Advertisement

BMC Plant Biology

, 18:375 | Cite as

Na+/K+ Balance and Transport Regulatory Mechanisms in Weedy and Cultivated Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Under Salt Stress

  • Yuhua Zhang
  • Jiapeng Fang
  • Xibao Wu
  • Liyao DongEmail author
Open Access
Research article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biochemistry and physiology

Abstract

Background

Salinization is a primary abiotic stress constraining global plant growth and production. Weedy rice, though highly homologous to cultivated rice, is more salt tolerant during seed germination and seedling growth; we hypothesize that this is owing to ionic homeostasis and changes in the expression of genes encoding ion transport regulators.

Results

The four different genotypes of weedy (JYGY-1 and JYFN-4) and cultivated (Nipponbare and 9311) rice have different salt-tolerance during seed germination and seedling vegetative growth under salt stress. In this study, Na+ and Ca2+content increased in weedy and cultivated rice genotypes under salt stress while K+ and Mg2+decreased; however, JYGY-1 had the lowest Na+/K+ ratio of assessed genotypes. Genes in the high-affinity K+ transporter (HKT) and tonoplast sodium-hydrogen exchanger (NHX) families, and salt overly sensitive 1 (OsSOS1) have more than 98% homology in amino acid sequences between weedy and cultivated rice genotypes. Under salt stress, the HKT family members were differentially expressed in the roots and shoots of four different genotypes. However, the NHX family transcripts were markedly up-regulated in all genotypes, but there are significant differences between different genotypes. OsSOS1 was significantly up-regulated in roots, especially in JYGY-1genotype.

Conclusions

The results showed that different genotypes had different germination and nutrient survival under salt stress, which was related to the difference of ion content and the difference of a series of ion transport gene expression. At the same time this study will provide new insight into the similarities and differences in ion homeostasis and gene regulatory mechanisms between weedy and cultivated rice under salt stress, which can aid in novel rice breeding and growth strategies.

Keywords

NaCl stress Weedy rice Na+/K+ homeostasis HKT family NHX family Vacuolar SOS1 

Abbreviations

GR

Guaranteed reagent

HKT

High-affinity K+ transporter

ICP-OES

Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry instrument

IRRI

International Rice Research Institute

NHX

Tonoplast sodium-hydrogen exchanger

PPFD

Photosynthetic photon flux density

QRT-PCR

Quantitative real-time PCR

SOS1

Salt overly sensitive 1

Background

Salt stress is one of the most serious abiotic stresses that affects plant natural productivity and causes significant crop loss worldwide. Sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) ions were present in the ocean during early life evolution, but only K+ ions maintain electrolyte and osmotic balance in the cells of organisms [1]. One of the many important physiological changes during early plant cell evolution was the ability to adapt to low levels of Na+ and K+ intermediates. This evolution has led to the ability for plants to assimilate nutrients from low ionic concentrations in their growth medium, but they often cannot tolerate high Na+ concentrations [1]. The effects of salinity are diverse, but Na+ toxicity is one of the primary mechanisms of cell damage in most salt-sensitive plants, whereas K+ is an essential ion [2]. The cytosol of plant cells normally contains 100–200 mM K+ and 1–10 mM Na+; this Na+/K+ ratio is optimal for many metabolic cell functions [2]. Therefore, it is essential that the cytosol maintain a low concentration of Na+ or a low Na+/K+ ratio in cells when under salt stress.

For many plants, leaves that develop photosynthesis and other metabolic processes are the main sites of Na+ toxicity [3]. Some mechanisms to alleviate Na+ toxicity in leaves have been discovered and/or proposed in rice. They include limiting the absorption of Na+ from the soil, reducing the transport of Na+ to the xylem, storing Na+ in the lower part of the leaf (such as the sheath), isolating Na+ into the vacuole, and cycling Na+ from shoots to roots [4]. Intracellular Na+ is transported out of the cell via SOS1 transporter [5], or into the root xylem by the high-affinity potassium transporter (HKT1;4, HKT1;5), which is essential for relieving Na+ toxicity in stems. The Na+ can also be sequestrated into the vacuole via the sodium-hydrogen exchanger (NHX1) in the tonoplast [6] (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Transport regulatory mechanisms of Na+ in plants under salt stress. High-affinity K+ transporter (HKT1) mediate Na+-specific transport or Na+-K+ transport, and play a key role in regulation of Na+ homeostasis. Salt overly sensitive 1 (SOS1) plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter exports intracellular Na+ to extracellular. Sodium-hydrogen exchanger (NHX1)in the tonoplast can sequestrate Na+ into the vacuole. While balancing the Na+ in the cytoplasm, SOS1 and NHX1 convert H+ in the extracellular and vacuolar into the cytoplasm, and excess H+ in the cytoplasm are transported to extracellular by consuming energy (ATP is converted to ADP + Pi)

The rice cultivar Nipponbare (Oryza sativa L.) genome contains seven HKT genes and two HKT pseudogenes [1]. The salt tolerance of plants may depend on the HKT transporter, which play a key role in regulating Na+ homeostasis because it mediate Na+-specific or Na+-K+ transport [1]. Members of the HKT transporter family are highly conserved in both monocots and dicots such as AtHKT1;4 in Arabidopsis and OsHKT1;5 in Oryza sativa, which have similar functions in their respective plant species. These transporters reduce Na+ transport to shoots and actively regulate salt tolerance [7]. The TmHKT1;4 and TmHKT1;5 proteins have been reported in wheat with similar mechanisms [8]. The sequestering of Na+ lowers the cytoplasmic Na+ concentration and also helps to maintain the osmotic adjustment of water absorption in the salt solution, which indicates that the separation of Na+ into vacuoles is the basic strategy for plant salt tolerance [9]. The OsNHX1, OsNHX2, OsNHX3, OsNHX4, and OsNHX5 antiporter genes have been identified in rice [10]. The relative abundance of NHX transcripts was determined by RNA gel blotting and RT-PCR and the results showed that NHX1 and NHX2 were abundant and widely distributed in plant tissues, and the same effectors (NaCl, KCl, LiCl, osmotic pressure and abscisic acid) have a certain accumulation [11] (Fig. 1). Although the mechanisms of ion-homeostasis and transport regulation under salt stress have been studied extensively in cultivated rice, they have not been studied in weedy rice (O. sativa L.).

Weedy rice is the result of de-domestication of rice, so the genetic background, morphology and growth behavior are similar to cultivated rice [12]. However, there will be differences in stress tolerance during de-domestication, such as weedy rice has cold tolerance at the seedling stage, rice blast resistance, high salinity and drought tolerance, as well as positive germination characteristics [13]. Weedy rice has become one of the most stubborn and harmful weeds in rice-growing regions worldwide may be due to its stronger competitiveness and stress tolerance. Recent investigation found that weedy rice has infested rice field all over china over the past 5 years, and the area has grown to more than three million hectares [14]. Not only that, weedy rice has a serious negative impact on rice production areas in other countries. Approximately 50% of US rice is produced in Arkansas where 60% of the rice fields are infested at different levels by weedy rice [15]. A similar proportion of rice fields is infested by weedy rice in Costa Rica [16]. Therefore, weedy rice is considered an important germplasm resource to improve rice varieties, and the screening of salt-tolerant weedy rice based on Na+/K+ transport regulatory systems, and further identifying and transferring useful genes from weedy rice to cultivated rice varieties, might play vital roles in the improvement of cultivated rice’s tolerance to salt stress.

We observed that the weedy rice accession JYGY-1 is salt-tolerant, whereas the accession JYFN-4 is relatively salt-sensitive. Furthermore, the two rice cultivars Nipponbare and 9311 were compared to the weedy rice accessions with the following objectives: to (i) investigate the differences in the phenotypes under salt stress among the weedy and cultivated rice lines; (ii) study the ion homeostasis among weedy and cultivated rice lines under salt stress; (iii) identify the homology levels of the Na+/K+ transport genes between weedy and cultivated rice lines; and (iv) determine the Na+/K+ transport regulation-related gene expression levels and its contribution to salt damage resistance/protection when weedy and cultivated rice under salt stress.

Results

Effects of salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of weedy rice and cultivated rice

Among the four different genotypes of weedy and cultivated rice, the seed germination rate decreased to different degrees as the salt concentration increased. At 200–250 mM NaCl, the seed germination in the JYGY-1 population was significantly higher than that in the other three genotypes (Fig. 2a). The seed germination in Nipponbare, 9311, and JYGN-4 lines was inhibited by a 7–14 d treatment of 400 mM NaCl, while JYGY-1 seed was still able to germinate at this salt concentration (Fig. 2b, c). To further analyze the response of rice seedlings to salt stress, we used a hydroponic culture system to grow rice seedlings in 150 mM NaCl, which has been shown to be the best condition for observing salt stress in liquid culture media growth conditions, as well as being highly reproducible. At this level of salt stress, morphological damage was evident after exposure of 2 week old seedlings to salt stress for 3 days. The most obvious morphological change appeared on the seventh day after salt stress treatment; the height of Nipponbare, 9311, and JYFN-4 plants was significantly reduced, and the leaves gradually yellowed. In contrast, the JYGY-1 population was almost unaffected (Fig. 2d). After 3–5 d of recovery, the Nipponbare and 9311 rice genotypes gradually died, while the older leaves of the weedy rice genotypes JYGY-1 and JYFN-4 began to yellow to different degrees. However, after 7 d of recovery, weedy rice populations were still able to grow new leaves (Fig. 2d, e). Thus, the survival rates were rated as JYGY-1 > JYFN-4 > 9311 > Nipponbare, indicating that the weedy rice genotype JYGY-1 had the highest salt tolerance during both seed germination and seedling growth.
Fig. 2

Seed germination and seedling growth of different weedy rice and cultivated rice genotypes under salt stress. Seed germination after 14 d in different salt stress conditions (a). b and (c) are graphs representing the seed germination rates for the different genotypes under salt stress after 7 and 14 d, respectively. The seedlings were treated for 7 d with 150 mM NaCl and allowed to recover for 7 d (d). Graphical representation of the survival rate of seedlings treated for 7 d with 150 mM NaCl and allowed to recover for 7 d (e)

Ion content changes in roots and shoots of weedy and cultivated rice under salt stress

Under salt stress, the content of Na+ and K+ in the shoots and roots was significantly changed in all genotypes. After 7 days of salt stress treatment, the Na+ content increased significantly compared to the control, while K+ content decreased. Under salt stress, the Na+ content in roots of the four genotypes, Nipponbare, 9311, JYGY-1, and JYFN-4 increased approximately by 12.1, 14.6, 7.3 and 14.8-fold, respectively, and in shoots the Na+ content increased by 34.3, 42.0, 26.3, 33.8-fold, respectively. The K+ content of the roots decreased by 2.7, 2.5, 1.7, and 2.1-fold, and decreased by 1.4, 1.2, 1.1 and 1.3-fold in the shoots of Nipponbare, 9311, JYGY-1, and JYFN-4, respectively (Fig. 3a, b). The Na+ content in JYGY-1 was significantly lower than that in the other three genotypes, but the K+ content was significantly higher. After 7 days of nutrient recovery, the Na+ in the roots of all four genotypes decreased significantly and only the shoots of JYGY-1 and JYFN-4 genotypes showed decreased Na+ levels (Fig. 3a). The K+ concentrations in roots and shoots remained almost unchanged in all genotypes after recovery (Fig. 3b). The ratio of Na+/K+ in roots and shoots was significantly increased after salt stress treatment in the order of Nipponbare > 9311 > JYFN-4 > JYGY-1. After recovery, in addition to the rise of the Na+/K+ ratio in the shoots of the rice populations, the Na+/K+ ratio in weedy rice and in the roots of the rice populations were significantly decreased (Fig. 3c). The Na+ and K+ measurements were consistent with the phenotypes of the different genotypes under salt stress. Under salt stress, the uptake and transportation of other ions in addition to Na+ and K+ were also sensitive to salt stress treatment. In this study, Mn2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Ca2+, Mg2+, P, and Fe2+ content in the roots and shoots of the four different genotypes changed to differing degrees after salt stress treatment and recovery. In the roots and shoots of all four genotypes, Mn2+, Mg2+, and Fe2+ content decreased after salt stress treatment and increased after recovery. The content of Ca2+ in both roots and shoots increased after salt stress treatment and recovery. In all genotypes, the P and Cu2+ content in the shoots decreased after salt stress treatment, while in roots they increased after salt stress and decreased after recovery. Additionally, the Zn2+ content in the shoots increased after salt stress and recovery, while in the roots did not change or decreased at first and then increased (Table 1). Therefore, under salt stress, salt-tolerant weedy rice population JYGY-1 had an improved adaptability to salt stress conditions mainly through the regulation of its Na+ and K+ balance. The regulation of the absorption of Ca2+, Mn2+, Mg2+, P, Cu2+, Zn2+, and Fe2+ iron may also play an important role in increased salt tolerance or the repair from salt poisoning in the plant.
Fig. 3

The Na+ and K+ content in roots and shoots of different rice genotypes were determined after 7 d of 125 mM salt stress and recovery. a Na+ content in roots and shoots. b K+ content in roots and shoots. c Na+/ K+ ratio in roots and shoots. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between treatments the different treatments (P < 0.05 by Duncan’s Multiple Range test)

Table 1

Ion concentrations of root and shoot of cultivated and weedy rice under salt stress

Ion

Salt stress (125 mM)

Ion content

Nipponbare *

9311

JYGY-1

JYFN-4

Shoot

Root

Shoot

Root

Shoot

Root

Shoot

Root

Ca2+

Control 7 d**

4.09 ± 0.17b***

1.41 ± 0.04c

4.23 ± 0.16b

1.48 ± 0.1c

3.67 ± 0.07c

0.78 ± 0.11c

4.24 ± 0.21b

0.92 ± 0.03c

NaCl 7 d

4.5 ± 0.16b

1.64 ± 0.02bc

4.38 ± 0.12b

1.75 ± 0.13c

4.34 ± 0.07b

1.36 ± 0.04b

4.57 ± 0.22b

1.08 ± 0.06c

Recovery 7 d

5.36 ± 0.22a

3.3 ± 0.22a

5.29 ± 0.26a

3.66 ± 0.21a

5.32 ± 0.05a

1.99 ± 0.08a

5.09 ± 0.04a

2.22 ± 0.07a

Control 14 d

3.49 ± 0.02c

1.83 ± 0.09b

3.64 ± 0.07c

2.22 ± 0.05b

3.41 ± 0.05c

1.55 ± 0.06b

3.67 ± 0.03c

1.97 ± 0.06b

Mg2+

Control 7 d

7 ± 0.1b

1.36 ± 0.01c

8.65 ± 0.44bc

1.74 ± 0.07b

6.02 ± 0.13c

1.49 ± 0.05b

6.16 ± 0.14b

0.93 ± 0.04c

NaCl 7 d

5.19 ± 0.07c

1.26 ± 0.02c

7.61 ± 0.18c

1.33 ± 0.02c

4.72 ± 0.12d

0.5 ± 0.03c

5.52 ± 0.24b

0.44 ± 0.02d

Recovery 7 d

8.43 ± 0.15a

2.06 ± 0.05a

9.29 ± 0.25ab

1.77 ± 0.01b

7.01 ± 0.06b

1.54 ± 0.03b

8.05 ± 0.09a

1.63 ± 0.01b

Control 14 d

8.77 ± 0.25a

1.8 ± 0.1b

10.04 ± 0.35a

2.14 ± 0.05a

8.03 ± 0.09a

2.3 ± 0.01a

8.3 ± 0.17a

2.2 ± 0.04a

P

Control 7 d

15.34 ± 0.73ab

10.11 ± 0.4b

16.06 ± 0.46a

9.55 ± 0.26b

14.06 ± 0.68a

5.07 ± 0.2c

15.17 ± 0.36a

8.56 ± 0.28bc

NaCl 7 d

13.52 ± 0.67b

12.33 ± 0.25a

13.41 ± 0.33b

13.33 ± 0.79a

12.29 ± 0.56b

9.44 ± 0.17a

14.19 ± 0.09bc

10.4 ± 0.4a

Recovery 7 d

14.07 ± 0.54b

10.13 ± 0.33b

11.22 ± 0.64c

13.07 ± 0.43a

13.26 ± 0.11ab

8.96 ± 0.35a

14.9 ± 0.35ab

9.5 ± 0.23ab

Control 14 d

16.36 ± 0.63a

8.63 ± 0.27c

14.95 ± 0.34a

8.3 ± 0.15b

14.49 ± 0.15a

7.51 ± 0.12b

13.33 ± 0.13c

7.98 ± 0.25c

Fe2+

Control 7 d

0.27 ± 0.01bc

2.24 ± 0.05a

0.26 ± 0.01b

2.62 ± 0.02a

0.27 ± 0a

3.01 ± 0.02a

0.3 ± 0.02bc

2.49 ± 0.16a

NaCl 7 d

0.25 ± 0.01c

1.98 ± 0.08b

0.24 ± 0.01c

2.11 ± 0.02c

0.24 ± 0.01b

1.24 ± 0.04c

0.28 ± 0.01c

1.88 ± 0.03b

Recovery 7 d

0.3 ± 0.02a

2.18 ± 0.04a

0.28 ± 0.02a

2.58 ± 0.06a

0.28 ± 0.01a

1.53 ± 0.06b

0.32 ± 0.01ab

2.12 ± 0.06b

Control 14 d

0.28 ± 0.01ab

1.49 ± 0.01c

0.24 ± 0.01c

2.41 ± 0.02b

0.21 ± 0.01c

1.6 ± 0.03b

0.33 ± 0.01a

1.3 ± 0.01c

Mn2+

Control 7 d

1389 ± 50.54a

142.67 ± 5.81b

938.33 ± 18.7a

137.33 ± 1.33b

816.33 ± 4.1a

68 ± 0a

949.67 ± 68.63a

61.33 ± 4.81a

NaCl 7 d

640 ± 28.57b

54.67 ± 1.33c

750 ± 12.77b

66.67 ± 3.53c

560.67 ± 19.36b

13.33 ± 1.33d

567.33 ± 13.48b

29.33 ± 1.33b

Recovery 7 d

739.33 ± 15.1b

378.67 ± 7.42a

760 ± 17.21b

394.67 ± 12.7a

825.67 ± 17.32a

46.67 ± 2.67b

911.67 ± 12.47a

57.33 ± 1.33a

Control 14 d

740.33 ± 7.8b

60 ± 0c

746.33 ± 10.8b

76 ± 4c

606.33 ± 7.13b

38.67 ± 1.33c

524.67 ± 9.24b

34.67 ± 3.33b

Cu2+

Control 7 d

20.33 ± 1.2a

193.33 ± 7.1ab

23.67 ± 1.67a

253.33 ± 1.3c

22.33 ± 0.88a

193.33 ± 1.3b

19 ± 1.53a

172 ± 2.31c

NaCl 7 d

19.67 ± 1.2a

210.67 ± 9.33a

21.33 ± 0.67a

349.33 ± 10.4a

13.33 ± 0.33b

261.3 ± 6.67a

15.33 ± 0.88b

208 ± 4b

Recovery 7 d

16 ± 0.58b

177.33 ± 9.61b

21 ± 1a

280 ± 8.33b

14.33 ± 0.67b

214.7 ± 10.4b

16.33 ± 0.33ab

230.67 ± 7.42a

Control 14 d

14 ± 0.58b

132 ± 0c

20.33 ± 0.33a

244 ± 4.62c

14.67 ± 0.33b

133.33 ± 4.8c

16 ± 0.58ab

145.33 ± 5.33d

Zn2+

Control 7 d

74.67 ± 2.96a

70.67 ± 8.11b

40.67 ± 1.33c

69.33 ± 7.42b

38.33 ± 0.33c

76 ± 2.31b

56 ± 2c

141.33 ± 5.81b

NaCl 7 d

77.33 ± 0.88a

64 ± 2.31b

54 ± 1.53b

52 ± 4.62b

42.33 ± 0.88b

60 ± 8.33b

66 ± 2.08b

104 ± 6.11c

Recovery 7 d

82.33 ± 6.12a

112 ± 4a

61 ± 1.73a

128 ± 10.07a

60 ± 1.53a

97.33 ± 8.74a

75.67 ± 2.73a

176 ± 6.11a

Control 14 d

57.67 ± 3.28b

82.67 ± 9.61b

42 ± 1.53c

66.67 ± 4.81b

38.33 ± 1.45c

60 ± 2.31b

37.67 ± 0.88d

178.67 ± 3.53a

The samples that seedlings had three fully expanded leaves, were harvested after treated with nutrient solution containing 125 mM NaCl for 1 weeks, and recovered with IRRI nutrient solution for 1 weeks, respectively. The ion content of Ca2+, Mg2+, P and Fe2+ were mg/g, and Mn2+, Cu2+ and Zn2+ were mg/kg, indicated by dry weight

*Nipponbare is a japonica rice cultivar, 9311 an indica rice cultivar, JYGY-1 a salt-tolerant weedy rice genotype, and JYFN-4 a salt-sensitive weedy rice genotype

**Control 7 d and Control 14 d indicate control conditions (no stress). NaCl 7 d indicates salt stress treatment for 7 days. Recovery 7 d indicates that the first salt stress treatment lasted 7 days and then recovery in normal nutrient conditions for 7 days

*** “±” indicate standard error and different letters (a-d) indicate statistically significant differences between treatments the different treatments (P < 0.05 by Duncan’s Multiple Range test)

Comparison of homology in ion transport-related genes between weedy rice and rice

The HKT and NHX gene families, and the SOS1 gene play an important role in the transport of ions such as sodium, potassium, and calcium [1, 5, 24]. When comparing the gene and amino acid sequences, the homology level was greater than 98% between the cultivated and weedy rice genotypes (Additional file 1: Table S1). Among them, the gene with the most amino acid change between weedy rice and rice is NHX4, as there are eight amino acid changes identified, followed by OsHKT2;2, OsHKT2;3, OsHKT2;4, OsHKT1;5, OsNHX2, OsHKT1;1, OsSOS1 and OsHKT1;4 (Additional file 2: Figure S1). There are seven HKT genes and two HKT pseudogenes (OsHKT2;2 and OsHKT1;2) in Nipponbare rice, but some salt-tolerant rice varieties such as indica rice that have a complete OsHKT2;2 gene [25]. It is noteworthy that these two HKT genes exist in weedy rice and have high homology with indica rice (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Gene homology study results confirms that weedy rice is an important germplasm resource for rice cultivation improvement.

Comparison of the gene expression of ion transport-related genes between weedy rice and cultivated rice genotypes under salt stress

Based on the qRT-PCR results, we wanted to confirm that the changes in gene expression levels were related to ion transport regulation under salt stress. The expression of all nine genes was visualized using real-time PCR (Fig. 4). Among the nine HKT genes identified, OsHKT2;1 was down-regulated after 24 h and OsHKT1;4 at all the times under salt stress. After 24 h of salt stress treatment, the expression of OsHKT2;1 began to decrease, and the JYGY-1 population showed the most significant decline in OsHKT2;1 expression, with more than a 2-fold and 4-fold reduction in shoot and root tissues, respectively (Fig. 4a). In all genotypes tested, the expression of OsHKT2;2 was up-regulated in the shoots, and JYGY-1 had more than a 12-fold increase in OsHKT2;2 expression; however, in the roots, this gene was down-regulated, and in the 9311 population, this gene was down-regulated more than 30-fold (Fig. 4b). The OsHKT2;3, OsHKT1;1, OsHKT1;3, OsHKT1;5, and OsHKT2;4 genes were all significantly up-regulated in all genotypes under salt stress after 6 h except the OsHKT2;3 of 9311 in the shoots was down regulated and OsHKT1;1 was little upregulated in the roots of any of the tested genotypes. The JYGY-1 genotype had the most significant level of up-regulation, JYFN-4 genotype followed by and the Nipponbare genotype had the lowest level of OsHKT1;1 gene expression (Fig. 4). The expression of OsHKT1;2 was down-regulated under salt stress after 6 h in the shoots, but in the roots, it was up-regulated, particularly in the JYGY-1 population, which showed more than a 110-fold change in gene expression (Fig. 4e). The OsHKT1;4 expression was down-regulated more than 10-fold after 6 h, with the JYGY-1 population having the largest decrease in gene expression in the shoots, but not in root tissue (Fig. 4g).
Fig. 4

Expression analysis of the HKT family by quantitative real-time PCR amplification of RNA from root and shoot tissue from weedy rice (JYGY-1 and JYFN-4) and rice (Nipponbare and 9311) genotypes. (a) OsHKT2;1, (b) OsHKT2;2, (c) OsHKT2;3, (d) OsHKT1;1, (e) OsHKT1;2, (f) OsHKT1;3, (g) OsHKT1;4, (h) OsHKT1;5, (i) OsHKT2;4. The number of hours (6, 24, and 72 h) elapsed after growing plants under salt stress (125 mM NaCl) conditions is indicated. Amplification was performed with specific primers for HKT family and compared to their expression under control conditions (no stress). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between treatments the different treatments (P < 0.05 by Duncan’s Multiple Range test)

Several of the OsNHX gene family members were significantly up-regulated under salt stress, while OsNHX3 and OsNHX4 were down-regulated in roots (Fig. 5). OsNHX1 reached a maximum level of expression 24 h after salt stress, and the JYGY-1 population had the highest level of up-regulation in both the shoots and roots, which increased > 14 and > 20-fold, respectively (Fig. 5a). The expression of OsNHX2 and OsNHX3 genes was up-regulated and down-regulated approximately 3-fold and 2-fold after salt treatment 6 h in the shoots, respectively; however, in the roots the expression of these genes increased > 420-fold and 550-fold in the JYGY-1 population, while in the other populations they increased < 60-fold and 130-fold, respectively (Fig. 5b, c). The expression of OsNHX4 in the shoots was down-regulated, and in the roots, it was up-regulated after 6 h for the genotypes tested in this study. In JYGY-1, OsNHX4 expression decreased < 5-fold and increased > 90-fold in shoots and roots, respectively (Fig. 5d). The expression of OsNHX5 in shoot tissue increased > 10-fold after salt treatment 24 h in the four genotypes; however, in the roots it increased > 19-fold in JYGY-1 and < 5-fold after 6 h in other genotypes (Fig. 5e). The expression of OsSOS1 did not change significantly in the shoots after salt stress treatment, but it was significantly up-regulated in the roots of all genotypes. The maximum OsSOS1 expression in weedy rice populations (JYGY-1 and JYFN-4) was achieved 6 h after salt stress, and was approximately 49-fold and 12-fold, respectively. However, the cultivated rice populations (Nipponbare and 9311) achieved maximum levels of gene expression in 24 h that were approximately 6-fold and 11-fold, respectively (Fig. 5f).
Fig. 5

Expression analysis of the NHX family and OsSOS1 genes by quantitative real-time PCR amplification of RNA from root and shoot tissue from weedy rice (JYGY-1 and JYFN-4) and rice (Nipponbare and 9311) genotypes. (a) OsNHX1, (b) OsNHX2, (c) OsNHX3, (d) OsNHX4, (e) OsNHX5, (f) OsSOS1. The number of hours (6, 24, and 72 h) elapsed after growing plants under salt stress (125 mM NaCl) conditions is indicated. Amplification was performed with specific primers for NHX family and OsSOS1 genes and compared to their expression under control conditions (no stress) Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between treatments the different treatments (P < 0.05 by Duncan’s Multiple Range test)

Discussion

Rice is the main food crop grown worldwide and salt stress is one of the major abiotic stress factors restricting its yield. Weedy rice has become a malignant weed in cultivated rice fields and has a very high homology to cultivated rice lines. This homology may make weedy rice an important germplasm resource for the improvement of current rice varieties if its genes for cold tolerance at the seedling stage, blast resistance, and high salinity and drought tolerance can be characterized [13]. Our studies have found that weedy rice has a strong salt tolerance, so it is important to study the differences in ion homeostasis and transport regulation mechanisms between weedy rice and traditionally cultivated rice lines under salt stress.

Weedy rice has stronger salt tolerance than cultivated rice during seed germination and seedling growth

Weedy rice has acquired many characteristics of weed in the process of de-domestication, which makes it have stronger environmental adaptability [12]. A stronger stress tolerance might be one of the reasons for the occurrence of weedy rice in cultivated rice fields. Weedy rice has also been reported to have a strong tolerance to drought and low temperature stress [13]. Our study further confirmed that weedy rice has stronger salt tolerance than cultivated rice by salt stress determination of 74 weedy rice populations collected. This is consistent with a previous study that showed that weedy rice was tolerant to a 0.5% saline-alkaline solution [26]. Although the genotype JYGY-1 and JYFN-4 all showed stronger salt tolerance than the cultivated rice genotypes Nipponbare and 9311 in the reproductive growth stage of seedlings, the genotype JYFN-4 performed basically consistent with cultivated rice in the seed germination stage (Fig. 2a, b). The difference in genotype JYFN-4 tolerance during seed germination and vegetative growth under salt stress indicates that salt tolerance in these two stages can be inconsistent. Previous studies have found that during rice de-domestication not only endows cold tolerance, blast resistance, high salinity and drought tolerance on weedy rice at the seedling stage, but also gives its seeds positive germination characteristics [13]. Therefore, we can speculate that in the process of rice de-domestication to weedy rice, the salt tolerance of the seed stage and vegetative growth stage may not be obtained at the same time, for example, genotype JYFN-4. Thus, weedy rice is a good material in which to study the mechanism of salt tolerance and improve on the salt tolerance in cultivated rice lines.

Weedy rice enhances salt tolerance by regulating Na+/K+ ratios and other ion absorption under salt stress

Numerous studies have shown that salt tolerance is ultimately manifested in plants through several physiological processes, including Na+ uptake and exclusion, ion homeostasis, especially between Na+ and K+, and partitioning [7]. Various studies have shown that plants increase Na+ uptake and reduce K+ uptake under salt stress [9, 25]. The K+ ions are beneficial to plants, and by increasing K+ content, plants can reduce the absorption of Na+ ions to a certain extent, thus reducing the Na+/K+ ratio. This is consistent with our findings that the salt-tolerant genotype JYGY-1 has the lowest Na+/K+ ratio (Fig. 3). In addition, the negative relationship between Mg2+ and K+ has also been reported in other studies [27]. However, in our study we measured a decrease in Mg2+ after salt stress and an increase after salt stress recovery, which is consistent with the dynamics of potassium ions (Table 1). Therefore, the Mg2+ in the salt tolerance of plants is likely to play a similar role to K+. Generally, Na+ uptake is limited by increased Ca2+ absorption, thus, ensuring ion balance. The response to salt stress in studied rice lines was accompanied by an increase in the Ca2+ concentration of plant tissues (Table 1). The P and microelement uptake in plants under salinity stress is complex and many other factors can also affect the absorption of P and microelements such as habitat, plant species and variety, plant growth stage, the level and composition of salt stress, and external P concentration in the growth medium [28]. This may be the reason for the differences we observed in the trends of P and microelement uptake in weedy and cultivated rice lines in this study.

Under the salt stress, the contribution of ion transport-related genes to salt tolerance is different among four different genotypes

The present study indicates that the expression of the HKT and NHX gene families and of SOS1 in tested rice tissues all changed over time during salt stress. Studies have found that the expression of HKT genes was relatively stable in shoots and higher than their expression in roots; however, their expression was higher in the roots under K+ starvation conditions [29]. Our findings show that the expression of OsHKT2;1 in four different rice genotypes was not affected for up to 6 h under salt stress conditions; however, the expression was down-regulated after 24 h of stress, and the salt-tolerant population JYGY-1 had the lowest level (Fig. 4a). As previously reported, OsHKT2;1 mediates the influx of Na+ but not that of K+ [25]. It was observed that OsHKT2;1 was induced by salt stress [29], and may be involved in the uptake and transport of Na+ from the roots to the mesophyll cells where Na+ causes damage.

The expression of OsHKT2;2 was up-regulated after 6 h in the shoots in the tested genotypes in response to salt stress, with the highest expression level measured in the salt-tolerant JYGY-1; however, in the roots, OsHKT2;2 was down-regulated after 6 h, most significantly in the 9311 genotype (Fig. 4b). Previous studies have found that the gene OsHKT2;2 exists in the form of pseudogenes in Nipponbare, and is completely present in some salt-tolerant rice varieties [25]. In this study, the complete OsHKT2;2 gene exists in the genotypes 9311, JYGY-1 and JYFN-4 (Additional file 2: Figure S1), which is consistent with the salt tolerance level (Fig. 2). It is revealed that although OsHKT2;2 does not mediate K+ uptake in severely abundant K+ or deficient Na+ conditions, it does impart salt tolerance to plants grown in high salt conditions. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, it has been demonstrated that this may be achieved by potentiating K+ uptake [1]. Evolutionary analysis of the HKT transporter sequences revealed that OsHKT2;3 and OsHKT2;4 in rice are 93% homologous [1]. In this study, the expression of OsHKT2;3 and OsHKT2;4 genes in roots and shoots was significantly up-regulated under salt stress, with the largest increase in expression observed in the JYGY-1 genotype (Fig. 4c, i). Additionally, the OsHKT2;4 transporter has a high permeability to K+ relative to Na+ [30]. Our previous study has found that after 7 days of salt stress treatment and recovery 7d, the genotype JYGY-1 has the lowest Na+/K+ ratio, followed by genotype JYFN-4, genotype Nipponbare is the highest (Fig. 3c). We concluded that OsHKT2;2, OsHKT2;3, and OsHKT2;4 play an important role in the uptake and translocation of K+ by reducing the Na+/K+ ratio to improve salt tolerance in weedy rice. This is consistent with our phenotypic results and the Na+-K+ content in weedy rice and cultivated rice under salt stress.

Semi-quantitative PCR analysis showed that in 100 mM salt stress conditions, the expression of OsHKT1;2 did not change in roots or shoots [31]. However, we found that while the expression of OsHKT1;2 is a first down-regulation, then upregulation after the initial rise in the shoots, it is up-regulated in the roots most significantly in the JYGY-1 genotype (Fig. 4e). This is consistent with the phenotypic observations made of rice cultivars under salt stress, indicating that OsHKT1;2 gene expression plays an important role in improving salt tolerance in weedy rice and cultivated rice.

Electrophysiological experiments showed that in oocytes, the OsHKT1;4 gene had the strongest selectivity for Na+ among cations including Li+, Na+, K+, Rb+, Cs+, and NH4+ [32]. During the reproductive stage of the Nipponbare line, OsHKT1;4 concentrates Na+ in the leaf sheath and then excretes it from leaf blades, but the contribution of OsHKT1;4 to sodium content is very little in the vegetative growth stage [32]. In addition, OsHKT1;4 is expressed in all organs except young leaf sheaths and significantly decreases during the vegetative growth stage [32]. In this experiment, the rice and weedy rice were three to four leaf stage. The results showed that OsHKT1;4 expression had decreased in the shoots and roots, indicating that the OsHKT1;4 played a certain negative regulation in sodium ion transport process, which is consistent with the results of previous studies (Fig. 4g). Therefore, OsHKT1;4 plays an important role in maintaining Na+/K+ balance in weedy rice and cultivated rice.

This study also found that the OsHKT1;1, OsHKT1;3, and OsHKT1;5 genes were significantly up-regulated under salt stress after 6 h, genotype JYGY-1 was the largest, JYFN-4 was the second, and Nipponbare was the smallest.; in addition, OsHKT1;1 expression was not affected in the roots (Fig. 4d, f, h). Studies have found that the Na+ content in the phloem of OsHKT1;1 mutants was lower than that of the wild type, indicating that OsHKT1;1 may be involved in the regulation of Na+ in the phloem [33]. A different study also found that the HKT1;3 gene is highly expressed in leaf adaxial epidermal bulliform cells in response to environmental changes [34]. The rice gene OsHKT1;5 was first identified as the quantitative trait locus SKC1, which encodes for a transporter that unloads Na+ from the root xylem [7]. The OsSKC1 protein is a specific Na+ transport, and is not involved in the direct transport of K+. Under the salt treatment, OsSKC1 protein could control Na+ concentration/transport by increasing the transport of Na+ from the roots to the shoots when rice plants were subjected to salt stress, alleviating Na+ toxicity and enhancing salt tolerance in rice [7]. This shows that during rice seedling growth, OsHKT1;1 and OsHKT1;5 are responsible for transporting Na+ to the shoot, alleviating the toxicity of the Na+ concentration in the roots. It can be seen that under salt stress, there is a quasi-transport of Na+ from not only the shoots to the roots but also from the roots to the shoots. When the concentration reaches toxic levels Na+ is transported to the shoots to alleviate the toxicity in the roots; however, when Na+ concentrations reach toxic levels in both tissues, it may cause death in the rice plants. Furthermore, in response to environmental changes, OsHKT1;3 expression is up-regulated, which is consistent with the results from our gene expression study.

Previous studies have indicated that NHX-type antiporters play an important role in rice salt tolerance; OsNHX1, OsNHX2, OsNHX3, and OsNHX5 can suppress Na+, Li+ accumulation in cells, and their sensitivity to high K+ concentrations [10]. Other studies have shown that the expression of OsNHX1, OsNHX2, OsNHX3, and OsNHX5 is regulated differently in different rice plant tissues and is increased by salt stress, hyperosmotic stress, and ABA [10]. This is consistent with our findings that the NHX gene family members were both significantly up-regulated under salt stress in addition to the down-regulation of OsNHX3 and OsNHX4 in roots. The salt-tolerant JYGY-1 rice variety had the maximum increase in OsNHX3 and OsNHX4 gene expression in response to salt stress (Fig. 5a-e). OsNHX1 plays an important role in the isolation of excess cytoplasmic Na+ and K+ in vacuoles, and the amount of antiporter expressed is a meaningful index for evaluating the salt tolerance in rice [6]. Thus, the difference in NHX gene expression in different genotypes is one of the major factors leading to their different salt tolerance levels, and the magnitude of the difference in expression will indicate how much of a contribution each OsNHX gene makes to salt tolerance in that particular genotype.

The salt overly sensitive (SOS) pathway is involved in the expulsion of Na+ from the cell and maintaining an optimal cytosolic Na+/K+ ratio in the cell. The OsSOS1 encoded Na+/K+ antiporter in plasma membrane regulates Na+ exclusion from the cell by transporting the ions to the apoplastic space [5]. Thus, OsSOS1 mediated Na+ exclusion seems to be an important mechanism by which cells get rid of excess Na+. In this study, the expression of OsSOS1 in the shoots did not change significantly after salt stress treatment, but it was significantly up-regulated in the roots (Fig. 5f). The higher expression of OsSOS1 in both cultivated and weedy rice genotypes under salt stress would lead to the exclusion of toxic apoplastic Na+ from entering the internal cellular environment, and consequently leads to better salt tolerance management.

Conclusions

Weedy rice is very close to cultivated rice in morphology and has a similar genome, but it performs better in salt stress growth conditions, which may be one of the causes of weedy rice occurrence worldwide. Due to these genetic and morphologic similarities, weedy rice provides a potential seed source for improving salt tolerance in cultivated rice varieties. Our results show that the weedy rice population JYGY-1 has a strong salt tolerance during both seed germination and seedling growth. Weedy rice enhances its salt tolerance by regulating the Na+/K+ ratio throughout the body of the plant, as well as the absorption and transport of other ions, which is consistent with the salt tolerance mechanisms documented in rice and other plants. However, the regulation of ion homeostasis is a complex network system that requires several different genes. Together, the OsHKT and OsNHX gene families and OsSOS1 regulate ion transport regulation under salt stress. Our results indicate that the genes related to ion transport regulation in weedy and cultivated rice share 98% homology in their cDNA and protein sequences. However, from the results of this study, the contribution of different ion transport genes in weedy rice and cultivated rice salt tolerance is different. Therefore, the results of this study will help the exploration of the key factors that lead to differences in salt tolerance between rice genotypes and will provide a reference for the cultivation of salt tolerant rice varieties.

Methods

Experimental material selection

We undertook an initial study of the salt tolerance of the collected 74 weedy rice populations by seed germination (with the NaCl concentration of 150, 250 and 350 mM) and seedling culture (with the NaCl concentration of 100 and 150 mM), and thus two weedy rice lines were chosen for study (data not shown). Two weedy rice lines, one JYGY-1 (colleted from Yangzhou City, Jiangsu Province-32°59′N, 119°26′E) was salt-tolerant, whereas the other accession, JYFN-4 (collected from Yancheng City, Jiangsu Province-33°37′N, 119°27′E) was salt-sensitive. The seed shell colors are straw without mans, and the seed peel colors are red, in addition to these, they are collected in dry direct seeding rice fields. Two rice cultivars, Nipponbare and 9311, were used as comparison in this study. As the japonica rice cultivar Nipponbare was used for almost the whole genome sequence (International rice genome sequencing project, 2005) and approximately 28,000 full-length cDNA sequences are available [17]. 9311 is an excellent maintainer line of indica rice and one of the parents of the first super hybrid rice combination Liangyou Peijiu cultivated by two-line method in China [18]. At the same time, the genome sequence of 9311 was also published in 2002 [19].

Seed germination

Seeds from the four different genotypes were surface sterilized with 1% (V/V) sodium hypochlorite solution for 30 min and washed with deionized water three times. Unless otherwise stated, 20 seeds were placed evenly in each Petri dish (9 cm in diameter) lined with two layers of filter paper moistened with 5 ml deionized water (pH 6.6) containing 0, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, and 400 mM NaCl. Four replicates for each experiment were placed in different petri dishes. Each Petri dish was sealed with plastic paraffin film and placed in an incubator with a 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod regime at 30 °C /25 °C. The light intensity was 140 μmol m− 2 s− 1 photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) provided by fluorescent lamps, and the growth chamber was maintained at 60% relative humidity. The salt stress treatment duration was two weeks. Seeds were considered germinated when the radicle was protruding from the seed coat. The number of germinated seeds was counted each week.

Seedling culture and salt stress treatment

Seeds imbibed in deionized water for 24 h at 25 °C and were germinated in Petri dishes with two layers of wet filter paper at 30 °C in dark for 3 d. The uniformly germinated seeds were selected and cultivated in a plastic pot (10.3 cm × 9 cm × 5.4 cm) filled with IRRI (International Rice Research Institute) nutrient solution [20], and 20 plants were maintained in each pot. Four replicates for each experiment were placed in different plastic pots. The seedlings were grown at 25 °C/20 °C and were maintained photoperiodic cycle of 14 h light and 10 h dark with light intensity of mentioned above. When seedlings had three fully expanded leaves (about 2 weeks after sowing), they were treated with nutrient solution containing 150 mM NaCl for 1 week, and followed by recovery with IRRI nutrient solution for 1 week, and then to measure their survival rate. In the 150 mM salt concentration, the sensitive plants were dead and dried-up and the results of the phenotypic experiments were clearly showed. However, the results of the determination of the ion content and the expression of genes were greatly affected. Therefore, 125 mM salt concentration was used for measure ion content and the expression of genes. In addition to that the seedings were treated with 125 mM NaCl after 0, 6, 24 and 72 h were harvested, and immediately frozen with liquid nitrogen, and stored at − 80 °C, and were prepared for the quantitative real-time PCR experiments.

Determination of Na+ and K+ content

Shoots and roots of weedy and cultivated rice seedlings were sampled separately and the concentration of copper (Cu2+), manganese (Mn2+), iron (Fe2+), zinc (Zn2+), calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), potassium (K+), phosphorus (P), and sodium (Na+) was measured according to the method provided by Ali et al. [21], with minor modification. Briefly, samples were dried in 80 °C for 5 d. Each dried sample was boiled for 8 h at 90 °C in 5 ml of nitric acid guaranteed reagent (GR), dilute with distilled water to a final volume of 25 ml, and analyzed using an inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry instrument (ICP-OES; Pekin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA). Finally calculate the Na+/K+ ratio according to the ion concentrations.

Gene identification by Illumina sequencing and homology comparison

Relevant gene sequences were obtained by Illumina sequencing using methods described by Xu et al., with minor modification. A brief description is total RNA was extracted from 5 to 6 entire weedy rice plants using RNAiso Plus (TaKaRa Biotech, Japan) according to the instructions for use of the product. The concentration and the quality of RNA were analyzed using a Nanodrop ND1000 (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, USA) and Ultrasec™ 2100 pro UV/Visible spectrophotometer (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). Equal quantities of total RNA from three independent samples were used for RNA-Seq and we used BlastN (version 2.2.23) alignment against known ion transport-related genes in rice. The rice gene sequences (OsHKT, OsNHX, and OsSOS1) were obtained from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and RAP-DB (http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/). The sequences were analyzed and compared using BioEdit (Ibis Biosciences Co., Ltd. CA, USA) Sequence Alignment Editor Software.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Twenty plants of each genotype were grown to the three- to four-leaf stage under the cultivated conditions described above. The plants of the above ground part were used to extract RNA after 0, 6, 24 and 72 h with salt treated (125 mM). Total RNA was extracted from each plant and the quality and quantity of total RNA were analyzed according to the method described above. Total RNA was reverse-transcribed using PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa Biotech) according to the instructions for use of the product. The amplification of actin1 (accession no. AB047313) was used as internal control genes, since it is considered as relatively stable genes in rice [22]. All of the genes related to ionic homeostasis and internal control gene were used to design primers for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) (Table 2). The Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) method with reference to Pan et al. [23].
Table 2

Primer list for the qRT-PCR analysis of rice and weedy rice genes

Accession

Gene

Forward primer (5′-3′)

Reverse primer (5′-3′)

Fragment size (bp)

AB061311

OsHKT2;1

TCGGCAAGCACTGTGATAAG

AGCGACATGGATCACAACAA

156

AB061313

OsHKT2;2

GCTTCCTAAGTTGCCGACTG

TGAGTGAGCAGTCGATGGAG

197

AJ491820

OsHKT2;3

GCTGGTCTGCATCACTGAAA

GCAGAGCATTGCAAGAACAA

235

AJ491816

OsHKT1;1

CCTTTTGCATCTTCACAGCA

ATACGCATAGCCGCAAGAGT

165

KT795742

OsHKT1;2

ATCCACGTCGTTCTTCTCGT

GTCCTCTTCACCCGGTTCTT

192

AJ491818

OsHKT1;3

GGATTTCTCAAGCGCTCAAC

CCATGCGGAGTTCAGAAAAT

233

AK109852

OsHKT1;4

CATCTGCATCACCGAGAGAA

CTCCCTACGAAACCAGTCCA

180

AK108663

OsHKT1;5; SKC1

CCCATCAACTACAGCGTCCT

AACTTCTTGAGCCTGCCGTA

206

AJ491855

OsHKT2;4

CTTGGTTTTGTTGCCTTGGT

GGCCAAGAAAGGAAAGGAAC

205

AB021878

OsNHX1

GCTAGATTTGAGCGGCATTC

CACTGGCAAACTCCCATTTT

197

AB531435

OsNHX2

TGGATCAAGGAAGGATTTCG

AAGGTCAGGCCACACTCAAC

193

AB531433

OsNHX3

ATGGATGCACTGGACATTGA

TCTTTGGGCGTGTCTCTTTT

166

AP003507

OsNHX4

CGCCAATCACATTCAATCAC

GCCTTGTCAAGAAGCCAAAC

192

AB531434

OsNHX5

CTTCCTGGAGGACATGGAAA

AACGATGTCGTGCTTTTGTG

248

AY785147

OsSOS1

TAAGCAGCAGGCATTCATTG

AAAGCCTGGCAACGACTAGA

206

AB047313

Actin1

CTGCGGGTATCCATGAGACT

TGGAATGTGCTGAGAGATGC

247

Data analyses

The experiments were designed with random complete block and repeated three times. Each replication was considered as a block and arranged in different Petri dishes or pots in the incubators. All experiments were performed twice. The experimental results were tested by one-way analysis of variance. Data were incorporated for analysis based on each experiment without significant (α > 0.05) trial-by-treatment interaction. Unless otherwise noted, the data are means ± standard error (SE). Data was fitted to a four-parameter non-linear logistic-regression model using SigmaPlot ver. 10.0 (Systat Software, Inc., CA, USA). Differences among the treatment means were evaluated using Duncan’s Multiple Range test at P < 0.05. Data analyses were conducted using SPSS ver. 21.0 (IBM, USA).

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Longfen Zhu (Wujin Plant Protection Station, Jiangsu Province, China) for providing help with collect weedy rice seeds. We also thank the reviewers and editors for helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest, People’s Republic of China (201303022) for providing different genotypes of experimental materials of this study and designing the study, the Jiangsu Province Ordinary University Academic Degree Graduate Innovation Project for conducting all experiments and writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from authors on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

YHZ and LYD designed experiments and wrote the article; JPF collected experimental materials and processed samples; XBW performed the experiments and analyzed the data; All authors have read and approved the manuscript, and ensure that this is the case.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Rice is a very common crop in the world. This study does not contain any research requiring ethical consent or approval.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12870_2018_1586_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Additional file 1: Table S1. Gene sequences were obtained by Illumina sequencing and homology studies between cultivated and weedy rice genotypes. (DOCX 19 kb)
12870_2018_1586_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (2.6 mb)
Additional file 2: Figure S1. Comparison of amino acid change sites of ion transport related genes (HKT and NHX gene families and SOS1) between weedy rice genotype JYGY-1 and cultivated rice genotype Nipponbar. (W) stands for weedy rice genotype JYGY-1, and (R) stands for cultivated rice genotype Nipponbar (Except for the gene OsHKT2;2). Among them, the gene with the most amino acid change between weedy rice and rice is OsNHX4, as there are eight amino acid changes identified, followed by OsHKT2;2, OsHKT2;3, OsHKT2;4, OsHKT1;5, OsNHX2, OsHKT1;1, OsSOS1 and OsHKT1;4. And the homology of other genes not shown is 100%. (PDF 2709 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Garciadeblas B, Senn ME, Banuelos MA, Rodriguez-Navarro A. Sodium transport and HKT transporters: the rice model. Plant J. 2003;34(6):788–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kader MA, Seidel T, Golldack D, Lindberg S. Expressions of OsHKT1, OsHKT2, and OsVHA are differentially regulated under NaCl stress in salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. J Exp Bot. 2006;57(15):4257–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:651–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tian H, Baxter IR, Lahner B, Reinders A, Salt DE, Ward JM. Arabidopsis NPCC6/NaKR1 is a phloem Mobile metal binding protein necessary for phloem function and root meristem maintenance. Plant Cell. 2010;22(12):3963–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shi HZ, Quintero FJ, Pardo JM, Zhu JK. The putative plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 controls long-distance Na+ transport in plants. Plant Cell. 2002;14(2):465–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Apse MP, Aharon GS, Snedden WA, Blumwald E. Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science. 1999;285(5431):1256–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ren ZH, Gao JP, Li LG, Cai XL, Huang W, Chao DY, Zhu MZ, Wang ZY, Luan S, Lin HX. A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nat Genet. 2005;37(10):1141–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Byrt CS, Xu B, Krishnan M, Lightfoot DJ, Athman A, Jacobs AK, Watson-Haigh NS, Plett D, Munns R, Tester M, et al. The Na+ transporter, TaHKT1;5-D, limits shoot Na+ accumulation in bread wheat. Plant J. 2014;80(3):516–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhu JK. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003;6(5):441–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fukuda A, Nakamura A, Hara N, Toki S, Tanaka Y. Molecular and functional analyses of rice NHX-type Na+/H+ antiporter genes. Planta. 2011;233(1):175–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yokoi S, Quintero FJ, Cubero B, Ruiz MT, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM, Pardo JM. Differential expression and function of Arabidopsis thaliana NHX Na+/H+ antiporters in the salt stress response. Plant J. 2002;30(5):529–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Qiu J, Zhou Y, Mao L, Ye C, Wang W, Zhang J, Yu Y, Fu F, Wang Y, Qian F et al. Genomic variation associated with local adaptation of weedy rice during de-domestication. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15323.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15323.
  13. 13.
    Dai L, Dai WM, Song XL, Lu BR, Qiang S. A comparative study of competitiveness between different genotypes of weedy rice (Oryza sativa) and cultivated rice. Pest Manag Sci. 2014;70(1):113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DY L SQ, SM Z. The damage situation and the control measures of weedy rice in China. Chin Plant Protect (in Chinese). 2011;31:21–4.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shivrain VK, Burgos NR, Agrama HA, Lawton-Rauh A, Lu B, Sales MA, Boyett V, Gealy DR, Moldenhauer KAK. Genetic diversity of weedy red rice (Oryza sativa) in Arkansas, USA. Weed Res. 2010;50(4):289–302.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arrieta-Espinoza G, Sanchez E, Vargas S, Lobo J, Quesada T, Espinoza AM. The weedy rice complex in Costa Rica. I. Morphological study of relationships between commercial rice varieties, wild Oryza relatives and weedy types. Genet Resour Crop. 2005;52(5):575–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kikuchi S, Satoh K, Nagata T, Kawagashira N, Doi K. Collection, mapping, and annotation of over 28,000 cDNA clones from japonica rice. Science. 2003;301(5631):376–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jiangshi Z, Chuangen L, Cailin W, Gewu Z, Shouyu Z, Ling Z, Yonghua S. Breeding of two - line hybrid rice “Liangyoupeijiu” and its cultural characters (China). Chin Agric Sci. 2003;36:869–72.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yu J, Hu SN, Wang J, Wong GKS, Li SG. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp indica). Science. 2002;296(5565):79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ma X, Zhu C, Yang N, Gan L, Xia K. λ- aminobutyric acid addition alleviates ammonium toxicity by limiting ammonium accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings. Physiol Plant. 2016;158(4):389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ali Z, Park HC, Ali A, Oh D-H, Aman R, Kropornicka A, Hong H, Choi W, Chung WS, Kim W-Y, et al. TsHKT1;2, a HKT1 homolog from the extremophile Arabidopsis relative Thellungiella salsuginea, shows K+ specificity in the presence of NaCl. Plant Physiol. 2012;158(3):1463–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang A, Dai X, Zhang W-H. A R2R3-type MYB gene, OsMYB2, is involved in salt, cold, and dehydration tolerance in rice. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(7):2541–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pan L, Gao H, Xia W, Zhang T, Dong L. Establishing a herbicide-metabolizing enzyme library in Beckmannia syzigachne to identify genes associated with metabolic resistance. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(6):1745–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rodriguez-Rosales MP, Galvez FJ, Huertas R, Aranda MN, Baghour M, Cagnac O, Venema K. Plant NHX cation/proton antiporters. Plant Signal Behav. 2009;4(4):265–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Horie T, Yoshida K, Nakayama H, Yamada K, Oiki S, Shinmyo A. Two types of HKT transporters with different properties of Na+ and K+ transport in Oryza sativa. Plant J. 2001;27(2):129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yu L, Mortimer AM, Xuan S, Lu Y, Zhou Y. Stress-resistance of weedy rice Luolijing (Oryza sativa). Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao. 2005;16(4):717–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Valdez-Aguilar LA, Grieve CM, Poss J. Salinity and alkaline pH in irrigation water affect Marigold plants: I. growth and shoot dry weight partitioning. Hortscience. 2009;44(6):1719–25.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grattan SR, Grieve CM. Salinity mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops. Sci Hortic. 1999;78(1–4):127–57.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Horie T, Costa A, Kim TH, Han MJ, Horie R, Leung H-Y, Miyao A, Hirochika H, An G, Schroeder JI. Rice OsHKT2;1 transporter mediates large Na+ influx component into K+-starved roots for growth. EMBO J. 2007;26(12):3003–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sassi A, Mieulet D, Khan I, Moreau B, Gaillard I, Sentenac H, Very A-A. The Rice monovalent cation transporter OsHKT2;4: revisited ionic selectivity. Plant Physiol. 2012;160(1):498–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wu Y, Hu Y, Xu G. Interactive effects of potassium and sodium on root growth and expression of K/Na transporter genes in rice. Plant Growth Regul. 2009;57(3):271–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Suzuki K, Yamaji N, Costa A, Okuma E, Kobayashi NI, Kashiwagi T, Katsuhara M, Wang C, Tanoi K, Murata Y, et al. OsHKT1;4-mediated Na+ transport in stems contributes to Na+ exclusion from leaf blades of rice at the reproductive growth stage upon salt stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang R, Jing W, Xiao L, Jin Y, Shen L, Zhang W. The Rice high-affinity potassium Transporter1;1 is involved in Salt tolerance and regulated by an MYB-type transcription factor. Plant Physiol. 2015;168(3):1076−+.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jabnoune M, Espeout S, Mieulet D, Fizames C, Verdeil J-L, Conejero G, Rodriguez-Navarro A, Sentenac H, Guiderdoni E, Abdelly C, et al. Diversity in expression patterns and functional properties in the Rice HKT transporter family. Plant Physiol. 2009;150(4):1955–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuhua Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jiapeng Fang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xibao Wu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Liyao Dong
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Plant ProtectionNanjing Agricultural UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in East China, Ministry of AgricultureNanjing Agricultural UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations