Advertisement

BMC Microbiology

, 18:128 | Cite as

Involvement of a dihydrodipicolinate synthase gene (FaDHDPS1) in fungal development, pathogenesis and stress responses in Fusarium asiaticum

  • Weichao Ren
  • Jiting Tao
  • Dongya Shi
  • Wenchan Chen
  • Changjun Chen
Open Access
Research article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Microbial biochemistry, physiology and metabolism

Abstract

Background

Dihydrodipicolinate synthase (DHDPS) is an allosteric enzyme, which catalyzes the first unique step of lysine biosynthesis in prokaryotes, higher plants and some fungi. To date, the biological roles of DHDPS in filamentous fungi are poorly understood.

Results

In this study, on the basis of comparative genome resequencing, a DHDPS gene was found to be specific in Fusarium asiaticum, named FaDHDPS1, which showed high amino acid identity to that of entomopathogenic fungus. Subcellular localization of the FaDHDPS1-GFP fusion protein was mainly concentrated in the cytoplasm of conidia and dispersed in the cytoplasm during conidial germination. To reveal the biological functions, both deletion and complementation mutants of FaDHDPS1 were generated. The results showed that the FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant was defective in conidiation, virulence and DON biosynthesis. In addition, deletion of FaDHDPS1 resulted in tolerance to sodium pyruvate, lysine, low temperature and Congo red.

Conclusion

Results of this study indicate that FaDHDPS1 plays an important role in the regulation of vegetative differentiation, pathogenesis and adaption to multiple stresses in F. asiaticum.

Keywords

Fusarium asiaticum FaDHDPS1 Development Virulence Stress responses 

Abbreviations

ASA

Aspartate-β-semialdehyde

DHDPS

Dihydrodipicolinate synthase

DON

Deoxynivalenol

dpi

days post incubation

FHB

Fusarium head blight

GC-MS

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

GYEP

Glucose yeast extract peptone

HPH

Hygromycin B resistance gene

HSV-tk

Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene

MBL

Mung bean broth

MM

Minimal medium

NIV

Nivalenol

PDA

Potato dextrose agar

RGI

Mycelial growth inhibition

WT

Wild-type

ZEN

Zearalenone

Background

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a severely devastating disease of wheat and other cereals caused by a complex of Fusarium species and leads to significant economic losses worldwide [1]. In addition to quantitative yield losses, harvested grain sustains qualitative problems of contamination with mycotoxins such as deoxynivalenol (DON), nivalenol (NIV), and zearalenone (ZEN), posing an enormous threat to food and feed production [2]. Due to diversities in climate and cropping systems, different Fusarium species are associated with FHB in different wheat growing areas. For Asia, one of the most common Fusarium species responsible for FHB is F. asiaticum [3, 4]. Despite the high economic impact of FHB on agricultural production, efficient strategies for FHB management have not been well established [5]. Thus, comprehensive understanding of the fundamental biology of this pathogen can provide the basis for sustainable and long-term disease control.

Lysine synthesis starts with the condensation of aspartate-β-semialdehyde (ASA) and pyruvate into dihydrodipicolinic acid in microbes and plants [6]. Dihydrodipicolinate synthase (DHDPS), the enzyme that catalyzes this reaction, is inhibited by the end-product lysine and is therefore thought to have a regulatory control on lysine synthesis [7, 8]. DHDPS has been extensively studied in bacteria and been purified to homogeneity from Escherichia coli [9, 10]. Studies of mechanisms in E. coli indicated that DHDPS catalyzes the condensation reaction by means of a ping-pong mechanism, that pyruvate binds to a lysine residue in the active site forming a Schiff base, and then the binding of ASA is followed by condensation and release of dihydrodipicolinic acid [9]. Besides lysine synthesis, this pathway produces some intermediate products that are required for the synthesis of cell wall, housekeeping proteins, and virulence factors [11, 12]. Given its importance to pathogenic bacteria and absence in humans, DHDPS is now regarded as a promising antibiotic target [13].

DHDPS has also been studied in various plants, such as tobacco [14], wheat [15], and maize [16]. Structural biology studies of DHDPS protein from tobacco reveals that the plant DHDPS is a homotetramer, which is made up of dimers [8]. The active site and lysine binding site are located at the center and interface of each monomer, respectively. The structure of most DHDPS enzymes from prokaryotes is homotetrameric, apart from Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which being as dimers [17, 18]. Although DHDPS from both bacteria and plants are composed of dimers, they employ a totally different way of dimer assembly [19]. For higher plants, the feedback of DHDPS is also inhibited by the end-product lysine [20]. Thus, Lysine biosynthesis in plants provides a promising target for the design of novel herbicides by lysine inhibition, or improving the nutritional value of crops by increase of lysine production.

For fungi, DHDPS is found not only in plant pathogen, but also in entomogenous fungus, however, to update, the functions of DHDPS is elusive in filamentous fungi, including Fusarium spp. Comparing the genome sequencing data of F. asiaticum wild-type strain 2021 with the F. graminearum sequenced strain PH-1, FaDHDPS1 was unique in F. asiaticum. We hypothesized that FaDHDPS1 played crucial roles in the development and pathogenesis of F. asiaticum, thus, main purposes of this study were to characterize the genetic, biological and biochemical functions of FaDHDPS1. Our study showed that the FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant exhibited obviously phenotype changes in vegetative differentiation, virulence and stress tolerance.

Methods

Fungal strains and culture conditions

F. asiaticum wild-type (WT) strain 2021, which was isolated in wheat field from Zhejiang Province, China, was used as the WT progenitor for sequencing and transformation receipt strain. The WT strain and transformants obtained in this study were cultured at 25 °C on potato dextrose agar (PDA, 200 g potato, 20 g dextrose, 15 g agar and 1 L water) or minimal medium (MM, 10 mM K2HPO4, 10 mM KH2PO4, 4 mM (NH4)2SO4, 2.5 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.45 mM CaCl2, 9 mM FeSO4, 10 mM glucose and 1 L water, pH 6.9) for mycelial growth assays. Mung bean broth (MBL, 30 g of mung beans was boiled in 1 L water for 20 min and filtered through cheesecloth) was used for conidiation assays [21]. Yeast extract peptone dextrose (YEPD, 20 g dextrose, 10 g peptone, 3 g yeast extract and 1 L water) was used for conidial germination.

Deletion and complementation of FaDHDPS1 in F. asiaticum

The gene replacement construct for deleting FaDHDPS1 was generated using the method described previously [22]. Briefly, the 5′ and 3′ flanking regions of FaDHDPS1 were amplified with the primer pairs listed in Additional file 1: Table S1, and then fused with the resistance cassette carrying the hygromycin B resistance gene (HPH) and the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene (HSV-tk). The resulting PCR products were transformed into the protoplasts of the WT progenitor 2021, as described previously [23]. Hygromycin B and 5-Fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine were added to a final concentration of 100 μg mL− 1 and 50 ng mL− 1, respectively, for transformants selection. For complementation, the full-length of FaDHDPS1 was amplified from the genomic DNA of the strain 2021. Before this vector was transformed into the FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant, FaDHDPS1 in the vector was sequenced to ensure the flawlessness of the sequence.

Putative gene deletion mutants were identified by PCR assays with the relevant primers (Additional file 1: Table S1), and were further analyzed by the Southern blotting assays (Additional file 2: Figure S1). DNA of each strain was extracted and then digested with the appropriate restriction endonuclease, as indicated in Additional file 2: Figure S1. The probe was labeled with digoxigenin (DIG) using a High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection Starter kit II according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).

Mycelial growth and conidiation assays

To test sensitivity of each strain to different stresses, mycelial plugs (5-mm diameter) taken from the edge of a 3-day-old colony were grown in the dark for 3 days at 25 °C in 9-cm diameter Petri plates containing PDA amended with 1.2 M NaCl or 1.2 M KCl (osmotic stress agents), 0.05% (w/v) SDS (a cell membrane-damaging agent), 0.05% (w/v) Congo red or 5 mM caffeine (cell wall-damaging agents), or 5 mM paraquat or 8 mM H2O2 (oxidative pressure agents). In addition, mycelial plugs were cultured on MM plates with 50 mM sodium pyruvate as the only carbon source, 2 M lysine as the carbon and nitrogen sources, and MM plates without carbon or nitrogen sources to test the nutrient sources sensitivity. Furthermore, mycelial plugs were cultured on PDA plates in the dark for 20 days at 4 °C to test the sensitivity of each strain to low temperature. Each experiment was repeated three times independently.

For conidiation assays, four 5-mm mycelial plugs from the edge of 3-day-old colony of each strain were inoculated in 30 mL of MBL in a 50-mL flask. After cultivated in a 185-rpm shaker at 25 °C for 5 days, the conidia of each strain were harvested by filtering through cheesecloth and counted by hemacytometer under microscope. Each experiment with three replicates was repeated three times independently.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR

To extract total RNA, mycelia of each strain were cultured in glucose yeast extract peptone (GYEP) liquid medium (5% glucose, 0.1% yeast extract and 0.1% peptone) for 7 days shaking incubation in the dark at 28 °C. Total RNA was extracted using the RNAsimple Total RNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China), and then used for reverse transcription with the HiScript Q Select RT SuperMix for qPCR kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). The expressions of FaTRI5 and FaTRI6 were determined by quantitative real-time PCR, and the relative quantification of each transcript was calculated by the 2-ΔΔCT method [24] with the F. asiaticum actin gene FaActin as the internal control. The experiment was repeated three times independently.

Plant infection and DON production assays

For plant infection assays, conidia from 5-day-old MBL cultures were harvested and resuspended in sterile distilled water at a concentration of 1 × 105 conidia mL− 1. Wheat germs were inoculated with 2 μl conidial suspensions and examined at 10 days post incubation (dpi). Flowering wheat heads of cultivar Zhenmai 5 were drop-inoculated with 10 μl of conidia suspensions at the central spikelet of the spike. 10 μl of sterile distilled water served as controls. Symptomatic spikelets were examined and counted at 15 dpi. For each treatment, 20 samples were inoculated.

For DON production assays, conidia of each strain (1 × 105 conidia mL− 1) was added to GYEP liquid medium. After 7 days shaking incubation in the dark at 28 °C, the filtrate was gathered and the mycelia was dried off and weighed. DON was extracted from the filtrate with ethyl acetate, derivatized, mixed with iso-octane and analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) according to the method described previously [25]. The experiment was repeated for three times.

Generation of the FaDHDPS1-GFP fusion cassette

To construct the FaDHDPS1-GFP fusion cassette, FaDHDPS1 containing the open-reading fragment (without stop codon) and its native promoter region was amplified from the genomic DNA of 2021. The resulting PCR product was cloned into XhoI-digested pYF11 vector by the yeast gap repair approach [26]. Subsequently, the FaDHDPS1-GFP fusion construct was recovered from the yeast transformants using the Yeast Plasmid Kit (Solarbio Biotech, Beijing, China) and then transferred into E. coli strain DH5α for propagation. The recombinational plasmid was confirmed by sequencing analysis to contain the in-frame fusion construct and transformed into the FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant. The resulting G418-resistant transformants were screened by PCR and confirmed by the presence of GFP signals. The primers used are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Results

Identification of FaDHDPS1 in F. asiaticum

The whole genome sequence of F. asiaticum wild-type strain 2021was sequenced by the second generation of gene sequencing technology. Compared with the gene sequenced F. graminearum strain PH-1, FaDHDPS1 was found to be a specific gene in F. asiaticum. To avoid the sequencing gap mistakes, the full-length of FaDHDPS1 was labeled as a probe to hybrid the 2021 and PH-1 genomic DNA. As shown in Fig. 1a, the hybrid band was only observed in 2021 indicating that FaDHDPS1 is unique in 2021.
Fig. 1

FaDHDPS1 exists only in F. asiaticum among Fusarium sp. (a) The full-length of FaDHDPS1 was used as a probe to hybrid the genomic DNA of 2021 and PH-1, and water was used as a negative control. (b) Alignment of amino acid sequences of the DHDPS homolog of F. asiaticum with those of Escherichia coli, Arabidopsis thaliana, Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium robertsii. The black shading boxshade was used to highlight identical amino acids

FaDHDPS1 was 906 bp in length without any introns, and was predicted to encode a protein with 301 amino acid residues. Blastp searches with FaDHDPS1 protein sequence as a query showed that the best hit was to entomopathogenic fungi, such as Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium robertsii with 77% and 73% amino acid sequence identity, respectively. However, FaDHDPS1 showed low degree of homology with the counterparts form E. coli and Arabidopsis thaliana (Fig. 1b).

Deletion and complementation of FaDHDPS1 in F. asiaticum

To investigate the function of FaDHDPS1, target gene deletion mutants of FaDHDPS1 were generated using a homologous recombination strategy (Additional file 2: Figure S1A). Four putative gene deletion mutants were identified from 16 hygromycin-resistant transformants by PCR analysis with the primer pair P7/P8 (Additional file 1: Table S1). The gene deletion and complementation candidates were further confirmed by Southern blot experiment, as expected, only a 1934 bp band appeared in the gene deletion mutant ΔFaDHDPS1, and only 2253 bp bands appeared in the wild-type progenitor 2021 and complemented strain ΔFaDHDPS1-C (Additional file 2: Figure S1B). The results indicated that ΔFaDHDPS1 was a null mutant resulting from expected recombination events at the FaDHDPS1 locus, and ΔFaDHDPS1 was complemented in situ by a single copy of FaDHDPS1.

Involvement of FaDHDPS1 in conidial production and germination

The FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant ΔFaDHDPS1 grew slightly slower than the wild-type progenitor 2021 and the complemented strain ΔFaDHDPS1-C on PDA and MM medium, but the difference is not significant. Since asexual reproduction is important for the disease spread of F. asiaticum, the conidiation capacity was tested. After incubated in MBL medium for 5 days, the number of conidia produced by ΔFaDHDPS1 was 45% less than that of the wild-type progenitor 2021 (Fig. 2a). In addition, conidial germination was tested, after 6 h incubation in YEPD medium at 25 °C, the germination rate was nearly 100% in the strain 2021 but only 48% in ΔFaDHDPS1 (Fig. 2b). These results indicate that FaDHDPS1 is essential for growth, conidiogenesis and germination in F. asiaticum.
Fig. 2

Impacts of FaDHDPS1 on conidial production and germination. (a) Conidia were accounted after incubation of the wild-type strain 2021, the FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant ΔFaDHDPS1 and complemented strain ΔFaDHDPS1-C in mung bean liquid (MBL) medium for 5 days in a shaker. Bars denote the standard errors from three experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). (b) Percentages of germinated conidia of 2021, ΔFaDHDPS1 and ΔFaDHDPS1-C after incubated in YEPD medium for 6 h. Bars denote standard errors from three experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05)

Effects of FaDHDPS1 deletion on sensitivity to nutrient sources

DHDPS catalyzes the condensation of ASA and pyruvate to generate dihydrodipicolinic acid in lysine biosynthesis pathway of bacteria and plants [27]. We, therefore, tested the sensitivity of ΔFaDHDPS1 to carbon or nitrogen source on MM medium. The mycelial growth rates of ΔFaDHDPS1 was slightly slower than those of 2021 and ΔFaDHDPS1-C on MM without carbon or nitrogen source, while its aerial hyphae and pigment decreased significantly on MM without nitrogen source (Fig. 3a). Notably, the inhibition of mycelial growth of ΔFaDHDPS1 was lower on MM amended with 50 mM sodium pyruvate or 2 M lysine than that of wild-type 2021 (Fig. 3b). These results suggested that FaDHDPS1 is involved in the regulation of material metabolism in F. asiaticum.
Fig. 3

Sensitivity of the wild-type strain 2021, FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant ΔFaDHDPS1 and complemented strain ΔFaDHDPS1-C to carbon-free,nitrogen-free,C3H3NaO3 and Lysine on MM (a) Colony morphology of 2021, ΔFaDHDPS1 and ΔFaDHDPS1-C, the images were photographed after 4 days at 25 °C. (b) Inhibition rate of mycelial growth on each stress indicated in figure. Bars denote the standard errors from three experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05)

Effects of FaDHDPS1 deletion on sensitivity to environmental stresses

To assess the biological fitness of ΔFaDHDPS1, the sensitivity to osmotic stresses KCl and NaCl, oxidative stresses H2O2 and paraquat, and cell wall damaging agents Congo red, caffeine and SDS was examined. The results showed that deletion of FaDHDPS1 did not alter the sensitivity of ΔFaDHDPS1 to stresses generated by the above substances, except for Congo red (Fig. 4), namely, the sensitivity of ΔFaDHDPS1 to Congo red was significantly decreased compared with wild-type and complemented strains.
Fig. 4

Comparison of sensitivity of 2021, ΔFaDHDPS1 and ΔFaDHDPS1-C to various environmental stresses. Inhibition of mycelial growth was examined after each strain had been incubated for 3 days on PDA amended with the osmotic stress NaCl or KCl, the oxidative stress H O or paraquat and the cell wall and cytoplasm membrane stress caffeine, Congo red or SDS. Bars denote the standard errors from three experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05)

Effects of FaDHDPS1 deletion on sensitivity to low temperature

The occurrence of FHB is strongly determined by weather conditions, and temperature is a key factor to affect the variety distribution of Fusarium species [28], we, therefore, were interested in the effect of FaDHDPS1 on thermosensitivity. As shown in Fig. 5, ΔFaDHDPS1 grew slightly slower than the wild-type strain 2021 on PDA at 25 °C, whereas ΔFaDHDPS1 grew significantly faster than 2021 in low temperature 4 °C. These results suggest that FaDHDPS1 plays an important role in cold stress adaption.
Fig. 5

Sensitivity determination of the FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant to temperature. (a) Colony growth of the wild-type 2021, the FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant △FaDHDPS1 and complemented strain FaDHDPS1-C on PDA at 4 °C and 25 °C. Colonies were photographed after 20 days and 3 days for 4 °C and 25 °C, respectively. (b) The inhibition rate of mycelial growth on PDA at 4 °C and 25 °C. Values are the means ± standard error (SE) of three repeated experiments

Requirement of FaDHDPS1 in the pathogenicity of F. asiaticum

To determine whether FaDHDPS1 is related to pathogenicity in F. asiaticum, the virulence of ΔFaDHDPS1 was evaluated by point inoculation of conidial suspension on flowering wheat heads. 15 days after inoculation, scab symptoms caused by ΔFaDHDPS1 were restricted near the inoculated spikelets. However, the wild-type and the complemented strains caused severe and typical scab symptoms (Fig. 6a and b), suggesting that FaDHDPS1 is required for full virulence of F. asiaticum.
Fig. 6

Virulence of the FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant. (a) Wheat germs were incubated with conidial suspensions of 2021, ΔFaDHDPS1 and ΔFaDHDPS1-C and examined after 10 days post incubation (dpi). (b) The lengths of diseased lesions of wheat germs were measures 10 dpi. (c) Flowering wheat heads were incubated with the conidia of each strain and photographed at 15 dpi. (d) Percentage of diseased spikes on inoculated wheat heads. Values are the means ± standard error (SE) of three repeated experiments

Pathogenicity was also assessed on wheat germs, the ΔFaDHDPS1 strain caused significantly smaller lesions than the wild-type and the complemented strains (Fig. 6c and d). These results indicate that FaDHDPS1 is required for full virulence of F. asiaticum.

Role of FaDHDPS1 in the regulation of deoxynivalenol (DON) biosynthesis

Previous studies have shown that DON is a prerequisite for primary infection of F. graminearum [29]. Since the virulence of ΔFaDHDPS1 was significantly reduced, we examined the impact of FaDHDPS1 on DON biosynthesis. The amount of DON produced by ΔFaDHDPS1 was one-half less than the wild-type and complemented strains (Fig. 7a). To get more clues, we detected the transcriptional levels of two trichothecene biosynthesis genes, TRI5 and TRI6, by quantitative real-time PCR. Compared with the wild-type and complemented strains, the expression levels of TRI5 and TRI6 in ΔFaDHDPS1 reduced by 36% and 45%, respectively (Fig. 7b). These results indicate that FaDHDPS1 plays a critical role in DON biosynthesis in F. asiaticum.
Fig. 7

Deoxynivalenol (DON) production and the expression of DON biosynthesis genes. (a) DON production by each strain in GYEP medium was examined by gas chromatography. Line bars in each column denote standard errors of three repeated experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). (b) Relative expression levels of TRI5 and TRI6 were measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Line bars in each column denote standard errors of three repeated experiments

Subcellular localization of FaDHDPS1-GFP fusion protein

To further explore the function of FaDHDPS1, we generated FaDHDPS1-GFP fusion construct and transformed it into ΔFaDHDPS1. The expression of FaDHDPS1-GFP fusion protein was detected by Western blotting using anti-GFP antibody (Additional file 3: Figure S2). The phenotypic defects of ΔFaDHDPS1 were restored, which indicated that the FaDHDPS1-GFP fusion protein was fully functional (data not shown). FaDHDPS1-GFP was mainly localized in the cytoplasm of both conidia and hyphae (Fig. 8). Further examination showed that the GFP fluorescence which concentrated in conidia diffused in cytoplasm of germinated conidia and growing hyphae (Fig. 8) suggesting that FaDHDPS1 is crucial for conidial germination, which is consistent with the germination delay of ΔFaDHDPS1.
Fig. 8

Subcellular localization of FaDHDPS1 in various developmental stages of Fusarium asiaticum. A FaDHDPS1-GFP fusion construct under native promoter was introduced into the FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant. The fluorescence signals were detected in conidia, germlings and mycelia. Bar = 10 μm

Discussion

Lysine is one of the most essential amino acids that cannot be synthesized in human and animal [6]. In prokaryotes and higher plants, DHDPS catalyzes the first unique step of lysine biosynthesis [8]. The potential of lysine biosynthesis as an anti-microbial target is increased because diaminopimelate, a precursor in the mesodiaminopimelic acid pathway to lysine, is essential in bacterial cell-wall development [30]. Lysine biosynthesis has also attracted the attention of biotechnologists, since lysine is nutritionally limiting for humans and livestock in most cereal crops and feeds [31], and understanding the regulatory mechanisms of this pathway is thus critical for the generation of ‘high-lysine’ plants. However, up to now, DHDPS has not been functionally characterized in filamentous fungi. In the present study, a DHDPS gene was identified and characterized in F. asiaticum, a severe fungal pathogen of cereal crops. Our data showed that FaDHDPS1 is required for fungal development, virulence and stress responses in F. asiaticum. To our knowledge, this is the first report about biological functions of DHDPS in filamentous fungi.

Homologous sequence alignment via Blast showed no DHDPS counterparts exist in other Fusarium species, and the FaDHDPS1 coding amino acids showed high homology to that of entomopathogenic fungi, but low homology to that of bacteria and plants, indicating that DHDPS may perform a specific role in kingdoms.

The deletion of FaDHDPS1 in F. asiaticum was viable. Previous studies reported that DHDPS is related to growth in Streptococcus pneumonia, a Gram-positive bacterium [32], and lacking the DHDPS gene in S. pneumoniae is unable to grow. In this study, the FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant showed slightly reduced mycelial growth rate on PDA and MM medium, even in MM without carbon or nitrogen sources, while the obvious reduction of aerial hyphae and pigment in the FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant was found when cultured on MM without nitrogen source. The results indicated that FaDHDPS1 is not only associated with the assimilation of carbon and nitrogen sources, but also involved in pigment biosynthesis in F. asiaticum. Although the inhibition ratio of ΔFaDHDPS1 mutant is lower on MM with sodium pyruvate and lysine respectively, its colony diameter was not significantly different from the parental strain 2021 and complemented strain. The specific function of DHDPS in the lysine biosynthesis pathway of F. asiaticum needs further research.

DHDPS delivers the direct precursor of dipicolinic acid which plays a key role in the bacterial sporulation process [33]. In this study, the ΔFaDHDPS1 mutant presented serious defects in conidiation, which is consistent with the crucial role of DHDPS in bacteria [32]. In addition, the conidial germination is severely delayed in ΔFaDHDPS1 mutant compared with that in wild-type strain. Furthermore, the dynamic change of the FaDHDPS1-GFP fusion protein also demonstrated that FaDHDPS1 is required for conidiation. Thus, FaDHDPS1 may be essential for providing materials for conidial formation and germination.

FaDHDPS1 was lysine-insensitive in F. asiaticum. The sensitivity of DHDPS to lysine differs widely. DHDPS from plants is strongly inhibited by lysine [34], while DHDPS from gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli [35] is less strongly inhibited by lysine, and most gram-positive bacteria, such as Bacillus subtilis [36] and Corynebacterium glutamicum [37], DHDPS is not inhibited by lysine at all. Therefore, FaDHDPS1 was similar to the DHDPS from most gram-positive bacteria.

FaDHDPS1 may be involved in the regional distribution of F. asiaticum. The response of ΔFaDHDPS1 mutant to low temperature decreased significantly when compared with the parental strain 2021, and this may be explained at a certain extend that the population distribution of F. asiaticum in China, where FHB caused by F. asiaticum mainly dominates in the south of the Yangtze river, in which the annual average temperature is greater than 15 degrees, whereas F. graminearum s.st. mainly thrives in the north of the Huanghe river, where the annual average temperature is less than 15 degrees [38].

The previous study reported that DHDPS is required for virulence in human pathogen Neisseria meningitides [39]. In this study, the FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant showed considerably attenuated virulence on both germ and spike of wheat. In addition, the FaDHDPS1 deletion mutant exhibited significantly reduced deoxynivalenol production in vitro which is consistent with the inability of ΔFaDHDPS1 mutant to infect plant. To further confirm this result, the expression level of two trichothecene biosynthesis genes TRI5 and TRI6 were detected by quantitative real-time PCR. The expression levels of these two genes were considerably decreased in the ΔFaDHDPS1 mutant. The deletion of FaDHDPS1 might reduce trichothecene biosynthesis through an indirect effect on secondary metabolism, which is consistent with the conclusion that knockouts of most genes reduce toxin biosynthesis and attenuate virulence [40] (Kazan et al., 2012).

Conclusion

Our data provided strong evidence that FaDHDPS1 is involved in diverse cellular processes in filamentous fungi F. asiaticum, including conidiation, conidial germination, cell wall pressure response, low temperature tolerance, carbon/nitrogen sources utilization, secondary metabolism and virulence. The future work will focus on the role of FaDHDPS1 in lysine biosynthesis.

Notes

Funding

This work was funded by National Key Research and Development (R&D) Plan of China (2016YED0201007 and 2018YFD0201002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672065), Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303023 and 201303025) and Agricultural Projects of Jiangsu Province, China [BE2018378 and CX(18)2005]. The funding bodies did not have any influence in the design of the study or the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data as well as in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article and its Additional files 1, 2 and 3.

Authors’ contributions

CC and WR designed this study; WR and JT performed most part of the experimental work; WR, DS and WC analyzed the data; CC and WR wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12866_2018_1268_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Additional file 1: Table S1. Oligonucleotide primers used in this study. (DOCX 18 kb)
12866_2018_1268_MOESM2_ESM.tif (1.3 mb)
Additional file 2: Figure S1. Generation and identification of Fusarium asiaticum FaDHDPS1 gene deletion mutants. (A) Gene replacement and complementation strategy for FaDHDPS1. The gene replacement cassette HPH-HSV-tk contains the hygromycin resistance gene and the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene. Primer binding sites are indicated by arrows (see Additional file 1: Table S1 for the primer sequences). (B) Southern blot hybridization analysis of 2021, ΔFaDHDPS1 and ΔFaDHDPS1-C using the upstream fragment of FsDHDPS1 as a probe, and genomic DNA were digested with SphI. (TIF 1328 kb)
12866_2018_1268_MOESM3_ESM.tif (1.9 mb)
Additional file 3: Figure S2. Western blotting assays of the expression of FaDHDPS1-GFP fusion protein. The total proteins from ΔFaDHDPS1::FaDHDPS1-GFP strains were detected with the anti-GFP antibody. The wild-type strain 2021 and ΔFaDHDPS1::GFP were used as controls. (TIF 1911 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Mcmullen M, Jones R, Gallenberg D. Scab of wheat and barley: a re-emerging disease of devastating impact. Plant Dis. 1997;81:1340–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Starkey DE, Ward TJ, Aoki T, Gale LR, Kistler HC, Geiser DM, et al. Global molecular surveillance reveals novel Fusarium head blight species and trichothecene toxin diversity. Fungal Genet Biol. 2007;44:1191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Qu B, Li HP, Zhang JB, Xu YB, Huang T, Wu AB, et al. Geographic distribution and genetic diversity of Fusarium graminearum and F. asiaticum on wheat spikes throughout China. Plant Pathol. 2008;57:15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ren W, Zhao H, Shao W, Ma W, Wang J, Zhou M, et al. Identification of a novel phenamacril-resistance-related gene by the cDNA-RAPD method in Fusarium asiaticum. Pest Manag Sci. 2016;72:1558–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steiner B, Kurz H, Lemmens M, Buerstmayr H, et al. Differential gene expression of related wheat lines with contrasting levels of head blight resistance after Fusarium graminearum inoculation. Theo Appl Genet. 2009;118:753–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dobson RCJ, Griffin MDW, Roberts SJ, Gerrard JA. Dihydrodipicolinate synthase (DHDPS) from Escherichia coli displays partial mixed inhibition with respect to its first substrate, pyruvate. Biochimie. 2004;86:311–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yugari Y, Gilvarg C. The condensation step in diaminopimelate synthesis. J Biol Chem. 1965;240:4710–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blickling S, Renner C, Laber B, Pohlenz H-D, Holak TA, Huber R. Reaction mechanism of Escherichia coli dihydrodipicolinate synthase investigated by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1997;36:24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shedlarski JG, Gilvarg C. The pyruvate-aspartic semialdehyde condensing enzyme of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1970;245:1362–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Skovpen YV, Palmer DRJ. Dihydrodipicolinate synthase from Campylobacter jejuni: kinetic mechanism of cooperative allosteric inhibition and inhibitor-induced substrate cooperativity. Biochemistry. 2013;52:5454–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soares da Costa TP, Christensen JB, Desbois S, Gordon SE, Gupta R, Hogan CJ, et al. Quaternary structure analyses of an essential oligomeric enzyme. Methods in Enzymol. 2015;562:205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grant Pearce F, Hudson AO, Loomes K, Dobson RCJ. Dihydrodipicolinate synthase: structure, dynamics, function, and evolution. Subcell Biochem. 2017;83:271–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gillner DM, Becker DP, Holz RC. Lysine biosynthesis in bacteria: a metallodesuccinylase as a potential antimicrobial target. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2013;18:155–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghislain M, Frankard V, Jacobs M. Dihydrodipicolinate synthase of Nicotiana sylvestris, a chloroplast-localized enzyme of the lysine pathway. Planta. 1990;180:480–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumpaisal R, Hashimoto T, Yamada Y. Purification and characterization of dihydrodipicolinate synthase from wheat suspension cultures. Plant Physiol. 1987;85:145–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frisch DA, Gengenbach BG, Tommey AM, Sellner JM, Somers DA, Myers DE. Isolation and characterization of dihydrodipicolinate synthase from maize. Plant Physiol. 1991;96:444–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Burgess BR, Dobson RCJ, Bailey MF, Atkinson SC, Griffin MDW, Jameson GB, et al. Structure and evolution of a novel dimeric enzyme from a clinically important bacterial pathogen. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:27598–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaur N, Gautam A, Kumar S, Singh A, Singh N, Sharma S, et al. Biochemical studies and crystal structure determination of dihydrodipicolinate synthase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int J Biol Macromol. 2011;48:779–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Griffin MDW, Dobson RCJ, Pearce FG, Antonio L, Whitten AE, Liew CK, et al. Evolution of quaternary structure in a homotetrameric enzyme. J Mol Biol. 2008;380:691–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arruda P, Kemper EL, Papes F, Leite A. Regulation of lysine catabolism in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5:324–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bai G, Shaner G. Variation in Fusarium graminearum and cultivar resistance to wheat scab. Plant Dis. 1996;80:975–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yu J-H, Hamari Z, Han K-H, Seo J-A, Reyes-Domínguez Y, Scazzocchio C. Double-joint PCR: a PCR-based molecular tool for gene manipulations in filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet Biol. 2004;41:973–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hou Z, Xue C, Peng Y, Katan T, Kistler HC, Xu J-R. A mitogen-activated protein kinase gene (MGV1) in Fusarium graminearum is required for female fertility, heterokaryon formation, and plant infection. Mol Plant Microbe In. 2002;15:1119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zheng Z, Gao T, Hou Y, Zhou M. Involvement of the anucleate primary sterigmata protein FgApsB in vegetative differentiation, asexual development, nuclear migration, and virulence in Fusarium graminearum. FEMS Microbiol Let. 2013;349:88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ma H, Kunes S, Schatz PJ, Botstein D. Plasmid construction by homologous recombination in yeast. Gene. 1987;58:201–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Christensen JB, Soares da Costa TP, Faou P, Pearce FG, Panjikar S, Perugini MA. Structure and function of cyanobacterial DHDPS and DHDPR. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Backhouse D. Global distribution of Fusarium graminearum, F. asiaticum and F. boothii from wheat in relation to climate. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2014;139:161–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Proctor RH, Hohn TM, Mccormick SP. Reduced virulence of Gibberella zeae caused by disruption of a trichothecene toxin biosynthetic gene. Mol Plant Microbe In. 1995;8:593–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Guo BB, Devenish SRA, Dobson RCJ, Muscroft-Taylor AC, Gerrard JA. The C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli dihydrodipicolinate synthase (DHDPS) is essential for maintenance of quaternary structure and efficient catalysis. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2009;380:802–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wallsgrove RM, Mazelis M. The enzymology of lysine biosynthesis in higher plants: complete localization of the regulatory enzyme dihydrodipicolinate synthase in the chloroplasts of spinach leaves. FEBS Let. 1980;116:189–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dogovski C, Gorman MA, Ketaren NE, Praszkier J, Zammit LM, Mertens HD, et al. From knock-out phenotype to three-dimensional structure of a promising antibiotic target from Streptococcus pneumoniae. PLoS One. 2013;e83419:8.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hoganson DA, Stahly DP. Regulation of dihydrodipicolinate synthase during growth and sporulation of Bacillus cereus. J Bacteriol. 1975;124:1344–50.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mazelis M, Whatley FR, Whatley J. The enzymology of lysine biosynthesis in higher plants: the occurrence, characterization and some regulatory properties of dihydrodipicolinate synthase. FEBS Let. 1977;84:236–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Geng F, Chen Z, Zheng P, Sun J, Zeng A-P. Exploring the allosteric mechanism of dihydrodipicolinate synthase by reverse engineering of the allosteric inhibitor binding sites and its application for lysine production. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2013;97:1963–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vold B, Szulmajster J, Carbone A. Regulation of dihydrodipicolinate synthase and aspartate kinase in Bacillus subtilis. Journal of Bacteriol. 1975;121:970–4.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cremer J, Eggeling L, Sahm H. Control of the lysine biosynthesis sequence in Corynebacterium glutamicum as analyzed by overexpression of the individual corresponding genes. Appl Environ Microb. 1991;57:1746–52.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xu XM, Parry DW, Nicholson P, Thomsett MA, Simpson D, Edwards SG, et al. Within-field variability of Fusarium head blight pathogens and their associated mycotoxins. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2008;120:21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Devenish SRA, Huisman FHA, Parker EJ, Hadfield AT, Gerrard JA. Cloning and characterisation of dihydrodipicolinate synthase from the pathogen Neisseria meningitidis. BBA-Proteins Proteom. 1794;2009:1168–74.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kazan K, Gardiner DM, Manners JM. On the trail of a cereal killer: recent advances in Fusarium graminearum pathogenomics and host resistance. Mol Plant Pathol. 2012;13:399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Plant ProtectionNanjing Agricultural UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations