Advertisement

BMC Genomics

, 20:70 | Cite as

Overexpression of herbaceous peony HSP70 confers high temperature tolerance

  • Daqiu Zhao
  • Xing Xia
  • Jianghong Su
  • Mengran Wei
  • Yanqing Wu
  • Jun TaoEmail author
Open Access
Research article
  • 173 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Plant genomics

Abstract

Background

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are found extensively in Eukaryotes and are involved in stress tolerance. However, their functions in herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) under high temperature stress are poorly characterized.

Results

In this study, the genomic sequence of P. lactiflora HSP70, designated PlHSP70, was isolated. Its full-length was 3635 bp, and it contained a large 1440-bp intron. The encoded protein with a molecular weight of 71 kDa was localized in the cytoplasm of the cell. PlHSP70 transcription was detected in P. lactiflora and increased with the treatment of high temperature stress. The constitutive overexpression of PlHSP70 in Arabidopsis thaliana obviously conferred tolerance to high temperature stress by affecting different physiological and biochemical indices. Transgenic A. thaliana plants exhibited higher chlorophyll fluorescence values than the wild-type (WT) when exposed to high temperature stress. The accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anion free radical (O2·-) and relative electric conductivity (REC) were significantly lower in the transgenic A. thaliana plants compared to the WT. In addition, more intact cell membranes, chloroplasts and starch grains, and fewer plastoglobuli were found in the PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines than in the WT.

Conclusions

All of these results indicated that PlHSP70 possessed the ability to improve the tolerance to high temperature in transgenic A. thaliana, which could provide a theoretical basis to improve high temperature tolerance of P. lactiflora by future genetic manipulation.

Keywords

Heat shock proteins Reactive oxygen species High temperature Stress Herbaceous peony 

Abbreviations

Amp

Ampicillin

CaMV

Cauliflower mosaic virus

cDNA

Complementary DNA

DAB

Diaminobenzidine

HSPs

Heat shock proteins

Hyg

Hygromycin

ORF

Open reading frame

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

qRT-PCR

Quantitative real-time PCR

REC

Relative electric conductivity

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

SDS-PAGE

Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

sHSP

Small heat shock proteins

WT

Wild-type

Background

Plant growth and development is often affected by all types of stresses, including biotic and abiotic stresses. Abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, and extreme temperature are important factors limiting the growth of plants [1]. In the context of global warming and the increased frequency of extreme temperature, high temperature has been well recognized as a highly significant environmental factor that represents a serious threat to almost all aspects of plant development, growth, reproduction, and yield worldwide [2]. For example, the germination rate index of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) seeds under 35 °C was significantly lower than that at 25 °C and 30 °C [3]. In addition, the floret pollination and fertilization in rice (Oryza sativa L.) could not be conducted normally during the heading and flowering period above 35 °C, and the fertilization rate decreased significantly [4, 5]. In addition, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) exposure to high temperature significantly decreased the rate and duration of grain filling and decreased the grain weight [6]. To prevent the damage caused by high temperature, plants developed various defence mechanisms, including a complex metabolic adjustment process known as the heat shock response [2].

The induced synthesis of heat shock proteins (HSPs) is a major component of the heat shock response, which can decrease the harmful effects of high temperature. HSPs are a class of the most ubiquitous and stress-resistant protective proteins which primarily act as molecular chaperones and play a crucial role in protecting the cells from oxidative damage through the folding and translocation of newly translated proteins and the repair of misfolded proteins to maintain the stability of the internal environment of the plant [7, 8]. Based on their apparent molecular mass, plant HSPs are divided into five classes: HSP100, HSP90, HSP70, HSP60 and small heat shock proteins (sHSP) [9]. HSP70 is the most abundant and highly conserved of the five classes in most organisms and acts as a molecular chaperone, and it is currently the most highly studied heat shock protein [10]. When exposed to high temperature treatment at 35–42 °C for 12–168 h, the HSP70 content was up-regulated in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) [11], pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) [12], lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) [13], luffa (Luffa cylindrica (L.) Roem.) [14] and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) [15]. In addition, the overexpression of non-heading Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis Makino) HSP70 confers high temperature tolerance to tobacco [16], and the introduction of Porphyra seriata HSP70 into Chlamydomonas can effectively enhance its resistance to high temperature stress [17]. Therefore, HSP70 plays a crucial role in helping to protect plants from high temperature damage, but there has been little in-depth study on this topic in ornamental plants.

As one of the traditional flowers of China, herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.) has a broad market prospect because of its large, multicolored and beautiful flowers. It could be used as potted flowers, cutting flowers and materials for gardening to make unique seasonal landscapes [18]. However, the damage caused by high temperature limits the popularization and application of P. lactiflora. High temperature in the summer results in the yellowing and withering of the P. lactiflora leaves resulting in dead spots, particularly in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River to southern China. Plant growth vigour is excessively reduced, and diseases and insect pests are serious problems, which severely affect its beauty and the growth during the following year. But in this field, only several studies had preliminarily clarified its biochemical and molecular responses [19, 20, 21], and these studies all found that HSP70 play a critical role in the resistance of P. lactiflora to high temperature. However, more in-depth studies to validate the function of the high temperature resistance of P. lactiflora HSP70 have not been performed. In this study, we isolated the genomic sequence of P. lactiflora HSP70 and studied its heterologous expression in Escherichia coli, subcellular localization in O. sativa protoplasts and expression patterns in P. lactiflora with high temperature stress treatment. In addition, we generated transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants that overexpressed P. lactiflora HSP70 to compare the high temperature tolerance and systematically studied its underlying mechanism. These results could provide a theoretical basis to improve the high temperature tolerance of P. lactiflora by genetic manipulation in the future.

Methods

Isolation and bioinformatics analysis of PlHSP70 genomic sequence

According to the full-length cDNA sequence of PlHSP70 (accession number in NCBI: JN180465), gene-specific primers (forward primer: 5’-CTCTTACTTTTCTTCTCTCGACCC CTTCCG-3′, reverse primer: 5’-CTCTTACTTTTCTTCTCTCGACCCCTTCCG-3′) were designed to isolate its genomic DNA sequence. Total DNA extraction was performed according to MiniBEST Plant Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, Japan). The extracted total DNA was used as a template for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to obtain the genomic DNA sequence of PlHSP70. The genomic DNA sequence was amplified in a total volume of 25 μL reaction system containing total DNA 2 μL, 10 × PCR Buffer 2.5 μL, dNTP Mixture (2.5 mM each) 2 μL, TaKaRa Taq™ (5 u/μL) 0.2 μL (TaKaRa, Japan), PCR primers (10 μM) (Additional file 1: Table S1) 2.5 μL and ddH2O 15.8 μL. PCR conditions were 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 51 °C, and 240 s at 72 °C, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and sent to Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Services Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for sequencing. Sequence comparison was performed using DNAMAN 5.2.2.

Heterologous expression of PlHSP70 in E. coli

The expression plasmid of PlHSP70 was constructed. The full-length of PlHSP70 was amplified with primers that included NotI/CpoI restriction sites (forward 5’-GATCCGGTCCGAAACTCTTACTTTTCTTCTCTCGACCC-3′, reverse 5’-TGCAGCGGCCGCTTAGTCGACCTCTTCAATCTTGGGA-3′) and ligated into the pET-sumo vector, which was treated with the Champion™ pET SUMO Expression System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The ligation (pET-PlHSP70-sumo) mixture was chemically transformed into the E. coli Top 10 competent cells. The recombinant cells were plated on LB medium (50 μg/mL Kanamycin sulfate) and grown at 37 °C for 16 h. Single colony of recombinant plasmid was inoculated into 3 mL LB (50 μg/mL Kanamycin sulfate) with the same condition. At an OD600 of 0.6, IPTG was added to a final concentration of 0.1 mM. The cells were further grown at 37 °C for another 3 h. After centrifugation at 12,000×g for 120 s, the pellet was harvested and resuspended in 40 μL washing buffer (0.3 M NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). Lysozyme was added to the suspension at a final concentration of 1 mg/mL. Then, the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and inserted into an ice bath for 15 min. Ultrasonication of the samples was then performed on ice with a 40% duty cycle, pulse on/off 9.9 × 10 s pause. The disrupted cells were centrifuged at 8,000×g for 30 min and the supernatant was collected. A HiTrap™ chelating HP column (Amersham Biosciences, USA) was used to purify PlHSP70 protein from E. coli. After equilibrated with washing buffer, the cell-free extract was loaded onto the column and washed with 150 mL washing buffer. The isocratic elution consisted of eluting buffer (0.3 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) at 1 mL/min flow rate. The 2.5 mL fractions were collected and analysed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) to visualise the PlHSP70 protein.

Subcellular localization of PlHSP70

Subcellular localization of PlHSP70 was determined using confocal laser microscopy in O. sativa protoplasts. PlHSP70 product was obtained by constructing gene fusions of p35S::PlHSP70-GFP. The open reading frame (ORF) of PlHSP70 was amplified with primers that included BsaI/Esp3I restriction sites (forward 5’-CAGTCGTCTCACAACATGGCAGGCAAAGGAGAAGG-3′, reverse 5’-CAGTCGTCTCATACAGTCGACCTCTTCAATCTTGG-3′), which was digested and the product ligated into the expression vectors with T4 DNA ligase (TaKaRa) to generate a set of pBWA(V)HS-PlHSP70-GFP fusion, subsequently sequenced for verification. The p35S::PlHSP70-GFP constructs and the empty pBWA(V)HS-GFP vector were transformed into O. sativa protoplasts using a modified procedure that was described previously [22]. Gently mix 200 μL protoplast suspension, 10 μL plasmid DNA and 10 μL marker plasmid DNA together with 220 μL PEG solution, standing for 30 min at room temperature. After concentration at 100×g for 5 min, after which the precipitate was suspended in W5 medium. The transformed protoplasts were then incubated at 28 °C for 24 h in W5 medium in the dark. The transient expression of GFP and mkate were monitored by confocal laser microscopy combination system (LSM510/ConfoCor2, Zeiss, Germany).

Expression pattern analysis of PlHSP70 under high temperature stress

The 3-year-old P. lactiflora ‘Da Fugui’ in potting soil (loam: peat: coarse sand, 1:1:1) were used for expression pattern analysis of PlHSP70 under high temperature stress. Plants were grown in a growth chamber at 40 °C on a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle, the light intensity was 30–40 μM/m2 s and the relative humidity was 60%. And the leaves were taken on 0, 1, 2 and 3 days after treatment. One part samples were used for relative electric conductivity (REC) determination, and the others were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at − 80 °C until PlHSP70 expression pattern analysis.

Overexpressing PlHSP70 in Transgenic A. thaliana

The ORF sequence of PlHSP70 gene was amplified with primers that included BamHI/KpnI restriction sites (forward 5’-CGCGGATCCATGGCAGGCAAAGGA-3′, reverse 5’-CGGGGTACCTTAGTCCACCTCTTCAA-3′) and ligated into the plant expression vector pCAMBIA1301 behind the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter. The pCAMBIA1301-PlHSP70 plasmid was introduced into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 via the freeze-thaw method and then transformed into A. thaliana using the floral dip method [23]. Seeds from transgenic A. thaliana and non-transgenic A. thaliana plants (wild-type, WT) were harvested from individual plants and sown again. In order to identify transgenic plants, the screening medium (1/2 MS + 30 g/L sucrose + 6.5 g/L agar + 25 mg/L ampicillin (Amp) + 25 mg/L hygromycin (Hyg), pH 5.8) and GUS staining method were used to screen transgenic A. thaliana, and when the screening transgenic A. thaliana grew to the bolting stage, leaves were collected for PCR.

Before A. thaliana grew to the bolting stage, plants were transferred to a growth chamber at 40 °C in continuous light for 48 h. After high temperature treatment, plants were firstly used for chlorophyll fluorescence parameters measurement, as well as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anion free radical (O2·-), REC and anatomy observation, and then were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C until further quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).

Physiological indices measurement and anatomy observation

H2O2 accumulation was detected by diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining [24]. Briefly, the A. thaliana leaves were immersed in 0.1 mg/mL DAB in 50 mM Tris-acetate buffer, pH 5.0, at 25 °C for 24 h in the dark, and then they were boiled in 95% (v/v) ethanol for 15 min, and then photographed using a camera (Canon 50D, Japan). O2·- accumulation was detected by a reagent kit (Shanghai Haling Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China). The samples were observed at 540 nm excitation wavelength and 590 nm emanation wavelength, and imaged with a fluorescent microscope (Axio Imager D2, ZEISS, Germany). The fluorescent signals were gathered using ZEN software (ZEISS, Germany). Relative water content of leaf was measured using the oven (Jinghong Laboratory Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and balance (Gandg Testing Instrument Factory, Changshou, China). MDA content was performed according to the guidelines of a reagent kit from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, China. REC was determined according to the method reported by Yang et al. [25]. Additionally, the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured with a chlorophyll fluorescence spectrometer (Heinz Walz GmbH 91,090 Effeltrich, Germany).

The anatomical details of leaves were observed by the transmission electron microscope (Tecnai 12, Philips, Holland). The fixed leaves were washed 3 times with 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer for 15 min, and post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide for 4 h at room temperature (25 °C). After washing 3 times with 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer for 15 min each, the leaves were dehydrated using 50, 70, 85, 95 and 100% gradient ethanol for 15 min each. Moreover, they were treated with 100% acetone solution (15 min) and acetone solution containing anhydrous sodium sulfate (15 min), infiltrated in Spurr resin and then hardened at 70 °C for 24 h. Sections (70 nm thick) were cut with a diamond knife using a Leica EM UC6 ultramicrotome (Leica Co., Austria) and stained with 1% uranyl acetate in 70% methanol, and 1% lead citrate before examination. Finally, the samples were observed and imaged.

PCR and gene expression analysis

To identify the transformed plants, total RNA was extracted from A. thaliana leaves using MiniBEST Plant RNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, Japan). The cDNA was synthesized from RNA using PrimeScript® RT reagent Kit With gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Japan). PCR was performed in a total volume of 25 μL reaction system containing total cDNA 2 μL, 10 × PCR Buffer 2.5 μL, dNTP Mixture (2.5 mM each) 2 μL, TaKaRa Taq™ (5 u/μL) 0.2 μL (TaKaRa, Japan), PCR primers (10 μM) (Additional file 1: Table S1) 2.5 μL, ddH2O 15.8 μL. PCR conditions were 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 52 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min.

Gene transcript levels were analyzed using qRT-PCR with a BIO-RAD CFX Connect™ Optics Module (Bio-Rad, USA), and all gene-specific primers were shown by Additional file 1: Table S1. qRT-PCR was performed using the SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ (Perfect Real Time) (TaKaRa, Japan) and contained 12.5 μL 2 × SYBR Premix Ex Taq™, 2 μL cDNA solution, 2 μL mix solution of target gene primers and 8.5 μL ddH2O in a final volume of 25 μL. The amplification was carried out under the following conditions: 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s, 51 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. Gene relative expression levels of target genes were calculated by the 2-△△Ct comparative threshold cycle (Ct) method [26]. The Ct values of the triplicate reactions were gathered using the Bio-Rad CFX Manager V1.6.541.1028 software.

Statistical analysis

All experiments described here were repeated three times arranged in a completely randomized design. Sequences analysis was performed by DNAMAN 5.2.2 software. Primers were designed using a Primer 5.0 program. All data were means of three replicates with standard deviations. The results were analyzed for variance using the SAS/STAT statistical analysis package (version 6.12, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Cloning and sequence analysis of genomic DNA

The genomic sequence of PlHSP70 was obtained using PCR method based on its full-length cDNA sequence (JN180465) and extracted DNA. Sequence analysis indicated that the size of the PlHSP70 genomic DNA was 3635 bp. To elucidate its genomic organization, the genomic DNA and cDNA sequences were aligned using the software DNAMAN 5.2.2, and the results indicated that PlHSP70 consisted of two exons and one intron, and their sizes were summarized in Fig. 1. This intron began with the GT sequence and ended with AG confirming the consensus 5′ and 3′ intron splice sites for the mRNA. This sequence was deposited in GenBank with accession number MF817498.
Fig. 1

Genomic organization of PlHSP70. Exons are represented as grey boxes, introns as thin lines and the untranslated region as bold black lines

Heterologous expression and subcellular localization of PlHSP70

The heterologous expression of the recombinant PlHSP70 plasmid (pET-PlHSP70-sumo rose) was constructed and transformed into E. coli cells. The recombinant E. coli cells were induced using IPTG, the cells were harvested and the protein was isolated. The soluble fractions from the recombinant strains differed from those of the non-IPTG-induced pET-PlHSP70-sumo rose and empty pET-sumo rose vector, and the apparent molecular weight of the PlHSP70 protein plus the GST-Tag protein (16 kDa) was approximately 87 kDa, thus, the molecular weight of the PlHSP70 protein was approximately 71 kDa, which was consistent with its putative molecular weight (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Heterologous expression of PlHSP70 protein in E. coli. M: Protein marker; 1: IPTG induced pET-PlHSP70-sumo rose; 2, Non-IPTG-induced soluble fraction of E. coli pET-PlHSP70-sumo rose; 3, Protein marker; 4, Empty pET-sumo rose vector

In addition, the subcellular localization of PlHSP70 was observed. When transient transformation with PlHSP70-GFP driven by the 35S promoter occurred in O. sativa protoplasts, PlHSP70-GFP fluorescence indicated that PlHSP70 was localized in the cytoplasm of the cell (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Subcellular localization of PlHSP70 in rice protoplasts

Expression pattern analysis of PlHSP70 under high temperature stress

To examine the expression pattern of PlHSP70 treated under high temperature stress, P. lactiflora ‘Da Fugui’ in potting soil was exposed to a high temperature (40 °C) for 0, 1, 2 and 3 days. And total RNA was isolated from leaves for qRT-PCR with gene-specific primers as described above. Before qRT-PCR, REC reflecting the membrane lipid peroxidation was first measured. It increased with the treatment and peaked on 3 d, and the value of 0 d was only 39.58% of that on 3 d, which revealed that the damage of high temperature to plants became more intense with the treatment. In addition, the relative expression level of PlHSP70 demonstrated the same tendency, and it was quickly induced on 1 d and peaked on 3 d, resulting in expression levels up to 26-fold of those at 0 d (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

REC and the relative expression level of PlHSP70 in P. lactiflora under high temperature stress. All data are the means of three replicates with standard deviations, and different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05)

Transgenic plants identification

To identify the transgenic A. thaliana plants, the harvested seeds were first sown on the screening medium with antibiotics. In addition, the identified transgenic plants were randomly selected for GUS staining. As shown in Fig. 5a, the WT remained white, and the transgenic lines all turned blue in the GUS staining buffer. In addition, the DNA extracted from the leaves was used for identification using PCR and the results showed that one clear and bright band could be observed in the PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines, while there was no specific band in WT (Fig. 5b). Subsequently, these A. thaliana plants were treated with 40 °C for 48 h, and Fig. 5c showed that the leaves of WT turned to yellow, shrunk and tended to die, while the PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines still grew well. In addition, qRT-PCR analysis revealed that the transgenic lines had significantly higher transcript levels of PlHSP70, which were 10-fold higher than those of the WT on average (Fig. 5d).
Fig. 5

Identification of transgenic A. thaliana plants and their phenotype under high temperature stress. a GUS staining. b PCR analysis of PlHSP70 mRNA. c Phenotype of WT and transgenic lines. d Relative expression level of PlHSP70 in leaves. All data are the means of three replicates with standard deviations, and different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05)

Physiological indices measurement and anatomy observation of the transgenic plants

To further evaluate the growth status of the transgenic A. thaliana plants under high temperature stress, related physiological indices and anatomical structures were measured. Firstly, we detected the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters using a chlorophyll fluorescence spectrometer, including the ratio of variable fluorescence to maximum fluorescence (Fv/Fm), and the actual photosynthetic efficiency of light system II (Y (II)), non-photochemical quenching (qN) and the electron transport rate (ETR). When compared with WT, the four parameters in the PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines were all higher, and significant differences were detected in all of the treatments; Fv/Fm, Y (II), qN and ETR increased by an average of 6.77, 115.45, 85.82 and 163.09%, respectively (Fig. 6). In addition, we determined the stress physiological indices including H2O2, O2·- and REC. The H2O2 content was determined using DAB staining, and the results revealed that significant differences between WT and PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines, and the accumulation of H2O2 decreased dramatically in the PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines when a light color was observed compared with WT (Fig. 7a). The accumulation of O2·- was detected using a fluorescence probe, and the results indicated that a significantly different fluorescence intensity was observed between WT and PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines; O2·- partially accumulated, and the fluorescence intensity of PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines was significantly lower than that of WT (Fig. 7b). And relative water content of leaf, REC and MDA content were determined, relative water content was significantly increased in PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines compared with WT, whereas REC and MDA content were significantly decreased in PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines compared with WT. Then, AtCu/ZnSOD, AtCAT and AtAPX were significantly expressed in PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines compared with WT (Fig. 7c). In addition, the anatomical structure of the leaves was observed. As shown in Fig. 8, broken cell membranes were found in WT, and PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines all had intact cell membranes. Chloroplasts were the most prominent cell organelle, and they were arranged close to the cell membranes in greater quantities were mostly oval in shape. PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines had more chloroplasts than WT. In addition, the chloroplasts of WT contained some bored plastoglobulis, whereas they were not observed in PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines. However, a number of starch grains appeared in the chloroplasts of PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines.
Fig. 6

Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of WT and transgenic lines under high temperature stress. All data are the means of three replicates with standard deviations, and different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05)

Fig. 7

Physiological indices of WT and transgenic lines under high temperature stress. a H2O2 accumulation was detected by DAB staining. b O2·- accumulation was detected by a fluorescence probe. c Other physiological indices. All data are the means of three replicates with standard deviations, and different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05)

Fig. 8

Anatomical structures of WT and transgenic lines under high temperature stress. CH: chloroplast; SG: starch grain; P: plastoglobuli

Discussions

Numerous studies in the past years have focused on the function of HSP70, but its biological functions have not yet been fully elucidated. In this study, the genomic sequence of HSP70 was isolated from P. lactiflora and characterized. Sequence analysis indicated that PlHSP70 consisted of two exons and one intron. Wang et al. [27] found that the number of introns of S. lycopersicum HSP70 ranged from 0 to 12, and most of them contained only 1 or 5–7 introns. Song et al. [28] also found that HSP70 from A. thaliana, B. campestris and B. rapa all had only one intron, this finding was supported by our results. HSP70 was part of the HSP70 family, which contained a number of highly related protein isoforms ranging in molecular weight from 66 kD to 78 kD [29]. In tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.), the isolated HSP70 cDNA encoded a 71.25-kDa polypeptide [30], and the putative molecular weight of the PlHSP70 protein was 71.28 kDa [21]. These results revealed that the protein molecular weight of the closely related species was highly similar. And heterologous expression in this study also verified the accuracy of the previous prediction. The sequence analysis of PlHSP70 indicated that the conserved domains play important roles in maintaining the function of HSPs, and a cytosolic compartment sequence (GPKIEEVD) at the C-terminal was found, which suggested that PlHSP70 might be located in the cytosolic region [16]. And subcellular localization supported the prediction that PlHSP70 was located in the cytoplasm of the cell, which was in agreement with the results from B. campestris [28].

Under high temperature stress, HSPs are synthesized and accumulated, and their contents are increased when the plants experience either abrupt or gradual increases in temperature [31]. In our previous studies, the expression levels of PlHSP70 were all detected in P. lactiflora subjected to long-term high temperature stress, and the results showed that they all increased gradually in the early stages and then decreased [20, 21]. Whereas in this study, the potted P. lactiflora was treated under short-term high temperature stress, the expression level of PlHSP70 increased gradually with the treatment, and no decline was observed. This expression pattern was consistent with the tendency of the REC, suggesting the PlHSP70 was responsive to high temperature stress, which was in agreement with previous studies in B. campestris [16, 28] and soybean (Glycine max L.) [32]. In addition, this result reflected the fact that P. lactiflora might quickly perceive the changes in environmental temperature and react through the biosynthesis of large amounts of HSP70 to help it tolerate high temperature stress, and PlHSP70 might be involved in the resistance to high temperature in P. lactiflora.

Several studies had reported the role of HSP70 in response to environmental stresses. Augustine et al. [33] found that the overexpression of Erianthus arundinaceus HSP70 increased the drought and salinity tolerance of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid). Transgenic expression of the Trichoderma harzianum HSP70 increases A. thaliana resistance to heat, salt, osmotic and oxidative stresses [34]. B. campestris HSP70-overexpressing tobacco plants showed higher tolerance in response to heat stress [16]. To address the function of PlHSP70, it was overexpressed in A. thaliana under the control of the 35S CaMV promoter to evaluate its resistance to high temperature stress. And the medium screening, GUS staining and PCR of PlHSP70 all confirmed that PlHSP70 had been successfully transferred into A. thaliana plants and expressed. And the subsequent high temperature treatment showed that the overexpression of PlHSP70 substantially enhanced the basal resistance to high temperature stress in transgenic lines compared to WT plants, and qRT-PCR analysis confirmed the significantly higher transcript levels of PlHSP70 in transgenic lines, suggesting that PlHSP70 might act as a molecular chaperone to confer plant high temperature tolerance.

It is clear that photoinhibition usually happens when plants are exposed to high temperature by affecting electron transport, photophosphorylation and so on, and the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters can reflect the damage of the photosynthetic reaction, including Fv/Fm, Y (II), qN and ETR. When P. lactiflora was treated under high temperature stress, these above four parameters decreased significantly [35]. In watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Matsum. & Nakai), Fv/Fm and ETR all showed a slight drop under high temperature stress [36]. Our results revealed that Fv/Fm, Y (II), qN and ETR in PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines were all significantly higher compared with WT, which suggested that photoinhibition of photosynthesis in A. thaliana occurred due to high temperature stress, and PlHSP70 played an important role in alleviating the photochemical damage caused by high temperature.

High temperature can promote the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including H2O2 and O2·- in the chloroplasts, which induces membrane lipid peroxidation [37]. In fingered citron (Citrus medica var. sarcodactylis Swingle), high temperature caused the accumulation of H2O2 and O2·- [38]. In this study, the accumulation of H2O2 and O2·- were observed by DAB staining and fluorescence probe, respectively, in the leaves of PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines and WT. However, the degree of accumulation of H2O2 and O2·- differed drastically, with only slight accumulation in the PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines and much greater accumulation in WT. In addition, the cell membrane damage caused by high temperature could result in the leakage of electrolytes from the cell, and REC was often considered to be an indicator for reflecting the extent of high temperature stress [39]. For example, Wan et al. [39] found that the REC of A. thaliana was significantly lower than that of WT under 42 °C treatment. And our study showed that PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines had a decreased REC, suggesting PlHSP70 played an important role in the reduction of ROS and the maintenance of membrane integrity. In addition, high temperature stress could directly destroy the cells. And among organelles, chloroplasts were the organelles most sensitive to high temperature stress and the primary location for the production of ROS [40], whose ultrastructure was inevitably affected or even damaged [10]. Chen et al. [38] observed chloroplast ultrastructural changes in C. medica using transmission electron microscopy and found chloroplast ultrastructural alterations, including their swelling, matrix zone expanding and lamella structure loosening. In moderately heat-tolerant P. lactiflora, few intact cellular structures were observed, most of the chloroplasts were swollen and assumed a near spherical shape, and their membranes were decomposed, which caused leakage of the grana lamellaes under high temperature stress [20]. In this study, PlHSP70-overexpressing transgenic lines had more intact cell membranes, chloroplasts and starch grains and fewer plastoglobulis than WT, which was consistent with our observation of the yellow leaves in WT. These results could provide a theoretical basis to improve the high temperature tolerance of P. lactiflora by genetic manipulation in the future.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we isolated the genomic sequence of P. lactiflora HSP70, which contained two exons and one intron encoding an approximately 71-kDa polypeptide that was localized in the cytoplasm of the cell. In addition, PlHSP70 was found to be involved in high temperature tolerance in P. lactiflora. With relative to wild-type plants, the overexpression of this gene in A. thaliana decreased cell membrane damage (as indicated REC accumulation and anatomy observation) and increased the potential photosynthetic capacity (as indicated chlorophyll fluorescence parameters values) under high temperature stress by reducing the accumulation of ROS (as indicated H2O2 and O2·- accumulation), and ultimately resulting in high temperature tolerance (Fig. 9). Thus, this study indicated that PlHSP70 was crucial to enhance high temperature tolerance in P. lactiflora.
Fig. 9

A proposed model of PlHSP70 conferring high temperature tolerance. PlHSP70 was involved in resistance to high temperature stress in P. lactiflora. The overexpression of PlHSP70 in A. thaliana plants conferred high temperature tolerance by decreasing cell membrane damage and increasing photosynthetic capacity, which reduced the accumulation of ROS

Notes

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the building project of combined and major innovation carrier of Jiangsu province (BM2016008), the lifting project of youth science and technology talents of Jiangsu province association for science and technology, the program of key members of Yangzhou University outstanding young teacher, and the priority academic program development from Jiangsu government.

Availability of data and materials

The full-length cDNA sequence of PlHSP70 were deposited in NCBI GenBank as accession JN180465. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/340784764/].

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JT and DZ. Performed the experiments: XX, JS, MW and YW. Analyzed the data: XX, JS, MW, YW, and DZ. Wrote the paper: DZ, XX and JS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12864_2019_5448_MOESM1_ESM.doc (36 kb)
Additional file 1: Table S1. Gene-specific primers used in the gene expression analysis. (DOC 35 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Cho EK, Choi YJ. A nuclear-localized HSP70 confers thermoprotective activity and drought-stress tolerance on plants. Biotechnol Lett. 2009;31(4):597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mittler R, Finka A, Goloubinoff P. How do plants feel the heat? Trends Biochem Sci. 2012;37(3):118–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nascimento MDGRD, Alves EU, Silva MLMD, Rodrigues CM. Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) seeds exposed to different salt concentrations and temperatures. Revista Caatinga. 2017;30(3):738–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morita S, Yonemaru J, Takanashi J. Grain growth and endosperm cell size under high night temperatures in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Ann Bot. 2005;95(4):695–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peng SB, Huang JL, Sheehy JE, Laza RC, Visperas RM, Zhong X, Centeno GS, Khush GS, Cassman KG. Rice yields decline with high temperature from global warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(27):9971–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dias AS, Lidon FC. Evaluation of grain filling rate and duration in bread and durum wheat, under heat stress after anthesis. J Agron Crop Sci. 2009;195(2):137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feder ME, Hofmann GE. Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: evolutionary and ecological physiology. Annu Rev Physiol. 1999;61:243–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Renner T, Waters ER. Comparative genomic analysis of the Hsp70s from five diverse photosynthetic eukaryotes. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2007;12:172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al-Whaibi MH. Plant heat-shock proteins: a mini review. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2011;23(2):139–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR. Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot. 2007;61(3):199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen QH, Zhao XQ, Lei DK. Hydrogen-rich water pretreatment alters photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidant activities in heat-stressed cucumber leaves. Plant Growth Regul. 2017;83(1):69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo M, Liu JH, Ma X. Genome-wide analysis of the Hsp70 family genes in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) and functional identification of CaHsp70-2 involvement in heat stress. Plant Sci. 2016;252:246–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Han YY, Li YB, Zhao ZZ, Fan SX, Liu CJ. Study of differences in Hsp70 expression in lettuce with different heat tolerance under heat stress and indicator for evaluating heat resistance of lettuce. Acta Hortic. 2016;1127:271–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li H, Ahammed GJ, Zhou G. Unraveling main limiting sites of photosynthesis under heat stress in cucumber and the alleviatory role ofbelow- and above-ground luffa rootstock. Fornt Plant Sci. 2016;7:746.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu W, Cai SY, Zhang Y. Melatonin enhances thermotolerance by promoting cellular protein protection in tomato plants. J Pineal Res. 2016;61(4):457–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang XR, Yan B, Shi M, Zhou W, Zekria D, Wang H, Kai G. Overexpression of a Brassica campestris HSP70 in tobacco confers enhanced tolerance to heat stress. Protoplasma. 2016;253(3):637–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park HS, Jeong WJ, Kim E, Jung Y, Hwang MS, Choi DW. Heat shock protein gene family of the Porphyra seriata and enhancement of heat stress tolerance by PsHSP70 in Chlamydomonas. Mar Biotechnol. 2017;14(3):332–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Niu L, Fu X, Liu A. Application of herbaceous peony in flower border. North Hortic. 2010;4:97–100 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hao ZJ, Wei MR, Gong SJ, Zhao DQ, Tao J. Transcriptome and digital gene expression analysis of herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora pall.) to screen thermo-tolerant related differently expressed genes. Genes Genom. 2016;38(12):1201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu YQ, Zhao DQ, Han CX, Tao J. Biochemical and molecular responses of herbaceous peony to high temperature stress. Canadian J Plant Sci. 2016;96(3):474–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao DQ, Han CX, Zhou CH, Tao J. Shade ameliorates high temperature-induced inhibition of growth in herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.). Int J Agric Biol. 2015;17(5):911–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mravec J, Skůpa P, Bailly A, Hoyerová K, Krecek P, Bielach A, Petrásek J, Zhang J, Gaykova V, Stierhof YD, Dobrev PI, Schwarzerová K, Rolcík J, Seifertová D, Luschnig C, Benková E, Zazímalová E, Geisler M, Friml J. Subcellular homeostasis of phytohormone auxin is mediated by the ER-localized PIN5 transporter. Nature. 2009;459(7250):25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16(6):735–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tian F, Gong J, Zhang J, Zhang M, Wang G, Li A, Wang W. Enhanced stability of thylakoid membrane proteins and antioxidant competence contribute to drought stress resistance in the tasg1 wheat stay-green mutant. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(6):1509–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang GP, Rhodes D, Joly RJ. Effects of high temperature on membrane stability and chlorophyll fluorescence in glycinebetaine-deficient and glycinebetaine-containing maize lines. Funct Plant Biol. 1996;23(4):437–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc. 2008;36(6):1101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang RQ, Wan HJ, Li ZM, Ye QJ, Ruan MY, Zhou GZ, Yao ZP, Yang YJ. Identification and phylogenetic relationships of Hsp70 genes in tomato. J Nuclear Agric Sci. 2014;28(3):378–85 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Song HB, Song XM, Zhou JJ, Liu HH, Li Y, Hou XL. Clone, phylogenetic and expression analysis of BcHSP70-1 gene from Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis. Acta Bot. Boreal. –Occident. Sin. 2013;33(8):1508–15 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kaźmierczuk A, Kiliańska ZM. The pleiotropic activity of heat-shock proteins. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2009;63:502–21.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li CZ, Zhao DQ, Tao J. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of a heat shock protein gene PsHSP70 from tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa). J Yangzhou Univ (Agric. Life Sci Edition). 2011;32(4):55–8 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nover L, Miernyk JA. A genomics approach to the chaperone network of Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2001;6(3):175–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang L, Zhao HK, Dong QL, Zhang YY, Wang YM, Li HY, Xing GJ, Li QY, Dong YS. Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling under heat and drought treatments of HSP70 gene family in soybean (Glycine max L.). Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:773.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Augustine SM, Narayan JA, Syamaladevi DP, Appunu C, Chakravarthi M, Ravichandran V, Subramonian N. Erianthus arundinaceus HSP70 (EaHSP70) overexpression increases drought and salinity tolerance in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid). Plant Sci. 2015;232:23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Montero-Barrientos M, Hermosa R, Cardoza RE, Gutiérrez S, Nicolás C, Monte E. Transgenic expression of the Trichoderma harzianum hsp70 gene increases Arabidopsis resistance to heat and other abiotic stresses. J Plant Physiol. 2010;167(8):659–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hao ZJ, Zhou CH, Liu D, Wei MR, Tao J. Effects of high temperature stress on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and ultrastructure of herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora pall.). Mol Plant Breeding. 2017;15(6):2359–67. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hou W, Sun AH, Chen HL, Yang FS, Pan JL, Guan MY. Effects of chilling and high temperatures on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves of watermelon seedlings. Biologia Plant. 2016;60(1):148–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Djanaguiraman M, Prasad PVV, Seppanen M. Selenium protects sorghum leaves from oxidative damage under high temperature stress by enhancing antioxidant defense system. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48(12):999–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chen WR, Zheng JS, Li YQ, Guo WD. Effects of high temperature on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, chloroplast ultrastructure, and antioxidant activities in fingered citron. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2012;59(6):732–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wan XL, Yang J, Li XB, Zhou Q, Guo C, Bao MZ, Zhang JW. Over-expression of PmHSP17.9 in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana confers thermotolerance. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2016;34(5):899–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mubarakshina MM, Ivanov BN. The production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in the plastoquinone pool of chloroplast thylakoid membranes. Physiol Plant. 2010;140(2):103–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daqiu Zhao
    • 1
  • Xing Xia
    • 1
  • Jianghong Su
    • 1
  • Mengran Wei
    • 1
  • Yanqing Wu
    • 1
  • Jun Tao
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and PhysiologyCollege of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou UniversityYangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations