Advertisement

BMC Gastroenterology

, 19:92 | Cite as

Paraneoplastic pemphigus and myasthenia gravis as the first manifestations of a rare case of pancreatic follicular dendritic cell sarcoma: CT findings and review of literature

  • Tao Lu
  • Bin SongEmail author
  • Hong PuEmail author
  • Xinglan Li
  • Qiqi Chen
  • Chong Yang
Open Access
Case report
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders

Abstract

Background

Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) is a rare neoplasm that originates from follicular dendritic cells in lymphoid tissue while paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP) is an autoimmune blistering disease associated with neoplasms. Pancreatic FDCS associated with PNP and myasthenia gravis (MG) is even rarer and highly malignant. We present the clinical data, pathological materials and computed tomography (CT) features of a rare case of this disease.

Case presentation

A 49-year-old woman presented with repeated ptosis of both eyelids, oral ulcers and erosions. Her laboratory results showed a slight elevation of CA125 and positivity of some autoimmune antibodies. CT revealed a round solid mass with central necrosis in the pancreatic tail. The solid component of the mass showed slight enhancement and serpentine feeding arteries in the arterial phase, moderate enhancement with a draining vein around the tumor in the portal venous phase and persistent enhancement in the delayed phase. Surgical resection was performed, and the pathological diagnosis was FDCS. However, the patient died of inability to excrete sputum and occlusion of the respiratory tract.

Conclusions

Pancreatic FDCS manifested as PNP and MG is very rare. Its CT features are not specific, and the disease should be differentiated from neuroendocrine tumors, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms and acinar cell carcinoma.

Keywords

Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma CT paraneoplastic pemphigus myasthenia gravis 

Abbreviations

AFP

Alpha-fetoprotein

ANA

Antinuclear antibody

ANCA

Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies

anti-AchR

antibody anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody

anti-CENP-B antibody

anti-centromere protein B antibody

CA125

Carbohydrate antigen125

CA199

Carbohydrate antigen125

CD117

Cluster of Differentiation117

CD138

Cluster of Differentiation138

CD21

Cluster of Differentiation21

CD23

Cluster of Differentiation23

CD34

Cluster of Differentiation34

CEA

Carcinoembryonic antigen

CK

Cytokeratin

CT

Computed tomography

Des

Desmin

DOG-1

Delay of germination 1

EBER

Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA

EBV

Epstein-Barr virus

FDC

Follicular dendritic cells

FDCS

Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma

MG

Myasthenia gravis

MRI

Magnectic resonace imaging

PNP

Paraneoplastic pemphigus

SMA

Antismooth muscle antibody

SPT

Solid pseudopapillary tumors

T1WI

T1 weighted imaging

T2WI

T2 weighted imaging

Background

Follicular dendritic cells (FDC), also recognized as dendritic reticulum cells, are an indispensable part of B-cell follicles. Their functions include antigen presentation, generation and regulation of the germinal center reaction [1]. Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) was first recognized in 1986 by Monda et al., and is a rare neoplasm that originates from these follicular dendritic cells [2]. Since then, more than 300 patients of FDCS have been reported worldwide [3]. Approximately 2/3 of the cases were found in lymph nodes, particularly in the cervical lymph nodes and occasionally in the axillary and mediastinal lymph nodes, whereas 1/3 of the cases were found in extranodal sites, especially in the abdominal cavity and pelvic region, then in the neck and chest, and rarely in the breast, thigh, groin, dura mater encephali and skin [4].

The abdominal cavity is a more desirable site of extranodal FDCS with a preference of the pancreas and peripancreatic tissues [1, 4]. To our knowledge, to date, only 5 cases of pancreatic FDCS have been reported [5, 6, 7, 8], and none of the reported cases manifested as paraneoplastic pemphigus and myasthenia gravis. We herein report a case of pancreatic FDCS with paraneoplastic pemphigus and myasthenia gravis as the first manifestations and describe the CT features of the tumor.

Case presentation

A 49-year-old woman presented with a 3-month history of repeated ptosis of both eyelids and oral ulcers and erosions. Physical examinations revealed scattered ulcers and erosions in the mouth (Fig. 1). Laboratory examinations showed that CA 125 was elevated (51.6 U/ml), while other tumor markers, including CA199, 153, CEA, and AFP, were normal. Autoimmune antibodies, including anti-CENP-B antibody, ANCA, anti-AchR antibody, and ANA, were all positive.
Fig. 1

Scattered ulcers and erosions in the mouth of the patient

The patient was first diagnosed with an oral aphthous ulcer and ocular myopathy myasthenia gravis. She was treated with gentamycin and dexamethasone spray inhalation to improve her oral lesions and pyridostigmine to cure muscle weakness. However, the oral ulcers improved slightly and the myasthenia gravis persisted. An abdominal ultrasound showed a hypoechoic mass in the left adrenal gland. A further CT examination showed a 6 × 5 cm, well-defined round solid mass with central necrosis in the pancreatic tail. There was no calcification detected in the mass. The solid part of the mass had slight enhancement in the arterial phase with many serpentine feeding arteries, moderate enhancement with a draining vein around the tumor in the portal venous phase and persistent enhancement in the delayed phase (Fig. 2a-e). The fundus of the stomach was compressed by the mass. The boundary between the mass and the splenic artery and vein was not clear, and swollen lymph nodes were not observed in the posterior peritoneum. The mass was initially considered to be a neuroendocrine tumor in the pancreatic tail.
Fig. 2

a-e A well-defined round solid mass with central necrosis in the pancreatic tail

At the same time, the patient’s symptoms worsened. She could not swallow, and she felt severe pain in her mouth. She also developed a cough and expectoration. A chest CT revealed infection in the lower lobes of both lungs. Streptococcus was detected from a throat swab. Levofloxacin was administered to fight the infection, methylprednisolone to fight the inflammation, and thalidomide to alleviate the vascular inflammatory reaction in addition to pyridostigmine and immunomodulatory therapy. However, 3 days later, the patient progressed to severe dyspnea, wheezing and difficulty with expectoration. Emergency intubation and mechanical ventilation were administered. Aspergillus was detected after bronchoalveolar lavage. Immunoglobin and voriconazole were given. Four days later, the symptoms resolved and the intubation was detached. Most of the infections in the lungs were resolved according to a chest CT. The pain in the mouth was also alleviated.

After a multidisciplinary discussion, the patient’s tentative diagnosis was paraneoplastic pemphigus and the myasthenia symptoms caused by the pancreatic tumor. Myasthenia gravis, in turn, led to the patient’s inability to excrete sputum. If the pancreatic tumor could not be removed, the symptoms would not completely remit, and the symptoms due to myasthenia gravis would also continue to aggravate, finally leading to the occlusion of the respiratory tract. Therefore, the patient was transferred to general surgery. During the surgery, a 4 × 5 cm dark-red tumor with medium texture and clear boundaries was detected in the pancreatic tail (Fig. 3). The tumor was close to the splenic artery and vein, and the spleen was normal. Postoperative pathology confirmed the tumor was a follicular dendritic cell sarcoma with immunohistochemistry showing CD21(+), CD23(+), CD138(+), SMA(+), Des(+), CD117(−), DOG-1(−), S-100(−), CD34(−), CK(−), EBER and EBV(−)(Fig. 4a-c).
Fig. 3

Dark-red tumor in the pancreatic tail during surgery

Fig. 4

a-c Microphotograph(a) showing spindle tumor cells(×200). Immunohistochemistry of the tumor showing positivity for CD21 (b) and CD23(c) (×200)

The patient continued to be treated with antifungal and anti-infection therapy. Twelve days after surgery, the patient developed sudden heart palpitation, discomfort and difficulty in breathing. Mechanical ventilation was again administered. However, the patient died of inability to excrete sputum and occlusion of the respiratory tract.

Discussion and conclusions

Extranodal FDCS was first reported by Chan et al. in 1994 [9]. After that, a great spectrum of FDCS in extranodal sites has been reported, including the tonsils, pharyngeal region, thyroid, mediastinum, intra-abdominal sites and retroperitoneum [10, 11]. Extranodal FDCS can ocurr between 9 and 82 years of age with an average age of onset in the fourth decade, and has a slight female predominance [4, 11].

A review of the literature suggests only 5 cases of pancreatic FDCS have been previously realized. In the 5 cases, the age of the patients ranged from 56 to 70 years, and there was an obvious predilection for men, with a female to male ratio of 1:4. The occurrence was in the pancreatic head in 3 cases and in the tail in 1 case, and the authors did not specify the location of the tumor in the remaining 1 case. The maximum diameter of the tumor ranged from 2 to 11 cm in 4 cases, and the authors did not specify the exact size of the tumor in 1 case. In our case, the pancreatic tumor occurred in the tail in a 49-year-old woman with a maximum diameter of 5 cm. In 2 previous reports, the clinical presentations of pancreatic FDCS included weight loss, poor appetite, nausea, abdominal fullness and mass, in another report, the patient had no symptoms at all, and in the remaining 2 reports, the authors did not describe the patients’ symptoms. In our case, the patient presented with paraneoplastic pemphigus and myasthenia gravis. There are few reports of intra-abdominal FDCS manifested as paraneoplastic pemphigus. In addition, our case is the only case of pancreatic FDCS with the initial presentation as paraneoplastic pemphigus and myasthenia gravis.

FDCS has traditionally been considered as an indolent tumor and has a tendency of local recurrence and a low risk of metastases. Chan et al. [1] analyzed the clinicopathologic features of 17 cases of FDCS and found that the overall recurrence, metastasis and mortality rates were 43, 21 and 17%, respectively. FDCS should be considered to be a tumor with at least intermediate grade malignancy. It has been reported that abdominal FDCS tends to manifest as larger-sized tumors than those outside the abdomen with the average tumor size of 10.2 cm (range 3–22 cm) [11]. An intra-abdominal location was also considered to be the single most important unfavorable prognostic factor for FDCS [12]. Extrinsic necrosis, a larger tumor size (> 6 cm), cytologic atypia and a high proliferative index (mitotic count > 5 mitoses/10 high-power fields) are other poor prognostic factors, all of which increase the likelihood of recurrence, metastasis and death [10].

The gold standard for the diagnosis of FDCS is the histologic appearance and specific immunohistochemical staining pattern. Proliferation of spindle-to-ovoid shaped cells arranged in storiform, fascicular and whorled patterns with a sprinkling of small lymphocytes throughout the tumor and perivascular lymphocytic cuffing are the main histologic features of FDCS [1]. Ultrastructure studies are desirable but not essential. CD21, CD35 and CD23 are the most widely used FDCS markers. It can also be variably positive with other markers, including S-100, EMA, CD68, CD45, CD3, CD20, HMB-45 and Ki-67. The immunophenotypic profile in our case conformed to that of previous reports.

Abdominal FDCS has been described as a well-defined mass with central necrosis and/or coarse internal calcification, homogeneous or heterogeneous enhancement and regional lymphadenopathy [13, 14]. Li et al. [14] reported that abdominal FDCS showed marked or moderate enhancement with ‘rapid wash-in and slow wash-out’ or ‘progressive enhancement’ patterns during multiphase imaging with or without serpentine feeding arteries and draining veins in and/or around the tumor. For the previous published 5 cases of pancreatic FDCS, only 2 described the imaging features of the tumors. One tumor was heterogeneous in the pancreatic head with dilation of the biliary tree, the other tumor was a clear-defined, round, solid mass with a cystic component in the pancreatic tail with slight contrast enhancement. The tumor in our case was also in the pancreatic tail. It was a round solid mass with a central cystic area but without calcification. The margin of the tumor was also clear. After enhancement, the solid component of the tumor demonstrated a ‘progressive enhancement’ pattern with many serpentine vessels detected in the arterial phase and a draining vein around the tumor in the venous phase. Since the tumor was in the pancreatic tail, it was impossible for it to result in dilation of the bile duct and pancreatic duct. The enhancement pattern in our case suggested that the tumor was relatively hypervascular, which was similar to some previous reports [12, 13]. Second, the ‘progressive enhancement’ in the venous and delayed phases are thought to correlate with hypercellular density areas with proliferation of spindle to ovoid cells and to be associated with lymphocyte-rich stroma [13]. The presence of a cystic area in the tumor may be related to the tumor size, as a large tumor is prone to degeneration or necrosis. Some enlarged lymph nodes were detected in the peripancreatic area or in the retroperitoneum in the previous 2 reports of pancreatic FDCS. However, in our case, lymphadenopathy was not detected.

From imaging, the differential diagnosis of pancreatic FDCS include neuroendocrine tumors, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms and acinar cell carcinoma. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are usually hypervascular with areas of necrosis and cystic degeneration in larger tumors. Large, non-hyperfunctioning endocrine tumors usually have cystic changes, and the patients with those tumors also present late due to the lack of endocrine symptoms [14]. Typically, the tumors enhanced rapidly, with the thick cyst walls enhanced with an irregular inner surface [15]. The pancreatic FDCS in our case was a solid mass with a central cystic area, but it showed a progressive enhancement pattern, and the inner surface of the cyst wall was smooth. Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPT) are commonly seen in young females without symptoms or can be with vague abdominal pain, dyspepsia and bloating [16]. The tumor typically located in the tail of the pancreas with internal architecture. Hemorrhage or necrosis of the tumors can be easily discriminated on CT. A solid part with contrast enhancement and calcification on the capsule may also be present. From CT, FDCS and SPT are similar and sometimes it is difficult to differentiate. However, MRI demonstrates the internal architecture of the SPT better because it has the advantage of detecting hemorrhage, which is hyperintense on T1WI and hypointense on T2WI. In Liang’s report, the pancreatic FDCS appeared as hypointense on T1WI because of tumor necrosis [5]. On the other hand, the fibrosis capsule of SPT is typically hypointense on both T1WI and T2WI, which is absent in FDCS, thus increasing the likelihood of SPT diagnosis. Acinar cell carcinoma affects males more frequently than females and the patients with this disease usually have symptoms related to mass effect or metastases. It has been reported that the tumors can produce pancreatic enzymes such as lipase, amylase and elastase, which contribute to adiponecrosis, arthritis and other symptoms associated with functioning tumors [14]. Tatli et al. [17] reported that the majority of the cases were exophytic, oval or round, well-marginated masses, and were hypoenhancing on postcontrast CT and MRI. Tumors are usually solid when small but cystic degeneration can also be detected in large lesions [17]. However, the symptoms of pancreatic FDCS vary from no symptoms to paraneoplastic syndrome, as in our case. They do not present with symptoms due to production of pancreatic enzymes. From most reports, extranodal FDCS are relatively hypervascular, although some cases were hypovascular. This feature can also contribute to the differential diagnosis of the two tumors.

Paraneoplastic pemphigus is a life-threatening bullous autoimmune disease that is characterized by severe stomatitis and polymorphous skin eruptions [18]. Myasthenia gravis is reported to be a complication of PNP [19]. The pathogenesis is thought to be due to the production of antibodies against tumor-derived antigens; the antibodies may attack components sharing the same or a similar epitope [20]. To date, few cases of PNP associated with intra-abdominal FDCS have been reported, and only 1 case of PNP and MG associated with an FDCS in the axillary region and neck has been reported [21].

Our patient was the first case of PNP and MG associated with pancreatic FDCS. Cases of FDCS associated with PNP were also reported to suffer a higher degree of malignancy. Extranodal FDCS also presented with relative high aggression. Therefore, our case, an extranodal FDCS associated with PNP and MG, was highly aggressive. Although treated with surgery, the patient’s symptoms did not disappear but kept progressing. Several reasons may be responsible for this. First, since the tumor was highly malignant, it may have invaded neighboring tissues or organs before the operation. Second, a release of massive antibodies when touching the tumor during surgery would temporarily result in a more serious condition. Even after the resection of the tumor, plenty of residual antibodies also promoted the progression of the disease. Finally, the patient was in a consumption status with poor resistance associated with systemic inflammatory response to bacterial and fungal infection in the lungs. The long-term use of hormones may also have led to immune dysfunction [22].

The optimal treatment of FDCS is unclear because of the rarity of the disease. The current treatment is complete surgical resection for localized tumors, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy may be combined in cases with adverse prognostic factors.

In conclusion, pancreatic FDCS is rare, and pancreatic FDCS manifested as PNP and MG is even rarer. The CT features of the pancreatic FDCS in our case are a well-defined, solid mass with central necrosis, progressive enhancement, serpentine feeding arteries and a draining vein in the solid component of the tumor. The tumor should be differentiated from neuroendocrine tumors, solid papillary neoplasms and acinar cell carcinoma. When it is associated with PNP and MG, extranodal FDCS would become highly aggressive, so the prognosis is poor even after surgery and other intensive treatment.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

Conception and design of this manuscript was carried out by TL, BS, administrative support was carried out by HP, provision of study materials or patients was carried out by XL, QC, CY, collection and assembly of data was carried out by TL, XL, QC, CY, Data analysis and interpretation was carried out by HP, and manuscript writing ant the final approval of manuscript was carried out by all authors. All authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s husband for publication of this case report about the patient’s medical information and images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Chan JKC, Fletcher CDM, Nayler SJ, Cooper K. Follicular dendtritic cell sarcoma. Clinicopathologic analysis of 17 cases suggesting a malignant potential higher than currently recognized. Cancer. 1997;79(2):294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Monda L, Warnke R, Rosai J. A primary lymph node maglinancy with features suggestive of dendritic reticulum cell differentiation. A report of 4 cases. Am J Pathol. 1986;122(3):562–72.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouriga R, Abdessaied N, Hochlef M, et al. Retroperitoneal follicular dendtritic cell sarcoma in a young woman. Diagnosis and treatment chanllenges. Curr Probl Cancer. 2018;42(3):287–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li L, Shi YL, Guo ZJ, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognosis assessment of extranodal follicular dendritic cell sarcoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(20):2504–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liang WJ, He W, Li ZW. Extranodal follicular dendritic cell sarcoma originating in the pancreas: a case report. Medicine. 2016;95(15):1–4.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shen SC, Wu CC, Ng KF, et al. Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma mimicking giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas. Pathol Int. 2006;56(8):466–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holliwood K, Stamp G, Zouvani I, Hetcher CD. Extranodal follicular dendritic cell sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract: morphologic, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis of two cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;103(1):90–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sorinano AO, Thompson MA, Admirand JH, et al. Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma: a report of 14 cases and a review of the literature. Am J Hematol. 2007;82(8):725–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chan JK, Tsang WY, Ng CS. Follicular dendtritic cell tumor and vascular neoplasm complicating hyaline-vascular Castleman’s disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994;18(5):517–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang RF, Han W, Qi L, et al. Extranodal follicular dendritic cell sarcoma: a clinicopathologcial report of four cases and a literature review. Oncol Len. 2014;9(1):391–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leger S, Picard D, Ingen-Housz-Oro S, et al. Prognostic factors of paraneoplastic pemphigus. Arch Dermatol. 2012;148(10):1165–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kang TN, Lee SJ, Song HJ. Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma of the solid component of abdomen: the imaging findings. KJR. 2010;11(2):239–43.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li J, Geng ZJ, Xie CM, et al. Computer tomography imaging findings of abdominal follicular dendritic cell sarcoma. Medicine. 2016;95(1):1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takeshita K, Furui S, Makita K, et al. Cystic islet cell tumors: radiologic findings in three cases. Abdom Imaging. 1994;19(3):225–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hammond NA, Miller FH, Day K, Nikolaidis P. Imaging features of the less common pancreatic masses. Abdom Imaging. 2013;38(3):561–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sidden CR, Hortele KJ. Cystic tumors of the pancreas: ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging features. Semin ultrasound CT MR. 2007;28(5):339–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tatli S, Mortele K, Levy A, et al. CT and MRI features of pure acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas in adults. AJR. 2005;184(2):511–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anhalt GJ, Kim SC, Stanley JR, et al. Paraneoplastic pemphigus. An autoimmune mucocutaneous disease associated with neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 1990;323(25):1729–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang R, Li J, Wang M, et al. Prevalence of myasthenia gravis and associated autoantibodies in paraneoplastic pemphigus and their correlations with symptoms and prognosis. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(4):968–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yong AA, Tey HL. Paraneoplastic pemphigus. Australas J Dermatol. 2013;54(4):241–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang LF, Deng H, Mao M. Paraneoplastic pemphigus and myasthenia gravis associated with inflammatory pseudotumor-like follicular dendritic cell sarcoma: response to rituximab. Clinical case reports. 2016;4(8):797–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Su Z, Liu GJ, Liu JP, et al. Paraneoplastic pemphigus associated with follicular dendritic cell sarcoma: report of a case and review of literature. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(10):11983–94.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Department of RadiologySichuan Academy of Medical Science and Sichuan Provincial People’s HospitalChengduChina
  3. 3.Department of PathologySichuan Academy of Medical Science and Sichuan Provincial People’s HospitalChengduChina
  4. 4.Department of RheumatologySichuan Academy of Medical Science and Sichuan Provincial People’s HospitalChengduChina
  5. 5.Department of Organ transplantationSichuan Academy of Medical Science and Sichuan Provincial People’s HospitalChengduChina

Personalised recommendations