. The response rates for the first wave after that, calculated as participation in the first wave with respect to potential participants identified in wave 0, were 93% for China; 83% for Russia; 68% for India; 81% for Ghana, 53% for Mexico; and 74% for South Africa. The main reason for non-response in SAGE first wave was loss to follow-up from wave 0, mainly due to lack of time during fieldwork to locate participants in the World Health Survey [43], and analysis of the association between non-response and risk factors for depression has shown that the non-response was non-differential [44]. More information on sampling and procedures can be consulted in a previous publication [42].

Four questionnaires were applied as part of the SAGE study: 1) a household questionnaire for information about household chores distribution, house conditions and household socioeconomic position; 2) an individual questionnaire inquiring about health and health determinants, disability, work history, chronic conditions, risk factors, health services response, caregivers and subjective wellbeing; 3) a proxy-respondent questionnaire for health, functional status, chronic conditions and health services utilization; and 4) a module of verbal autopsy to determine probable cause of death of members of the household during the previous 24 months. The questionnaires were developed for SAGE, and are available in the World Health Organization’s web page at http://apps.who.int/healthinfo/systems/surveydata/index.php/catalog/5.

Outcome

The questionnaire of SAGE included an abbreviated version of the World Mental Health Survey version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI), which asks about history of depressive episodes in the last year, as well as depressive symptoms in the last two weeks. We followed an algorithm developed and previously used by the SAGE team [45] that combines scores on the WMH-CIDI questions to obtain an indicator of MDE according to DSM-IV criteria. The concordance of WHM-CIDI with clinical assessments has been evaluated as moderate to good [46]. For the algorithm, we classified symptoms in two sets. Set A included six items measuring three domains: depressive affect, anhedonia (loss of interest or pleasure in activities, including decreased libido), and tiredness or lack of energy. Set B included 12 items measuring seven domains (1–2 items per domain): hopelessness, low self-esteem or unworthiness; anxiety or psychomotor agitation; suicidal attempt or ideation; slow thinking or lack of concentration; slow movement; sleep alterations; and appetite loss. For each domain in each set, a dichotomous variable was computed as 1 when the participant responded affirmatively to at least one of the items in the domain, and 0 otherwise. Then, a score was obtained for each set. A participant was considered to have had a MDE if he/she scored > = 2 points in set A and > =4 points in set B.

Independent variable

The main independent variable was religious affiliation, assessed in the SAGE questionnaire by the question “Do you belong to a religious denomination?” The response categories were: unaffiliated, Buddhist, Traditional Chinese Religion, Christian, Hindu, Muslim, Jewish, Indigenous, Sikh, Other. For this analysis, we kept the categories unaffiliated, Buddhist, Christian, Hindu and Muslim, and grouped the rest as “Other” (a category that comprised less than 0.5% in each country). While there is no general agreed-upon definition of what a minority is, a rough definition might be that minorities are social groups that are numerically inferior to others in a given country [31]. For this analysis, we defined minority religious affiliation by country, by comparison to the affiliation declared by the majority of participants.

Potential confounders

The models were adjusted by variables related to both religious affiliation and MDE, including sociodemographic, household, health conditions and social networks variables.

The sociodemographic variables were gender, age (in categories 60–69, 70–79 and 80+ yrs.), living with a partner (either by marriage or de facto), educational attainment (none, incomplete or complete elementary school, incomplete or complete secondary school, and college or higher), and having health insurance coverage.

We also considered socioeconomic position, defined as the relative position in household wealth. We used the methodology previously described by Fernández-Niño et al. [47], computing an index from 20 items asking for ownership (yes or no) of various goods at the household level. After a factor analysis with a tetrachoric correlation matrix of the 20 items, we obtained the prediction of the first factor (explaining 46% of the joint variance of the items) and categorized it by country-specific tertiles, where the first tertile corresponded to the lower socioeconomic position and the third to the higher socioeconomic position.

Health-related variables included multimorbidity and physical disability. As in a previous work [47], we computed a variable with categories from zero to three or more diagnosis (the standard definition of multimorbidity) [48], from the self-report of a medical diagnosis of arthritis, cerebrovascular event, angina, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, hypertension, or cataracts. Physical disability was a yes/no indicator of being severely or extremely limited in at least one of 18 basic activities over the previous 30 days, an approach based on the World Health Organization’s Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) [45, 49].

Finally, we included three variables, each one representing a different domain of social networks: 1) not living alone; 2) participation in non-religious social activities (being a member of at least one social organization other than a church); and 3) having someone to trust. All of the above variables were dichotomic (yes = 1 and no =0).

Statistical analysis

We conducted exploratory analyses with central tendency (mean or median) and dispersion measures (standard deviation and interquartile range) for quantitative variables, and proportions and confidence intervals at the 95% level (CI 95%) for categorical variables. We estimated the standardized prevalence rate of MDE with the direct method, using as population of reference the world population provided by the World Health Organization [50]. We conducted bivariate analysis of the associations between the dependent variable and each independent variable with chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests.

To estimate the association of religious affiliation and MDE we employed logistic regression models, and report the results as odds ratios (OR) and their respective CI 95% and p-values. We estimated two models: one comparing the unaffiliated vs each religious affiliation, and another comparing the majority religion for each country vs the other religious affiliations and the unaffiliated.

All analyses considered the complex sampling design, and were done with Stata 14 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).

Ethical considerations

All participants in SAGE signed and informed consent. Approval for the SAGE study was obtained from institutional review boards in each participant country, and endorsed by the World Health Organization’s committee. This article presents the results of a secondary analysis of data from that study. The information collected by wave 1 of the SAGE study is public. Authorization from SAGE was obtained for the present analysis via the internet.

Results

Women comprised 53.8% of the study sample. The mean age of the study sample was 69.9 (SD = 7.6) years, with most participants in the 60–69 years range. As for educational attainment, 33.9% of participants reported no formal education, 33.7% had primary education or less, 25.7% had secondary education, and 6.7% had some college education or more. In Table 1, we present the general characteristics of the sample, by gender and presence of a MDE in the past 12 months. Among both men and women, those with a MDE had lower educational attainment, were less likely to have health insurance, were in the lower tercile of household wealth, were more likely to live in rural zones and to have a physical disability. They were also less likely to participate in non-religious social activities, and to have someone to trust. Finally, those with a MDE in the past 12 months were more likely to have a religious affiliation (as opposed to no affiliation).
Table 1

Characteristics of older adults in SAGE participant countries, 2007–2010, by major depressive episode (MDE) during the past 12 months

Variable

Men

p-valuea

Women

p-valuea

MDE (n = 491)

No MDE (n = 8584)

MDE (n = 790)

No MDE (n = 9816)

Sociodemographic

Age

 60–69

55.3

56.8

0.88

49.5

52.7

0.46

 70–79

35.3

34.7

37.6

36.6

  ≥ 80

9.4

8.5

12.9

10.7

 Living with a partner

85.3

86.3

0.77

47.3

57.0

< 0.01

Educational attainment

 None

48.4

22.8

< 0.01

70.9

48.6

< 0.01

 Elementary

31.7

40.1

17.2

27.8

 Secondary

17.3

29.7

10.5

20.4

 College or higher

2.7

7.3

1.4

3.4

 Having health insurance coverage

19.6

66.7

< 0.01

21.8

65.6

< 0.01

Household wealth (terciles)

 1 (lower)

46.6

31.9

< 0.01

44.0

34.8

0.01

 2

36.0

35.0

31.4

35.2

 3 (higher)

17.4

33.1

24.6

30.0

Zone

 Urban

30.3

42.7

< 0.01

33.1

44.8

< 0.01

 Rural

69.7

57.3

66.9

55.2

Health-related

Multimorbidity

 None

37.6

48.3

0.04

40.5

41.7

0.16

 One

32.2

29.4

27.0

31.0

 Two or more

30.2

22.2

32.5

27.3

 Physical disability

77.6

27.1

< 0.01

85.2

38.5

< 0.01

Social networks

 Not living alone

94.1

92.1

0.35

89.1

82.8

< 0.01

 Participation in non-religious social activities

17.6

26.3

< 0.01

8.4

16.6

< 0.01

 Having someone to trust

86.0

93.3

< 0.01

74.7

88.1

< 0.01

Religious affiliation

Affiliation

 None

13.3

63.8

< 0.01

14.0

54.6

< 0.01

 Buddhist

4.6

2.1

1.9

4.7

 Christian

4.0

6.0

8.8

12.6

 Hindu

59.2

23.9

64.6

23.8

 Muslim

17.8

3.7

9.0

3.6

 Other

1.1

0.6

1.9

0.8

ap-value for the difference between the groups with and without major depressive episode (MDE)

In the sample as a whole, the majority of participants (37.7%) reported having no religious affiliation. The next more frequent affiliation was Christian (27.1%) followed by Hindu (16.5%). However, these unadjusted percentages have no straightforward interpretation, as the sample from China (where most participants were unaffiliated) was larger than the others and therefore descriptive statistics for the whole sample are mainly reflective of that sample. Table 2 shows the frequencies of each affiliation by country.
Table 2

Religious affiliation of older adults in SAGE participant countries, 2007–2010

Religious affiliation

China

(n = 7208)

Ghana

(n = 2608)

India

(n = 3621)

México

(n = 1781)

Rusia

(n = 2439)

Sudáfrica

(n = 1847)

n (%)

None

6579 (92.6)

140 (5.3)

7 (0.2)

53 (2.9)

423 (13.5)

114 (6.9)

Buddhist

418 (4.9)

3 (0.2)

39 (1.5)

0

0

8 (0.6)

Christian

155 (2.0)

1750 (67.2)

23 (0.4)

1615 (91.0)

1732 (78.6)

1544 (83.8)

Hindu

0

1 (0.1)

3082 (85.6)

39 (1.8)

0

61 (1.6)

Muslim

24 (0.2)

409 (16.5)

416 (11.2)

14 (1.1)

259 (6.7)

56 (2.3)

Other

32 (0.3)

305 (10.7)

54 (1.1)

60 (3.3)

25 (1.2)

64 (4.8)

The 12-month prevalence of MDE was 6.5% (CI 95% 6.2–6.9) for the whole sample, 7. 5% (CI 95% 7.0–8.0) among women and 5.4% (CI 95% 4.9–5.9) among men. The prevalence of MDE by country and religious affiliation appears in Table 3. In China, Muslims had a significantly higher prevalence as compared with the non-affiliated and Buddhists. In Ghana, Muslims had a significantly higher prevalence as compared with Christians. In other countries there were no statistically significant differences in the prevalences.
Table 3

Twelve-month prevalence of major depressive episode by country and religious affiliation among. older adults in SAGE participant countries, 2007–2010

Religious affiliation

China

Ghana

India

México

Rusia

Sudáfrica

%

(CI 95%) a

None

1. 6 (1.2–1.9)

11.8 (4.4–19.1)

NEa,b

6.0 (0.8–12.9)

5.2 (2.6–8.4)

1.92 (0.4–4.2)

Buddhist

1.2 (0.1–2.4)

NEb

35.3 (5.9–64.7)

NEb

NEb

NEb

Christian

2.2 (1.1–5.5)

8.5 (7.1–9.9)

11.6 (9.2–32.5)

6.3 (4.4–8.3)

5.6 (3.5–7.5)

2.00 (0.4–3.6)

Hindu

NEb

NEb

15.8 (13.8–17.8)

9.7 (0.7–20.0)

NEb

7.1 (1.0–15.1)

Muslim

2.6 (2.5–7.7)

14.1 (9.9–18.4)

22.8 (16.1–29.5)

10.3 (4.6–25.2)

7.5 (2.3–12.6)

8.9 (5.3–23.0)

Other

NEb

8.2 (4.8–11.7)

24.5 (7.6–41.4)

15.9 (0.6–32.4)

6.7 (2.5–15.8)

13.3 (1. 9–28. 5)

aPercentages and confidence intervals represent the prevalence of mayor depressive episode for each combination of country and religion. b NE: Non-estimable

The crude logistic regression model for the whole sample (Table 4, unadjusted) showed that, contrary to our expectation, religious affiliation was associated with higher odds of MDE for all categories of affiliation, as compared with unaffiliated participants. However, after adjusting by covariables, the effect was no longer statistically significant (Table 4, adjusted).
Table 4

Models for major depressive episode among older adults in SAGE participant countries, 2007–2010

Religious affiliation

Unadjusted model

Adjusted modela

OR

CI 95%

p-value

OR

CI 95%

p-value

None

Reference

Buddhist

3.8

1.3–11.0

0,013

1.3

0.6–2.7

0.493

Christian

3.2

2.1–4.7

< 0,0001

0.9

0.4–1.9

0.823

Muslim

11.3

8.5–15.0

< 0,0001

0.6

0.3–1.4

0.290

Hindu

14.9

9.7–22.8

< 0,0001

0.8

0.3–1.9

0.724

Other

9.5

4.7–19.1

< 0,0001

1.1

0.4–3.2

0.874

aAdjusted by all variables that appear in Table 1

In Tables 5 and 6 we show the results of logistic regression models stratified by country. With the unaffiliated as the reference category (Table 5), we observed significantly higher odds of MDE only for Muslims in Ghana (OR 2.6; CI 95%: 1.1–6.4). When using the majority affiliation as the reference category (Table 6), Muslims in Ghana again still had higher odds of MDE (OR 2.7; CI 95%: 1.7–4.1). In this analysis, minorities in South Africa also had higher odds of MDE (Hindus OR 14.8, CI 95%: 2.7–82.4; Muslims OR 53.9, CI 95%: 5.5–525.2; other OR 18.7, CI 95%: 4.7–74.9).
Table 5

Adjusted odds ratios (OR) a for major depressive episode among older adults in SAGE participant countries, 2007–2010. Unaffiliated as reference category

Religious affiliation

China

Ghana

India

Mexico

Russia

South Africa

 

OR (CI 95%)

None

Reference

Buddhist

0.7 (0.2–2.1)

NE

1.6 (0.3–8.0)

NE

NE

NE

Christian

1.6 (0.3–8.1)

1.4 (0.6–3.3)

0.5 (0.0–5.8)

0.7 (0.2–2.5)

1.1 (0.5–2.3)

0.7 (0.1–3.2)

Hindu

NE

NE

0,6 (0.2–1.8)

1.2 (0.2–6.7)

NE

2.1 (0.4–12.2)

Muslim

2.4 (0.3–16.8)

2.6 (1.1–6.4)

0.8 (0.2–2.5)

1.1 (0.1–9.2)

1.1 (0.4–3.1)

2.9 (0.2–37.7)

Other

NE

1.5 (0.6–3.7)

NE

1.6 (0.3–8.5)

1.8 (0.4–8.2)

7.1 (0.9–52.2)

aAdjusted by all variables that appear in Table 1. Odds ratios in each column are within-country. NE: Non-estimable

The significance of the boldface data is indicated by the CI 95% not including the null value of 1

Table 6

Adjusted odds ratios (OR) a for major depressive episode among older adults in SAGE participant countries, 2007–2010. Majority religion as reference category

Religious Affiliation

China

Ghana

India

Mexico

Russia

South Africa

 

OR (CI 95%)

None

Reference

1.1 (0.5–2.4)

NE

1.6 (0.3–8.2)

0.9 (0.4–2.0)

1.1 (0.2–7.3)

Buddhist

0.7 (0.2–2.2)

NE

2.7 (0.8–8.8)

NE

NE

NE

Christian

1.9 (0.4–8.7)

Reference

0.8 (0.1–7.2)

Reference

Reference

Reference

Hindu

NE

NE

Reference

1.6 (0.6–4.5)

NE

14.8 (2.7–82.4)

Muslim

2.1 (0.3–14.7)

2.7 (1.7–4.1)

1.3 (0.8–2.0)

1.5 (0.3–8.5)

1.4 (0.6–3.2)

53.9 (5.5–525.2)

Other

NE

1.1 (0.6–1.9)

1.5 (0.5–4.8)

2.7 (0.7–11.1)

1.7 0.4–7.4)

18.7 (4.7–74.9)

aAdjusted by all variables that appear in Table 1. Odds ratios in each column are within-country. NE: Non-estimable

The significance of the boldface data is indicated by the CI 95% not including the null value of 1

Discussion

We found no evidence of the expected inverse association between religion and MDE. This is in contrast with previous studies that found associations between personal and organized religious practices and religiosity, and lower risk of depression symptoms [17, 18, 19, 20, 23]. However, as others have pointed out [13, 26], the association can be different depending of what aspect of religion is measured (religiosity vs spirituality, personal vs organized practices, etc.), and as our study measured only one aspect (affiliation) it is difficult to establish adequate comparisons.

In all six countries included, the prevalence of MDE was either higher or similar among those who reported a religious affiliation, as compared to the unaffiliated. The association between reporting a religious affiliation and higher odds of MDE, however, was explained away by sociodemographic, household and health related variables that were in turn associated with religious affiliation. Additional file 1: Table S1 presents the distribution of other covariates by religion, showing that the unaffiliated were more likely to be male, in the upper quartiles of household wealth, more educated, living with a partner and having someone to trust. All of these characteristics are inversely associated with depression, and so one way of interpreting this result is that the apparent religion-MDE relationship was the result of confounding by other factors.

However, the association of certain characteristics with religion is socially determined. The fact that, in the combined sample for the six countries, Muslims tended to be poorer and having lower educational attainment is the result of sociohistorical conditions, so the sociodemographic and other variables could be interpreted as part of a “cluster of disadvantages” [51] experienced by minority religions. From this point of view, the loss of significance of the effect of religious affiliation after adjustment by covariates doesn’t mean that the “true” relationship is not significant, only that it occurs as part of a complex network of social relationships.

Even after adjusting by other variables, an association remained between minority religion and MDE for Muslims in Ghana, and for Hindus, Muslims and “Other” in South Africa. Religious minorities can experience multiple stressors that offset the positive aspects of religion, but the effect of being a member of a minority religion might also vary depending on the context. The expectation would be that in countries with more interfaith conflict or discrimination on the basis of religion, the negative living experiences associated with minority religion should increase. The importance of context was evidenced by a previous study reporting that active members of religious minorities had worst health and wellbeing indicators when living in countries where the percentage of members of the majority religion was higher [33]. However, according to a recent survey, residents of Ghana and South Africa are not especially likely to cite religious conflict as a very big problem, and while the percentage saying that religion is important to them is high, it is not particularly so when compared with other African countries [52].

In order to understand why the expected association was only significant in Ghana and South Africa, a more in-depth exploration of the contextual differences that affect the experience of being a member of a minority would be required, but we can advance some suggestions. First, our sample was composed of older adults, so the change in religion-related social aspects during their lifetimes could explain the differences more than the current conditions. Second, the small sample size in some groups might have limited the statistical power to uncover associations, although the fact that most of them were in the direction of higher odds of MDE among minorities seems to confirm our hypothesis regarding the association of minority religion and MDE. Third, it is possible that for some countries the relevant majority and minority comparison groups were not assessed. This probably was the case in Mexico and Russia, where a more significant contrast might have been between types of Christian faith that were mixed in the “Christian” category of SAGE (Protestants/Evangelicals vs. Catholics in Mexico, and Orthodox vs. other Christians in Russia). Likewise, the “Other” category in South Africa might have been a very different mixture than the same category in other countries. A more precise investigation of the subject should consider all of these aspects.

A limitation of our study was the cross-sectional design, as the association of religious affiliation and mental health could theoretically go in both directions. Another limitation was that religious affiliation is only one aspect of religion, and doesn’t necessarily indicate spirituality, the importance attributed to religious beliefs, and other elements that the literature has reported as related to depression. Using a variety of measures of religion-related aspects might have changed our results, especially if those aspects are associated with being part of a religious minority. However, with the current data it is difficult to hypothesize in which direction the results would have changed. Also, the percentage of the population affiliated with some denominations is very low for some countries, resulting in zero or a small number of respondents for some combinations of category-country, so that the analysis of the association of specific denominations and MDE might be non-significant due to lack of power. Finally, MDE is an extreme of the continuum between emotional well-being and disorder, so that our results apply to what could be considered the graver cases of depression.

Conclusion

To conclude, our results suggest an association between minority religion membership and MDE. This finding is important for public health, as it points to a social source of health inequity that could be addressed through public policies protecting minorities. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore this issue in a sample of older adults from diverse sociocultural contexts. Older adults who are members of religious minorities might be at risk for mental health problems, and there is a need for public health interventions aimed at them.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

The conception, analysis and report of this work were conducted without funding. The authors thank all the respondents who contributed to SAGE and the survey teams. No specific financial support was provided for this analysis. SAGE is supported by WHO and the US National Institute on Aging (NIA) through Interagency Agreements (OGHA 04034785; YA1323–08-CN-0020; Y1-AG-1005–01) and through a research grant (R01-AG034479).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed in this study are available in the World Health Organization’s website at http://apps.who.int/healthinfo/systems/surveydata/index.php/catalog. To access data, researchers most send a brief request to WHO, filling out a form at the website.

Authors’ contributions

JFN conceived of the study and statistical analysis, conducted statistical analysis and co-wrote the first draft of the manuscript; IB conceived of the study and statistical analysis and wrote the final manuscript; CBA conceived and conducted statistical analysis; CAG co-wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and made contributions to the final manuscript. All authors read an approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

JFN has a PhD in Epidemiology. He has extensive experience in analyzing population health surveys in the dimensions of mental health and aging. His areas of interest include social epidemiology, aging, and mental health. IB has a PhD in Epidemiology. Her research focuses on the social and cultural determinants of health, especially in the areas of mental health and health-related practices. CBA has a MSc in epidemiology. Her areas of interest include transmissible and non-transmissible diseases. CAG is a psychologist and has a PhD in Epidemiology. Her areas of interest include mental health and aging; as well as its social determinants.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants in SAGE signed an informed consent. All procedures in the SAGE study was approved by the following institutional review boards: Ethics Review Committee, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Ethics Committee, Shanghai Municipal Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China; Ethical Committee, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana; Institutional Review Board, International Institute of Population Sciences, Mumbai, India; Ethics Committee, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico; Ethics Committee, School of Preventive and Social Medicine, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia; and the Research Ethics Committee, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa. This manuscript is based on a secondary analysis of the anonymized SAGE database.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12889_2019_6806_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
Additional file 1: Table S1. Characteristics of participants by religious affiliation, SAGE round one. Table S2. Characteristics of participants by religious affiliation, SAGE round one. (DOCX 20 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    National Institute of Mental Health. Transforming the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses 2016 [Available from: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/depression/index.shtml.
  2. 2.
    Barua A, Ghosh MK, Kar N, Basilio MA. Prevalence of depressive disorders in the elderly. Ann Saudi Med. 2011;31(6):620–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). GBD Compare. Seattle, Washington;2017.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anand A. Understanding depression among older adults in six low-middle income countries using WHO-SAGE survey. Behav Health. 2015;1(2):1–11.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Conwell Y. Suicide later in life: challenges and priorities for prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(3 Suppl 2):S244–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wiktorsson S, Marlow T, Runeson B, Skoog I, Waern M. Prospective cohort study of suicide attempters aged 70 and above: one-year outcomes. J Affect Disord. 2011;134(1–3):333–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Licht-Strunk E, van der Windt DA, van Marwijk HW, de Haan M, Beekman AT. The prognosis of depression in older patients in general practice and the community. A systematic review. Fam Pract. 2007;24(2):168–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barry LC, Allore HG, Bruce ML, Gill TM. Longitudinal association between depressive symptoms and disability burden among older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64(12):1325–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fiske A, Wetherell JL, Gatz M. Depression in older adults. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5:363–89.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller L, Wickramaratne P, Gameroff MJ, Sage M, Tenke CE, Weissman MM. Religiosity and major depression in adults at high risk: a ten-year prospective study. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169(1):89–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellison CG, Flannelly KJ. Religious involvement and risk of major depression in a prospective nationwide study of African American adults. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009;197(8):568–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maselko J, Gilman SE, Buka S. Religious service attendance and spiritual well-being are differentially associated with risk of major depression. Psychol Med. 2009;39(6):1009–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith TB, McCullough ME, Poll J. Religiousness and depression: evidence for a main effect and the moderating influence of stressful life events. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(4):614–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lucchetti G, Lucchetti AL, Peres MF, Moreira-Almeida A, Koenig HG. Religiousness, health, and depression in older adults from a brazilian military setting. ISRN Psychiatry. 2012;2012:940747.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meeks TW, Vahia IV, Lavretsky H, Kulkarni G, Jeste DV. A tune in "a minor" can "b major": a review of epidemiology, illness course, and public health implications of subthreshold depression in older adults. J Affect Disord. 2011;129(1–3):126–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Idler EL, McLaughlin J, Kasl S. Religion and the quality of life in the last year of life. J Gerontol Series B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009;64(4):528–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ronneberg CR, Miller EA, Dugan E, Porell F. The protective effects of religiosity on depression: a 2-year prospective study. The Gerontologist. 2016;56(3):421–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aranda MP. Relationship between religious involvement and psychological well-being: a social justice perspective. Health Soc Work. 2008;33(1):9–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sun F, Park NS, Roff LL, Klemmack DL, Parker M, Koenig HG, et al. Predicting the trajectories of depressive symptoms among southern community-dwelling older adults: the role of religiosity. Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(2):189–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blay SL, Batista AD, Andreoli SB, Gastal FL. The relationship between religiosity and tobacco, alcohol use, and depression in an elderly community population. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;16(11):934–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hayward RD, Owen AD, Koenig HG, Steffens DC, Payne ME. Religion and the presence and severity of depression in older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;20(2):188–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Braam AW, Hein E, Deeg DJ, Twisk JW, Beekman AT, Van Tilburg W. Religious involvement and 6-year course of depressive symptoms in older Dutch citizens: results from the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. J Aging Health. 2004;16(4):467–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hank K, Schaan B. Cross-National Variations in the correlation between frequency of prayer and health among older Europeans. Res Aging. 2008;30(1):36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stanley MA, Bush AL, Camp ME, Jameson JP, Phillips LL, Barber CR, et al. Older adults' preferences for religion/spirituality in treatment for anxiety and depression. Aging Ment Health. 2011;15(3):334–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leurent B, Nazareth I, Bellon-Saameno J, Geerlings MI, Maaroos H, Saldivia S, et al. Spiritual and religious beliefs as risk factors for the onset of major depression: an international cohort study. Psychol Med. 2013;43(10):2109–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    King DA, Lyness JM, Duberstein PR, He H, Tu XM, Seaburn DB. Religious involvement and depressive symptoms in primary care elders. Psychol Med. 2007;37(12):1807–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Volkert J, Harter M, Dehoust MC, Ausin B, Canuto A, Da Ronch C, et al. The role of meaning in life in community-dwelling older adults with depression and relationship to other risk factors. Aging Ment Health. 2017:1–7.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Braam AW, Deeg DJ, Poppelaars JL, Beekman AT, van Tilburg W. Prayer and depressive symptoms in a period of secularization: patterns among older adults in the Netherlands. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;15(4):273–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bonelli R, Dew RE, Koenig HG, Rosmarin DH, Vasegh S. Religious and spiritual factors in depression: review and integration of the research. Depress Res Treat. 2012;2012:962860.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harrison MO, Koenig HG, Hays JC, Eme-Akwari A, Pargament KI. The epidemiology of religious coping: a review of recent literature. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2001;13:86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Minorities under international law: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights; 2019 [Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/minorities/pages/internationallaw.aspx.
  32. 32.
    Hatzenbuehler ML, Pachankis JE. Stigma and minority stress as social determinants of health among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth: research evidence and clinical implications. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2016;63(6):985–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    May M, Smilde D. Minority participation and well-being in majority Catholic nations: what does it mean to be a religious minority? J Relig Health. 2016;55(3):874–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bhui K. Discrimination, poor mental health, and mental illness. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28(4):411–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Goto JB, Couto PF, Bastos JL. Systematic review of epidemiological studies on interpersonal discrimination and mental health. Cad Saude Publica. 2013;29(3):445–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Karpov V, Lisovskaya E, Barry D. Ethnodoxy: how popular ideologies fuse religious and ethnic identities. J Sci Study Relig. 2012;51:638–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fox J. Religious causes of discrimination against ethno-religious minorities. Int Stud Q. 2000;44(3):423–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li H, Xu L, Chi I. Factors related to Chinese older adults' suicidal thoughts and attempts. Aging Ment Health. 2016;20(7):752–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Iqbal S, Ahmad R, Ayub N. Level of depression among adolescents of religious minorities and their dominant counterparts in Pakistan. J Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2012;24(2):163–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Iqbal S, Ahmad R, Ayub N. Self-esteem: a comparative study of adolescents from mainstream and minority religious groups in Pakistan. J Immigr Minor Health. 2013;15(1):49–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    United Nations DoSeEA, Population Divition,. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. 2017. Report No.: Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kowal P, Chatterji S, Naidoo N, Biritwum R, Fan W, Lopez Ridaura R, et al. Data resource profile: the World Health Organization study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(6):1639–49.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kowal P, Chatterji S, Naidoo N, Biritwum R, Fan W, Lopez Ridaura R, et al. Data resource profile: the World Health Organization study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). Int J Epidemiol. 41(6):1639–49.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bonilla-Tinoco LJ, Fernández-Niño JA, Manrique-Espinoza BS, Sosa-Ortiz AL. Retirement and depression in Mexican older adults: effect modifiers in a cohort based on the study on AGEing and adult health (SAGE), 2002–2010. J Popul Aging. 2018.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Arokiasamy P, Uttamacharya U, Jain K, Biritwum RB, Yawson AE, Wu F, et al. The impact of multimorbidity on adult physical and mental health in low- and middle-income countries: what does the study on global ageing and adult health (SAGE) reveal? BMC Med. 2015;13:178.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Haro JM, Arbabzadeh-Bouchez S, Brugha TS, de Girolamo G, Guyer ME, Jin R, et al. Concordance of the composite international diagnostic interview version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO world mental health surveys. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2006;15(4):167–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fernandez-Nino JA, Bonilla-Tinoco LJ, Manrique-Espinoza BS, Romero-Martinez M, Sosa-Ortiz AL. Work status, retirement, and depression in older adults: an analysis of six countries based on the study on global ageing and adult health (SAGE). SSM Popul Health. 2018;6:1–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fernández-Niño J, Bustos-Vázquez E. Multimorbilidad: bases conceptuales, modelos epidemiológicos y retos de su medición. Biomedica. 2016;36:188–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, Epping-Jordan J, et al. Developing the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(11):815–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ahmad OB, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Lozano R, Inoue M. Age Standarization of Rates: a New WHO Standard. In: Organization WH, editor. GPE Discussion Paper Series2001.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wolff J, De-Shalit A. Disadvantage. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. Tolerance and tension. Islam and Christianity in sub-Saharan Africa. Washington: Pew Research Center; 2010. p. 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public HealthUniversidad del Norte, Colombia. Km. 5 Vía Puerto ColombiaBarranquillaColombia
  2. 2.Department of Population StudiesEl Colegio de la Frontera Norte, MexicoTijuanaMexico
  3. 3.Research Group on Health, Rehabilitation and Work (SARET)Manuela Beltrán University -- Colombia.Sectional BucaramangaBucaramangaColombia
  4. 4.Psychiatric Services, Secretaria de SaludCiudad de MéxicoMexico

Personalised recommendations