Advertisement

BMC Infectious Diseases

, 18:370 | Cite as

Restriction of in vivo infection by antifouling coating on urinary catheter with controllable and sustained silver release: a proof of concept study

  • Kedar Diwakar Mandakhalikar
  • Rong Wang
  • Juwita N. Rahmat
  • Edmund Chiong
  • Koon Gee Neoh
  • Paul A. Tambyah
Open Access
Research article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Healthcare-associated infection control

Abstract

Background

Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections are among the most common urological infections world-wide. Bacterial biofilms and encrustation cause significant complications in patients with urinary catheters. The objective of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of an anti-microbial and anti-encrustation silver nanoparticle (AgNP) coating on silicone urinary catheter in two different animal models.

Methods

Antifouling coating (P3) was prepared with alternate layers of polydopamine and AgNP and an outermost antifouling layer. Sixteen C57BL/6 female mice and two female PWG Micropigs® were used to perform the experiments. In mice, a 5 mm long silicone catheter with or without P3 was transurethrally placed into the urinary bladder. Micropigs were transurethrally implanted – one with P3 silicone catheter and the other with commercially available silver coated silicone catheter. Both models were challenged with E. coli. Bacteriuria was evaluated routinely and upon end of study (2 weeks for mice, 3 weeks for micropigs), blood, catheters and bladders were harvested and analysed for bacterial colonization and encrustation as well as for toxicity.

Results

Lower bacterial colonization was seen on P3 catheters as well as in bladders of animals with P3 catheter. Bacteriuria was consistently less in mice with P3 catheter than with uncoated catheters. Encrustation was lower on P3 catheter and in bladder of micropig with P3 catheter. No significant toxicity of P3 was observed in mice or in micropig as compared to controls. The numbers were small in this proof of concept study and technical issues were noted especially with the porcine model.

Conclusions

Antifouling P3 coating reduces bacterial colonization on catheter and in animal bladders without causing any considerable toxicity for 2 to 3 weeks. This novel coating could potentially reduce the complications of indwelling urethral catheters.

Keywords

CAUTI Silver nanoparticles Urinary catheter Mouse model Porcine model Catheter associated urinary tract infections 

Abbreviations

[poly(SBMA-co-AAm)]

poly(sulfobetaine methacrylate-co-acrylamide)

AgNPs

Silver nanoparticles

BSC

Biosafety cabinet

BUN

Blood urea nitrogen

CAUTI

Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections

CFU

Colony forming unit

dpi

day(s) post inoculation

IACUC

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee

ICP-OES

Inductive Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry

LB

Lysogeny broth

P3

Anti-fouling coating prepared by coating PDA-AgNP-PDA-AgNP-PDA-poly(SBMA-co-AAm) layers on the inside as well as outside surfaces of the silicone tubing

PBR

Prestige BioResearch Pte Ltd., Singapore

PDA

Polydopamine

SEM

Scanning electron microscopy

UPEC

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli

Background

Urinary catheters are among the most common medical devices in clinical use [1]. However, catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) are among the most common hospital acquired infections [2, 3, 4]. The risk of CAUTI is reported to be between 3 and 7% daily and increases with the duration of catheterization [5].

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) are responsible for most CAUTI [6]. Many UPEC strains are now resistant to multiple antibiotics, and thus difficult to treat, emphasizing the importance of preventative strategies [7, 8, 9].

Intraluminal and extraluminal biofilms, caused by the attachment of bacteria to the catheter, facilitate the entry and persistence of uropathogens in the bladder and thus promote the development of resistance [6]. In addition, urease producing bacteria, especially P. mirabilis, contribute significantly to catheter encrustation through precipitation of mineral salts such as calcium phosphate and magnesium ammonium phosphate [10]. These encrustations and biofilms are major contributors to morbidity and mortality in CAUTI [11, 12, 13, 14]. They are responsible for the failure of many medical devices [15]. Novel approaches to preventing CAUTI have focussed on preventing the development of biofilms using various techniques including novel coatings [16].

We have previously developed an anti-fouling catheter with controllable and sustained silver release which is effective in resisting encrustation induced by Proteus mirabilis in vitro for up to 45 days [17]. The coating comprises multiple layers of silver using polydopamine (PDA) as the surface anchor which reduces the silver ions into silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and stabilizes and protects the AgNPs from oxidization and aggregation. Therefore, the amount of silver loaded, and its subsequent release profile is readily controllable by changing the number of silver-containing layers. The outermost layer is made of an antifouling polymer, poly (sulfobetaine methacrylate-co-acrylamide) [poly (SBMA-co-AAm)], which also allows free diffusion of silver. Thus, this novel coating is different in having a higher intrinsic silver release capability than the current commercially available silver coated urinary catheters.

Here, we used a previously described mouse model [18, 19] to study the safety and potential efficacy of this catheter against biofilm formation and colonization by UPEC in vivo. To further test the coating for human catheters, we chose a porcine model for our in vivo experiments as it provides a urinary tract that resembles the macroscopic human urinary tract fairly well and is a very accessible animal for laboratory testing [20]. To our knowledge, this model has not been used for a long-term catheterization study. It was also important to compare the efficacy of our catheter to a silver coated catheter currently in use in patients. Therefore, we used an uncoated control in the mouse model whereas a commercially available silver coated catheter control was used in the porcine model.

This study was funded by Technology Enterprise Commercialisation Scheme-Proof-Of-Concept grant of SPRING Singapore (TI/TECS/POC/14/10).

Methods

Bacteria and growth conditions

E. coli UTI89, an uropathogenic strain known to be a good biofilm developer, isolated from a patient with uncomplicated cystitis, was kindly provided by Dr. Swaine Chen of Genome Institute of Singapore [21]. E. coli was cultured in lysogeny broth (LB) (BD Difco, Singapore) at 37 °C with constant agitation at 180–200 rpm. LB agar was used to grow E. coli on solid medium and incubated at 37 °C for 12–18 h.

Catheters for mouse model of CAUTI

Small silicone tubing, SIL037 (3 French, 0.5 mm ID × 0.9 mm OD) was obtained from Braintree Scientific, Inc., USA. Anti-fouling coating (P3) was prepared by coating PDA-AgNP-PDA-AgNP-PDA-poly(SBMA-co-AAm) layers on the inside as well as outside surfaces of the silicone tubing as described previously [17]. The method was modified to expedite the coating process as polydopamine was coated with oxygen bubbling at 60 °C for 20 min, instead of in air at room temperature for 24 h in our earlier work. Silver content in the coating was determined to be 33.98 ± 1.62 μg/cm2 using Inductive Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES, iCAP 6200 duo, Thermo Scientific, USA) as previously described [17]. The tubing was cut in 5 mm long segments, autoclaved and air-dried in a clean biosafety cabinet (BSC) before use in mice. Twelve mm long segments of SIL037 catheter tubing were fitted on sterile 25 G needles (Becton Dickinson). A 5 mm long, either coated or uncoated, sterile segment of SIL037 tubing was then placed on top of the 12 mm segment for implantation.

Catheters for porcine model of CAUTI

Uncoated silicone catheters of 14 Fr size were purchased from Promed Pte. Ltd., Singapore. P3 coated catheter was prepared by coating PDA-AgNP-PDA-AgNP-PDA-poly(SBMA-co-AAm) layers on pristine silicone catheter over the interior and exterior of the whole length as described previously with modification to obtain a similar silver content (30.30 ± 1.33 μg/cm2) as in the mouse work [17]. For a 14 Fr Foley catheter (40 cm long), total silver amount was estimated to be approximately 3 mg per catheter. A commercially available, Dover™ silver coated 100% silicone Foley catheter was purchased from Covidien Pte. Ltd., Singapore.

Since the balloon inflation port of the silicone catheter was not autoclave-compatible, the coated catheters were disinfected by 70% ethanol followed by UV irradiation for 30 min and sealed before the pig study. The Dover™ catheter was used as received since it was in sterile package.

Murine model of CAUTI

All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the university ethical regulations and were approved by the National University of Singapore Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). All animals were allowed an acclimatization period of at least five days in the animal testing facility after arrival, prior to experimentation. Laboratory feed and drinking water were provided ad libitum during entire duration, including before and during experimentation. The animal subjects were provided with environmental enrichment in accordance to species-specific standards. The temperature and humidity of the housing space was regulated as per international standards, and animals were provided with a cycle of 12 h of light followed by 12 h of darkness.

The mouse model was adapted from a previously published study with modifications mainly in the implant size and bacteria used [19]. Briefly, 18–20 weeks old C57BL/6 female mice (from InVivos Pvt. Ltd., Singapore) were anesthetized and 5 mm long catheter pieces were delivered in the urinary bladders by catheterizing the mice with a covered 25 G needle via the urethra lumen. The mice were re-catheterized with IV Catheters (24 G) and 50 μL bacterial cultures (2 x 106 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/ml) were instilled in the urinary bladder. After 30 min dwelling, the bladder was gently pressed to expel the contents.

Urine cultures were collected daily in metabolic cages overnight. Metabolic cages were used so as to collect larger volumes of urine for measurement of silver release from the coating. However, this way of urine collection may increase the risk of contamination of the urine by faeces and feed which we attempted to mitigate by having multiple comparisons. At the end of 14 days, mice were euthanized with CO2 overdose (method approved by NUS-IACUC), and catheters were collected (if not passed out in urine). Bacterial biofilm was quantified from the collected catheters with a method using vortexing and sonication as reported recently [22]. In addition, bacterial colonization in the urinary bladder was measured. Each bladder was cut in two halves – one for homogenization and bacterial count, the other for histopathology studies.

Porcine model of CAUTI

Female miniature pigs (PWG Micropig®) from Prestige BioResearch Pte Ltd., Singapore (PBR) were used for this study. The work was carried out at PBR in accordance with approval by PBR-IACUC. During acclimation, animals were group housed. After the Foley catheter implantation, the animals were individually housed in well labelled steel cages. A standard nutrient and micro-ingredient composition of laboratory animal pig diet ration (pellets - 400 g, Altromin 9029, Altromin Spezialfutter GmbH & Co.KG, Germany) was available to each animal daily. Ultraviolet-irradiated municipal tap water was provided ad libitum to the animals. The animal room environment was controlled: a temperature of 16–27 °C, humidity of 50–80% and approximately 12 h of the light/dark cycle with 150–300 lx.

The study was conducted in compliance with the principles specified in national and international regulatory authority test guideline: ISO 10993:2006 “Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 11: Tests for Systemic Toxicity”. This guideline largely deals with standardization of biological and clinical methods for evaluation of medical devices [23].

This proof of concept experiment comprised of two animals – one implanted with P3 coated catheter and the other animal with the commercially available silver coated Dover™ catheter for comparison. Implantation of the catheters was performed aseptically under general anaesthesia induced by isoflurane inhalation. The Foley catheter was inserted into the urinary bladder with long surgical forceps via the transurethral route with the animal in dorsal recumbency. The balloon was inflated with 5–6 ml of sterile distilled water according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, the inner lumen and outer surface were inoculated with 20 μL each of E. coli (105 CFU/ml) in 1X PBS at the outlet. After waiting approximately 10 min for bacteria to attach to the catheter surface, the external part of the catheter was tied to the tail of the pig with suitable adhesives.

Initially a urine reservoir bag was attached to the catheter at all times to maintain a closed system of urine collection as is the case in humans. We were not successful in securing the bag to the animal and observed that the catheter was pulled out or dropped out due to additional pressure from the bag. Therefore, subsequently, this was modified to an open catheter system. The outlet of the Foley catheter was anchored via suturing to skin in a dependent position and the urine bag was used only for urine sample collection.

Animals were euthanized at the endpoint (20 days post inoculation (dpi) for P3 catheter and 21 dpi for Dover™ catheter) by exsanguination of the vena cava and thoracic vein/artery under deep barbiturate anaesthesia (pentobarbitone sodium) as approved by PBR-IACUC. Catheters and organs of urinary tract were collected for evaluation of bacterial colonization and encrustation.

Assays used for analysis

In mice, efficacy of the coating was analysed using bacterial quantification in urine, on catheters and in tissues, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and by measuring IL-6 levels in urine. Moreover, safety of the coating was assessed by monitoring body weight, kidney function tests and histopathology examination. Additionally, in the porcine model, encrustation was qualitatively examined visually as well as quantified using ICP-OES to measure calcium and magnesium deposition on catheters and in tissues.

Bacteria in urine and from catheter or tissue samples were counted using Miles and Misra method [24]. SEM was performed as published elsewhere [25] with some modifications and visualised using JEOL JSM-6701F Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope. IL-6 levels were measured by ELISA to assess the degree of inflammation (Mouse IL-6, Cat# 88–7064-88, eBioscience Inc., USA).

Results and discussion

Euthanasia and harvesting

Mice

Out of 8 mice implanted with uncoated catheters, two mice were terminated early in the experiment due to bladder outlet obstruction as there was no urine output. An enlarged bladder was observed during post-mortem examination (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Catheters and bladders were collected and processed to assess bacterial colonization. One mouse was terminated 10dpi due to weight loss more than 25% and catheter and organs were collected and processed. The remaining 5 mice were euthanized at the endpoint (14 dpi). All 8 uncoated catheters were recovered.

Among the 8 mice implanted with P3 coated catheters, all mice survived till the endpoint. However, two catheters were lost, possibly, passed with urine from the bladder, hence only 6 catheters were recovered.

Pigs

Dover™ catheter in the pig was collected after euthanizing the animal 21 dpi. The P3 catheter did drop out once at two dpi, which was replaced with a new catheter and reinoculated with E. coli and the catheter was collected at the endpoint for the animal (20 dpi). It should be noted the pig was implanted with the P3 catheter for 23 days in total.

Anti-biofilm activity of P3 coating

Mice

After the mice were sacrificed, bacterial colonization on the catheter as well as in the bladder was quantified (Table 1). It was found that only one out of four P3 coated catheters had E. coli biofilm, whereas five out of six uncoated catheters had developed biofilm. On bacterial quantification, while median values showed a reduction of 107 CFU, average CFU values demonstrated a 50% reduction in bacterial load on P3 coated catheter. Moreover, both uncoated catheters recovered from mice terminated 3–4 dpi due to bladder obstruction were seen to be colonized by high numbers of bacteria (107). The majority of urinary bladders (5 out of 6) implanted with P3 coated catheters did not show any bacterial colonization. In comparison, more than half of the bladders (5 out of 8) implanted with uncoated catheters had bacterial colonization. Moreover, if the two bladders (implanted with uncoated catheters) that were harvested 3–4 dpi were excluded from analysis, the median value of CFU/bladder would be 1.2 X 102 (range: 0 to 6 x 107).
Table 1

Catheter recovery, bladder harvesting and E. coli colonization

 

Uncoated

P3 coated

Up to 14dpia

14dpi

Number of mice euthanized (total 8 mice per group)

8

8

Catheters collected (catheters lost)

8 (0)

6 (2)

Number of catheters processed for biofilm extraction assay (catheters processed for SEMb)

6 (2)

4 (2)

Number of catheters with viable biofilm

5

1

Median values of CFUc/catheter (range)

6.58 X 107 (0 to 1.52 X 108)

0 (0 to 1.18 X 108)

Number of urinary bladders collected with catheters

8

6

Number of bladders with viable bacteria

5

1

Median values of CFU/bladder (range)

5.0 X 102 (0 to 1.4 X 108)

0 (0 to 1.03 X 105)

aDays post inoculation

bScanning electron microscopy

cColony forming units

Biofilm formation on mouse catheters was visualized by SEM and the differences in coated and uncoated catheters can be seen in Fig. 1. Comparison between uncoated and P3 coated catheters at low magnification in Fig. 1a and b shows the difference in surface area covered with a layer or a film. At high magnification, a few rod-shaped structures resembling E. coli shape (and size) can be seen on the uncoated catheter (Fig. 1c – indicated by white arrow), suggesting that these are bacterial biofilms. On the other hand, the size of the cell-like structures seen on P3 coated catheters (Fig. 1d – indicated by black arrow) suggests that they are host cells.
Fig. 1

Representative SEM images of differences in biofilm formation on mouse catheters. (a) and (c) uncoated catheter, (b) and (d) P3 coated catheter. Scale bars indicate 100 μm for (a) and (b), and 1 μm for (c) and (d). The white and black arrows point to structures that suggest bacteria and host cells respectively

Pigs

The human catheter in the porcine model also showed promising results as average bacterial counts from the catheter collected from the pig with the P3 catheter (20 dpi) were 2.4 times lower than that on the silver coated Dover™ catheter (21 dpi). Biofilm extracted from three segments near tip of the catheters recovered from both animals yielded mostly E. coli colonies whereas two segments near the urethral exit yielded a polymicrobial biofilm.

Comparison between E. coli inoculated micropigs in Fig. 2 showed a significant (~ 700 fold) reduction in bladder infection with P3 coated catheter as compared to the pig with commercial Dover™ catheter. Similarly, a reduction was also observed in bacterial colonization in the urethra (4 fold) and kidneys (19 fold) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Viable bacterial cell counts from different organs of the micropigs at endpoint

Although an uncoated catheter would be an appropriate control to demonstrate efficacy in the pig model, the aim of this study was to develop a catheter which could be marketed for clinical use. However, by comparing the efficacy of our coating to a clinically tested silver coating which is licensed by the major regulatory agencies and in clinical use globally, the results of this proof-of-concept study would be more relevant as various reviews and meta-analyses have demonstrated ability of silver to reduce CAUTI [26, 27, 28]. We also do recognise that the proprietary nature of the commercial control catheter limits our ability to compare the details of the different coatings.

These results suggest that the P3 coating could inhibit E. coli biofilm formation both on catheter surface and in the bladder effectively in mice and in pigs.

Antibacterial activity in mice

Daily bacterial load in urine was calculated for 14 dpi in six mice implanted with P3 coated catheters. In the uncoated catheter implanted group, bacteriuria was quantified in 5 mice for 14 dpi and one mouse for 10 dpi. Consistently less bacteriuria (51–99%) was observed in mice with P3 coated catheters as compared to mice with uncoated catheters for up to 14 days (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Daily mean bacterial titres in urine of mice inoculated with E. coli. Error bars indicate SD

The higher values of IL6 in uncoated group (Additional file 1: Figure S2) indicating more inflammation as compared to P3 group supporting the finding of low activity of pathogenic bacteria in P3 group mice compared with controls.

Reduction of encrustation in pigs

Figure 4a shows the cross-sections of the catheters that challenged with E. coli. As can be seen, segments of the Dover™ catheter collected 21 dpi were totally or partially blocked, while the P3 coated catheter retrieved 20 dpi remained patent throughout the length assessed (up to 15 cm from the catheter tip, the length inserted in the urethra and bladder). Quantitative results from ICP-OES measurement indicate that both calcium (2.3 times on an average) and magnesium (6 times on an average) amounts were lower on P3 coated catheter as compared to Dover™ catheter (Fig. 4b and c). This indicates that P3 coated catheter inhibited encrustation formation during uropathogenic E. coli infection more effectively compared to the commercially available Dover™ catheter.
Fig. 4

a) Photos of cross-section of catheter segments collected from pigs implanted with Dover™ catheter and P3 coated catheter, on 21dpi and 20dpi, respectively. Catheter segments at different positions along the length are shown. Arrows indicate catheter lumen was either partially or completely blocked by crystals and/or biofilm. Average amounts of B) calcium and c) magnesium on the catheter segments

There were 1.8 times less calcium and magnesium precipitates in the bladder of the pigs with P3 coated catheter as compared to the silver coated Dover™ catheter (Additional file 1: Figure S3).

Toxicity

All mice lost up to 18% body weight in the first two dpi but recovered well 3rd day onwards (Additional file 1: Figure S4). Mice with the P3 coated catheter show slightly lower (~ 5%) weight loss as compared to mice with uncoated catheters indicating that silver does not appear to cause any general harm to the animals over a period of two weeks.

Kidney function was also assessed by measuring levels of creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) in serum at endpoint. As seen in Fig. 5, no major differences were observed in kidney functions (both parameters) of mice with uncoated catheter and those with P3 coated catheters. BUN readings were higher than normal and creatinine values were slightly lower than normal values [29, 30] in both groups indicating that the increase may not be due to P3 coating, but possibly due to the hydration status or inflammatory state of the animals.
Fig. 5

Kidney function tests in C57BL/6 mice inoculated with E. coli

Silver levels could not be measured in urine of mice with P3 catheters due to undetectable (low) levels.

Histopathology

The degree of bladder inflammation appeared more severe in the uncoated group as compared to the P3 group. Moderate to severe pyogranulomatous, lymphoplasmacytic, oedematous cystitis as well as minimal to moderate pyogranulomatous, lymphoplasmacytic serositis was seen in mice implanted with uncoated catheters infected with E. coli (Fig. 6a). On the other hand, no significant findings were observed in mice with P3-coated catheter and E. coli except in one mouse with moderate pyogranulomatous, lymphoplasmacytic serositis (Fig. 6b). Similar results were observed with pig bladders wherein moderate cystitis was seen in animal with the silver coated Dover™ catheter (Fig. 6c) whereas mild cystitis was observed in animal with P3 catheter (Fig. 6d). This indicates that the P3 coating is not harmful to the bladder compared to uncoated catheter (in mice) or silver coated Dover™ catheter (in pigs); it may even have an anti-inflammatory effect.
Fig. 6

Representative hematoxylin and eosin staining (scale bars 100 μm) of 5 μm section of urinary bladders of a) Mice with uncoated catheter and b) Mice with P3 coated catheter c) Pigs with silver coated Dover™ catheter and d) Pigs with P3 coated catheter. Images suggest a higher granulocyte infiltration in the sub-mucosal layer (indicated by black arrows) in a and c as compared to that in b and d respectively

Conclusion

In this study, we have demonstrated, using a murine model and a novel porcine model the safety, and antimicrobial effect of the P3 coating. The results also suggest an anti-encrustation capability of P3 coating. In the porcine model, using a proof of concept with a single animal, we demonstrated the potential efficacy of P3 coating in comparison with the commercial Dover™ silver coating. The P3 coated catheter was safe for use as indicated by the absence of systemic clinical and laboratory signs in both animal models. This suggests low toxicity from the catheter coating material in line with ISO 10993–11:2006.

It should be noted that due to the small group size in the study and the limitations of the current pig model (e.g. difficulty in retaining the catheter), more extensive evaluations of the efficacy and safety of the P3 coated catheter are needed before proceeding for regulatory approval, human studies and widespread clinical use of the catheter.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was partly presented at Urofair 2017, Singapore (Oral presentation), at the 15th International Congress of Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology 2017, Singapore (Poster presentation) and at the 33rd Annual European Association of Urology Congress 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark (Moderated poster presentation). Abstracts were published in BJU International 119 (S4); 42, and in European Urology Supplements 17 (2); e481.

Funding

This work was supported by Technology Enterprise Commercialisation Scheme-Proof-Of-Concept grant of SPRING Singapore (TI/TECS/POC/14/10). The funding organization played a role in design of the study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

KGN, EC and PAT designed and supervised the experiments. KDM, RW and JNR performed the experiments and analysed the results. KDM and RW drafted the manuscript. KGN, EC and PAT critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

All mouse experiments were conducted in accordance with the university ethical regulations and were approved by the National University of Singapore Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (R14–0601). All pig experiments were conducted as approved by Prestige BioResearch Pte Ltd. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Singapore (NP17027).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Paul A Tambyah has received research grants from Sanofi-Pasteur, Fabentech and GSK and honoraria from Johnson and Johnson. All other authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12879_2018_3296_MOESM1_ESM.docx (307 kb)
Additional file 1: Supporting information. Figure S1. Bladder enlarged due to blockage in urine flow. Figure S2. Average IL-6 levels in urine of E. coli inoculated mice implanted with uncoated catheters and P3 coated catheters. Error bars indicate SD. Figure S3. Amounts of calcium and magnesium deposition in urinary bladder of all micropigs with DoverTM and P3 catheter. Figure S4. Daily weight measurements to assess general health of the mice. Error bars indicate SD. (DOCX 306 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Dudeck MA, Edwards JR, Allen-Bridson K, Gross C, Malpiedi PJ, Peterson KD, Pollock DA, Weiner LM, Sievert DM. National Healthcare Safety Network report, data summary for 2013, Device-associated module. Am J Infect Control. 2015(43):206–21.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nicolle LE. Catheter associated urinary tract infections. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2014;3:23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tambyah PA, Oon J. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25:365–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    CDC: Urinary Tract Infection (Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection [CAUTI] and Non-Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection [UTI]) and Other Urinary System Infection [USI]) Events. In: Device-associated Module CAUTI. 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/7pscCAUTIcurrent.pdf Accessed 25 June 2015.
  5. 5.
    Maki DG, Tambyah PA. Engineering out the risk for infection with urinary catheters. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:342–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M, Hultgren SJ. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:269–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spaulding CN, Kau AL, Klein RD, Janetka JW, Gordon JI, Hultgren SJ. Small-molecule inhibitors against type 1 pili selectively target uropathogenic E. coli in the gut and bladder. FASEB J. 2017;31:939.939.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pitout JDD, DeVinney R: Escherichia coli ST131: a multidrug-resistant clone primed for global domination. F1000Research 2017, 6:F1000 Faculty Rev-1195.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mobley HL, Donnenberg MS, Hagan EC. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli. EcoSal Plus. 2009;3Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stickler DJ. Proteus mirabilis biofilm formation and catheter design. In: Denstedt J, Atala A, editors. Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering in Urology. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2009. p. 157–90.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amalaradjou M, A R, Venkitanarayanan K. Role of Bacterial Biofilms in Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) and Strategies for Their Control. In: Nelius T, editor. Recent Advances in the Field of Urinary Tract Infections. London: IntechOpen; 2013.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Choong S, Wood S, Fry C, Whitfield H. Catheter associated urinary tract infection and encrustation. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001;17:305–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stickler D, Morris N, Moreno MC, Sabbuba N. Studies on the formation of crystalline bacterial biofilms on urethral catheters. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998;17:649–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trautner BW, Darouiche RO. Role of biofilm in catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:177–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Donelli G. Biofilm-based healthcare-associated infections : volume I. New York: Springer; 2014.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mandakhalikar KD, Chua RR, Tambyah PA. New Technologies for Prevention of catheter associated urinary tract infection. Current Treatment Options in Infectious Diseases. 2016;8:24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang R, Neoh KG, Kang ET, Tambyah PA, Chiong E. Antifouling coating with controllable and sustained silver release for long-term inhibition of infection and encrustation in urinary catheters. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015;103:519–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kadurugamuwa JL, Modi K, Yu J, Francis KP, Purchio T, Contag PR. Noninvasive biophotonic imaging for monitoring of catheter-associated urinary tract infections and therapy in mice. Infect Immun. 2005;73:3878–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guiton PS, Hung CS, Hancock LE, Caparon MG, Hultgren SJ. Enterococcal biofilm formation and virulence in an optimized murine model of foreign body-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Immun. 2010;78:4166–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Swindle MM, Makin A, Herron AJ, Clubb FJ Jr, Frazier KS. Swine as models in biomedical research and toxicology testing. Vet Pathol. 2012;49:344–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen SL, Hung CS, Xu J, Reigstad CS, Magrini V, Sabo A, Blasiar D, Bieri T, Meyer RR, Ozersky P, et al. Identification of genes subject to positive selection in uropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli: a comparative genomics approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:5977–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mandakhalikar KD, Rahmat JN, Chiong E, Neoh KG, Shen L, Tambyah PA. Extraction and quantification of biofilm bacteria: method optimized for urinary catheters. Sci Rep. 2018;8:8069.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ISO. Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 11: Tests for systemic toxicity. In: Biological evaluation of medical devices, vol. ISO 10993–11: 2006: International Organization for Standardization. Geneva: ISO; 2006.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miles AA, Misra SS, Irwin JO. The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. J Hyg (Lond). 1938;38:732–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mukherjee D, Zou H, Liu S, Beuerman R, Dick T. Membrane-targeting AM-0016 kills mycobacterial persisters and shows low propensity for resistance development. Future Microbiol. 2016;11:643–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beattie M, Taylor J. Silver alloy vs. uncoated urinary catheters: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20:2098–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saint S, Veenstra DL, Sullivan SD, Chenoweth C, Fendrick AM. The potential clinical and economic benefits of silver alloy urinary catheters in preventing urinary tract infection. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2670–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saint S, Elmore JG, Sullivan SD, Emerson SS, Koepsell TD. The efficacy of silver alloy-coated urinary catheters in preventing urinary tract infection: a meta-analysis. Am J Med. 1998;105:236–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fernandez I, Pena A, Del Teso N, Perez V, Rodriguez-Cuesta J. Clinical biochemistry parameters in C57BL/6J mice after blood collection from the submandibular vein and retroorbital plexus. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2010;49:202–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Serfilippi LM, Pallman DR, Russell B. Serum clinical chemistry and hematology reference values in outbred stocks of albino mice from three commonly used vendors and two inbred strains of albino mice. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2003;42:46–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.ACI Medical Pte LtdSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  4. 4.Department of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations