Advertisement

BMC Genetics

, 20:46 | Cite as

In silico genome-wide miRNA-QTL-SNPs analyses identify a functional SNP associated with mastitis in Holsteins

  • Qiang Jiang
  • Han Zhao
  • Rongling Li
  • Yaran Zhang
  • Yong Liu
  • Jinpeng Wang
  • Xiuge Wang
  • Zhihua Ju
  • Wenhao Liu
  • Minghai Hou
  • Jinming HuangEmail author
Open Access
Research article

Abstract

Background

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in microRNAs (miRNAs) and their target binding sites affect miRNA function and are involved in biological processes and diseases, including bovine mastitis, a frequent inflammatory disease. Our previous study has shown that bta-miR-2899 is significantly upregulated in the mammary gland tissue of mastitis-infected cow than that of healthy cows.

Results

In the present study, we used a customized miRNAQTLsnp software and identified 5252 SNPs in 691 bovine pre-miRNAs, which are also located within the quantitative trait loci (QTLs) that are associated with mastitis and udder conformation-related traits. Using luciferase assay in the bovine mammary epithelial cells, we confirmed a candidate SNP (rs109462250, g. 42,198,087 G > A) in the seed region of bta-miR-2899 located in the somatic cell score (SCS)-related QTL (Chr.18: 33.9–43.9 Mbp), which affected the interaction of bta-miR-2899 and its putative target Spi-1 proto-oncogene (SPI1), a pivotal regulator in the innate and adaptive immune systems. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction results showed that the relative expression of SPI1 in the mammary gland of AA genotype cows was significantly higher than that of GG genotype cows. The SNP genotypes were associated with SCS in Holstein cows.

Conclusions

Altogether, miRNA-related SNPs, which influence the susceptibility to mastitis, are one of the plausible mechanisms underlying mastitis via modulating the interaction of miRNAs and immune-related genes. These miRNA-QTL-SNPs, such as the SNP (rs109462250) of bta-miR-2899 may have implication for the mastitis resistance breeding program in Holstein cattle.

Keywords

Dairy cattle SNP Bta-miR-2899 SPI1 Mastitis 

Abbreviations

3′-UTR

3′-untranslated regions

CM

Clinical mastitis

MAC-T

Bovine mammary epithelial cells

miRNA

microRNA

NEUT

Neutrophil count

Q-PCR

Quantitative real-time PCR

QTL

Quantitative trait locus

SCS

Somatic cell score

SD

Standard deviation

SEM

Standard error

SNP

Single-nucleotide polymorphism

SPI1

Spi-1 proto-oncogene

TLGTH

Teat length

UCI

Udder composite index

UDPTH

Udder depth

UHT

Udder height

Background

Mastitis is a common, complex and devastating inflammatory disease, which is caused by pathogenic infections and can result in significant economic losses to the dairy industry [1, 2] Molecular breeding is a technique used to increase the resistance ability to mastitis via expanding the favorable allele frequency in dairy cattle populations and is considered a feasible and long-term strategy. Evidence has shown that the consistent progress in mastitis resistance can be achieved by following genetic estimation and selection of sire, generating favorable udder heath phenotypes, such as increased udder conformation score of cows, decreased incidence of mastitis, and milk somatic cell score (SCS) [3]. In the genetic evaluation, the SCS trait is practical indicator because of its strong positive relationship with the presence of mastitis, and accessbility of measurement superior to mastitis in cow [4]. Further, SCS trait has obtained dramatic response to genomic selection of bull, resulting in rapid genetic improvement in recent years [5]. However, the recent development of genomic selection programs are based on genotypes of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), most of which have small effects and are distributed evenly across all chromosomes, and are non-functioning markers. The accuracy and reliability of genomic prediction are expected to enhance and the number of SNP needed for evaluation is expected to decrease if the functional or causative SNPs are enrolled in the evaluation [6, 7].

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are class of small, endogenous, non-coding RNAs that are critical and versatile regulators of inflammation-, immune-, and defense-related gene expression levels during infection with mastitis in dairy cattle [8, 9, 10]. A number of studies have revealed that miRNAs are the critical players during host innate immune response to various bacterial infections [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Furthermore, most of the quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for mastitis resistance on chromosomes have been reported for different cattle populations [15]. However, the adequate application of these resources remains a challenge. A total of 2.44 million SNPs (Bos_taurus_UMD_3.1 reference assembly) [16], 1025 miRNAs (http://www.mirbase.org/), and 120,122 QTLs (https://www.animalgenome.org/cgi-bin/QTLdb/index) are deposited in the dbSNP, miRNA and Animal QTL databases, respectively. However, the association of SNPs with miRNA function and mastitis susceptibility have not been elucidated. Therefore, narrowing down the SNPs to the candidate functional variants for further study is an important step. We designed the miRNAQTLsnp software to search functional miRNA SNPs involved in mastitis by integrating available bovine SNPs, miRNAs, and QTL data. Our previous study has revealed that bta-miR-2899 is differentially expressed between the cow’s mastitic mammary gland tissues and healthy tissues [10]. Based on our previous study and bioinformatics of miRNAQTLsnp, we speculated that a candidate SNP (rs109462250, g. 42,198,087 G > A) is mapped on the seed region of bta-miR-2899, and SCS-related QTL (Chr.18: 33.9–43.9 Mbp) will affect the binding of miR-2899 and its putative target Spi-1 proto-oncogene (SPI1, also named as PU.1). SPI1 is an E26 transformation-specific family transcription factor that is required for the development of immune system [17] and is a critical regulator for modulation of monocyte/macrophage differentiation [18].

Identification of miRNA target gene and miRNA-related SNPs associated with inflamation and immune responses is essential to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying mastitis susceptibility. The present study aimed to achieve the following: (1) to identify the genome-wide miRNA- and mastitis-related SNPs; (2) to confirm whether the candidate SNP in the seed region of bta-miR-2899 will affect the binding of bta-miR-2899 and the bovine SPI1 gene and its relationship with mastitis susceptibility.

Results

Identification of SNPs located within miRNAs and mastitis-related QTLs

By using our customized miRNAQTLsnp software (Fig. 1 and Additional file 1), we identified 5252 SNPs (including indel polymorphisms) in 691 bovine pre-miRNAs. Among these SNPs, 1662 were located in 497 mature miRNAs and 617 SNPs in the seed sequences of 331 bovine mature miRNAs (Additional file 2: Table S1). Furthermore, through mapping of SNPs onto miRNAs and within the mastitis-related QTLs, including clinical mastitis (CM), somatic cell count (SCC), SCS, neutrophil count (NEUT), udder composite index (UCI), udder depth (UDPTH), udder height (UHT), and teat length (TLGTH). We detected 2912 SNPs located in the known pre-miRNAs, 8 mastitis-related QTLs, and 325 SNPs harbored in the seed sequences of miRNAs and 8 mastitis-related QTLs (Table 1 and Additional file 3: Table S2).
Fig. 1

Workflow diagram for identification of miRNA- and mastitis-QTL-related SNPs. The Perl script of miRNAQTLsnp software was shown in the Additional file 1

Table 1

SNPs located within the bovine miRNAs and mastitis-related QTLs

 

CM

SCC

SCS

NEUT

UCI

UDPTH

UHT

TLGTH

SNPs in pre-miRNAs

270

70

1366

23

203

435

190

355

Number of pre-miRNAs

49

10

169

3

37

49

28

60

SNPs in miRNA seed region

28

9

168

1

28

50

20

21

Number of chromosomes

18

6

23

1

9

12

7

9

CM Clinical mastitis, SCC Somatic cell count, SCS Somatic cell score, NEUT Neutrophil count, UCI Udder composite index, UDPTH Udder depth, UHT Udder height, and TLGTH Teat length

Identification of SNP and computational prediction of miRNAs targeting the 3′-UTR of SPI1 gene

We observed that the candidate SNP (rs109462250) is located in the seed sequence of bta-miR-2899 and within the SCS-related QTL region (Chr.18: 33.9–43.9 Mbp). This candidate SNP was predicted to alter the binding of 3′-untranslated regions (3′-UTR) of SPI1 with bta-miR-2899 and it was selected as an example for the next analysis. As shown in Fig. 2, direct sequencing identified the SNP (g. 42,198,087 G > A, rs109462250) in the seed region of bta-miR-2899. Mutation generated a restriction endonuclease (FauI) binding site. The PCR products were digested by FauI, which was separated by the agarose gel, and showed three genotypes (GG, 268 bp; AG, 268 + 133 + 135 bp, and AA, 133+ 135 bp).
Fig. 2

Identification of SNP g. 42,198,087 G > A and two putative binding sites of bta-miR-2899 and SPI1. WT sequence of bta-miR-2899 featured two high-likelihood binding sites to 3′-UTR of the SPI1 (position 16–23; positions 155–161); the MT sequence of bta-miR-2899 cannot generate any binding site

To identify whether the WT and MT bta-miR-2899 potentially regulates the expression of SPI1, we integrated the results of two software programs to detect the potential target gene of bta-miR-2899. As shown in Fig.2, the WT sequence of bta-miR-2899 exhibited two high-likelihood binding sites to 3′-UTR of SPI1, whereas the MT sequence of bta-miR-2899 cannot generate any binding site.

Expression of SPI1 mRNA in the mammary gland tissues of cows with different genotypes

To investigate whether SPI1 will be expressed in the mastitic mammary glands, using quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR), we compared the relative expression of SPI1 mRNA in the mastitic mammary gland tissues of cows with three genotypes. As a result, the relative expression of SPI1 mRNA in cows with the AA genotype was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the cows with GG and GA genotypes (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Relative expression of Spi-1 proto-oncogene (SPI1) mRNA in the mammary gland tissues of cows with different genotypes in the SNP (g. 42,198,087 G > A) locus. Relative expression is represented as mean ± SD; vertical bars denote the SD. Different superscripts (a, b and c) in vertical error bars represent significant difference (P < 0.05)

Activity analysis of SPI1 3′-UTR targeted by bta-miR-2899

To validate whether SPI1 is directly targeted by bta-miR-2899 in cow, the WT SPI1 3′-UTR sequence was cloned to a luciferase reporter gene in a luciferase expression vector and transfected into bovine mammary epithelial cells (MAC-T). Dose-dependent repression of the luciferase activity was observed when concentrations of WT bta-miR-2899 were increased and co-transfected with the luciferase reporter vector compared with the negative-scramble miRNA control (CmiR0001-MR04) and pMIR-REPORT luciferase vector (Fig. 4). The data indicate the direct binding between WT bta-miR-2899 and the cloned SPI1 3′-UTR sequences, through which bta-miR-2899 exerts its inhibitory effect on the upstream luciferase gene. On the other hand, no significant repression effect of MT of bta-miR-2899 was observed on the 3′-UTR of SPI1 despite the varied dosages of co-transfection in MAC-T, agreeing with the results of TargetScan prediction.
Fig. 4

Differential expression ratios of Luc reporters carrying WT or MT miR-2899 with different doses of Spi-1 proto-oncogene (SPI1) gene. A luciferase reporter vector containing the SPI1 mRNA 3′-UTR co-transfected with ß-gal in MAC-T. WT, g. 42,198,087 G > A-GG; MT, g. 42,198,087 G > A-AA. MiR-2899 (CCS-bta-223-MR04) at quality of 100 ng to 300 ng dose dependently repressed the reporter activities. Mock-transfected cells treated with the pMIR-REPORT vector alone. CmiR001-MR04 served as a scrambled control. Data are representative of four separate experiments (mean ± SD)

Association analysis between SNP and milk SCS in dairy cattle

To investigate the genetic effect of a specific SNP (g. 42,198,087 G > A) on mastitis, the association between this SNP and SCS in 322 Chinese Holstein cows was analyzed. The SCS of cows with the AA genotype was significantly (P < 0.01) lower than that of cows with the GG and GA genotypes (Table 2), indicating the mutant AA genotype of SNP (g. 42,198,087 G > A) can be a mastitis-resistant genotype. The result further suggests that the SNP is a potential functional marker for the application of selective breeding on mastitis resistance in dairy cattle.
Table 2

The genotypic effect of SNP (g. 42,198,087 G > A) on somatic cell score (SCS) in Chinese Holstein cows

Genotype

Genotype count

Allelic frequency(%)

SCS

GG

157

G(87.30)

4.41 ± 0.29a

GA

95

 

3.98 ± 0.27b

AA

70

A(12.70)

3.54 ± 0.31c

Note: Different superscripts represent significant difference of P-value (P < 0.05)

Discussion

During immune and inflammatory responses, the miRNA–argonaute complex interacts with 3′-UTR, 5′-UTR, and coding regions of target genes via complementary binding of miRNA to mRNA. This miRNA-mRNA binding either blocks initiation of translation, induces endonucleolytic cleavage of the target mRNA, or both [19, 20, 21]. Polymorphisms and mutations in miRNA precursors and target sites significantly contribute to phenotypic variation including disease susceptibility [22]. Approximately 64% of genome-wide SNPs can modify the binding energy of putative miRNA–mRNA duplexes [23]. Several online tools have been developed to search for miRNA-related SNPs in humans; these tools include miRNASNP v2.0 [24], MicroSNiPer [25], RNAsnp [26], mrSNP [27], and MSDD [28]. However, these tools focus on human miRNA-related SNPs and diseases. In the present study, we used the available bovine SNP, miRNA, and QTL databases to design a customized mRNAsnp software and identified 5252 candidates for miRNA-related and mastitis-related SNPs, which are valuable resources for the studies of miRNA and SNP functions, respectively, and functional markers in the molecular basis of mastitis resistance and molecular breeding in dairy cattle. Of particular note is that favorable associations have been reported between mastitis resistance and several udder conformation traits. For example, higher and more tightly attached udders are associated with lower SCS and less clinical mastitis [29]. Moreover, neutrophil function is very important for mastitis because the neutrophil migration from blood to the site of infection is essential for resolution of most mastitis pathogens. Therefore, genes influencing udder type and neutrophil may also affect mastitis incidence. In the present study, in addition to SCC-, SCS- and CM-related SNPs, we aslo in silico identified the SNPs that are located within the QTLs of udder-type and neutrophil count traits. These candidates are warranted further investigation.

Mastitis occurs when the udder becomes inflamed due to the release of leukocytes into the bovine mammary gland in response to invasion of the teat canal, usually by bacteria [30]. An inflammatory response is then initiated. The invading bacteria multiply and produce toxins, enzymes, and cell wall components which stimulate the production of mediators of inflammation [30]. Milk SCC is a very sensitive biomarker of mammary gland inflammation [31]. Direct selection for mastitis resistance has been considered an inefficient pathway because the mastitis heritability is very low (less than 0.1). In addition, most countries including China do not widely record CM incidences. SCC is routinely monthly recorded in DHI test, and its information is easily available on a large scale. High positive genetic correlations between SCC and clinical mastitis with an average estimate of 0.70. The SCC or SCS reflects both subclinical and clinical mastitis, suggesting as an indicator of mastitis and a tool for selection for mastitis resistance [32]. Identification of SNPs involved in inflammatory response during mastitis could aid to improving herd health through selection of cattle. Therefore, we analyzed the association between SCS and genotypes of SNP to illuminate the relationship between the SNP and mastitis .

Several studies have provided convincing evidence that miRNAs are implicated in the regulation of inflammation and immune [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Although the miRNA expression and SNPs within the 3′-UTR of inflammation- and immune-related genes as well as their relationships with the risk of bovine mastitis have been extensively investigated, respectively, there are few example showing that mastitis can be affected by the SNPs within miRNAs in dairy cattle.

Based on the predicted result suggested that SPI1 is a direct target of miR-2899. Moreover, increasing evidences have shown that SNPs in miRNA genes including pri-miRNAs, pre -miRNAs and mature miRNAs may influence the processing and target binding of miRNAs. As expected, we confirmed that the SNP (rs109462250, g. 42,198,087 G > A) in the seed region of bta-miR-2899 can influence SPI1 expression by modulating the binding affinities of miRNA and target mRNA and thus cause differences in mastitis resistance. SPI1 is an important member of the ETS transcription factor family, which plays a key role in several steps of the inflammatory pathway [33]. SPI1 is also implicated in transcriptional regulation of several pattern recognition molecules, including Toll-like receptor 4 [34] and TLR9 [35], that trigger inflammation. In macrophages, SPI1 occupies regulatory regions in a large proportion of genes involved in inflammatory pathways, suggesting that SPI1 may be a central regulator of inflammation [17]. Mouse SPI1 gene knockout can also show the development defects of neutrophils, mononuclear cells B cells, and T cells [36]. Therefore, SPI1 gene is considered a candidate factor for immune and inflammation in dairy cattle.

Conclusions

We identified 5252 miRNA-related SNPs potentially involving mastitis-related traits. We furtherly validated a candidate functional SNP (rs109462250) in the seed region of bta-miR-2899, which is associated with mastitis by affecting the interaction of bta-miR-2899 and SPI1 in Chinese Holsteins. This research is promising, as it may represent an effective functional molecular markers for resistance to mastitis. Our findings will also significantly improve the understanding on miRNA dysfunction in mastitis.

Methods

In silico identification of miRNA and QTL-related SNPs

The information on Bos taurus miRNAs was downloaded from miRBase version 21 (http://www.mirbase.org/; genome-build-id:UMD3.1). The SNP data were downloaded from National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) dbSNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/; Build 133/148, assembly is UMD3.1.1). QTL data were obtained from the database (http://www.animalgenome.org/cgi-bin/QTLdb/BT/; assembly is UMD3.1; it was accessed at 11/01/2016). We designed a perl script, named as miRNAQTLsnp (Additional file 1), to map the SNPs that are simultaneously located within the miRNA sequences and in mastitis-related QTLs. These masitits-relalted QTLs included the Health traits “Mastitis (clinical mastitis, Somatic cell count, Somatic cell score)” and “immune capacity (Neutrophil number, NEUT)” and Udder traits (Udder composite index; Udder depth; Udder height and Teat length) (https://www.animalgenome.org/cgi-bin/QTLdb/BT/ontrait?trait_ID=1464; Genomic locations of QTLs were download by UMD 3.1 assembly). To further narrow down the candidate miRNA-related SNPs, we integrated the differential expression data of miRNAs between the healthy and clinical mastitic cows [10]. We retrived the SNPs that were located within those pre-miRNAs and miRNAs from the Refgene table of UCSC genome browser (http://genome.ucs c.edu/). Then, we used the miRNAQTLsnp to screen the SNPs that were located within the QTLs of 8 traits and pre-miRNAs and miRNAs as the candidate SNPs which were putatively associated with mastitis. We subsequently retrieved the sequences of 3′-UTRs of target genes for the candidate miRNAs. The genomic locations of SNPs were mapped onto pre-miRNAs and 3′-UTRs to obtain the SNPs in miRNA genes. We used the sequence with the reference allele as the wild-type (WT) miRNA and the sequence with mutant allele as the mutant-type (MT) miRNA for each candidate SNP in the bovine miRNA seed regions. Two sequences were considered variant sites, and 25 bp extensions on both sides were retrieved for each SNP in the bovine 3′-UTR. TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_50/) [37] and RNA22 [38] with default parameters were used to predict the target sites for the WT and MT sequences. Finally, we obtained the candidate miRNA-related SNPs that are associated with mastitis in dairy cattle. The workflow diagram was shown in Fig. 1.

Animal samples and bacterial identification

To identify the SNP of bta-miR-2899 and determine the relationship between the SNP and mastitis, 322 blood samples for association analysis were collected from the jugular vein of multiparous Chinese Holstein cows (4–7 years old, 1–4 parity) from 17 sires were selected from five dairy cattle farms participated in the Chinese Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) program; in dairy farms in Shandong Province. Genomic DNA was extracted according to a previously described publication [39]. DNA samples were stored at − 20 °C for subsequent analysis. Data on milk SCC, an indicator for mastitis status, were provided by the DHI Laboratory of Dairy Cattle Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The SCC values were transformed into SCS values according to the equation: SCS = log 2 (SCC/100) + 3, where SCC is expressed in cells/μL [40].

The relative expression of SPI1 gene in the mammary gland tissues between the healthy and mastitic cows was investigated. The initial selection of mastitis cow was based on clinical symptoms including redness, swelling, increased heat, and pain. Meanwhile, milk samples from cows with a high monthly SCC were tested for bacteriology and SCC. If one or more quarters had both a positive bacteriology and an SCC ≥500,000 cells/mL, the cow was enrolled and allocated to the mastitic group. If the cow had not clinical sympotoms, and had a negative bacteriology and a milk SCC ≤100,000 cells/mL, it was regarded as the healthy cows. Culturing and identification of pathogens were carried out according to the following procedures within 24 h after sampling. Briefly, a bacteriological loop was used to spread approximately 10 μL of each milk sample or collected fresh mammary gland tissue on blood agar and nutrient broth. The plates were incubated at 37 °C and bacterial growth was examined after 24 h under inverted microscope. Suspected colonies were purified and transferred to nutrient broth and agar slant culture medium. When unusual bacteria were suspected, longer incubation periods or on incubator environment of 10% CO2 were used. If no colony growth was observed within 7 d, samples were considered negative. All isolates were identified based on colony morphologic features, hemolytic characteristics and conventional Gram-staining and visualization under microscope. For the clinical samples, Only Staphylococcus aureus was detected in the mammary glands tissues from mastitis-infected cow were used for the present study as described in our previous study [41]. Finally, mammary gland tissues were collected from six healthy and six mastitis-infected Chinese Holstein cows during the first lactation from a commercial slaughter farm. When we prepared these tissue samples, one of the tissue samples was collected and stored in liquid nitrogen for RNA isolation, and another tissue sample was collected for further pathogen identification.

Detection of SNPs and genotyping

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers (SNP-F: 5′-CATCTGAGCCGGGAATACAG-3′; SNP-R: 5′-GGTCTCTGTTCTGGGGAGAGT-3′; product size = 268 bp; annealing temperature = 64 °C) of bovine miR-2899 (NCBI, AC_000175.1) were designed for PCR amplification using the Primer premier 5 software. The polymorphic PCR-amplified fragments were sent to Beijing Genomics Institute for sequencing. Sequence alignment was performed to screen the SNPs of bta-miR-2899 using DNAMAN version 6.0 [42] and Chromaspro1.41 software (www.technelysium.com.au/chromas.html). The comparison confirmed the SNP (rs109462250, g. 42,198,087 G > A) of bta-miR-2899 in the Holstein cows. The mutant-amplified products generated a natural FauI endonuclease restriction site. Genotyping of the SNP was performed by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay using 2% agarose gel after FauI restriction enzyme digestion.

Expression of bovine SPI1 mRNA in mammary gland

Mammary gland tissues from six healthy and six mastitis-infected cows were used for SPI1 expression analysis. Total RNA extraction and reverse transcription into cDNA were performed according to the previous protocol [43]. The primers (Q-F: 5′- GGAGAGCCATCGGAAGACCT-3′; Q-R: 5′-GGTGCGGATGAAAGTCCCAG-3′; product size = 199 bp) were designed to investigate the relative expression of SPI1 mRNA in the mammary gland tissues of cows with different genotypes in the SNP (rs109462250, G > A) locus using Q-PCR. The primers of housekeeping internal control β-actin gene were obtained from our previous report [43]. Q-PCR protocol and calculation of relative expression were described as previously reported but with minor modifications [43]. Each 20 μL per well contained 9 μL of 2.5× RealMasterMix/20× SYBR solution (TakaRa), 0.05 μM forward and reverse primers, 9.8 μL ddH2O, and 1 μL cDNA or SPI1-plasmid DNA. Q-PCR was run on a LightCycler® 480 II (Roche Diagnostics). Each sample was run in triplicate. The Q-PCR conditions were as follows: 50 °C for 2 min and 94 °C for 3 min followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 40 s, and 68 °C for 15 s. The last stage for the dissociation curve is as follows: 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 15 s, and 95 °C for 15 s.

Construction of miRNA expression vectors

A specific forward primer (MiR-2899-F: 5′-GAAGATCTCATCTGAGCCGGGAATACAG-3′; Bold font represents restriction enzyme site) was designed to include an BgI II restriction site, and a reverse primer (MiR-2899-R: 5′-CCGGAATTCGGTCTCTGTTCTGGGGAGAGT-3′) was incorporated with an EcoR I restriction enzyme site using the Primer5 software to amplify bta-miR-2899. The DNA products were extracted and purified using the Gel/PCR Extraction Kit (Biomiga) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The WT (GG) and MT (AA) genotype products were cloned into the pEZX-MR04 vector (OmicsLink), and a plasmid that expresses scramble oligonucleotides was used as a negative control (miR-NC). Plasmids were isolated and purified as our previous protocol [8] and directly sequenced to ensure that the only difference between plasmid sequences was the SNP locus. A specific forward primer (SPI1-F: 5′-CGACGCGTCCCCGTTGGCCATAGCATTA-3′) including a Hind III restriction site and a reverse primer (SPI1-R: 5′-CCAAGCTTTCTGGTCAGGCAGTGTCAAC-3′) with a Mlu I restriction site were designed to amplify the 3′-UTR of the SPI1 gene. Products were cloned into the pMIR- REPORT vector (Promega) to exclude the influence of foreign sequences on 3′-UTR of the SPI1 gene levels.

Cloning was performed and used to transform Trans5a cells (Invitrogen), which were plated on agar containing 100 mg/mL of ampicillin and incubated at 37 °C overnight. The colonies were screened by PCR for the presence of the insert using two pairs of primers (miR-2899-F, miR-2899-R and SPI1-F, SPI1-R) as mentioned previously. Positive colonies were cultured in 10 mL lysogeny broth medium (Fisher BioReagents) containing 100 mg/mL of ampicillin and incubated at 37 °C overnight. Plasmids were isolated using the Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Biomiga) according to manufacturer’s instructions, and plasmid DNA was quantified using NanoDrop ND-1000.

Transient transfection and luciferase reporter assay in cells

MAC-T cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modification of Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum, 1% nonessential amino acids, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin. The cells were maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and subcultured every other day. All reagents were obtained from GIBCO (https://www.thermofisher.com/) except for those that were specifically assigned. The cells were distributed into a 48-well culture tray containing 3 mL of DMEM complete media per well after subculturing the day before the transfection assay. Although the cells were grown to an 80–85% confluency, the cells were transfected with 100 ng SPI1 3′-UTR luciferase expression constructs and 100–300 ng of bta-miR-2899 expression plasmid using LipofectamineTM 2000 (Invitrogen, https://www.thermofisher.com/cn/zh/home/brands/invitrogen.html). These plasmids were cotransfected with 50 ng β-gal for normalization. All experiments were performed with a negative control plasmid (pMIR-REPORT). About 48 h after transfection, the cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline for image capturing and lysed in once 65 μL with Reporter Lysis Buffer per well (Promega, http://promega.bioon.com.cn/). Cell lysates from the transfected cells were prepared and assayed for both firefly luciferase and β-gal absorbance values according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega). All transfection data are present four repeat independent transfections. The activity was expressed as relative firefly luciferase activity normalized against β-gal absorbance value [8].

Statistical analyses

All data were analyzed by SPSS software (v.10.0, SPSS Inc., USA). The value of relative miRNA quantity was represented as fold change. Students’ t-tests were used to determine the significance of relative expressions. The effect of bta-miR-2899 genotypes on the activity of SPI1 was tested by one-way ANOVA. The association analysis between the genotypes of SNP and SCS was analyzed using a general least-square model procedure of the SAS statistical analysis software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) as described in our previous study [44]. The linear model is expressed as follows: Yijkl = μ + Gi + Pj + Ek + Fl + eijkl, where Yijkl is the observed value; μ is the overall mean; Gi is the fixed effect of genotype; Pj is the fixed effect of age; Hk is the effect of farm; El is the fixed effect of season; eijkl is the random residual error. Values of SCS were represented with mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Values of relative expression of SPI1 mRNA were shown in mean ± standard deviation (SD). A P- value less than 0.05 was regarded as significant.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the reviewers and editors for their suggestions to the work.

Funding

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771374, 31672397 and 31671286), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (JQ201709), the Major Project of National Transgene in China (2018ZX08007001–002), the Program of National Cow Industrial Technology System of China (CARS-36), and the Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Program of China (2017GNC10120). The funders had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.

Authors’ contributions

QJ carried out the experiment, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript; HZ and RL genotyped the SNP; YZ, YL, XW, ZJ, WL and MH participated in the sample collection and reagent prepartion; JW and JH designed the miRNAQTLsnp software. JH designed this study, analyzed the data and revised the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experiments were carried out according to the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals published by the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology in 2004 and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the Dairy Cattle Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong, P. R. China.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12863_2019_749_MOESM1_ESM.rar (122 kb)
Additional file 1: miRNAQTLsnp software (WinRAR). The package included 12 files: miRnaQTL.pm, miRNAQTLsnp_get.pl, miRNA-UCSC.txt, pre-miRNA-gff.txt, QTL_CM.txt, QTL_NEUT.txt, QTL_SCC.txt, QTL_SCS.txt, QTL_TLGTH.txt, QTL_UCI.txt, QTL_UDPTH.txt, QTL_UHI.txt. (RAR 121 kb)
12863_2019_749_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (430 kb)
Additional file 2: Table S1. SNPs within the bovine precursor, mature and seed sequences of microRNAs (.xlsx). (XLSX 429 kb)
12863_2019_749_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (290 kb)
Additional file 3: Table S2. Candidate miRNA-related SNPs located in the QTLs of 8 traits including CM, SCC, SCS, UDPTH, TLGTH, UCI, UHT and NEUT (8 sheets). (.xlsx). (XLSX 289 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Heikkilä AM, Nousiainen JI, Pyörälä S. Costs of clinical mastitis with special reference to premature culling. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(1):139–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heikkilä AM, Liski E, Pyörälä S, Taponen S. Pathogen-specific production losses in bovine mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(10):9493–504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller RH, Norman HD, Wright JR, Cole JB. Impact of genetic merit for milk somatic cell score of sires and maternal grandsires on herd life of their daughters. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92(5):2224–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shook GE, Schutz MM. Selection on somatic cell score to improve resistance to mastitis in the United States. J Dairy Sci. 1994;77(2):648–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    García-Ruiz A, Cole JB, VanRaden PM, Wiggans GR, Ruiz-López FJ, Van Tassell CP. Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(28):E3995–4004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wiggans GR, Vanraden PM, Cooper TA. The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94(6):3202–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rezende FM, Nani JP, Peñagaricano F. Genomic prediction of bull fertility in US Jersey dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(4):3230–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li L, Huang J, Zhang X, Ju Z, Qi C, Zhang Y, Li Q, Wang C, Miao W, Zhong J, Hou M, Hang S. One SNP in the 30-UTR of HMGB1 gene affects the binding of target bta-miR-223 and is involved in mastitis in dairy cattle. Immunogenetics. 2012;64(11):817–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang XG, Huang JM, Feng MY, Ju ZH, Wang CF, Yang GW, Yuan JD, Zhong JF. Regulatory mutations in the A2M gene are involved in the mastitis susceptibility in dairy cows. Anim Genet. 2014;45(1):28–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ju Z, Jiang Q, Liu G, Wang X, Luo G, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Zhong J, Huang J. Solexa sequencing and custom microRNA chip reveal repertoire of microRNAs in mammary gland of bovine suffering from natural infectious mastitis. Anim Genet. 2018;49(1):3–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eulalio A, Mano M, Dal Ferro M, Zentilin L, Sinagra G, Zacchigna S, Giacca M. Functional screening identifies miRNAs inducing cardiac regeneration. Nature. 2012;492(7429):376–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lawless N, Foroushani AB, McCabe MS, O'Farrelly C, Lynn DJ. Next generation sequencing reveals the expression of a unique miRNA profile in response to a gram-positive bacterial infection. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e57543.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    den Breems NY, Nguyen LK, Kulasiri D. Integrated signaling pathway and gene expression regulatory model to dissect dynamics of Escherichia coli challenged mammary epithelial cells. Biosystems. 2014;126:27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jin W, Ibeagha-Awemu EM, Liang G, Beaudoin F, Zhao X. Guan le L. transcriptome microRNA profiling of bovine mammary epithelial cells challenged with Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus bacteria reveals pathogen directed microRNA expression profiles. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:181.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hu ZL, Park CA, Reecy JM. Developmental progress and current status of the animal QTLdb. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D827–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eck SH, Benet-Pagès A, Flisikowski K, Meitinger T, Fries R, Strom TM. Whole genome sequencing of a single Bos taurus animal for single nucleotide polymorphism discovery. Genome Biol. 2009;10(8):R82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turkistany SA, DeKoter RP. The transcription factor PU.1 is a critical regulator of cellular communication in the immune system. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2011;59(6):431–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shen C, Chen MT, Zhang XH, Yin XL, Ning HM, Su R, Lin HS, Song L, Wang F, Ma YN, Zhao HL, Yu J, Zhang JW. The PU.1-modulated MicroRNA-22 is a regulator of monocyte/macrophage differentiation and acute myeloid leukemia. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(9):e1006259.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tili E, Michaille JJ, Costinean S, Croce CM. MicroRNAs, the immune system and rheumatic disease. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008;4(10):534–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reczko M, Maragkakis M, Alexiou P, Grosse I, Hatzigeorgiou AG. Functional microRNA targets in protein coding sequences. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(6):771–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Helwak A, Kudla G, Dudnakova T, Tollervey D. Mapping the human miRNA interactome by CLASH reveals frequent noncanonical binding. Cell. 2013;153(3):654–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Georges M, Coppieters W, Charlier C. Polymorphic miRNA-mediated gene regulation: contribution to phenotypic variation and disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007;17(3):166–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nicoloso MS, Sun H, Spizzo R, Kim H, Wickramasinghe P, Shimizu M, Wojcik SE, Ferdin J, Kunej T, Xiao L, Manoukian S, Secreto G, Ravagnani F, Wang X, Radice P, Croce CM, Davuluri RV, Calin GA. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms inside microRNA target sites influence tumor susceptibility. Cancer Res. 2010;70(7):2789–98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gong J, Liu C, Liu W, Wu Y, Ma Z, Chen H, Guo AY. An update of miRNASNP database for better SNP selection by GWAS data, miRNA expression and online tools. Database (Oxford). 2015;2015:bav029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barenboim M, Zoltick BJ, Guo Y, Weinberger DR. MicroSNiPer: a web tool for prediction of SNP effects on putative microRNA targets. Hum Mutat. 2010;31(11):1223–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sabarinathan R, Tafer H, Seemann SE, Hofacker IL, Stadler PF, Gorodkin J. The RNAsnp web server: predicting SNP effects on local RNA secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W475–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Deveci M, Catalyürek UV, Toland AE. mrSNP: software to detect SNP effects on microRNA binding. BMC Bioinf. 2014;15:73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yue M, Zhou D, Zhi H, Wang P, Zhang Y, Gao Y, Guo M, Li X, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Ning S, Li X. MSDD: a manually curated database of experimentally supported associations among miRNAs, SNPs and human diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D181–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rupp R, Boichard D. Genetics of resistance to mastitis in dairy cattle. Vet Res. 2003;34(5):671–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aitken SL, Corl CM, Sordillo LM. Immunopathology of mastitis: insights into disease recognition and resolution. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2011;16(4):291–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rainard P, Foucras G, Boichard D, Rupp R. Invited review: low milk somatic cell count and susceptibility to mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(8):6703–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Koivula M, Mäntysaari EA, Negussie E, Serenius T. Genetic and phenotypic relationships among milk yield and somatic cell count before and after clinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88(2):827–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Buras JA, Reenstra WR, Fenton MJ. NF beta a, a factor required for maximal interleukin-1 beta gene expression is identical to the ets family member PU.1. Evidence for structural alteration following LPS activation. Mol Immunol. 1995;32(8):541–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Roger T, Miconnet I, Schiesser AL, Kai H, Miyake K, Calandra T. Critical role for Ets, AP-1 and GATA-like transcription factors in regulating mouse toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr4) gene expression. Biochem J. 2005;387(pt2):355–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schroder K, Lichtinger M, Irvine KM, Brion K, Trieu A, Ross IL, Ravasi T, Stacey KJ, Rehli M, Hume DA, Sweet MJ. PU.1 and ICSBP control constitutive and IFN-gamma-regulated Tlr9 gene expression in mouse macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;81(6):1577–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gupta P, Gurudutta GU, Saluja D, Tripathi RP. PU.1 and partners: regulation of haematopoietic stem cell fate in normal and malignant haematopoiesis. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(11–12):4349–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005;120(1):15–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Miranda KC, Huynh T, Tay Y, Ang YS, Tam WL, Thomson AM, Lim B, Rigoutsos I. A pattern-based method for the identification of MicroRNA binding sites and their corresponding heteroduplexes. Cell. 2006;126(6):1203–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Huang J, Wang H, Wang C, Li J, Li Q, Hou M, Zhong J. Single nucleotide polymorphisms, haplotypes and combined genotypes of lactoferrin gene and their associations with mastitis in Chinese Holstein cattle. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37(1):477–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rupp R, Boichard D. Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, production, udder type traits, milking ease in first lactation Holsteins. J Dairy Sci. 1999;82(10):2198–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Huang J, Luo G, Zhang Z, Wang X, Ju Z, Qi C, Zhang Y, Wang C, Li R, Li J, Yin W, Xu Y, Moisá SJ, Loor JJ, Zhong J. iTRAQ-proteomics and bioinformatics analyses of mammary tissue from cows with clinical mastitis due to natural infection with staphylococci aureus. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:839.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Woffelman C. DNAMAN for windows, version 6.0. In: Lynon Biosoft, Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, Netherlands: Leiden University; 2004.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hou Q, Huang J, Ju Z, Li Q, Li L, Wang C, Sun T, Wang L, Hou M, Hang S, Zhong J. Identification of splice variants, targeted microRNAs and functional single nucleotide polymorphisms of the BOLA-DQA2 gene in dairy cattle. DNA Cell Biol. 2012;31(5):739–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ju Z, Wang C, Wang X, Yang C, Sun Y, Jiang Q, Wang F, Li M, Zhong J, Huang J. Role of an SNP in alternative splicing of bovine NCF4 and mastitis susceptibility. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0143705.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qiang Jiang
    • 1
  • Han Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rongling Li
    • 1
  • Yaran Zhang
    • 1
  • Yong Liu
    • 1
  • Jinpeng Wang
    • 1
  • Xiuge Wang
    • 1
  • Zhihua Ju
    • 1
  • Wenhao Liu
    • 1
  • Minghai Hou
    • 1
  • Jinming Huang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Dairy Cattle Research CenterShandong Academy of Agricultural ScienceJinanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Life SciencesShandong Normal UniversityJinanChina

Personalised recommendations