Advertisement

BMC Cancer

, 18:721 | Cite as

Differential expression of hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-135b, and hsa-miR-29c suggests a field effect in oral cancer

  • Camile B. Lopes
  • Leandro L. Magalhães
  • Carolina R. Teófilo
  • Ana Paula N. N. Alves
  • Raquel C. Montenegro
  • Massimo Negrini
  • Ândrea Ribeiro-dos-Santos
Open Access
Research article
  • 280 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Genetics, genomics and epigenetics’

Abstract

Background

The theory of field effect suggests that the tumor-adjacent area, besides histopathologically normal, undergoes genetic and epigenetic changes that can eventually affect epithelial homeostasis, predisposing the patient to cancer development. One of the many molecular changes described in cancer are microRNAs (miRNAs), which regulates the expression of important genes during carcinogenesis. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the field effect in oral cancer.

Methods

We investigated the differential expression profile of four miRNAs (hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-135b, and hsa-miR-29c) in cancerous oral tissue, in tumor-adjacent tissue and and in non-cancerous tissue samples from healthy volunteers.

Results

Our results showed significant overexpression profiles of all four studied miRNAs in cancerous oral tissue compared to non-cancerous samples, as well as in tumor-adjacent tissue compared to cancer-free tissue. No significant difference was found when comparing the expression profile of cancerous and tissue-adjacent tissue groups. We found a negative correlation between the expression of hsa-miR-21 expression and STAT3 in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Conclusion

These results suggest that the tissue adjacent to cancer cannot be considered a normal tissue because its molecular aspects are significantly altered. Our data corroborates the hypothesis of field cancerization.

Keywords

Oral cancer Field cancerization miRNAs Biomarkers 

Abbreviations

HNSCC

head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

miRNAs

microRNAs

OSCC

Oral squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Oral cancer is the most common type of head and neck cancer and includes lesions in the lips and in the oral cavity (buccal mucosa, hard palate, floor of the mouth, tongue, gums, retromolar trigone, and alveolar ridge). Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) represents 90% of the neoplasms in the oral cavity and is characterized by an aggressive and invasive growth pattern that spreads to the cervical lymph nodes. In most cases, OSCC has a mutilating characteristic and causes irreversible consequences to speech, breathing and swallowing. This affects the health and self-image of the patient, which can result in its social isolation. Therefore, it is a traumatic type of malignancy and causes a significant impact on the patient’s life quality [1, 2, 3].

Additionally, OSCC has a high mortality rate, mainly due to cervical lymph node metastasis, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastases in the lungs and bones [4, 5].

The theory of field effect or field cancerization, firstly described by Slaughter in 1953, shows that the tumor-adjacent area, besides histopathologically normal, undergoes genetic and epigenetic changes that can eventually lead to the development of local recurrence or onset of a second primary tumor [6].

Changes in the post-transcriptional regulation of mRNAs by microRNA (miRNAs) activity play an important role in carcinogenesis [7, 8, 9]. Mature miRNAs molecules are small non-coding single-stranded RNA molecules (18–25 nucleotides) [10, 11]. They are involved in several regulatory pathways, including cell development, differentiation, proliferation, aging, senescence and apoptosis. Deregulation of miRNA expression contributes to the manifestation of several diseases, including cancer [12, 13, 14].

The expression profile of several miRNAs is tissue-specific [15, 16]. Thus, the comparative analysis of miRNAs expression between tissues with and without cancer may reveal diagnostic markers or therapeutic targets [4, 13, 17]. In addition, miRNA profiles can be used for cancer classification and determination of its stage and progression, as well as for the prognosis and response to treatment [18, 19].

Studies of miRNAs and their targets have shown that the overexpression of both hsa-miR-21 [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25] and hsa-miR-221 [22, 26] participates in the initiation and progression of oral cancer [24, 25, 27]. Hsa-miR-29c hiperexpression was associated with the most aggressive and metastatic cases of OSCC [28, 29] and hsa-miR-135b differential expression was associated with poorer overall survival of patients, besides being a key regulator in this type of cancer [30].

Furthermore, previous studies from our group showed the presence of field cancerization in gastric cancer by high throughput miRNA sequencing [31]. Among the identified miRNAs, both hsa-miR-29c and hsa-miR-135b had different expression profiles in tumor and tumor-adjacent tissues in the field cancerization. It also encouraged us to investigate if these two miRNAs play a role in this process in OSCC.

The aim of this study was to characterize the expression profile of hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-135b, and hsa-miR-29c in non-cancerous tissue and oral cancer and to associate them with the field cancerization effect.

Methods

Sample and ethical aspects

This study included samples from 47 individuals categorized into three groups: i) tissue samples from oral cancer (n = 28); ii) tumor-adjacent tissue samples (n = 11); and iii) non-cancerous gingival tissue samples (n = 19). The adjacent-tumor samples were 1 cm from the tumor margin. For control group, gingival tissue without pericoronaritis was collected from healthy non-smoke volunteers who underwent extraction of the 3rd molar. Patients with history of head and neck radio or chemotherapy or patients with autoimmune disease were excluded. For control group (iii), gingival tissue without pericoronaritis was collected from healthy non-smoke volunteers who underwent extraction of the 3rd molar.

Samples were obtained from patients treated at the dental clinic of the UFC from 2014 to 2015. The samples were collected in a 2 mL microcentrifuge tube containing RNAlater and stored until RNA extraction. Clinical information, such as age, gender, tumor location, and risk factors (smoke and alcohol intake) were collected. The histologic samples were classified according to World Health Organization into well, moderately and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma [32].

All research procedures were conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki, the Nuremberg Code and subject to the Regulations on Research Involving Human Subjects (Res. CNS 196/96) of the Brazilian National Health Council, which respects ethical standards and patients’ rights. Data were collected after the patients signed a free and informed consent form. The project was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Ceará (Universidade Federal do Ceará - UFC), under the protocol number 77/09.

Total RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted following the protocol of the High Pure RNA Isolation kit (Roche Applied Science) and quantified using a Qubit®2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA). The total RNA extracted was diluted in diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water to a final concentration of 5 ng/μL and stored at − 80 °C.

Total RNA (5 ng) was used in a reverse transcription reaction using TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s guidelines. The reverse transcription product was subjected to amplification using TaqMan® MicroRNA Assays and Universal Master Mix II (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in a Rotor-Gene Q (QIAGEN, Venlo, The Netherlands). All reactions were performed in triplicate, and the comparative Ct method was used to analyze the differences in expression in each group. The expression levels of hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-135b, and hsa-miR-29c were normalized by using the endogenous control RNU6B (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

In silico prediction of hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-29c and hsa-miR-135b target genes

In order to identify genes that may be involved in OSCC, we searched for the of hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-29c and hsa-miR-135b target genes by using miRecords (http://c1.accurascience.com/miRecords/) (which integrates 11 prediction tools), TargetCompare (http://54.187.40.156:8080/targetcompare/), miRTarBase (http://mirtarbase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw), miRo (http://www.dmi.unict.it/~ferro/) and miRNAMap (http://mirnamap.mbc.nctu.edu.tw). We considered target genes the ones that were observed in no less than 10 tools and have already been validated experimentally.

Statistical analysis

To examine differences in the expression of hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-135b, and hsa-miR-29c among the cancerous, adjacent, and non-cancerous groups, ΔCt values were used. Normality of the data was evaluated by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. One-Way ANOVA or Kruskall-Wallis (for parametric and non-parametric distributions) was used to compare the expression values among the three groups. Tukey’s HSD correction was applied for multiple pairwise comparisons. Differences with a p-value < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. T-student was used to compare miRNA expression and clinical data. To estimate the sensitivity of the biomarker for distinguishing the groups, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) were used. A Spearman rank correlation was performed to verify if there was a correlation between the expression of hsa-miR-21 and STAT3 staining scores in OSCC cases. All tests and graphs were done using the statistical package R (www.R-project.org).

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical experiments were performed on histological sections “Conclusions” μm thick on previously identified silanized histological slides, following the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase technique phospho-STAT3 (ThermoFisher®, policlonal), diluted 1:800. The silanized slides were incubated at 65 °C for 1 h, and after this period, deparaffinized in xylene and alcohol gradient. Antigen retrieval was performed in pH 6 buffer, in microwave. After blocking the endogenous peroxidase activity (aqueous solution of H202 3%), the primary antibodies were incubated for 30 min. After washing, the secondary antibody was added (Bond Polymer Refine Detection, DS9800, Leica®), for 10 min followed by streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (10 min), and then revealed with chromogen diaminobenzidine (K3468, DAKO) for 10 min. The slides were counterstained with Harris hematoxylin for 30 s and mounted. As a negative control, the primary antibody was omitted from the reactions, and for a positive control, we used fragment of colon adenocarcinoma.

Digital Images from histologic slides were standardized obtained using the camera (DFC 295) equipped to a light microscope (Leica® DM 200). The procedure consisted of an initial scan of the tumor, using a small increase (40×) to identify areas of higher stain. Then, using a magnification of 200×, color digital images were captured of five aleatory fields. The images were stored in Windows® Bitmap (BMP) format.

A quantification of STAT-positive and negative cells was made by evaluating the stain intensity and if it was nuclear or cytoplasmic (MBF Image J, MacBiophotonics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada). The percentage of positive cells was acquired to perform the Label Index (LI). Score 0 was attributed if LI ≤ 10%; score 1 if LI ≤ 11–30%; score 2 if LI ≤ 31–50%; score 3 if LI ≤ 51–60%; score 4 if LI ≤ 71–100%. The intensity of stain was categorized in score 0 (negative), score 1 (mild), score 2 (moderate), score 3 (intense). Finally, the scores obtained from LI and intensity were adding and a total score was acquired. The field was considered positive when total score was 3 or higher [33].

Results

Sample characterization

The tumor samples (group i) was composed by moderate (n = 25) and well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (n = 3); and controls samples (group iii) were of non-cancerous gingival tissues (n = 19). The OSCC (Oral squamous cell carcinoma) sites were tongue (n = 10), gingiva (n = 8), floor of mouth (n = 5), cheek (n = 4) and retromolar trigone (n = 1). Most volunteers were male (n = 18) and the age varied from 62 to 84 (media =62 years) (Table 1).
Table 1

The clinicopathologic characteristics in OSCC patients

Clinical Characteristics

Average / N° (Range / %)

Age

62 (62–84)

Histological Classification

 Moderate differentiated

25 (89.3%)

 Well differentiated

3 (10.7%)

Gender

 Male

18 (64.3%)

 Female

10 (35.7%)

Smoking condition

 Yes

19 (67.8%)

 No

9 (32.2%)

Alcohol consumption

 Yes

11 (39.3%)

 No

17 (60.7%)

OSCC sites

 Tongue

10 (35.7%)

 Gingiva

8 (28.6%)

 Floor of mouth

5 (17.8%)

 Cheek

4 (14.2%)

 Retromolar trigone

1 (3.7%)

Among the evaluating risk factors, 19 were positive for smoking, and 11 were positive to alcohol consumption.

The collected tumor samples (group i) was composed by moderate (n = 25) and well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (n = 3). Among the evaluating risk factors, 19 were positive for smoking, and, of whom 11 were positive to too alcohol drinkers consumption. The OSCC sites were, tongue (n = 10), gingiva (n = 8), floor of mouth (n = 5), cheek (n = 4) and retromolar trigone (n = 1) (Table 1). Most volunteers were male (n = 18) and the age varied from 62 to 84 (media =62 years) (Table 1).

Expression profile of hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-135b, and hsa-miR-29c in OSCC

The normalized expression data of hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-135b, and hsa-miR-29c followed a normal Gaussian distribution, and ANOVA indicated significant differences between the non-cancerous (gingival samples from healthy volunteers) and cancerous groups as well as between the non-cancerous and adjacent groups. Pairwise comparisons revealed that the expression levels of these three miRNAs were significantly increased in OSCC and adjacent tissues (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison of expression data and significance levels for miRNAs among the different types of tissue

MicroRNA

Normal x Cancer

(P value)

Normal x Adjacent

(P value)

Adjacent x Cancer

(P value)

hsa-miR-221

0.0001

0.008

1

hsa-miR-135b

8.4E−7

9.7E−6

1

hsa-miR-29c

0.04

0.005

0.49

hsa-miR-21

7. 6E−8

7.3E−6

0.63

The expression profile of hsa-miR-21 was the only variable that did not follow a normal Gaussian distribution, and thus, we used the Mann-Whitney test to analyze this miRNA. The expression of hsa-miR-21 was significantly higher in OSCC tissue and tumor-adjacent tissue than in non-cancerous tissue (Table 2). In addition, a comparison of expression profiles between tumor-adjacent tissue and OSCC showed no significant difference (Table 2; Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Normalized expression values (ΔCt) of hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-135b, and hsa-miR-29c in non-cancerous, cancer-adjacent, and cancer tissue samples (a-d)

The expression profiles of hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-135b, and hsa-miR-29c as biomarkers of carcinogenesis in OSCC

To determine whether the expression profiles of hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-135b and hsa-miR-29c could be used as risk factors of carcinogenesis, ROC curves were analyzed, and the discriminatory accuracy was calculated for AUC values. Our results showed that the expression levels of these miRNAs could differentiate the non-cancerous tissue group from the cancer and cancer-adjacent groups.

The expression level of hsa-miR-21 showed higher discriminatory accuracy between the groups with and without cancerous tissue, exhibiting an accuracy of 96.8% [AUC = 0.968; 95% CI: 0.920–1.00]. Similarly, the non-cancerous and adjacent groups had an accuracy of 98.7% [AUC = 0.987; 95% CI: 0.987–1.00] (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Receiver operating characteristic curves of hsa-miR-21 (a), hsa-miR-221 (c), hsa-miR-135b (e) and hsa-miR-29c (g) differentiating OSCC patients from normal controls and those differentiating between normal controls and adjacent tissue using hsa-miR-21 (b), hsa-miR-221 (d), hsa-miR-135b (f) and hsa-miR-29c (h)

Hsa-miR-221 showed a better discriminatory accuracy between the groups with and without cancerous tissue with an AUC of 0.848 (95% CI: 0.728–0.968), followed by the discriminatory power for differentiating between the non-cancerous and adjacent tissue groups (AUC = 0.833; 95% CI: 0.674–0.993) (Fig. 2).

The discriminatory power of hsa-miR-135b for differentiating the groups with CCEO and normal tissue resulted in an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI: 0.778–0.983), whereas for the non-cancerous and tumor-adjacent tissue groups, the AUC was 0.957 (95% CI: 0.890–1.00) (Fig. 2).

The discriminatory power of hsa-miR-29c for differentiating between the groups with and without oral cancer resulted in an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI: 0.778–0.983), whereas for the non-cancerous and tumor-adjacent tissue groups, the AUC was 0.957 (95% CI: 0.890–1.00) (Fig. 2).

In silico prediction of hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-29c and hsa-miR-135b target genes

We identified that miRNAs hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-221 and hsa-miR-29c share two target genes that have been demonstrated to participate in oral carcinogenesis – phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and DICER1. hsa-miR-21 and hsa-miR-135b share the target gene Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC). The STAT3 gene was identified as hsa-miR-21 target.

Immunohistochemistry

In 88% of OSCC, STAT3 was positive and the scores ranged between 2 and 6. The cytoplasmic stain was more frequent than nuclear and the intensity of stain varied from mild (89%) to moderate (11%). Comparison between STAT immunostaning and clinical variables showed that cytoplasmic stain was more intense in moderately differentiated OSCC and that males presented a higher final score.

We also compared the expression of hsa-miR-21 with the percentage of STAT3 staining in the cytoplasm of OSCC cases. We observed that was a difference in hsa-miR-21 expression along the STAT3 staining scores in the cytoplasm (ANOVA, P = 0.036). The expression of this miRNA was lower in the group that had the highest percentage of STAT3 staining (Fig. 3, P = 0.04). Additionally, we performed a Spearman rank correlation and found a negative correlation between hsa-miR-21 and STAT3 expressions (r = − 0.52, P = 0.025).
Fig. 3

Hsa-miR-21 expression in OSCC patients and its correlation with STAT3

Discussion

Most studies in OSCC compare tumor tissue samples with tumor-adjacent tissue samples for investigating genetic and epigenetic markers [17, 20, 21, 25, 27, 28]. Using this approach, researchers consider the tissue surrounding the the tumor tissue as a non-cancerous sample [20, 21, 25]. In this study, we compared three sample groups: i) tissue samples from oral cancer (n = 28); ii) tumor-adjacent tissue samples (n = 11); and iii) non-cancerous gingival tissue samples.

Expression levels of hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-29c and hsa-miR-135b showed significant differences between non-cancerous and adjacent to the tumour tissues, and demonstrated no significant difference between cancer and tumor-adjacent tissues (P = 0.63; P = 1; P = 0.49 and P = 1, respectively). These four miRNAs suggest the occurrence of a field cancerization effect in OSCC, and their dysregulation may provide an environment permissive for a cascade of events that may promote oral carcinogenesis.

hsa-miR-21 is an oncomiR that is overexpressed in several types of carcinomas, including colorectal cancer [34], esophageal cancer [35], hepatocellular cancer [36] and OSCC [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. Blocking hsa-miR-21 expression inhibits or reduces cell growth and proliferation both in vitro and in vivo and induces apoptosis [24, 35]. Several studies have demonstrated the overexpression of hsa-miR-21 in OSCC [21, 25, 37, 38]; however, most of these studies used the tumor-adjacent for comparative analysis. Our results also show the 4.57 fold overexpression of hsa-miR-21 in tumor-adjacent tissue compared to the non-cancerous tissue samples (P = 7.3E− 6), indicating that the area surrounding the tumor already presents an altered expression profile for this miRNA and thus cannot be considered normal.

The hsa-miR-221 expression profiles in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) have shown its relationship with oncogenesis and cell invasion. In addition, studies showed overexpression of hsa-miR-221 increased proliferation, cell growth, and migration, and thus, this miRNA is involved in the tumorigenesis of OSCC. Consequently, this marker could be useful for defining strategies for the prevention and treatment of HNSCC [22, 26]. Our results also showed the involvement of hsa-miR-221 in the carcinogenesis of OSCC, once it was overexpressed in both tumor (29.3 fold) and tumor-adjacent (2.04 fold) samples (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.008, respectively).

hsa-miR-135b is overexpressed in cancers such as colorectal cancer [34], lung cancer [39], cervical cancer [40] and gastric cancer [14]. In lung cancer, hsa-miR-135b acts as an oncomiR and promotes tumor growth and cell invasion, and contributes to angiogenesis and metastasis; thus, it seems to play an important role in multiple cancer development processes [39, 41]. Few studies have shown the expression of hsa-miR-135b in OSCC, therefore, and this study does corroborate the previous works.. We found the expression of hsa-miR-135b to be upregulated in both tumor (7.93 fold) and tumor-adjacent (7.96 fold) tissues when compared to normal tissues (P = 8.4E− 7 and P = 9.7E− 6, respectively).

hsa-miR-29c acts as a tumor-suppressor miRNA (TS-miR) due to its reduced expression in some cancers, such as gastric cancer [14], liver cancer [42] and hepatocellular cancer [43]. However, our results showed the overexpression of hsa-miR-29c in OSCC (P = 0.04; 2.39 fold), which corroborates the results of a previous study [28].

Furthermore, the miRNAs hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-221 and hsa-miR-29c share two target genes that have been demonstrated to participate in oral carcinogenesis, Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and DICER1 [44, 45, 46, 47].

PTEN functions as a tumor suppressor by negatively regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, which is involved in multiple biological processes, including cellular apoptosis, cell cycle regulation, survival and proliferation [48, 49]. The aberrant activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway has a significant role in tumorigenesis and tumor metastasis [49, 50]. In OSCC, downregulation of PTEN is correlated with the stage of carcinoma differentiation, cell proliferation, invasion and indicate a potential therapy for OSCC [45, 50, 51]. Since PTEN is a common target of miRNAs hsa-miR-21, − 221 and -29c, its downregulation in OSCC may be due the excessive regulatory activity from these three overexpressed miRNAs.

Dicer is an endoribonuclease coded by DICER1 gene, that plays an essential role by regulating the miRNA biogenesis [52]. In this endoribonuclease there are two RNase III domains, an intramolecular dimer that can cleave the pre-miRNA hairpin to generate mature miRNAs [53, 54]. Therefore, DICER1 is one of the most important components involved in miRNA biogenesis and its expression level seemed to correlate with tumor initiation, progression and patients’ prognosis [54, 55, 56]. In OSCC, a low Dicer expression may influence the pathogenesis of oral cancer cells and was significantly correlated with the pathological response to chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, Dicer was suggested as a potential biomarker for predicting the clinical response and a therapeutic target for OSCCs [57, 58, 59].

Studies showed that the overexpression of hsa-miR-21 or hsa-miR-135b leads to a downregulated expression of Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) gene [60, 61, 62]. APC encodes a tumor suppressor protein that negatively regulates the Wnt signaling pathway. Consequently, inactivation of the APC gene or activation of the WNT-1 pathway causes the nuclear accumulation of β-catenin, hence it seems to lead to deregulated cell adhesion and other processes such as cell migration, and apoptosis [63, 64]. Among the alterations in the APC expression, the epigenetic modifications cause a downregulation in its expression in OSCC leading to a blockage of tumor suppressor action and a progress of tumorigenesis [64, 65].

Furthermore, according to Strzelczyk et al. [65] APC expression in tumor and tumor-adjacent from patients with OSCC had similar levels, corroborating the field cancerization effect hypothesis. The authors suggested that the cancer field effect should be considered in diagnosis and treatment of cancers, once the remaining field after a surgery may pose an increased risk of cancer development. Thus, molecular analysis on tumor-adjacent tissue and additional research regarding their assessment are necessary and fundamental.

The STAT family of transcription factors are the principal signaling proteins of cytokines, which mediates cell communication and wide range of biological responses. STAT3 is vital in tumorigenesis and cancer-induced immunosuppression [66, 67, 68] and its persistent activation has been observed in several cancers [38, 66, 67]. The activation of STAT family and the control of aberrantly expressed miRNAs seems in the most basic mechanisms of OSCC [38, 69, 70]. Furthermore, STAT3 activates miR-21 to promote cancer cell growth [38, 71]. In our study, we compared the expression of hsa-miR-21 with the percentage of STAT3 staining in the cytoplasm of OSCC and demonstrated a negative correlation between these two variables. This evidence suggests that STAT3 is a target gene and it is regulated by hsa-miR-21, even though Zhou et al., 2014 [38] showed that cytoplasmic miR-21 and STAT3 were both highly expressed in poorly differentiated OSCC tissue samples when compared to highly differentiated samples.

Conclusions

Analyzing the expression profiles of hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-221, hsa-miR-135b and hsa-miR-29c in non-cancerous, tumor-adjacent and OSCC tissue samples, we observed evidences of the existence of the field cancerization effect in oral carcinogenesis via an epigenetic approach. Thus, the studied miRNAs have the potential of representing biomarkers for detecting field cancerization. In addition, because of their reported function, these miRNAs are likely to be involved in pathogenic processes associated with OSCC development.

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), CAPES (Coordenacão de Aperfeicoamento Pessoal de Nível Superior), Rede de Pesquisa em Genomica Populacional Humana (RPGPH) - 051/2013 CAPES-BioComputacional and FADESP/PROPESP/UFPA (Universidade Federal do Pará) and FAPESPA (Fundacão Amazonia Paraense de Amparo à Pesquisa) ICAAF 083/2013. Camile B. Lopes is supported by PDSE in Doc-Sandwiche fellowship from CAPES/Brazil and CNPq/ Doctoral scholarship (CNPQ 158483/2011–1). Ândrea Ribeiro-dos-Santos supported by CNPq/Produtividade (CNPQ 304413/2015–1); The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

CBL performed experiments; CBL, ARS, RC and APNNA designed research, CBL, LLM, CRT and MN analyzed data and edited the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval to conduct this study was obtained from the ethics committees on Human Research, Federal University of Ceará (protocol number 77/09) in accordance with the guidelines of the Helsinki declaration 1964 and Nurumberg code. All written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from OSCC patients for samples to be collected from them.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Silveira A, Gonçalves J, Sequeira T, Ribeiro C, Lopes C, Monteiro E, et al. Head and neck cancer: health related quality of life assessment considering clinical and epidemiological perspectives. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2012;15(1):38–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harding S, Sanipour F, Moss T. Existence of benefit finding and posttraumatic growth in people treated for head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Peer J. 2014;11(2):e256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang W, Zhao S, Liu F, Sun M. Health-related quality of life after mandibular resection for oral cancer: reconstruction with free fibula flap. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19(4):e414.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takes RP, Rinaldo A, Silver CE, Haigentz M, Woolgar JA, Triantafyllou A, et al. Distant metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Part I. Basic aspects. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:775–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yi JS, Kim JH, Lee SH, Choi SY, Nam SY, Kim, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting distant metastases in patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106:708–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Slaughter PD, Southwick HW, Smejkal W. “Field cancerization” in oral stratified squamous epithelium. Clinical implications of multicentric origin. Cancer. 1953;65:963–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Negrini M, Ferracin M, Sabbioni S, Croce CM. MicroRNAs in human cancer: from research to therapy. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(Pt 11):1833–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Di Leva G, Garofalo M, Croce CM. MicroRNAs in cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2014;9:287–314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lupini L, Bassi C, Ferracin M, Bartonicek N, D’Abundo L, Zagatti B, et al. miR-221 affects multiple cancer pathways by modulating the level of hundreds messenger RNAs. Front Genet. 2013;4:64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Donnell KA, Wentzel EA, Zeller KI, Dang CV, Mendell JT. C-Myc-regulated microRNAs modulate E2F1 expression. Nature. 2005;435:839–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ribeiro-dos-Santos A, Cruz AMP, Darnet S. Deep Sequencing of MicroRNAs in Cancer: Expression profiling and its applications. In: Mallick B, Ghosh Z, editors. (org.) Regulatory RNAs. 21ed, vol. 1. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 523–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Darnet S, Moreira FC, Hamoy IG, Burbano RMR, Khayat AS, Cruz A, Magalhaes LL, Silva ALC, Santos SB, Demackhi S, Assumpção MB, Assumpção P, Ribeiro-dos-santos A. High-throughput sequencing of miRNAs reveals a tissue signature in gastric Cancer and suggests novel potential biomarkers. Bioinf Biol Insights. 2015;9:1–8.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Den Berg AV, Magalhães LL, Vidal AF, Cruz Aline MP, Ribeiro-dos-Santos Â. MicroRNAs as biomarkers of the response to treatment with ABVD scheme in Hodgkin lymphoma. J Leuk. 2016;3:1–6.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vidal AF, Cruz AM, Magalhães L, Pereira AL, Anaissi AK, Alves NC, et al. Hsa-miR-29c and hsa-miR-135b differential expression as potential biomarker of gastric carcinogenesis. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(6):2060.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, Ambs S, Cimmino A, Petrocca F, et al. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(7):2257–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ribeiro-dos-Santos Â, Khayat AS, Silva A, Alencar DO, Lobato J, Luz L, et al. Ultra-deep sequencing reveals the microRNA expression pattern of the human stomach. PLoS One. 2010;5:13205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramdas L, Giri U, Ashorn CL, Coombes KR, El-Naggar A, Ang KK, et al. miRNA expression profiles in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and adjacent normal tissue. Head Neck. 2009;31(5):642–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peng F, Zhang H, Du Y, Tan P. miR-23a promotes cisplatin chemoresistance and protects against cisplatin-induced apoptosis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells through twist. Oncol Rep. 2015;33(2):942–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hung KF, Liu CJ, Chiu PC, Lin JS, Chang KW, Shih WY, et al. MicroRNA-31 upregulation predicts increased risk of progression of oral potentially malignant disorder. Oral Oncol. 2016;53:42–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kawakita A, Yanamoto S, Yamada S, Naruse T, Takahashi H, Kawasaki G, et al. MicroRNA-21 promotes oral cancer invasion via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by targeting DKK2. Pathol Oncol Res. 2014;20(2):253–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Manikandan M, Rao DM, Arunagiri K, Rajkumar KS, Rajaraman R, Munirajan AK. Altered levels of miR-21, miR-125b-2*, miR-138, miR-155, miR-184, and miR-205 in oral squamous cell carcinoma and association with clinicopathological characteristics. J Oral Pathol Med. 2015;44(10):792–800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Avissar M, Christensen BC, Kelsey KT, Marsit CJ. MicroRNA expression ratio is predictive of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(8):2850–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    He Q, Chen Z, Cabay RJ, Zhang L, Luan X, Chen D, et al. microRNA-21 and microRNA-375 from oral cytology as biomarkers for oral tongue cancer detection. Oral Oncol. 2016;57:15–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang Y, Zhu Y, Lv P, Li L. The role of miR-21 in proliferation and invasion capacity of human tongue squamous cell carcinoma in vitro. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(5):4555–63.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lajer CB, Nielsen FC, Friis-Hansen L, Norrild B, Borup R, Garnaes E, et al. Different miRNA signatures of oral and pharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective translational study. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(5):830–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang CJ, Shen WG, Liu CJ, Chen YW, Lu HH, Tsai MM, et al. miR-221 and miR-222 expression increased the growth and tumorigenesis of oral carcinoma cells. J Oral Pathol Med. 2011;40(7):560–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sethi A, Wright Wood H, Rabbitts P. MicroRNAs and head and neck cancer: reviewing the first decade of research. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(15):2619–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Serrano NA, Xu C, Liu Y, Wang P, Fan W, Upton MP, et al. Integrative analysis in oral squamous cell carcinoma reveals DNA copy number-associated miRNAs dysregulating target genes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; Sep;147(3):501–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hilly O, Pillar N, Stern S, Strenov Y, Bachar G, Shomron N, et al. Distinctive pattern of let-7 family microRNAs in aggressive carcinoma of the oral tongue in young patients. Oncol Lett. 2016;12(3):1729–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li S, Chen X, Liu X, Yu Y, Pan H, Haak R, et al. Complex integrated analysis of lncRNAs-miRNAs-mRNAs in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2017;73:1–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Assumpção MB, Moreira FC, Hamoy IG, Magalhães L, Vidal A, Pereira A, et al. High-throughput miRNA sequencing reveals a field effect in gastric cancer and suggests an epigenetic network mechanism. Bioinf Biol Insights. 2015;9:111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barnes L. Pathology and genetics of head and neck Tumours. WHO Class Tumour. 2005;9:163–75.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Macha MA, Matta A, Kaur J, Chauhan SS, Thakar A, Shukla NK, et al. Prognostic significance of nuclear pSTAT3 in oral cancer. Head Neck. 2011;33(4):482–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xu XM, Qian JC, Deng ZL, Cai Z, Tang T, Wang P, et al. Expression of miR-21, miR-31, miR-96 and miR-135b is correlated with the clinical parameters of colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett. 2012;4(2):339–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nouraee N, Van Roosbroeck K, Vasei M, Semnani S, Samaei NM, Naghshvar F, et al. Expression, tissue distribution and function of miR-21 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Karakatsanis A, Papaconstantinou I, Gazouli M, Lyberopoulou A, Polymeneas G, Voros D. Expression of microRNAs, miR-21, miR-31, miR-122, miR-145, miR-146a, miR-200c, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-223 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its prognostic significance. Mol Carcinog. 2013;52(4):297–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ren W, Wang X, Gao L, Li S, Yan X, Zhang J, et al. MiR-21 modulates chemosensitivity of tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells to cisplatin by targeting PDCD4. Mol Cell Biochem. 2014;390(1–2):253–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhou X, Ren Y, Liu A, Han L, Zhang K, Li S, et al. STAT3 inhibitor WP1066 attenuates miRNA-21 to suppress human oral squamous cell carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Rep. 2014;31(5):2173–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lin CW, Chang YL, Chang YC, Lin JC, Chen CC, Pan SH, et al. MicroRNA-135b promotes lung cancer metastasis by regulating multiple targets in the hippo pathway and LZTS1. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1877.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Xu Y, Zhao S, Cui M, Wang Q. Down-regulation of microRNA-135b inhibited growth of cervical cancer cells by targeting FOXO1. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(9):10294–304.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Matsuyama H, Suzuki HI, Nishimori H, Noguchi M, Yao T, Komatsu N, et al. miR-135b mediates NPM-ALK-driven oncogenicity and renders IL-17-producing immunophenotype to anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Blood. 2011;118:6881–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang B, Li D, Sidler C, Rodriguez-Juarez R, Singh N, Heyns M, Ilnytskyy Y, et al. A suppressive role of ionizing radiation-responsive miR-29c in the development of liver carcinoma via targeting WIP1. Oncotarget. 2015;6(12):9937–50.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bae HJ, Noh JH, Kim JK, Eun JW, Jung KH, Kim MG, et al. MicroRNA-29c functions as a tumor suppressor by direct targeting oncogenic SIRT1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 2014;33:2557–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ren W, Qiang C, Gao L, et al. Circulating microRNA-21 (MIR-21) and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) are promising novel biomarkers for detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Biomarkers. 2014;19:590–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhou L, Jiang F, Chen X, Liu Z, Ouyang Y, Zhao W, et al. Downregulation of miR-221/222 by a microRNA sponge promotes apoptosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells through upregulation of PTEN. Oncol Lett. 2016;12(6):4419–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Peng F, Zhang Y, Wang R, Zhou W, Zhao Z, Liang H, et al. Identification of differentially expressed miRNAs in individual breast cancer patient and application in personalized medicine. Oncogene. 2016;5(2):e194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gao L, Ren W, Zhang L, Li S, Kong X, Zhang H, et al. PTENp1, a natural sponge of miR-21, mediates PTEN expression to inhibit the proliferation of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 2017;56:1322–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sun MM, Zhang MZ, Chen Y, Li SL, Zhang W, Ya GW, Chen KS. Effect of PTEN antisense oligonucleotide on oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. J Int Med Res. 2012;40:2098–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Xue Q, Sun K, Deng HJ, Lei ST, Dong JQ, Li GX. Anti-miRNA-221 sensitizes human colorectal carcinoma cells to radiation by upregulating PTEN. World J Gastroentero. 2013;19:9307–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang H, Wu Q, Liu Z, Luo X, Fan Y, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Hua S, Fu Q, Zhao M, et al. Downregulation of FAP suppresses cell proliferation and metastasis through PTEN/PI3K/AKT and Ras ERK signaling in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1155.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shah S, Jajal D, Mishra G, Kalia K. Genetic profile of PTEN gene in Indian oral squamous cell carcinoma primary tumors. J Oral Pathol Med. 2017;46:106–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pampalakis G, Diamandis EP, Katsaros D, Sotiropoulou G. Down-regulation of dicer expression in ovarian cancer tissues. Clin Biochem. 2010;43:324–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Slade I, Bacchelli C, Davies H, et al. DICER1 syndrome: clarifying the diagnosis, clinical features and management implications of a pleiotropic tumour predisposition syndrome. J Med Genet. 2011;48:273–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bahubeshi A, Tischkowitz M, Foulkes WD. miRNA processing and human cancer: DICER1 cuts the mustard. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:111ps146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Conlon N, Schultheis AM, Piscuoglio S. A survey of DICER1 hotspot mutations in ovarian and testicular sex cord-stromal tumors. Mod Pathol. 2015;28:1603–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Shan W, Sun C, Zhou B, Guo E, Lu H, Xia M, et al. Role of dicer as a prognostic predictor for survival in cancer patients: a systematic review with a meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(45):72672.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wu BH, Xiong XP, Jia J, et al. MicroRNAs: new actors in the oral cancer scene. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:314–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kawahara K, Nakayama H, Nagata M, Yoshida R, Hirosue A, Tanaka T, et al. A low dicer expression is associated with resistance to 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy and a shorter overall survival in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2014;43(5):350–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Cantini LP, Andino LM, Attaway CC, Butler B, Dumitriu A, Blackshaw A, et al. Identification and characterization of Dicer1e, a Dicer1 protein variant, in oral cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2014;13(1):190.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lin PL, Wu DW, Huang CC, He TY, Chou MC, Sheu GT, et al. MicroRNA-21 promotes tumour malignancy via increased nuclear translocation of β-catenin and predicts poor outcome in APC-mutated but not in APC-wild-type colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35(10):2175–82.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Valeri N, Braconi C, Gasparini P, Hart J, Grivennikov S, Lovat F, et al. microRNA-135b promotes cancer progression acting as a downstream effector of oncogenic pathways in colon cancer. Lancet. 2013;381:S17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Xin H, Jiang D, Lü Z, Sun S, Kong J, Li F. Effect of miRNA-135b on proliferation, invasion and migration of triple-negative breast cancer by targeting APC. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015;95(30):2474–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Nagel R, le Sage C, Diosdado B, van der Waal M, Oude Vrielink JA, Bolijn A, Meijer GA, Agami R. Regulation of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene by the miR-135 family in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5795–802.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pérez-Sayáns M, Suárez-Peñaranda JM, Herranz-Carnero M, Gayoso-Diz P, Barros-Angueira F, Gándara-Rey JM, García-García A. The role of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:56–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Strzelczyk JK, Gołąbek K, Krakowczyk Ł, Owczarek AJ. Expression profiles of MGMT, p16, and APC genes in tumor and matching surgical margin from patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Biochim Pol. 2016;63(3):505–9.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Resemann HK, Watson CJ, Lloyd-Lewis B. The Stat3 paradox: a killer and an oncogene. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;382:603–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Yu H, Kortylewski M, Pardoll D. Crosstalk between cancer and immune cells: role of STAT3 in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:41–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    He G, Karin M. NF-κB and STAT3 - key players in liver inflammation and cancer. Cell Res. 2011;21:159–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Grandis JR, Drenning SD, Zeng Q, et al. Constitutive activation of Stat3 signaling abrogates apoptosis in squamous cell carcinogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97:4227–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Bourguignon LY, Earle C, Wong G, et al. Stem cell marker (Nanog) and Stat-3 signaling promote MicroRNA-21 expression and chemoresistance in hyaluronan/CD44-activated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2012;31:149–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wang YY, Sun G, Luo H, et al. MiR-21 modulates hTERT through a STAT3-dependent manner on glioblastoma cell growth. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012;18:722–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Camile B. Lopes
    • 1
  • Leandro L. Magalhães
    • 1
  • Carolina R. Teófilo
    • 2
  • Ana Paula N. N. Alves
    • 2
  • Raquel C. Montenegro
    • 3
  • Massimo Negrini
    • 4
  • Ândrea Ribeiro-dos-Santos
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Laboratory of Human and Medical Genetics, Graduate Program of Genetics and Molecular BiologyFederal University of ParáBelémBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Dentistry - Health Sciences CenterFederal University of CearáFortalezaBrazil
  3. 3.Center of Research and Drug DevelopmentFederal University of CearaFortalezaBrazil
  4. 4.Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental MedicineUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly
  5. 5.Research Center of OncologyFederal University of ParáBelémBrazil

Personalised recommendations