Advertisement

BMC Plant Biology

, 19:50 | Cite as

Myc-like transcriptional factors in wheat: structural and functional organization of the subfamily I members

  • Ksenia V. StryginaEmail author
  • Elena K. Khlestkina
Open Access
Research
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Myc-like regulatory factors carrying the basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) domain belong to a large superfamily of transcriptional factors (TFs) present in all eukaryotic kingdoms. In plants, the representatives of this superfamily regulate diverse biological processes including growth and development as well as response to various stresses. As members of the regulatory MBW complexes, they participate in biosynthesis of flavonoids. In wheat, only one member (TaMyc1) of the Myc-like TFs family has been studied, while structural and functional organization of further members remained uncharacterized. From two Myc-subfamilies described recently in the genomes of Triticeae tribe species, we investigated thoroughly the members of the subfamily I which includes the TaMyc1 gene.

Results

Comparison of the promoter regions of the Myc subfamily I members in wheat suggested their division into two groups (likely homoeologous sets): TaMyc-1 (TaMyc-A1/TaMyc1, TaMyc-B1, TaMyc-D1) and TaMyc-2 (TaMyc-A2 and TaMyc-D2). It was demonstrated that the TaMyc-D1 copy has lost its functionality due to the frame shift mutation. The study of functional features of the other four copies suggested some of them to be involved in the biosynthesis of anthocyanins. In particular, TaMyc-B1 is assumed to be a co-regulator of the gene TaC1-A1 (encoding R2R3-Myb factor) in the MBW regulatory complex activating anthocyanin synthesis in wheat coleoptile. The mRNA levels of the TaMyc-A1, TaMyc-B1, TaMyc-A2 and TaMyc-D2 genes increased significantly in wheat seedlings exposed to osmotic stress. Salinity stress induced expression of TaMyc-B1 and TaMyc-A2, while TaMyc-A1 was repressed.

Conclusions

The features of the structural and functional organization of the members of subfamily I of Myc-like TFs in wheat were determined. Myc-like co-regulator (TaMyc-B1) of anthocyanin synthesis in wheat coleoptile was described for the first time. The Myc-encoding genes presumably involved in response to drought and salinity were determined in wheat. The results obtained are important for further manipulations with Myc genes, aimed on increasing wheat adaptability.

Keywords

Anthocyanin biosynthesis bHLH Flavonoid biosynthesis Gene duplication Myc Osmotic stress Salinity stress Stress response Transcription factor Triticum Wheat 

Abbreviation

MBW

M – Myb, B – bHLH (Myc), W – WD40

Background

Most biological processes in eukaryotic cells are under the control of transcription factors (TFs). Each family of transcription factors is characterized by unique highly conserved domains [1, 2]. TFs usually contain two functional domains: one is associated with DNA binding, and the other – with protein dimerization [3]. In 1989, Murre, McCaw and Baltimore discovered that MyoD gene sharing a conservative cDNA region with members of myc family and the Drosophila daughterless (da), achaete-scute and twist gene family [4]. It was found that this conservative region encodes a protein motif, which is needed for DNA-binding and dimerization. These TFs were combined into one superfamily named bHLH (basic helix-loop-helix). It is the second largest family of TFs, which appeared in eukaryotic cells before the divergence of plants and animals [5]. The bHLH proteins are characterized by a highly conserved domain, which is approximately 60 amino acids in length [6, 7]. The bHLH domain is divided into two regions: the basic region and the helix-loop-helix (HLH) region. The basic region is approximately 15 amino acids in length and typically includes six basic residues, which function is binding with the palindromic hexanucleotide DNA region E-box (CANNTG), such as the G-box (CACGTG), in promoters of the target genes. The HLH region contains two amphipathic α-helices bound by a variable-length loop [6, 7]. The HLH promotes protein-protein interaction and acts as a region of homo- and heterodimerization. It was reported that bHLHs are key regulatory components in transcription networks that control a number of biological processes [5, 6, 7]. In plants, bHLH proteins are involved in the response to injury, drought and salinity stress, regulation of seed germination, trichome and fetal development, biosynthesis of uncolored flavonoids and their colored derivatives anthocyanins in flowers, leaves and fruits [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. Transcriptional regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway has been extensively studied in many plant species, including maize (Zea mays L.), Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana L.) and grape (Vitis vinifera L.) [10, 17, 18]. In the biosynthetic pathway, bHLH proteins interact with members of other TFs families such as R2R3-MYB and WD40. Together they can form MBW complexes, which have been described in plants only [7, 10, 15, 16, 18]. The specificity of the MYB and bHLH proteins determines genes to be activated. The non-specific WD40 protein plays a more general role in the MBW regulatory complex.

Allohexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L., genome BBAADD, 2n = 6x = 42,) is one of the most important cereal crops. The bHLH-coding gene TaMyc1/TaMyc1.1 (chromosome 2AL) controlling the synthesis of anthocyanins in the pericarp of wheat grains was previously isolated and characterized [19]. In addition, four more highly homologous copies of this gene were identified in homoeologous group 2 chromosomes of bread wheat. These genes form a cluster with orthologous sequence HvAnt2/HvMyc1 (2HL) from barley (HH, 2n = 14, Hordeum vulgare L.), which also regulates anthocyanin pigmentation in pericarps [19, 20, 21, 22, 23]. Later, by searching for homologous sequences, six highly homologous Myc-like sequences were identified and annotated in wheat genome (five copies located on the long arms of in homoeologous group 4 chromosomes and one copy located on 2DL chromosome) [24]. Also, it was found that in barley genome there is one Myc-like gene copy located on 4HL controlling anthocyanin biosynthesis in barley aleurone layer [25]. However, functions of Myc gene copies in wheat genome with the exception of TaMyc1 remain unknown. In the current study, we investigated features of structural and functional organization of further members of the Myc-like TFs’ family in wheat, exploring their relation to anthocyanin synthesis and stress response. We also tested, whether methylation status of TaMyc1 promoter could play a role in diverse activity of different alleles of this gene.

Results

Coding sequences of the Myc genes

Genetic relationship between 11 bread wheat and 2 barley Myc genes was established using a Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic analysis of their full-length bHLH domains. The results of the analysis demonstrated existence of two Myc-subfamilies in Triticeae tribe (Fig. 1), originating from the ancient duplication, which involved chromosomes 2 (carrier of the Myc copy giving rise to subfamily I) and 4 (subfamily II). Subfamily II included recently discovered HvMyc2 gene [25].
Fig. 1

Genetic similarity of Myc-like genes (bHLH motif). Phylogenic tree was constructed in MEGA 7.0 with Neighbor-Joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Green colour – homoeologous group 2 chromosomes genes (subfamily I). Pink colour – homoeologous group 4 chromosomes genes (subfamily II)

The TaMyc1.5 gene carries the single nucleotide deletion in the functionally significant bHLH domain (Fig. 2). This mutation should lead to the formation of non-functional bHLH domain, since it leads to both functional amino acid replacement and to the premature appearance of a stop codon in the Helix 2 region of bHLH domain. The presence of this mutation in the genome of bread wheat was confirmed by resequencing of the TaMyc1.5 gene in the cultivars Chinese Spring and Saratovskaya 29. Furthermore, the subsequent analysis of Myc1.5 from Aegilops tauschii L. (DD, 2n = 14, donor of the D-genome of bread wheat) revealed the same mutation that indicates the occurrence of this deletion and formation of a non-functional gene at a diploid level (contig 1,770,231, URGI database). This nonfunctional TaMyc1.5 copy was not included in further experiments aimed on comparison of transcriptional activity of the subfamily I members.
Fig. 2

The multiple alignment of the Myc subfamily I proteins. Analysed protein motif is Myc-type, basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) domain (IPR011598). Multiple sequence alignment was performed using MultAlin program. Red - high consensus, blue - low consensus, black - neutral

Promoter sequences of the Myc genes (subfamily I)

Based on promoter sequence of TaMyc1/TaMyc1.1 (GenBank: KJ747954) from the NCBI database, sequence alignment was applied to reveal promoter regions of Myc genes from homoeologous group 2 chromosomes (~ 350 bp from transcriptional start site of TaMyc1). The multiple sequence alignment as well as analysis using the New PLACE database (for detection of individual elements and their position relative to each other) showed that the genes are divided into two groups due to the features of their promoter regions and phylogenic relationship: TaMyc1.1, TaMyc1.3, TaMyc1.5 (the 1st group) and TaMyc1.2, TaMyc1.4 (the 2nd group) (Fig. 3, Additional file 1, Additional file 2). The sequences within each group have retained a common set of regulatory elements such as transcription factors binding sites, stress-responsive elements and sites of light-induced transcription activation (Fig. 3, Additional file 3). We suggested that common sequence patterns could be related with common origin of homoeologous genes as evidenced by phylogenetic analysis of the promoter sequences (Additional file 2). Based on rules of designation of homoeologous genes in wheat, the Myc subfamily I members were re-designated: TaMyc1.1 (TaMyc1) – TaMyc-A1, TaMyc1.2 – TaMyc-A2, TaMyc1.3 – TaMyc-B1, TaMyc1.4 – TaMyc-D2, TaMyc1.5 – TaMyc-D1, respectively (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Diverse promoter structure of the Myc subfamily I genes in wheat. Promoter analysis was performed using New PLACE database. Each square represents a corresponding colour motif

Expression of the Myc genes in the coleoptile of differently colored wheat cultivars

