Advertisement

BMC Evolutionary Biology

, 19:206 | Cite as

Comparative myoanatomy of Tardigrada: new insights from the heterotardigrades Actinarctus doryphorus (Tanarctidae) and Echiniscoides sigismundi (Echiniscoididae)

  • Dennis Krog Persson
  • Kenneth Agerlin Halberg
  • Ricardo Cardoso Neves
  • Aslak Jørgensen
  • Reinhardt Møbjerg Kristensen
  • Nadja MøbjergEmail author
Open Access
Research article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Evolutionary developmental biology and morphology

Abstract

Background

Tardigrada is a group of microscopic invertebrates distributed worldwide in permanent and temporal aquatic habitats. Famous for their extreme stress tolerance, tardigrades are also of interest due to their close relationship with Arthropoda and Cycloneuralia. Despite recent efforts in analyzing the musculature of a number of tardigrade species, data on the class Heterotardigrada remain scarce. Aiming to expand the current morphological framework, and to promote the use of muscular body plans in elucidating tardigrade phylogeny, the myoanatomy of two heterotardigrades, Actinarctus doryphorus and Echiniscoides sigismundi, was analyzed by cytochemistry, scanning electron and confocal laser scanning microscopy and 3D imaging. We discuss our findings with reference to other tardigrades and internal phylogenetic relationships of the phylum.

Results

We focus our analyses on the somatic musculature, which in tardigrades includes muscle groups spanning dorsal, ventral, and lateral body regions, with the legs being musculated by fibers belonging to all three groups. A pronounced reduction of the trunk musculature is seen in the dorsoventrally compressed A. doryphorus, a species that generally has fewer cuticle attachment sites as compared to E. sigismundi and members of the class Eutardigrada. Interestingly, F-actin positive signals were found in the head appendages of A. doryphorus. Our analyses further indicate that cross-striation is a feature common to the somatic muscles of heterotardigrades and that E. sigismundi—as previously proposed for other echiniscoidean heterotardigrades—has relatively thick somatic muscle fibers.

Conclusions

We provide new insights into the myoanatomical differences that characterize distinct evolutionary lineages within Tardigrada, highlighting characters that potentially can be informative in future phylogenetic analyses. We focus our current analyses on the ventral trunk musculature. Our observations suggest that seven paired ventromedian attachment sites anchoring a large number of muscles can be regarded as part of the ground pattern of Tardigrada and that fusion and reduction of cuticular attachment sites is a derived condition. Specifically, the pattern of these sites differs in particular details between tardigrade taxa. In the future, a deeper understanding of the tardigrade myoanatomical ground pattern will require more investigations in order to include all major tardigrade lineages.

Keywords

Tardigrada Myoanatomy Phalloidin Phylogeny Ecdysozoa 

Abbreviations

1–7

Ventromedian attachment site

a(a’)-f

Intermediate ventral attachment sites

ala

Wing-like extension of the cuticle

am

Anal muscles

an

Anus

A-W

Dorsal attachment sites (muscles associated dorsal sites are named with the corresponding lowercase letter followed by a number)

bm

Buccal muscles

B-W

Dorsal attachment sites

cE

Cirrus E

cg

Claw gland

ec

External cirrus/cirri

gm

Gonopore muscle

go

Gonopore

hm

Head muscles

ic

Internal cirri

lc

Lateral cirrus/cirri

mc

Median cirri

p3

Sensory organ of the third leg

p4

Sensory organ of the fourth leg

pb

Pharyngeal bulb

pc

Primary clavae

pil

Pillar

sc

Secondary clavae

T1-T3, τ0-τ3

Lateral attachment sites

Background

The phylum Tardigrada consists of over 1200 species of microscopic invertebrates, which are famous for their extreme stress tolerance [1, 2, 3, 4]. Tardigrades have a worldwide distribution, inhabiting marine, freshwater and terrestrial habitats [5, 6]. Apart from their impressive stress tolerance, tardigrades are also of great interest due to the widely accepted scenario of a close phylogenetic relationship with Arthropoda (e.g., insects, crustaceans) and Onychophora (velvet worms), within Ecdysozoa (moulting animals; for a review see [7]). Tardigrades have, however, also been recovered as sister group to Nematoda (e.g., C. elegans) and their exact phylogenetic affinities thus remain controversial [7, 8]. The internal phylogeny of Tardigrada is also, from a morphological stand point, often difficult to resolve due to the relative scarcity of useful characters.

Extant tardigrades are represented by two major evolutionary lineages, the well investigated Eutardigrada (including the newly erected Apotardigrada) and the lesser known and much more diverse Heterotardigrada [9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. The taxonomy and internal phylogeny of tardigrades was traditionally based on adult morphological features, such as cuticular structures (e.g., claws, sensory organs, pharyngeal placoids, and cuticular ornamentation) as well as egg morphology (e.g. [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21]). However, studies addressing tardigrade phylogeny have shifted more towards the use of DNA sequencing, which has had a great impact on this research field (e.g. [22, 23]). Importantly, the addition of molecular techniques has changed the internal phylogeny of Heterotardigrada by including Echiniscoidea within Arthrotardigrada, making the latter order paraphyletic [9, 11, 22, 23, 24]. It has become increasingly apparent that in order to advance towards a modern classification, it is essential to combine both morphological/anatomical and molecular data. Indeed, it has been suggested that the use of neuro- and myoanatomical structures can be useful for establishing a reliable taxonomic hierarchy and resolving the internal phylogeny of Tardigrada [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32].

In order to use myoanatomical variations as informative characters to assess phylogenetic relationships, the amount of data on the diversity of tardigrade myoanatomy must be significantly increased. This is especially true for Heterotardigrada, the class within Tardigrada which exhibits the highest variation in external morphology, and likely also possesses useful myoanatomical variation [12, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32]. Moreover, as heterotardigrades are considered to possess many ancestral tardigrade characters, an understanding of the myoanatomy and its diversity within Heterotardigrada will help us understand the evolutionary history of tardigrades. Here, we use phalloidin staining, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and 3D imaging to provide a detailed description of the myoanatomy of two heterotardigrades, namely Actinarctus doryphorus (Tanarctidae) and Echiniscoides sigismundi (Echiniscoididae). In addition, we give a short overview of the external morphology of the two species using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Investigations of tardigrade anatomy date back to the nineteenth century [12] and we note that Marcus [33] and Müller [34]—based on light microscopic investigations—provided drawings of the musculature in Echiniscoides sigismundi [33] as well as Echiniscus testudo, Milnesium tardigradum, Ramazzottius oberhaeuseri and Macrobiotus hufelandi [34]. Importantly, these early studies have provided a thorough basis for present day investigations. Here, we compare our results with contemporary myoanatomical data obtained from different tardigrade taxa and discuss potential homologies of character states.

Results

Tardigrades are bilaterally symmetric and the following descriptions thus apply solely to one side of the body unless otherwise stated. The description below follows the nomenclature used by Schmidt-Rhaesa and Kulessa [30], Halberg et al. [35], Schulze and Schmidt-Rhaesa [31], Halberg et al. [25] and Smith and Jockusch [32]. Muscle names are, when possible, derived from an attachment site and the muscle group that the respective muscle is part of. As an example, ventral leg muscles, i and iii, which connect to ventromedian attachment sites, are denoted with either i or iii preceded by a number that indicates which of the seven attachment sites the specific fiber is associated. For example, 1i or 2i, indicate leg muscle i from ventromedian attachment sites 1 and 2, respectively. In case more muscle fibers from one group originate from the same attachment site, numbers will be added sequentially after a hyphen at the end of the muscle name, e.g., 1i-1, 1i-2 and so on.

Gross morphology of Actinarctus doryphorus (Fig. 1)

Actinarctus doryphorus has a dorsoventrally compressed body with a length of 150–175 μm [36]. Notably, the dorsal cuticle forms a conspicuous wing-like structure (Fig. 1; ala), which is supported by epicuticular pillars (Fig. 1; pil). When viewed from the ventral side the distinct head region is clearly visible (Fig. 1a). The head appears relatively large and it is equipped with five sets of sensory appendages: primary clavae (Fig. 1; pc), secondary clavae (Fig. 1; sc), lateral cirri (Fig. 1; lc), external cirri (Fig. 1; ec) and internal cirri (Fig. 1; ic). The primary clavae are very long, sometimes exceeding the length of the body. In addition, the head region bears a single dorsal median cirrus (not shown) only visible from the dorsal side. Posteriorly the trunk bears a dorsolateral cirrus on each side (not shown). The four pairs of legs are telescopic and terminate in four toes, each bearing a retractable claw (Fig. 1). Additionally, each leg bears a sensory organ. The sensory organ of the fourth leg (p4) penetrates the ala and extends onto the dorsal surface (Fig. 1) [37].
Fig. 1

Habitus of Actinarctus cf. doryphorus. a Scanning electron microscope image showing the ventral side. b Light microscope image showing the dorsal side. Abbreviations: 1–7, approximate position of ventromedian attachment sites; a-f, approximate position of intermediate ventral attachment sites; ala, wing-like extension of the cuticle; ec, external cirri; ic, internal cirri; lc, lateral cirri; pc, primary clavae; pil, pillar; p4, sensory organ of the fourth leg; sc, secondary clavae. Double arrow indicates the anterior (A) -posterior (P) direction

Myoanatomy of Actinarctus doryphorus (Figs. 1-2 )

The phalloidin staining of the somatic musculature in most of our A. doryphorus specimens revealed a clear truncated signal, indicating a cross-striated musculature (Fig. 2 and Additional file 1). The following description of the somatic muscles in A. doryphorus is focused on the musculature of the legs, the dorsal and ventral musculature, including muscles of the head region. While a reduced number of lateral attachment sites can be recognized, the lateral muscles appear reduced and are not easily discernable as a distinct muscle group in our F-actin stainings.
Fig. 2

3D reconstruction of the musculature of Actinarctus doryphorus. a ventral and b dorsal view of the same specimen. Abbreviations: 1–7: ventromedian attachment site; a-f: intermediate ventral attachment sites; A-W, dorsal attachment sites (associated muscles: corresponding lowercase letter followed by a number); bm, buccal muscles; ec, external cirri; hm, head muscles; ic, internal cirri; mc, median cirri; pc, primary clavae; sc, secondary clavae

Ventromedian attachment sites of the trunk and leg muscles

Five paired ventromedian attachment points were recognized along the anterior-posterior body axis by CLSM analyses of phalloidin stained specimens (Fig. 2a). Their position within the trunk, relative to the four leg pairs, indicate that these anchoring points correspond to ventromedian attachment sites 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7 as described from eutardigrades (Fig. 1) [12, 25, 35]. Thus A. doryphorus seems to have lost attachment sites 2 and 4. The ventromedian attachment sites of A. doryphorus were not clearly visible as depressions in the cuticle of SEM preparations as reported from other tardigrades. Therefore, their positions, as indicated on Fig. 1a, are only approximate. The five paired ventromedian attachment points form a metameric pattern, each with a unique architecture determined by differences in the attachment of the ventral leg musculature (Fig. 2a). Specifically, ventral leg muscles (i and iii) connect with the attachment points. Our analysis failed to reveal any ventrolateral muscles (labeled “ii” in Echiniscoides sigismundi; see below), spanning the body from ventromedian to lateral attachment points.

At the most anterior ventromedian attachment site (site 1), muscle 1i-2 extends into the distal part, whereas the muscle 1i-3 connects with the proximal part of the first leg (Fig. 2a). Muscle 1i-1 extends anteriorly with a termination point in the proximal part of the first leg or in the head region. The muscles 3i-1 and 3i-3 span from the proximal region of the second leg to attachment site 3, whereas muscle 3i-2 attaches distally in the second leg (Fig. 2a). The musculature of the third leg is composed of muscles 3iii-1, 3iii-2, 3iii-3, 5i-1, 5iii-1, 5iii-2 and 6iii (Fig. 2a). The muscles 3iii-2 and 3iii-3 extend from attachment site 3 into the distal part of the leg (Fig. 2a). Also, from attachment site 3, the muscle 3iii-1 connects to the proximal part of the third leg. Muscle 5iii-2 extends from attachment site 5 to the distal part of the third leg, whereas muscle 5i-1, 5iii-1 and 6iii extend to the proximal part of the third leg from sites 5 and 6, respectively (Fig. 2a, Additional file 1). The musculature of the hind leg is composed of the muscles 7iii-1, 7iii-2 extending from the most posterior ventromedian attachment site (site 7). In addition, the muscle 7iii-3 extends into the fourth leg connecting to the thick ventral longitudinal musculature at intermediate attachment site f (Fig. 2a). There seems to be a pattern with regard to the number of ventromedian attachment sites that each of the first three legs are associated with: the ventral muscles of the first leg are all attached to ventromedian attachment site 1, while ventral muscles of the second leg pair attach to ventromedian attachment site 3 and 5, and ventral muscles of the third leg pair attach to attachment site 3, 5 and 6 (Fig. 2a). The ventral muscle fibers of the hind legs are attached only to attachment site 7 and to the ventral longitudinal musculature (Fig. 2a)

In addition, muscles of the legs are also found associated with dorsal attachment sites (below follows a description of the dorsal musculature). Specifically, the musculature of the first leg includes the dorsally connected muscles e1 and d1. Muscle k1 connects to the second leg, whereas p1, s1, u1 and w1, w2, w3 extend into, respectively, the third and fourth leg pairs (Fig. 2b).

The musculature of the legs furthermore comprises fibers pertaining to a much reduced lateral muscle group. The musculature of the first leg includes the lateral muscle t1a connecting to lateral attachment site T1 (Fig. 2b). The lateral muscle t2a extends from lateral attachment site T2 and into the second leg (Fig. 2b). From lateral attachment site T3, in the most posterior region of the animal, the lateral muscle t3a may extend all the way into the first leg (Fig. 2a, b), we however state this with caution as we have been unable to confirm the course of this muscle in other specimens. The muscle t3a’ seems to connect with the proximal part of the third leg (Fig. 2b) and the muscle t3b seems to connect T3 to the proximal region of the hind leg (Fig. 2b, Additional file 1).

Dorsal longitudinal musculature

Two dorsal longitudinal muscles extend in parallel along the anterior-posterior body axis (Fig. 2b). The two strands, the outer and inner muscle strand, span from anterior attachment site A, to posterior attachment site W (Fig. 2b). However, between attachment site U and W it seems that the inner and outer strand has fused into a single muscle. Compared to the ventral longitudinal muscles (see below), the dorsal longitudinal muscles are very thin and single sarcomeres cannot be clearly discerned. All of the dorsal attachment sites seem to be connected to muscles from the legs (Fig. 2b; d-w), except for the anterior most attachment point A. Close to attachment site D, we find what seems to be a discontinuity in the inner longitudinal strand (Fig. 2b, arrow).

Ventral longitudinal musculature and musculature of the head region

The ventral longitudinal musculature comprises a long pair of muscles within the trunk as well as two shorter pairs that pertain to the head region. The thick long pair spans the trunk from intermediate attachment site ‘c’—near the first leg pair—through intermediate attachment site ‘d’ between the second and third leg, to intermediate attachment site ‘f’, which is located at the fourth leg pair (Fig. 2a). Each of the long thick ventral longitudinal muscles seems to be composed of only four large sarcomeres (Fig. 2a).

The two short muscle pairs of the ventral musculature are positioned anteroventrally in the head region. One of these pairs forms a relatively thin inner band, which extends between intermediate attachment sites ‘b’ and ‘a’ and continues anteriorly along each side of the ovoid, muscular pharyngeal bulb (Fig. 2a; pb) in direction of muscles that seem to be associated with the stylet and mouth cone. The latter are collectively termed buccal muscles (Fig. 2a; bm) as our stainings do not allow for a more detailed investigation of these delicate structures. The inner band seems to be composed of two sarcomeres (see Additional file 1). In addition to this inner band, a pair of large muscles is found on each side of the head (Fig. 2a; hm), spanning in medial direction from a ventrolateral position. Specifically, each of these muscles is comprised of three large sarcomeres with a size comparable to the sarcomeres of the long ventral longitudinal muscles of the trunk. The first sarcomere of this thick outer band is aligned with the thick ventral longitudinal muscles of the trunk, and it continuous in an anterior direction from a ventrolateral position in front of the first leg closely associated with the secondary clavae. The second and third sarcomere of this conspicuous three sarcomere structure forms a “V” with the second sarcomere extending in medial direction towards the more anterior part of the above-mentioned buccal muscles (Fig. 2a; Additional file 1). Here the second sarcomere connects to the third sarcomere, which protrudes back towards the lateral surface and connects to fine dorsally extending muscles that associate with the proximal part of the primary clava (Fig. 2a; pc). The thickness of the individual sarcomeres in this outer ventral band of the head region, together with the ventrolateral position of the first sarcomere, indicates that this structure derives from the ventral trunk muscle. Notably, phalloidin positive signals are found inside the proximal part of all head appendages (Fig. 2a, b).

Gross morphology of Echiniscoides sigismundi (Fig. 3)

The external morphology of Echiniscoides sigismundi [38] is very different from that of A. doryphorus. The body of E. sigismundi is cylindrical and the legs are not telescopic. In most cases, the cuticular attachment sites are visible externally as small depressions on the surface of SEM prepared specimens; the approximate position of the remaining attachment sites are similarly indicated (Fig. 3). This echiniscoidean tardigrade is characterized by relatively short sensory appendages, which include primary clavae (pc), secondary clavae (sc) (papilla cephalica), lateral cirri (lc), external cirri (ec) and internal cirri (ic), as well as cirri E (cE) of the trunk and leg sensory appendages (p3, p4) (Fig. 3). External evidence of the heads median cirrus is absent.
Fig. 3

Habitus of Echiniscoides sigismundi. a-c Scanning electron microscope images. a Ventral side. b Dorsal side. c Lateral side. Abbreviations: 1–7, ventromedian attachment sites; a’-g, intermediate ventral attachment sites; B-W, dorsal attachment sites; T1-T3, τ0- τ3, lateral attachment sites; an, anus; go, gonopore; cE, cirrus E; ec, external cirrus; lc, lateral cirrus; ic, internal cirrus; pc, primary clavae; sc, secondary clavae; p3 + p4, sensory structures of legs. Double arrow indicates the anterior (A)-posterior (P) direction. The position given for all attachment sites are approximate

The myoanatomy of Echiniscoides sigismundi (Figs. 3 and 4)

Ventromedian attachment sites, ventral leg muscles and ventrolateral muscles (Figs. 3a and 4a)

Echiniscoides sigismundi possesses seven ventromedian attachment sites along the anterior-posterior body axis (Figs. 3a and 4a; sites 1–7), to which leg muscles (i and iii) and ventrolateral muscles (ii) attach. Leg muscles 1i-1, 1i-2, 1i-3, 1iii-1, 1iii-2 as well as the ventrolateral muscle 1ii connect to the most anterior site 1 (Fig. 4a). Muscles 2i and 2iii converge and connect to the second ventral attachment site, as does the ventrolateral muscle 2ii (Fig. 4a). Muscle 2i extends into the proximal part of the first leg pair, whereas muscle 2iii extends into the proximal part of the second leg pair. The third ventromedian attachment site serves as anchoring point for muscles 3i-1, 3i-2 and 3i-3 from the second leg as well as the ventrolateral muscle 3ii, and is connected to the ventral longitudinal musculature via muscle 3iii (Fig. 4a). The muscle 4i extends from the fourth ventromedian attachment site to the proximal part of the second leg, while the muscle 4iii extends to the proximal part of the third leg. The ventrolateral muscle 4ii is also connected to the fourth ventromedian attachment site. The muscle 5i-1 extends from the fifth ventromedian attachment site to the proximal part of the third leg. In addition, muscles 5i-2 and 5i-3 extend from the fifth ventromedian attachment site to the distal part of the third leg (Fig. 4a). The ventrolateral muscle 5ii is connected also with the fifth ventromedian attachment site. Two muscles, 6i and 6ii, were found in association with the sixth ventromedian attachment site. The muscle 6i extends into the third leg, whereas 6ii extends laterally. The muscles 7ii and 7iii extend from the seventh ventromedian attachment site to the lateral side and the fourth leg, respectively. The musculature of the fourth leg pair includes one ventral muscle, 7iii that emerges from the seventh ventromedian attachment site.
Fig. 4

3D reconstruction of the musculature of Echiniscoides sigismundi. a ventral side. b dorsal side. c lateral side. Abbreviations: 1–7, ventromedian attachment sites (associated muscles: i and iii); a-f, intermediate ventral attachment sites (associated muscles: ii); A-W, dorsal attachment sites (associated muscles: corresponding lowercase letter followed by a number); T1-T3, τ0-τ3, lateral attachment sites; bm, buccal muscles; hm, head muscles; am, anal muscles; gm, gonopore muscle pb, pharyngeal bulb

Ventral longitudinal musculature

The ventral longitudinal musculature consists of a single pair of muscles that span from anterior attachment sites a and a’ to the posterior attachment site g (Fig. 4a). These muscles are composed of several fibers, which anchor at various attachment sites, namely b, c, d, e and f, where they connect with other muscles such as 1iii-1, 3iii, 5a and 7a. From attachment site c the ventral longitudinal muscle bifurcates into two muscle fibers, which extend into the anterior attachment sites a and a’, respectively (Fig. 4a).

Dorsal and lateral longitudinal musculature (Figs. 4b, c)

Two pairs of dorsal longitudinal muscles are present in E. sigismundi, a short inner pair and a long outer pair. The short inner pair extends between dorsal attachment sites A* and P (Fig. 4b), while the long outer pair extends between attachment sites A and W (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, the long outer pair of dorsal longitudinal muscles bifurcates at approximately one third of its length (from the anterior end), and fuses again between attachment sites E and D (Fig. 4b).

The lateral muscles of E. sigismundi extend longitudinally and diagonally from attachment sites τ0 to T1 then to τ2 where it bifurcates to T2 and τ2’, and from τ1 to τ2’ (Fig. 4c). Muscles from T2 connect with the second and third leg, respectively, while a muscle from τ2’ connects to the ventral musculature. The lateral attachment sites τ3 and T3 did not seem to be connected to the rest of the lateral muscles and attachment sites (Fig. 4c).

Dorsal and lateral leg muscles (Fig. 4c)

The first leg musculature is supplied with a total of 12 identifiable muscles from dorsal attachment sites as well as from the lateral attachment sites τ1 and T1. The dorsal leg muscles b1, d1, e1, e*1, f1, g1 and h1 emerge from attachment points B, D, E, E*, F, G and H, respectively, associated with the long outer dorsal longitudinal muscle and extend into the anterior region of the leg, though it is not possible to distinguish their exact arrangement (Fig. 4c). Likewise, it is not possible to determine exactly where muscle a1 terminates and the path of c1 is also not discernable. The dorsal leg muscle h1 extends from the long outer dorsal longitudinal muscle and connects to the posterior region of the leg, fusing with muscles t1b, t1c, and τ1b from the lateral musculature, forming a sheet-like muscle in the distal part of the posterior region of the leg (Fig. 4c). In addition, muscle α fuses with muscles τ1a and e*1 and becomes part of the sheet-like muscle in the distal part of the first leg.

A total of nine muscles with dorsal and lateral attachment were identified for the second leg. Four of these muscles, i1, k1, l1 and m1, originate from the inner dorsal longitudinal muscle and three other, namely l*1, n1 and o1, from the outer dorsal longitudinal muscle (Fig. 4b, c). The second leg also receives muscles t1d and t2a from their respective attachment sites (Fig. 4c). Muscle t2a fuses into a distal sheet-like muscle.

In the third leg five muscles, namely p1, q1, q2, and u1, originate from the outer dorsal longitudinal muscle. The muscles p1 and q2 connect to the distal part of the leg, whereas q*1, q1 and u1 extend into the proximal part of the leg (Fig. 4a). The muscles t2b, τ3a and t3 also extend into the proximal part of the leg, whereas muscles τ3b and s1 connect and form a sheet-like muscle in the distal part of the leg (Fig. 4c).

The hind legs receive four dorsal muscles, w1, w2, w3 and w4, from attachment site W, which form a sheet-like muscle somewhat similar to the sheet-like muscles found in the other legs (Fig. 4a, c).

Musculature of the head region and gonopore

Muscles of the head include what we interpret as buccal muscles (Fig. 4a; bm). These muscles extend from the anteriormost region of the head towards the pharyngeal bulb (Fig. 4a). The pharyngeal bulb is located dorsally to the second ventromedian attachment site (Fig. 4a; pb). Musculature of the gonopore appears as a circular structure located near the seventh ventromedian attachment site (Fig. 4a; gm), whereas the musculature of the anus is located between the hind legs (Fig. 4a; am).

Discussion

The tardigrade somatic musculature can be divided into dorsal, lateral, and ventral muscle groups with the four leg pairs receiving muscles from all three groups [12, 25, 26, 30, 31, 32, 35]. Actinarctus doryphorus and Echiniscoides sigismundi share a common myoanatomical ground pattern with other tardigrades investigated so far. However, we also found significant differences in the more detailed architecture of the two species. A number of cuticular attachment sites pertaining to all three somatic muscle groups seem to have been lost in A. doryphorus and the musculature of the trunk generally appears reduced and simplified in this species as compared to other tardigrades, including other heterotardigrades. Our comparative analysis indicates that this reduction represents an apomorphic condition. In E. sigismundi, on the other hand, the somatic musculature seems to be composed of relatively thick muscle fibers—a feature that appears to be common to echiniscoidean heterotardigrades. Below we discuss the distinct musculature of the two anatomically very diverse heterotardigrades with reference to other tardigrades and internal phylogenetic relationships of Tardigrada.

Interestingly, the somatic musculature of A. doryphorus is composed of sarcomeres that in our fluorophore coupled phalloidin based stains show a clear striation pattern. Cross-striation is also seen in transmission electron microscopy of A. doryphorus, clearly revealing the presence of Z-lines consisting of small Z-discs within leg muscles (Fig. 2.9a in ref. [12]). Specifically, these Z-discs mark the boundaries between adjacent sarcomeres, providing an anchoring point for the phalloidin stained actin filaments. A similar striation pattern is seen in the heterotardigrade Batillipes pennaki as well [31, 39]. Our phalloidin stains also reveal gaps in the staining between sarcomeres in the musculature of E. sigismundi (see Additional file 2, Additional file 3 and Additional file 4), seemingly indicating that cross-striated somatic muscles is a feature shared by heterotardigrades. The somatic musculature of eutardigrades has been described as an intermediate condition between smooth and obliquely striated [40], whereas the musculature of the pharyngeal bulb, stylets and legs seem to be cross-striated in both heterotardigrades and eutardigrades [39, 41].

The myoanatomy of tardigrades shows a clear heteronomous metamerism. In particular, the musculature associated with the ventral attachment sites and legs exhibits a metameric pattern. Specifically, the ventral musculature in all tardigrades investigated so far shows a repeating pattern centered around 5–7 ventromedian attachment sites in addition to a number of ventrolateral attachment sites. The comparison between ventromedian attachment sites, across Tardigrada, indicates that there has been a reduction in the number of these sites within several groups of the paraphyletic heterotardigrade order Arthrotardigrada (Fig. 5). Moreover, in many tardigrade species these originally paired sites appear to have fused during their evolutionary history. For example, in all investigated heterotardigrades as well as in Milnesium tardigradum, ventromedian attachment site 7 is unfused, indicating that the fused condition of this attachment site, as observed in eutardigrades, is most probably an apomorphic condition (Fig. 5). The reduction in the number as well as fusion of ventromedian attachments sites thus seems to represent a derived condition.
Fig. 5

Schematic comparison of the ventromedian attachment sites and their associated muscles in tardigrades. Representation of Actinarctus doryphorus (this study), Echiniscoides sigismundi (this study), Batillipes pennaki [31], Milnesium tardigradum [30], Hypsibius exemplaris [32], Halobiotus crispae [35], Richtersius coronifer [25] and Paramacrobiotus richtersi [26] with tree topology and taxa names following recent taxonomic and phylogenetic assessments [1, 11, 13, 42]

Five ventromedian attachment sites (sites 1,3,5,6,7), all unfused, were recognized in A. doryphorus, a condition accompanied with relatively few ventral leg muscles. In addition, muscles connecting the ventral longitudinal muscle to ventromedian attachment sites seem to be lacking in this species. In marked contrast, in E. sigismundi several muscles connecting the ventral longitudinal musculature and the ventromedian attachment sites, such as muscles 1iii-1 and 5a can be seen in Fig. 4a. Interestingly, it has been suggested that B. pennaki—another arthrotardigrade—in reality only has four true ventromedian attachment sites (sites 1,3,5,7), as the positions of sites 2, 4 and 6 are hard to discern [31]. B. pennaki, however, possesses a higher number of ventral muscles, as compared to A. doryphorus. As compared to the situation in A. doryphorus and B. pennaki, the 7 ventromedian attachment sites in E. sigismundi are arranged in a pattern that is more similar to that found in eutardigrades. Based on results from our comparative analyses, we propose that the presence of seven unfused ventromedian attachment sites is a condition that represents the ground pattern of Tardigrada. While many ventromedian attachment sites are fused in Eutardigrada, unfused sites are also commonly found among the members of this class. For example, in Halobiotus crispae (Halobiotidae) the fifth attachment site is unfused [35] and in another eutardigrade, Richtersius coronifer (Richtersiidae), both the third and the fifth attachment sites are unfused [25]. According to Schmidt-Rhaesa & Kulessa [30] Milnesium tardigradum seems to exhibit alternating unfused (1, 3, 5 and 7) and fused (2, 4, and 6) ventromedian attachment sites. These observations were more recently corroborated by Marchioro and co-workers [26], though these authors described the first ventromedian attachment site as fused in their analysis of M. tardigradum (see Fig. 3.B in [26]).

The relatively simple ventral trunk musculature of A. doryphorus includes a conspicuous thick ventral muscle composed of only four large sarcomeres that span the entire length of the trunk, attaching at three intermediate attachment points (c,d,f). Interestingly, in A. doryphorus the position of this ventral longitudinal muscle seems to have a more ventral position relative to the leg muscles than previously reported from other tardigrades. In the head region of A. doryphorus the ventral musculature is composed of a two-sarcomere inner and a three-sarcomere thick outer band that connect to the buccal musculature and to the clavae (Fig. 2a). Noticeably, phalloidin staining was found in the proximal part of all head appendages, both cirri and clavae, as well as in cirri of the trunk. In addition, A. doryphorus has a conspicuous and well-developed leg musculature and a delicate dorsal longitudinal musculature composed of two strands that extend into the head region.

Generally, echiniscoidean heterotardigrades, including Echiniscoides sigismundi, appear to have thicker, but also fewer muscles as compared to eutardigrades [current study; 26]. Within Echiniscoidea we found that the musculature of E. sigismundi is quite similar to that described for Echiniscus testudo [26]. However, it seems that E. sigismundi has only one thick ventral longitudinal muscle, whereas E. testudo has two that fuse at the attachment site L and remain so until terminating in attachment site a [26]. The ventromedian attachment sites and the ventral leg muscles of these two species, only differ slightly in selected structures. One of these differences is related to the third ventromedian attachment site, in which E. sigismundi differs from E. testudo by having a muscle, 3iii (Fig. 4a), extending to intermediate attachment site d (equivalent to attachment site L in E. testudo), whereas E. testudo has a muscle extending to intermediate attachment site K (equivalent to attachment site c in E. sigismundi) [26]. Furthermore, the fourth leg pair also differs between the two species. In E. testudo the fourth leg pair receives one muscle from the dorsal musculature and one muscle from the lateral musculature [26]. However, in E. sigismundi the fourth leg pair receives four muscles from the dorsal musculature (Fig. 4, w1-w4) and the muscle from the lateral musculature connects with intermediate attachment site g (Fig. 4a, 8a). Marchioro and colleagues [26] suggested that the thickness and reduction in number of muscles in E. testudo is related to the development of sclerotized cuticular plates. However, our study contradicts this hypothesis showing that the musculature of E. sigismundi, a species that lacks sclerotized cuticular plates, is as thick as that of E. testudo, if not thicker. This could thus be an indication that the condition of having thicker, fewer muscles is an apomorphy for echiniscoideans.

Conclusions

Tardigrades have a complex myoanatomy that reflects the evolution of the phylum and its lineages as well as adaptations among specific species. In the current analysis we provide new myonatomical data on Actinarctus doryphorus (Tanarctidae) and Echiniscoides sigismundi (Echiniscoididae) highlighting features that characterize the two anatomically very distinct heterotardigrade species. Generally, the trunk musculature of A. doryphorus appears reduced and simplified as compared to other tardigrades, including other heterotardigrades. Our comparative analysis indicates that this reduction represents an apomorphic condition. In addition, cross-striation seems to be a feature common to the somatic muscles of heterotardigrades. A common feature to E. sigismundi and other echiniscoidean heterotardigrades seems to be the presence of relatively thick somatic muscle fibers. In our analyses we have focused on the ventral musculature of the trunk and we propose that 7 unfused ventromedian attachment sites are part of the ground pattern of tardigrades. The ventromedian attachment sites seem especially useful for comparative studies, as they seem to possess traits with value for phylogenetic analysis at several taxonomic levels. Specifically, the arrangement and structural pattern of these sites differs in particular details between classes, orders and families. In the future, a deeper understanding of the tardigrade myoanatomical ground pattern will require more investigations in order to include all major tardigrade lineages.

Methods

Collection and preservation of specimens

Specimens of adult Actinarctus doryphorus ocellatus Renuad-Mornant, 1971 (Fig. 1) used for CLSM and SEM were obtained from clean, coarse shell gravel collected off the coast of Roscoff, France [43], in a location known as Trezen ar Skoden between 2011 and 2013. The samples were taken with a Sanders dredge, at about 50 m water depth, through several transects with most specimens being retrieved from the following position: 48°45′563″N, 04°05′563″W to 48°45′560″N, 04°05′463″W. The sediment samples were soaked and stirred in freshwater, to cause the release of the meiofauna from the sediment grains by osmotic shock. The meiofauna was subsequently extracted by decantation through a 45 μm mesh net, transferred to Petri dishes with filtered seawater and sorted out using a stereomicroscope. For CLSM, specimens were fixed for 1 h at room temperature (RT) in 3–4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS; pH 7.4). Afterwards, all specimens were washed 3 × 15 min in PBS containing 0.1% sodium azide (NaN3) and stored at 4 °C. The specimens used for SEM were fixed for 1 h at RT in a 2.2% aldehyde fixative (1.2% PFA; 1% glutaraldehyde) in 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer containing 0.05 M sucrose (pH 7.4). The specimens were subsequently transferred to and stored at 5 °C in the sodium cacodylate buffer before being post fixed in 1% OsO4 in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 7.4) for 1 h at RT.

Specimens of Echiniscoides sigismundi Schultze, 1865 (Fig. 3) were sampled intertidally at Lynæs, Denmark (55°56.42′N, 11°51.15′E) in the period 2011–2013 by collecting barnacles of the species Semibalanus balanoides Linnaeus, 1767. The barnacles were gently broken apart, and subsequently freshwater shocked in order to expose the tardigrades living on their shells. E. sigismundi were located using a dissection microscope and relaxed in ddH2O for app. 30 min before fixation in 4% PFA in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4) for app. 1 h, at RT for CLSM or in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 2 h for SEM.

Phalloidin staining and confocal laser scanning microscopy

PFA-fixed specimens were washed 3 × 15 min in 0.1 M PBS and subsequently permeabilized overnight at 4 °C in 0.1 M PBS containing Triton X-100 (PBT, 5% for Actinarctus doryphorus and 1% for Echiniscoides sigismundi). The specimens were then stained in a 1:40 dilution of Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated phalloidin (Molecular Probes and Invitrogen) in PBT, for 24 h (A doryphorus) or 72 h (E. sigismundi) at 4 °C. The stained samples were washed in PBS (3 × 15 min) and mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) or Fluoromount G (SouthernBiotech) antifade mounting medium on glass slides. A total number of 15 specimens of A. doryphorus and five specimens of E. sigismundi were investigated by CLSM. The fluorescence preparations were analyzed with a Leica DM 5000 CS microscope equipped with a Leica DM 5000 SP5 confocal laser scanning unit and a Leica TCS SP5 X microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Maximum projections of the image series were processed and edited with the 3D reconstruction software IMARIS (Bitplane AG, Zürich, Switzerland).

Scanning electron microscopy

Fixed specimens for scanning electron microscopy were dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol, CO2-critical point dried (Autosamdri-815 critical point dryer, Tousimis Research Corporation, MD, USA) and coated with platinum-palladium (JEOL FC-2300 HR sputter coater, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Afterwards, tardigrades were examined and digitally photographed with a JEOL JSM-6335F field emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the technical support offered by the staff at Roscoff Marine Station.

Authors’ contributions

KAH and NM conceived the study. RCN, RMK, DKP, NM and AJ sampled and extracted tardigrades for the analyses. RCN and NM fixed specimens for CLSM and SEM. KAH and AJ performed SEM. RCN, DKP and KAH performed CLSM and 3D imaging. RMK performed LM. DKP and KAH prepared the figures. DKP, KAH, RCN and NM wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Funding to support collection in Roscoff was provided by EU programme ASSEMBLE- grant agreement no. 227799. Funding further came from the Carlsberg Foundation (2011_01_0539) and Independent Research Fund Denmark (DFF – 4090-00145). The funding bodies had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, or preparation of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Tardigrades are neither endangered nor protected or subject to regulation by European legislation. Nevertheless, when sampling we do our best to avert unnecessary disturbance of habitats and we aim at using the minimum number of specimens.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

12862_2019_1527_MOESM1_ESM.mov (2.5 mb)
Additional file 1. Movie of CLSM z-stacks used for the images shown in Fig. 2.
12862_2019_1527_MOESM2_ESM.mov (5.3 mb)
Additional file 2. Movie of CLSM z-stacks used for image shown in Fig. 4a.
12862_2019_1527_MOESM3_ESM.mov (3 mb)
Additional file 3. Movie of CLSM z-stacks used for image shown in Fig. 4b.
12862_2019_1527_MOESM4_ESM.mov (5.2 mb)
Additional file 4. Movie of CLSM z-stacks used for image shown in Fig. 4c.

References

  1. 1.
    Degma P, Guidetti R. Tardigrade Taxa. In: Schill RO, editor. Water bears: the biology of Tardigrades. Zoological monographs, vol. 2. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 371–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Møbjerg N, Halberg K, Jørgensen A, Persson DK, Bjørn M, Ramløv H, et al. Survival in extreme environments - on the current knowledge of adaptations in tardigrades. Acta Physiol. 2011;202:409–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guidetti R, Møbjerg N. Environmental adaptations: Encystment and Cyclomorphosis. In: Schill RO, editor. Water bears: the biology of Tardigrades. Zoological monographs, vol. 2. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 249–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wełnicz W, Grohme M, Kaczmarek Ł, Schill RO, Frohme M. Anhydrobiosis in tardigrades - the last decade. J Insect Physiol. 2011;57:577–83.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nelson DR, Bartels PJ, Guil N. Tardigrade Ecology. In: Schill RO, editor. Water bears: the biology of Tardigrades. Zoological monographs, vol. 2. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 163–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McInnes SJ, Pugh PJA. Tardigrade Biogeography. In: Schill RO, editor. Water bears: the biology of Tardigrades. Zoological monographs, vol. 2. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 115–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giribet G, Edgecombe GD. Current understanding of Ecdysozoa and its internal phylogenetic relationships. Integr Comp Biol. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icx072.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borner J, Rehm P, Schill RO, Ebersberger I, Burmester T. A transcriptome approach to ecdysozoan phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014;80:79–87.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jørgensen A, Faurby S, Hansen JG, Møbjerg N, Kristensen RM. Molecular phylogeny of Arthrotardigrada (Tardigrada). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010;54:1006–15.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sands C, McInnes S, Marley N, Goodall-Copestake W, Convey P, Linse K. Phylum Tardigrada: an "individual" approach. Cladistics. 2008;24:861–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jørgensen A, Kristensen RM, Møbjerg N. Phylogeny and integrative taxonomy of Tardigrada. In: Schill RO, editor. Water bears: the biology of Tardigrades. Zoological monographs, vol. 2. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Møbjerg N, Jørgensen A, Kristensen RM, Neves RC. Morphology and functional anatomy. In: Schill RO, editor. Water bears: the biology of Tardigrades. Zoological monographs, vol. 2. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 57–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guil N, Jørgensen A, Kristensen RM. An upgraded comprehensive multilocus phylogeny of the Tardigrada tree of life. Zool Scr. 2019;48:120–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guidetti R, Bertolani R. Phylogenetic relationships in the Macrobiotidae (Tardigrada : Eutardigrada : Parachela). Zool Anz. 2001;240:371–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guidetti R, Altiero T, Hansen JG. A new species of freshwater tardigrades from Disko Island (Greenland) increases an unsolved paradox in tardigrade systematics. Hydrobiologia. 2006;558:69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jørgensen A, Møbjerg N, Kristensen RM. Phylogeny and evolution of the Echiniscidae (Echiniscoidea, Tardigrada) - an investigation of the congruence between molecules and morphology. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 2011;49:6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jørgensen A. Cladistic analysis of the Echiniscidae Thulin, 1928 (Tardigrada: Heterotardigrada: Echiniscoidea). Steenstrupia. 2000;25:11–23.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kristensen RM. Generic revision of the Echiniscidae (Heterotardigrada), with a discussion of the origin of the family. In: Bertolani R, editor. Biology of Tardigrades. Selected symposia and monographs UZI 1. Modena: Mucchi; 1987. p. 261–335.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Renaud-Mornant J. Species diversity in marine Tardigrada. In: Nelson D, editor. Third international Symposia on Tardigrada; Johnson City, Tennessee, USA. Tennessee: East Tennessee State University Press; 1980. p. 149–77.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schuster RO, Nelson DR, Grigarick AA, Christenberry D. Systematic criteria of the Eutardigrada. Trans Am Microsc Soc. 1980;99:284–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pollock L. New marine tardigrades from hawaiian beach sand and phylogeny of the family Halechiniscidae. Invertebr Biol. 1995;114:220–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guidetti R, Schill RO, Bertolani R, Dandekar T, Wolf M. New molecular data for tardigrade phylogeny, with the erection of Paramacrobiotus gen. Nov. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 2009;47:315–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guil N, Giribet G. A comprehensive molecular phylogeny of tardigrades adding genes and taxa to a poorly resolved phylum-level phylogeny. Cladistics. 2012;28:21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fujimoto S, Jørgensen A, Hansen JG. A molecular approach to arthrotardigrade phylogeny (Heterotardigrada, Tardigrada). Zool Scr. 2017;46:496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Halberg KA, Jørgensen A, Møbjerg N. Desiccation tolerance in the tardigrade Richtersius coronifer relies on muscle mediated structural reorganization. PLoS One. 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085091.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marchioro T, Rebecchi L, Cesari M, Hansen JG, Viotti G, Guidetti R. Somatic musculature of Tardigrada: phylogenetic signal and metameric patterns. Zool J Linnean Soc. 2013;169:580–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mayer G, Kauschke S, Rudiger J, Stevenson P. Neural markers reveal a one-segmented head in tardigrades (water bears). PLoS One. 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059090.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Persson DK, Halberg KA, Jørgensen A, Møbjerg N, Kristensen RM. Neuroanatomy of Halobiotus crispae (Eutardigrada: Hypsibiidae): Tardigrade brain structure supports the clade Panarthropoda. J Morphol. 2012;273:1227–45.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Persson DK, Halberg KA, Jørgensen A, Møbjerg N, Kristensen RM. Brain anatomy of the marine tardigrade Actinarctus doryphorus (Arthrotardigrada). J Morphol. 2014;275:173–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Kulessa J. Muscular architecture of Milnesium tardigradum and Hypsibius sp. (Eutardigrada, Tardigrada) with some data on Ramazottius oberhaeuseri. Zoomorphology. 2007;126:265–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schulze C, Schmidt-Rhaesa A. Organisation of the musculature of Batillipes pennaki (Arthrotardigrada, Tardigrada). Meiofauna. Mar. 2011;19:195–207.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smith FW, Jockusch EL. The metameric pattern of Hypsibius dujardini (Eutardigrada) and its relationship to that of other panarthropods. Front Zool. 2014;11:66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marcus E. Zur Anatomie und Ökologie mariner Tardigraden. Zool Jahrb Abt Anat Ontog Tiere. 1927;53:487–558.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Müller J. Zur vergleichenden Myologie der Tardigraden. Z Wiss Zool. 1936;147:171–204.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Halberg KA, Persson DK, Møbjerg N, Wanninger A, Kristensen RM. Myoanatomy of the marine tardigrade Halobiotus crispae (Eutardigrada: Hypsibiidae). J Morphol. 2009;270:996–1013.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schulz E. Actinarctus doryphorus nov. gen. nov. spec., ein merkwürdiger Tradigrad aus der Nordsee. Zool Anz. 1935;111:285–8.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    D'Addabbo Gallo M, Pietanza R, D'Addabbo R, Morone de Lucia M, Grimaldi de Zio S. A redescription of Actinarctus doryphorus (Tardigrada, Heterotardigrada). Cah Biol. Mar. 1999;40:21–7.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schultze M. Echiniscus sigismundi ein Arctiscoide der Nordsee. Arch Mikrosk Anat. 1865;1:428–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kristensen RM. On the structure of Batillipes noerrevangi Kristensen, 1978. II. The muscle-attachments and the true cross-striated muscles. Zool Anz. 1978;200:173–84.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Walz B. The fine structure of somatic muscles of Tardigrada. Cell Tissue Res. 1974;149:81–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Eibye-Jacobsen J. On the nature of pharyngeal muscle cells in the Tardigrada. Zool J Linnean Soc. 1996;116:123–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gąsiorek P, Stec D, Morek W, Michalczyk Ł. Deceptive conservatism of claws: distinct phyletic lineages concealed within Isohypsibioidea (Eutardigrada) revealed by molecular and morphological evidence. Contrib Zool. 2019;88:78–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Renaud-Mornant J. Campagne d'essais du «Jean Charcot» (3-8 décembre 1968) 7. Meiobenthos. I. Données générales. Bull Mus Natl Hist Nat. 1970;42:745–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural History Museum of Denmark, Department of BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen ØDenmark
  2. 2.Present Address: Department of Chemistry and Molecular BiologyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  3. 3.Section for Cell- & Neurobiology, Department of BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen ØDenmark
  4. 4.Department of BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen ØDenmark

Personalised recommendations