Previously, the TaMyc-A1 gene was shown to be involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in wheat pericarp, while other subfamily I members were inactive in this tissue [19]. To explore whether they could be related to anthocyanin synthesis in other parts of wheat plant, we performed qRT-PCR with gene-specific primers to TaMyc-A1, TaMyc-A2, TaMyc-B1 and TaMyc-D2 in coleoptile of wheat cultivars and lines having green (uncolored), light red and dark red coleoptile coloration (Table 1, Additional file 4). The TaMyc-A1 expression on 5th day after seed germination was much higher (almost in 8–15 and 13–25 times, respectively) in coleoptiles of two genotypes i:S29Pp-A1Pp-D1Pp3P and Purple chance (carriers the dominant allele of TaMyc-A1) in comparison with all other genotypes (Fig. 4). A high level of TaMyc-A1 expression could explain the appearance of a dark red colour of coleoptile in i:S29Pp-A1Pp-D1Pp3P and Purple chance. However, this gene cannot be considered the main regulator of anthocyanins accumulation in coleoptile, since the lines with a dark red colour of coleoptile (i:S29Ra, CS(Hope 7A), Novosibirskaya 67) did not share the same TaMyc-A1 expression level. Overall, qRT-PCR at the 5th day after germination revealed no correlation between relative level of gene expression and the presence of anthocyanins in wheat coleoptile (Fig. 4), therefore we carried out the analysis in dynamics from the 2nd till the 5th day after germination, using 3 genotypes: uncolored CS, light-red S29 and dark-red CS(H7A) (Table 1).
Table 1

Genetic stocks of wheat genotypes used in the current study, and their phenotypic characteristics. NIL – near-isogenic line, SCSL – single chromosome substitution line

Cultivar name

Description

Coleoptile coloration

Pericarp coloration

Saratovskaya 29 (S29)

Russian spring wheat

light red color

uncolored

i:S29Pp-A1Pp-D1Pp3P

Wheat NIL developed on S29, donor Purple [40, 41]

dark red color

dark purple color

i:S29Ra

Wheat NIL developed on S29, donor Ulyanovka [40, 42]

dark red color

uncolored

Novosibirskaya 67

Russian spring wheat

dark red color

uncolored

Chinese Spring (CS)

Chinese spring wheat

uncolored

uncolored

CS(Hope 7A)

Wheat SCSL developed on CS, donor Hope [43]

dark red color

uncolored

CS(Hope 7B)

Wheat SCSL developed on CS, donor Hope [43]

light red color

uncolored

Purple chance

Russian spring wheat [44]

dark red color

dark purple color

Golubka

Russian spring wheat

uncolored

uncolored

Fig. 4

The expression of the Myc subfamily I genes in the coleoptile of wheat genotypes having different coloration (the 5th day after germination). The data are presented as mean value ± standard error. *differences are statistically significant between coloured genotypes and S29 at p ≤ 0.005 (U-test)

For all of the analyzed genes in each of the three genotypes we found a general trend of decrease of the mRNA levels from very high at the 2nd day to extremely low at the 5th day (Fig. 5). We found statistically significant changes in the expression levels of TaMyc-B1 gene between the sister lines CS and CS(H7A) at the early stages of development (Fig. 5). These genotypes differ by the allelic state of the TaC1-A1 gene, which is considered to be the Myb-encoding regulator of the anthocyanin synthesis in coleoptile. The introduction of the dominant TaC1-A1 gene into the CS genome causes an increase of the TaMyc-B1 gene expression 2-fold (Fig. 5). We assumed that TaMyc-B1 could be the main co-regulator of TaC1-A1 in anthocyanin biosynthesis control in wheat coleoptile. In addition, for the S29 genotype, it was found that the expression of the TaMyc-A2 gene on the 2nd day of development was significantly higher than its expression in CS and CS(H7A) (approximately 2-fold higher). This difference may be the reason for the appearance of a weak anthocyanin colour of S29 coleoptile (Table 1, Additional file 4). S29 is a carrier of another TaC1-A1 allele differing from both CS and CS(H7A). Specific recognition of different TaMyc-1 copies by different R2R3-Myb factors can be hypothesized for future verification.
Fig. 5

The expression of the Myc subfamily I genes in the coleoptile during wheat seedling development (from the 2nd to the 5th day). Selected genotype: sister lines CS (uncolored) and CS(H7A) (dark-colored) and the unrelated genotype S29 (light-coloured). The data are presented as mean value ± standard error. *differences are statistically significant between coloured genotypes and S29 at p ≤ 0.05 (U-test)

Methylation patterns of the TaMyc-A1 promoter

Due to the detection of increased transcriptional activity of the TaMyc-A1 gene in genotypes with anthocyanin pericarp pigmentation (Fig. 4), we analyzed the DNA methylation in promoter of this gene by bisulfite sequencing in genotypes of near isogenic lines (NILs), differing in allelic state of TaMyc-A1: lines S29 and i:S29Pp-A1Pp-D1Pp3P (Table 1). As a result of the analysis, we showed that the analyzed 748 bp region contains methylated sites neither in the promoter region (406 bp) nor in 342 bp from the transcription start site in CpG and plant-specific non-CpG methylation sites (Fig. 6, Additional file 5). Thus, we assume that the level of expression of the regulatory TaMyc-A1 gene is determined by the structure of the cis-regulatory components of the gene. Such epigenetic mechanisms as DNA methylation apparently do not affect the activity of the analyzed gene.
Fig. 6

Methylation patterns of the TaMyc-A1 promoter regions in the pericarp of isogenic lines differing in anthocyanin pigmentation of this tissue. ATG – the triplet code for the first amino acid methionine, e – exon, TSS – transcription start site

Stress response relation of Myc genes

Finding the stress-dependent elements in the promoters of the Myc subfamily I genes (Fig. 3, Additional file 3) was the reason for further analysis of their expression levels in response to drought and salinity stress. The relative levels of the Myc genes mRNA were measured in coleoptiles of S29 plants in response to either 10% PEG or 0.2 M NaCl and was compared to that in plants germinated in distilled water. The mRNA levels of the TaMyc-A1, TaMyc-B1, TaMyc-A2 and TaMyc-D2 genes increased significantly in wheat seedlings exposed to 10% PEG. Salinity stress induced expression of TaMyc-B1 and TaMyc-A2 only. The TaMyc-A1 mRNA level was decreased, while TaMyc-D2 did not respond to 0.2 M NaCl treatment. The changes of the mRNA levels in response to stress correlated with the changes of anthocyanin content in the coleoptile with the exception of TaMyc-A1 (Fig. 7a, and b).
Fig. 7

a The expression of the Myc-like genes in wheat coleoptiles under salinity and drought stress (the 4th day after germination). b The relative level of anthocyanin content under the same conditions. The data are presented as mean value ± standard error. *differences are statistically significant between stressed and control S29 at p ≤ 0.05 (U-test)

Discussion

Polyploids have many advantages over diploid ancestors. The evolution of genes and genomes of polyploid organisms remains a subject of extensive research in the field of evolutionary biology. Organisms acquire new functions due to gene duplications such as resistance to diseases and adaptation to stress and extreme environmental conditions [26, 27]. Most duplicated genes remain active in neopolyploid organisms, contributing to the beneficial effect of an additional gene dose. For example, polyploidization of wheat, cotton and soybean has contributed to the improvement of such important agronomical traits as grain quality and flowering time [26]. Bread wheat T. aestivum is a hexaploid species which was formed as a result of hybridization between tetraploid Triticum turgidum (2n = 4x = 28, BBAA) and diploid Aegilops tauschii (2n = 14, DD) about 8000 years ago [28, 29, 30]. Bread wheat genome carries both paralogous and orthologous (homoeologous) copies of many structural and regulatory genes, including Myc-encoding genes. Myc TFs are the members of the regulatory MBW complexes [7, 10, 18]. From 17 possible Myc copies potentially involved in regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis, T. aestivum genome retained 11 (6 copies were likely pseudogenized) [24]. The retention of the 11 copies may suggest their specialization in synthesis of different classes of flavonoids in different tissues. The specific features were determined previously for the TaMyc-A1 gene, which together with the Myb-encoding TaC1-D1 gene controls the biosynthesis of anthocyanins in the pericarp of wheat grains [16, 19]. The specific features of other 10 copies remained unknown. We have found that at least two more Myc copies (TaMyc-A2 and TaMyc-B1) could be involved in the biosynthesis of anthocyanins (Fig. 5). In addition, we demonstrated that the early stage of wheat development (until the 3rd day after germination) may be a key stage for initiation of the anthocyanin biosynthesis (Fig. 5). Probably, therefore we did not detect any significant differences in the Myc genes expression pattern among the genotypes differing by the coleoptile coloration at the later stage (5th day after the germination; Fig. 4).

It is known that after duplication two identical gene copies are most often redundant. Duplicated copies of the gene usually undergo one of the possible evolutionary events: pseudogenization (one of the duplicated genes becomes nonfunctional), neofunctionalization (one of the duplicated genes may acquire a new function) or subfunctionalization (the copies can share the functions of the original gene) [31]. While the above mentioned TaMyc-A1 or TaMyc-B1 gene may represent the examples of subfunctionalization ([19]; Fig. 5), the TaMyc-D1 gene is undergoing pseudogenization due to a single nucleotide frame shift mutation detected (Fig. 2). Increasing the dose of some genes may have adverse consequences. In such cases, the normalization of the gene dose occurs owing to genetic and epigenetic changes. For example, among three homoeologous copies of the WLHS-1 wheat gene one gene has lost it functionality due to mutation in the functional domain, while another copy became silent because of hypermethylation, and only the third gene retained its functionality [32]. Such epigenetic factor as DNA methylation (mC) is significant for binding of TFs to the gene cis-regulatory region (TF recognition elements usually present in the promoter region and the first intron) [33, 34, 35]. The epigenetic changes are potentially reversible and less stable than genetic changes. DNA methylation is a covalent modification of cytosine, which predominantly occurs on the CpG dinucleotide in plants and animals. However, for plants, DNA methylation is observed not only at CpG sites, but also in CpHpG and CpHpH sites, where H is adenine, cytosine or thymine [33]. In wheat, epigenetic changes can be potentially found among both alleles of the same gene or homoeoalleles. Since promoter regions of the TaMyc-A1 (TaMyc1) dominant (transcribed in pericarp) and recessive (non-transcribed in pericarp) alleles were identical [19], the hypothesis was proposed about putative difference in the methylation patterns of the cis-regulatory regions of the TaMyc-A1 alleles. However, the hypothesis was not confirmed (Fig. 6). Finally, the difference between the alleles has been found in copy number variation of the 261 bp-element upstream the promoter [16, 36]. Tandem duplication of this element results in strong activation of TaMyc-A1 expression and appearance of anthocyanin pigment in wheat pericarp.

Pigmentation is only one of the multiple roles of flavonoid substances. They are also widely known for their adaptation properties, which help plant to survive in unfavorable environment conditions [37]. Comparative assessment of mRNA levels of the members of Myc subfamily I in optimal growth vs stress (salinity and drought) conditions suggested them presumably to be involved in a stress-dependent response (Fig. 7). Furthermore, the parallel was found between the quantitative content of anthocyanins in wheat coleoptile and the relative level of the Myc genes expression. The exception was the TaMyc-A1 gene, for which a significant decrease of mRNA level in response to treatment with a 0.2 M NaCl solution was detected (Fig. 7). In plants, a wide range of evidences for the relationship between abiotic stress and flavonoid biosynthesis has been received. Drought and salinity cause such negative effects in the cell as osmotic and oxidative stress, repression of photosynthesis, damage to cellular components and metabolic dysfunction. Different flavonoid substances participate in osmoregulation, protection of photosynthetic apparatus and plasma membrane, scavenging free radicals, which appear during oxidative stress development [37]. We propose, that the Myc subfamily I genes may participate in improvement wheat plant tolerance under drought and salinity stress, due to activation of synthesis of various flavonoid compounds, including anthocyanins.

Conclusions

The features of the structural and functional organization of the members of subfamily I of Myc-like TFs in wheat were determined. Myc-like co-regulator (TaMyc-B1) of anthocyanins synthesis in wheat coleoptile was described for the first time. The Myc-encoding genes involved in salinity and drought stress response were determined in wheat. The results obtained are important for understanding of (i) retaining multiple Myc copies in wheat genome, (ii) regulation features of flavonoid biosynthesis in wheat, as well as for (iii) further manipulations with Myc genes aimed on increasing adaptability of wheat plants.

Methods

Multiple sequence alignments, identification of conserved motifs and phylogenetic analysis

Wheat Myc-coding genes (promoter and coding sequences) were selected from the International URGI database (https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr) according [24] using BLAST. Barley genes HvAnt2/HvMyc1 (GenBank: KX035100) and HvMyc2 (GenBank: MF679157) were taken from the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Multiple sequence alignment was performed using MultAlin program (http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin).Promoter sequences of Myc genes from subfamily I were predicted by comparison with TaMyc-A1 (GenBank: KJ747954). Protein sequences were analyzed with InterPro program by predicting domains and important binding sites (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro). Promoter analysis was performed using New PLACE database, containing cis-acting regulatory DNA elements of vascular plants (https://sogo.dna.affrc.go.jp/cgi-bin/sogo.cgi?lang=en&pj=640&action=page&page=newplace) (Additional file 3). A phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA 7.0 software (http://www.megasoftware.net) using the Neighbor-Joining method with 500 (promoter sequences) and 1000 (bHLH motif sequences) bootstrap replicates. The resulting images show bootstrap accounts ≥50%.

Plant materials and growth conditions

Plant material included nine cultivars of the hexaploid wheat T. aestivum from the ICG collection GenAgro, contrasting by anthocyanin pigmentation in its coleoptile and pericarp. These cultivars and their phenotypes are presented in Table 1. Seeds for RNA extraction were germinated in the climatic chamber “Rubarth Apparate” (RUMED GmbH, Laatzen, Germany) on moist filter paper under a 12 h photoperiod at 20 °C. The germinated one-day old seedlings were exposed to 0 (control), 200 mM NaCl and 15% polyethylene glycol (PEG 6000) simulating salinity and drought stress, respectively. The experiments were conducted in triplicate for each stage of development, concentration and each genotype. The plants for DNA extraction from pericarps were grown using resources of ICG Greenhouse Core Facilities (Novosibirsk, Russia) under 12 h of light per day at 20–25 °C.

Anthocyanins extraction and relative content measurements

Anthocyanins were extracted from the frozen and homogenized coleoptiles at the 4th day after germination in 1%-HCl/methanol according [38]. Anthocyanin extractions and measurements were performed in three replicates. The relative anthocyanin content was evaluated by spectrophotometry at 530 nm wavelength.

DNA extraction and bisulfite treatment

Total genomic DNA was extracted from fresh wheat pericarps using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN) from two cultivars: S29 (uncolored pericarp) and i:S29Pp-A1Pp-D1Pp3P (dark purple pericarp) (Table 1). Pericarps were scalpeled from grains at early dough stage maturity. One μg of gDNA from each sample was treated with sodium bisulfite using the EpiTect kit (QIAGEN).

RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis

RNAs from coleoptile samples were extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN). All isolated RNAs were treated with the RNase-free DNase set (QIAGEN). Total RNA was converted to single-stranded cDNA in a 20-μL reaction from a template consisting of 0.5 μg of total RNA using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.).

Primer design and PCR amplification, sequencing

Gene-specific primers were developed: (1) for amplification partial gene sequences and full length CDS were designed using OLISO software; (2) for promoter region of TaMyc-A1 gene using MethPrimer (Table 2). Amplification was made in 20 μL PCRs. Reaction mixtures contained 50–100 ng of genomic template DNA, 1 ng of each of primer, 0.25 mM of each dNTP, 1x reaction buffer (67 mM TrisHCl, pH 8.8; 2 mM MgCl2; 18 mM (NH4)2SO4; 0.01% Tween 20) and 1–2.5 U Taq polymerase. DNA templates were amplified with initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles were run at 94 °C for 1 min, 50–63 °C for 1 min (Table 2), and 72 °C for 0.5–2 min, followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were separated on agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light. The amplified fragments were purified from an agarose gel using a DNA Clean kit (Cytokine). DNA sequencing was performed using the SB RAS Genomics core facilities (Novosibirsk, Russia). Obtained sequences were deposited in GenBank (NCBI).
Table 2

Gene-specific primers used for amplification of the TaMyc genes in current study. Primer pairs used for promoter region amplification of TaMyc-A1 are underlined

Gene

Purpose

Annealing temperature. (°C)

PCR product length (bp) DNA/cDNA

Forward primer (5′ → 3′)

Reverse primer (5′ → 3′)

TaMyc-A1

qRT-PCR, sequencing

60

283/177

AACCATGTCATTTCGGAGAGGA

GGCCGCCCTGTTGGATC

 

PCR, sequencing

60

−/1707

ATGGCGCTGCCAGTAGTTCGTC

TCATGGCCTGCGAATAGCTCTCT

 

cloning

50

292/−

TTATTAGATTAAGTATAGTTTTTTTGGTAGAA

CAACATCAAAATACTATACTACACTAACA

 

cloning

53

231/−

TGTTAGTGTAGTATAGTATTTTGATGTTG

ACCATAACCCATAAATAAAAAAAAAACTTCC

 

cloning

57

309/−

GGAYGATAGGTTGGTTTTTGAGTTTTTTG

CCATTACCACACTATTTCCTTCCTTCA

TaMyc-A2

qRT-PCR, sequencing

60

334/220

AACCATGTCATTTCGGAGAGGA

TCTTCCCGCCGACTTCATGA

 

PCR, sequencing

60

−/1697

ATGGCGCTGCCAGTAATTCGTC

TCAGCGCCTGCGTATAGCTTTCT

TaMyc-B1

qRT-PCR, sequencing

60

347/198

AACCATGTCATTTCGGAGAGGA

GAGTTTTCGGACGGCTGTTG

 

PCR, sequencing

60

−/1692

ATGGCGCTGTCAGTAGTTCGTC

TCAGCGCCTGCGTATGGCTCT

TaMyc-D1

PCR, sequencing

60

504/244

GCTCATCGTGCTTTGCGG

GCCGCCCTGTTGGATTCT

TaMyc-D2

qRT-PCR, sequencing

60

341/188

AACCATGTCATTTCGGAGAGGA

ACGGCTGTTCCGGCCA

 

PCR, sequencing

63

−/1665

ATGGCGCTGCCGGTAGTTCATC

TCATCCGGGTTCCACGGCTCCA

Bisulfite genomic sequencing analysis

Amplified bisulfite PCR products for each samples described above were subcloned using the PCR Cloning Kit (Qiagen). Plasmid DNA of 10 insert-positive clones for each PCR product were sequenced in both directions with M13 primers.

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis

qRT-PCR was performed with the primers from Table 2. A fragment of the Ubiquitin gene sequence was used for reference [39]. The amplifications were performed in an ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) applying a SYBR Green I kit (Syntol). Pre-determined amounts of cloned cDNA were used to generate standard curves. Each sample was run in three technical replications. The differences among genotypes were tested by Mann-Whitney U-test, taking p ≤ 0.05 and 0.005 as significant.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

Publication costs are funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (№ 16–04-00912). Growing of plants was performed in the ICG Plant Growth Core Facility supported by ICG project 0324–2018-0018.

Availability of data and materials

The sequences obtained in the current study are available at NCBI: MH727568-MH727571.

About this supplement

This article has been published as part of BMC Plant Biology Volume 19 Supplement 1, 2018: Selected articles from BGRS\SB-2018: plant biology. The full contents of the supplement are available online at https://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-19-supplement-1.

Authors’ contributions

KVS performed all molecular-genetic experiments, carried out in silico analysis, and participated in drafting the manuscript. EKK contributed to the conception and design of the study, to interpretation of data and to revising the manuscript critically. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12870_2019_1639_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (49 kb)
Additional file 1: The multiple alignment of the Myc subfamily I genes. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using MultAlin program. Sequences were selected from the International URGI database according [24]. Red is high consensus colour, blue is low consensus colour, black is neutral colour. (PPTX 48 kb)
12870_2019_1639_MOESM2_ESM.pptx (38 kb)
Additional file 2: Genetic similarity of promoter sequences of Myc-like genes subfamily I. Phylogenic tree was constructed in MEGA 7.0 with Neighbor-Joining method with 500 bootstrap replicates. Blue colour – the 1st group. Green colour – the 2nd group. (PPTX 37 kb)
12870_2019_1639_MOESM3_ESM.docx (28 kb)
Additional file 3: Putative cis-acting regulatory elements identified in the Myc promoters. Promoter analysis was performed using New PLACE database. “+” – coding strand, “–” – template strand. (DOCX 27 kb)
12870_2019_1639_MOESM4_ESM.pptx (460 kb)
Additional file 4: Coleoptile colour of selected wheat samples at the fifth day after germination. (PPTX 459 kb)
12870_2019_1639_MOESM5_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Additional file 5: The results of bisulfite sequencing in genotypes of near isogenic lines, differ in allelic state of TaMyc-A1: lines S29 and i:S29Pp-A1Pp-D1Pp3P. First and second exons are marketed with yellow and green colour, respectively. Blue – unmethylated CpG sites, red – start-codon (ATG site). (DOCX 13 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Cooper GM. Regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. In: The cell: a molecular approach. 2nd edition. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Riechmann JL, Ratcliffe OJ. A genomic perspective on plant transcription factors. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000;3(5):423–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00107-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frietze S, Farnham PJ. Transcription factor effector domains. In: A handbook of transcription factors. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011. p. 261–77.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9069-0_12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murre C, McCaw PS, Baltimore D. A new DNA binding and dimerization motif in immunoglobulin enhancer binding, daughterless, MyoD, and myc proteins. Cell. 1989;56(5):777–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90682-X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pires N, Dolan L. Origin and diversification of basic-helix-loop-helix proteins in plants. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;27(4):862–74.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp288.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Massari ME, Murre C. Helix-loop-helix proteins: regulators of transcription in eucaryotic organisms. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(2):429–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feller A, Machemer K, Braun EL, Grotewold E. Evolutionary and comparative analysis of MYB and bHLH plant transcription factors. Plant J. 2011;66(1):94–116.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04459.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quattrocchio F, Wing JF, Va K, Mol JN, Koes R. Analysis of bHLH and MYB domain proteins: species-specific regulatory differences are caused by divergent evolution of target anthocyanin genes. Plant J. 1998;13(4):475–88.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1998.00046.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oh E, Kim J, Park E, Kim JI, Kang C, Choi G. PIL5, a phytochrome-interacting basic helix-loop-helix protein, is a key negative regulator of seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2004;16(11):3045–58.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.104.025163. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gonzalez A, Zhao M, Leavitt JM, Lloyd AM. Regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway by the TTG1/bHLH/Myb transcriptional complex in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J. 2008;53(5):814–27.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03373.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Long TA, Tsukagoshi H, Busch W, Lahner B, Salt DE, Benfey PN. The bHLH transcription factor POPEYE regulates response to iron deficiency in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell. 2010;tpc-110.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.074096.
  12. 12.
    Zhao H, Li X, Ma L. Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors and epidermal cell fate determination in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7(12):1556–60.  https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.22404.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kavas M, Baloğlu MC, Atabay ES, Ziplar UT, Daşgan HY, Ünver T. Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of common bean bHLH transcription factors in response to excess salt concentration. MGG. 2016;291(1):129–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-015-1095-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mao K, Dong Q, Li C, Liu C, Ma F. Genome wide identification and characterization of apple bHLH transcription factors and expression analysis in response to drought and salt stress. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:480.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00480.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lloyd A, Brockman A, Aguirre L, Campbell A, Bean A, Cantero A, et al. Advances in the MYB–bHLH–WD repeat (MBW) pigment regulatory model: addition of a WRKY factor and co-option of an anthocyanin MYB for betalain regulation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017;58(9):1431–41.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcx075.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jiang W, Liu T, Nan W, Jeewani DC, Niu Y, Li C, et al. Two transcription factors TaPpm1 and TaPpb1 co-regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in purple pericarps of wheat. J Exp Bot. 2018;69(10):2555–67.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holton TA, Cornish EC. Genetics and biochemistry of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 1995;7(7):1071.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.7.7.1071. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu W, Dubos C, Lepiniec L. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis by MYB–bHLH–WDR complexes. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20(3):176–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.12.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shoeva OY, Gordeeva EI, Khlestkina EK. The regulation of anthocyanin synthesis in the wheat pericarp. Molecules. 2014;19(12):20266–79.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules191220266.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jende-Strid B. Genetic control of flavonoid biosynthesis in barley. Hereditas. 1993;3(5):187–204.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1993.00187.x. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cockram J, White J, Zuluaga DL, Smith D, Comadran J, Macaulay M, et al. Genome-wide association mapping to candidate polymorphism resolution in the unsequenced barley genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(50):21611–6.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010179107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shoeva OY, Mock H-P, Kukoeva TV, Börner A, Khlestkina EK. Regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway genes in purple and black grains of Hordeum vulgare. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0163782.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163782.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Adzhieva VF, Babak OG, Shoeva OY, Kilchevsky AV, Khlestkina EK. Molecular genetic mechanisms of the development of fruit and seed coloration in plants. Russ J Genet Appl Res. 2016;6(5):537–52.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079059716050026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Strygina KV, Khlestkina EK. Myc gene family in cereals: transformation in the course of the evolution of hexaploid bread wheat and its relatives. Mol Biol. 2017;51(5):572–9.  https://doi.org/10.7868/S0026898417050032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Strygina KV, Börner A, Khlestkina EK. Identification and characterization of regulatory network components for anthocyanin synthesis in barley aleurone. BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17(1):184.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1122-3. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Panchy N, Lehti-Shiu MD, Shiu SH. Gene Duplicates: from origins to implications for plant evolution. Plant Physiol. 2016:00523.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.00523.
  27. 27.
    Jiao Y, Paterson AH. Polyploidy-associated genome modifications during land plant evolution. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2014;369(1648):20130355.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gill BS, Kimber G. Giemsa C-banding and the evolution of wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974;71(10):4086–90.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.71.10.4086.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dvorak J, McGuire PE, Cassidy B. Apparent sources of the a genomes of wheats inferred from polymorphism in abundance and restriction fragment length of repeated nucleotide sequences. Genome. 1988;30(5):680–9.  https://doi.org/10.1139/g88-115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marcussen T, Sandve SR, Heier L, Spannagl M, Pfeifer M, Jakobsen KS, et al. International wheat genome sequencing Consortium. Ancient hybridizations among the ancestral genomes of bread wheat. Science. 2014;345(6194):1250092.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250092. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lynch M, Conery JS. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science. 2000;290(5494):1151–5.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5494.1151. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shitsukawa N, Tahira C, Kassai KI, Hirabayashi C, Shimizu T, Takumi S, et al. Genetic and epigenetic alteration among three homoeologous genes of a class E MADS box gene in hexaploid wheat. Plant Cell. 2007;19(6):1723–37.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.051813.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Finnegan EJ, Genger RK, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES. DNA methylation in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 1998;49(1):223–47.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schübeler D. Function and information content of DNA methylation. Nature. 2015;517(7534):321.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002;16(1):6–21.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.947102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zong Y, Xi X, Li S, Chen W, Zhang B, Liu D, et al. Allelic variation and transcriptional isoforms of wheat TaMYC1 gene regulating anthocyanin synthesis in pericarp. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1645.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01645.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Khlestkina EK. The adaptive role of flavonoids: emphasis on cereals. Cereal Res Commun. 2013;41:185–98.  https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.2013.0004. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Khlestkina E, Antonova E, Pershina L, Soloviev A, Badaeva E, Börner A, et al. Variability of Rc (red coleoptile) alleles in wheat and wheat-alien genetic stock collections. Cereal Res Commun. 2011;39(4):465–74.  https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.39.2011.4.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Himi E, Noda K. Red grain colour gene (R) of wheat is a Myb-type transcription factor. Euphytica. 2005;143(3):239–42.  https://doi.org/10.1139/g05-026. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Arbuzova VS, Maystrenko OI, Popova OM. Development of near-isogenic lines of the common wheat cultivar 'Saratovskaya 29. Cereal Res Commun. 1998:39–46.  https://doi.org/10.2307/23785246.
  41. 41.
    Gordeeva EI, Shoeva OY, Khlestkina EK. Marker-assisted development of bread wheat near-isogenic lines carrying various combinations of pp (purple pericarp) alleles. Euphytica. 2015;203:469–76.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1317-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Khlestkina EK, Gordeeva EI, Arbuzova VS. Molecular and functional characterization of wheat near-isogenic line ‘i:S29Ra’ having intensive anthocyanin pigmentation of the coleoptile, culm, leaves and auricles. Plant Breed. 2014;133:454–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gale MD, Flavell RB. The genetic control of anthocyanin biosynthesis by homoeologous chromosomes in wheat. Genet Res. 1971;18(2):237–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tereshchenko OY, Pshenichnikova TA, Salina EA, Khlestkina EK. Development and molecular characterization of a novel wheat genotype having purple grain colour. Cereal Res Commun. 2012;40:210–4.  https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.40.2012.2.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesInstitute of Cytology and GeneticsNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Research Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR)St. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations