Nanoscale Research Letters

, 13:234 | Cite as

A Convenient and Effective Method to Deposit Low-Defect-Density nc-Si:H Thin Film by PECVD

  • Yuwei Wang
  • Hong Liu
  • Wenzhong Shen
Open Access
Nano Express


Hydrogenated nanocrystalline silicon (nc-Si:H) thin film has received a great deal of attention as a promising material for flat panel display transistors, solar cells, etc. However, the multiphase structure of nc-Si:H leads to many defects. One of the major challenges is how to reduce the defects conveniently. In this work, we developed a simple and effective method to deposit low-defect-density nc-Si:H thin film. This method is simply by tuning the deposition pressure in a high-pressure range in plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) process. Microstructures of the nc-Si:H were characterized by Raman, AFM, and SEM. Furthermore, we focused on the defect density which was the key characteristic for photovoltaic materials and achieved the defect density of 3.766 × 1016 cm−3. This defect density is lower than that of previous studies on the fabrication of low-defect-density nc-Si:H by other complex methods in PECVD process. The minority carrier lifetime of nc-Si:H is thus greatly improved. Moreover, we demonstrated the mechanism about the effect of deposition pressure on the ion bombardment and proved that the defect density is the key characteristic for nc-Si:H photovoltaic material.


Hydrogenated nanocrystalline silicon PECVD Deposition pressure Ion bombardment Defect density 



Atomic force microscope


Direct current


Atomic hydrogen


Hydrogenated nanocrystalline silicon


Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition


Scanning electron microscopy




An important landmark in the progress of thin film silicon technology is the development of high-quality hydrogenated nanocrystalline silicon (nc-Si:H). Compared with hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H), nc-Si:H has much higher mobility, much better response at wavelengths greater than 800 nm, and is much less susceptible to the Staebler-Wronski degradation [1, 2]. nc-Si:H thin film can be deposited using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), which makes it compatible with well-developed integrated circuit industry. Therefore, nc-Si:H thin film has a wide application in various devices, such as thin film transistors [3], photodetectors [4], and solar cells [5].

However, as a multiphase material, nc-Si:H thin film has its own defects such as voids and dangling bonds at the interfaces of crystals/amorphous phase and between crystals. It is known that the atomic hydrogen is the key to the deposition of high-quality nc-Si:H which has less defects [6]. The atomic hydrogen can saturate dangling bonds, and it has been pointed out [7] that the atomic hydrogen on the growing surface gives rise to crystal growth at a temperature much lower than the melting one. Thus, more atomic hydrogen is beneficial for the deposition of high-quality nc-Si:H. In order to increase the atomic hydrogen flux on the growing surface, high hydrogen dilution or silane depletion would be essential for nc-Si:H growth.

Yielding silane depletion in PECVD is to raise radio frequency (RF) power [7]. But simply increasing the power will dramatically increase the ion bombardment on the growing surface, which will probably lead to more defects. Thus, a direct current (DC) bias should be used to suppress the ion bombardment. However, if the RF power is increased to obtain more atomic hydrogen, the DC bias should be changed as well. Otherwise, the DC bias cannot relieve the ion bombardment effectively. And the suitable DC bias under certain RF power cannot be found without the vast experiments. Another method of raising the atomic hydrogen content is to increase the deposition pressure. Electron-molecule collision frequency increases with the deposition pressure. It makes the dissociation rate of SiH4 and H2 rising. A dissociation of SiH4 and H2 generates the atomic hydrogen [8]. As a result, increasing deposition pressure could raise the atomic hydrogen content.

In this paper, we thus propose to tune the deposition pressure in a high-pressure range to obtain more atomic hydrogen (the conventional deposition pressure is 50–100 Pa). It is a convenient and effective method in the PECVD process. By using this method, the film deposited under a certain pressure has a lower defect density in comparison with previous studies on the fabrication of low-defect-density nc-Si:H [5, 9, 10]. And a high minority carrier lifetime has been achieved. In addition, compared with the previous reports on the effect of different deposition pressures on the macroscopic or general properties of the samples [11, 12], we have significantly extended the range of deposition pressure and focused on its effect not only on the general properties (e.g., crystallinity) but also on the defect density and minority carrier lifetime which are key characteristics for high-quality photovoltaic material. Furthermore, we have demonstrated the mechanism about the effect of deposition pressure on the ion bombardment, while previous reports just gave general discussions. And we have further proven that the ion bombardment is not the weaker the better for the film growth (the degree of ion bombardment should be appropriate). In the end, we have proved that the defect density is the key characteristic for nc-Si:H photovoltaic material.


The nc-Si:H thin films were grown on Corning glass by a capacitively coupled PECVD system (the schematic diagram of the reactor is shown in Fig. 1a) at different deposition pressure. The deposition pressure was increased from 150 to 1050 Pa, with a step of 150 Pa. All the samples were deposited using RF of 13.56 MHz and power density of 0.32 W/cm2, with a total gas (SiH4 and H2) flow rate of 110 sccm (the SiH4 concentration was 0.727%). The substrate temperature was kept at 250 °C, and the deposition time was 2 h.
Fig. 1

The schematic diagram of a the PECVD reactor and b the distribution of potential between electrodes (Vp, the plasma potential; V, the root mean square RF potential)

The crystallinity Xc was calculated from Raman spectra measured with a UV micro-Raman spectrometer (Jobin Yvon LabRam, HR800) in backscattering mode using an Ar-ion laser at 514.5 nm. The laser power density was kept at 1 mW/mm2 to avoid any beam-induced crystallization. The defect density of the samples was characterized by the spin density Ns, which was calculated from the results measured by an electron spin resonance (ESR) spectrometer (Bruker, EMX-8X-band) at 9.8 GHz and 5 mW. The effective minority carrier lifetime τ was measured using a Semilab WT-1200A. The surface morphology of these films was observed by an atomic force microscope (AFM, SII Nanonavi E-Sweep), and the micromorphology was observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Sirion 200).

Results and Discussion

Structural Investigation by Raman Analysis

For the structural investigation of the nc-Si:H thin film deposited under various pressure, micro-Raman measurements were carried out. In Fig. 2, four representative samples were chosen to show the Raman spectra. They are deposited under 300 Pa, 450 Pa, 750 Pa, and 1050 Pa, respectively. Each spectrum (open circles) under certain pressure can be deconvoluted into three Gaussian peaks: (1) a broad Gaussian distribution around 480 cm−1, which is attributed to the transverse optical (TO1) mode of amorphous silicon; (2) a peak near 520 cm−1, which belongs to the asymmetric TO2 vibrational mode of crystalline silicon [13, 14]; and (3) the peak around 506 cm−1 which is attributed to the intermediate range order [1, 15]. The crystallinity (Xc) in nc-Si:H can be calculated by [16, 17]:
$$ {X}_c=\left({I}_{520}+{I}_{506}\right)/\left({I}_{520}+{I}_{506}+\gamma {I}_{480}\right) $$
Fig. 2

Raman spectra and their deconvolution of typical samples deposited under 300 Pa (a), 450 Pa (b), 750 Pa (c), and 1050 Pa (d) and the calculated crystallinity of nc-Si:H thin films deposited under different pressures (e)

where γ is the ratio of the integrated Raman cross-section for c-Si to a-Si (γ = 1 [17, 18]), and I520, I506, I480 are the integrated intensity of the peaks observed at 520, 506, 480 cm−1, respectively. The crystallinity as a function of different deposition pressures is plotted in Fig. 2e.

It is known that the atomic hydrogen (H), is mainly generated from the following two collisions in hydrogen diluted silane plasma [8]:
  1. a.

    The primary electron-silane reaction

$$ {\mathrm{SiH}}_4+\mathrm{e}\to {\mathrm{SiH}}_3+\mathrm{H} $$
  1. b.

    The electron-hydrogen reaction

$$ {\mathrm{H}}_2+\mathrm{e}\to \mathrm{H}+\mathrm{H} $$
According to formulae S(1) and S(2) in the Additional file 1, we can get \( {n}_e=\frac{P}{RT}\bullet \mu \) (P, deposition pressure; R, ideal gas constant; T, absolute temperature of gas before discharge; μ, ionization rate; and ne, electron density). μ is constant because of the unchanged RF power, and T is constant as well. The electron density ne thus increases with the deposition pressure P. According to chemical Eqs. (2) and (3), the density of H which is produced in the plasma increases with ne. This is the theoretical analysis in an ideal condition. Discharge process is so complex that the analysis on discharge process (i.e., plasma diagnoses) becomes an independent discipline. The change of H with the deposition pressure in the real condition should be measured through plasma diagnoses. Yang et al. measured the intensity of \( {H}_{\alpha}^{\ast } \) (\( {I}_{H_{\alpha}^{\ast }} \)) by optical emission spectra (OES) and demonstrate \( {I}_{H_{\alpha}^{\ast }} \) first increases then decreases [19]. According to previous plasma diagnoses reports, the intensity of \( {H}_{\alpha}^{\ast } \) indicates the amount of atomic hydrogen [20, 21]. Thus, the density of H in the plasma first increases then decreases when the deposition pressure continues increasing. This trend is a little different to our theoretical analysis. The difference is related to the secondary reaction of H:
$$ \mathrm{H}+{\mathrm{SiH}}_4\to {\mathrm{H}}_2+{\mathrm{SiH}}_3 $$
where SiH4 is the one which is not decomposed, i.e., the remaining SiH4. In our experiment, the deposition pressure is increased by reducing the outflow of gases including SiH4. In other words, it is equivalent to increase the supplement of SiH4.When the deposition pressure rises to a certain level, the speed of SiH4 supplement exceeds its decomposition speed. Thus, there are more amounts of SiH4 left. There is a distance for H from its escape out of the plasma to its arrival at the film-growing surface. H will react with the remaining SiH4 in this distance, as shown in the secondary chemical Eq. (4). The density of H thus decreases. As a result, the atomic hydrogen density first increases then decreases when the deposition pressure continues increasing. It is known that more amount of H is beneficial to deposition of low-defect-density nc-Si:H. Therefore, the defect density of nc-Si:H deposited in our experiment shows the same tendency of the atomic hydrogen density, i.e., the defect density first decreases then increases. The discussions about the trend of defect density in detail are shown in the latter section.

In Fig. 2e, it can be clearly seen that the crystallinity of nc-Si:H, Xc, increases with the deposition pressure. This indicates that increasing pressure can raise Xc. The crystallinity is not only affected by the atomic hydrogen but also influenced by the content of growth precursor SiHn (n = 1,2,3, mainly n = 3) which can be indicated by SiH* in OES measurement [21, 22]. Hsieh et al. have demonstrated that \( {I}_{H_{\alpha}^{\ast }} \)/ISiH (the intensity ratio \( {H}_{\alpha}^{\ast } \)/SiH*) increases with the deposition pressure [20]. It is generally accepted that \( {I}_{H_{\alpha}^{\ast }} \)/ISiH is the index for Xc, i.e., Xc increases with the increase of \( {I}_{H_{\alpha}^{\ast }} \)/ISiH [21, 23]. Therefore, the \( {I}_{H_{\alpha}^{\ast }} \)/ISiH trend strongly support our result about the tendency of Xc.

The mean grain size d can also be deduced from Raman spectrum, according to the formula [24, 25]:
$$ d=2\pi \sqrt{B/\Delta \upnu} $$
where ∆ν is the frequency in unit of cm−1 shift, which was defined as the difference between the observed peak frequency value and that of the bulk Si. Using the usual value of B of 2.0 cm−1 nm2 [25], d = 4.07~4.50 nm.

Surface Morphology and the Mechanism About the Influence of the Deposition Pressure on the Ion Bombardment

Besides the structural analysis by Raman spectroscopy, the morphology of the samples was also characterized by AFM, as shown in Fig. 3. To detect the roughness evolution of the film surfaces, the root mean square (RMS) as a function of deposition pressure was depicted in Fig. 3h (RMS value was averaged over several different locations in each film). In Fig. 3h, RMS decreases as the deposition pressure increases. The increasing pressure causes an aggravated collision between particles and subsequent loss of kinetic energy when these particles reach the film-growing surface. Lower energy ions arriving at the film-growing surface lead to weaker ion bombardment. It suggests that the increasing pressure is beneficial to suppression of the ion bombardment, which has been also mentioned in the previous report [7]. However, the mechanism about the influence of the deposition pressure on the ion bombardment has not been demonstrated. It will be investigated as follows.
Fig. 3

AFM images of nc-Si:H thin films showing a surface morphology change by different deposition pressures. a 150 Pa, b 300 Pa, c 450 Pa, d 600 Pa, e 750 Pa, f 900 Pa, and g 1050 Pa. The craters in a and b are marked by dashed circles, and root mean square (RMS) roughness of film surfaces under different deposition pressures marked as h

The potential distribution between the two electrodes can be divided into three regions: plasma region in the center, anode sheath, and cathode sheath (see Fig. 1b). The ions which lead to ion bombardment must diffuse out of the plasma region and pass through the anode sheath. The potential of plasma is higher than that of any other sections of the reactor because electrons diffuse faster than ions. As our reactor wall is grounded, the potential of plasma is positive (see Fig. 1). Anions are thus trapped in the plasma region; only the neutral particles and cations can diffuse to the anode sheath and finally reach the film-growing surface. In other words, the ion bombardment in our experiment is caused by cations only. Cations pass through the anode sheath without collision as the width of the sheath is very small (the evidence in detail is shown in Additional file 1). As a result, cations are only accelerated by the electric field of the anode sheath when they enter the sheath. Therefore, the strength of ion bombardment depends only on cation’s initial velocity when they just enter the anode sheath (v0) and the degree of acceleration by the electric field of anode sheath afterward.

Firstly, the correlation of v0 with the deposition pressure will be analyzed. Particles including cations lose their kinetic energy in the plasma region due to the aggravating collision when the deposition pressure increases. So, v0 declines as the pressure increases. Then, the variation in the degree of acceleration by the electric field of the sheath with the deposition pressure will be demonstrated. It is known that [22]:
$$ {V}_p-{V}_f=\frac{k{T}_e}{2e}\left(\frac{m_i{T}_e}{m_e{T}_i}\right) $$
where me is the electron’s mass; mi is ion’s mass; Te and Ti are the temperature of electron and ion, respectively; Vp is the plasma potential; and Vf is the floating potential. As the substrate is suspended in our reactor, the voltage of the anode sheath, Vsheath is equal to Vp − Vf, then we have:
$$ {V}_{\mathrm{sheath}}=\frac{k{T}_e}{2e}\left(\frac{m_i{T}_e}{m_e{T}_i}\right) $$
In the plasma region, Te decreases as increasing deposition pressure aggravates the collision between the particles (including electrons and ions). Hsieh et al. have demonstrated that Te decreases with the increasing deposition pressure by the OES measurement [20]. This suggests that the trend of Te by our theoretical analysis is absolutely correct. Compared with Te, Ti decreases so little that it can be considered unchanged. As a result, Vsheath declines when the pressure increases according to Formula (6). It weakens the degree of acceleration by the anode sheath. Coupled with falling v0, we can draw a conclusion that the kinetic energy of cations that reaches the film-growing surface becomes much smaller when the pressure increases. In other words, increasing deposition pressure makes the ion bombardment effect weaker. Therefore, RMS of the film surface keeps decreasing from 150 to 1050 Pa. According to the previous report, the lower the ion energy, the better the crystallinity is [7]. It also supports the conclusion about the correlation between crystallinity and deposition pressure which we have already drawn. Moreover, the film surfaces which are deposited under much lower pressures (150 Pa and 300 Pa) are more rough, and we can see as well that these surfaces contain plenty of craters as shown in Fig. 4a, b. That is the consequence of strong ion bombardment. According to Fig. 3, we can apparently conclude that the film deposited under 450 Pa is the most compact (especially shown in Figs. 5c and 6d) and uniform.
Fig. 4

The ESR spectra of typical samples deposited under 300 Pa, 450 Pa, 750 Pa, 1050 Pa

Fig. 5

Dependence of spin density (a) and effective minority carrier lifetime (b) on different deposition pressures. The high-resolution AFM image (c) and SEM image (d) of nc-Si:H thin film deposited under 450 Pa

Fig. 6

Schematic diagram of particle diffusion on the growing surface

Defect Density and Electrical Property

The effect of the deposition pressure on the defect density of nc-Si:H thin film was investigated by ESR technique. Figure 4 shows the four ESR spectra of typical samples which were deposited under 300 Pa, 450 Pa, 750 Pa, 1050 Pa, respectively. The data of Fig. 5a are calculated from the ESR spectrum of each sample. As shown in Fig. 5a, when the pressure increases, the spin density first decreases then increases. There is a minimum at 450 Pa. According to the ESR principle, the number of unpaired spins is directly proportional to the density of neutral dangling bonds. These bonds mostly reside in the film-growing surface and constitute the steady-state defect of the film-growing surface, while the defect density in the resulting film is basically determined by these steady-state defect density [26]. Therefore, the results calculated from the ESR spectra are indeed the defect density of the resulting film. These results in Fig. 5a reveal that the defect density in nc-Si:H reaches a minimum at 450 Pa, which is 3.766 × 1016 cm−3. Chowdhury et al. studied how to fabricate low-defect-density nc-Si:H. When they used 13.56 MHz RF source, they did their best to achieve the low-defect density. The values were 1.1 × 1017 and 7.0 × 1016cm−3. When they used very-high-frequency (VHF) excitation source (54.24 MHz), they achieved the lowest defect density of 4.3 × 1016 cm−3 [10]. It is known that the ion energy in VHF plasma is low, and the density of ion flux is high. Due to these two factors, the thin film deposited by VHF-PECVD contains low-defect density and thus has high quality [27]. However, the defect density is higher than ours, and 54.24 MHz excitation source is much more expensive than its 13.56 MHz counterpart. In order to achieve low-defect density, Wen et al. additionally applied DC bias. However, the minimum is 4.0 × 1016 cm−3 [9]. Finding a suitable RF power is not easy, let alone an appropriate DC bias. The reason is that the DC bias should be tuned once the RF power is changed. Otherwise, the DC bias cannot relieve the ion bombardment effectively. By contrast, our method is simple. Recently, Jadhavar et al. have deposited a high-quality nc-Si:H by PECVD which has low-defect density. The defect density is about 8.75 × 1016 cm−3 [5]. Therefore, our method to achieve a low-defect-density thin film is convenient and effective. Taking it into consideration that the lower the defect density is, the higher the minority carrier lifetime should be, we directly carried out the measurement of the minority carrier lifetime. As shown in Fig. 5b, the effective minority carrier lifetime reaches its maximum at 450 Pa. The trend of minority carrier lifetime synchronizes with that of the defect density calculated from the ESR spectra. This reveals that the defect density of the films can be absolutely measured by ESR.

Relationship of Ion Bombardment and Defect Density

Increasing pressure can suppress the ion bombardment. In a sense, the defect density should drift down continuously from 150 to 1050 Pa. In fact, it decreases then increases. There is another factor that should not be ignored—the diffusion of H and SiH3 (in the plasma, the main film precursor is SiH3 [26]). The schematic diagram of particle diffusion on the growing surface is shown in Fig. 6. From 150 to 1050 Pa, the kinetic energy of particles reduces. The ion bombardment effect is certainly lower and lower. However, the kinetic energy of particles reduces significantly from 450 to 1050 Pa due to the increasing particle collision frequency. The atomic hydrogen, which is the key to deposition of high-quality nc-Si:H, loses its kinetic energy so much that it cannot diffuse further to saturate more dangling bonds, let alone its density begins to decrease, which is shown in the “Structural investigation by Raman analysis.” On the other hand, particles, including atomic hydrogen, lose their kinetic energy dramatically so that they cannot transfer more energy to the growing surface. Thus, the diffusion length of SiH3 precursor cannot be enhanced. It is known that if SiH3 absorbed on the surface could find the energetic favorable growing sites, an atomically more ordered structure is formed. But now, SiH3 has not enough diffusion length to find their energetic favorable growing sites. Therefore, the ordered structure cannot be formed. In other words, the deposited film has more defects. As a result, the spin density in Fig. 5a begins to rise from 450 Pa on the contrary. However, it is worth noting that the spin densities from 600 to 1050 Pa are still lower than the ones from 150 to 300 Pa. It is the result of the weaker ion bombardment. Furthermore, as a result of its reduced diffusion length, SiH3 precursor tends to pile up to form aggregates. As shown in Fig. 3, aggregates began to appear at 750 Pa, and they agglomerated gradually intensively when the deposition pressure continued to increase. According to the points above, the ion bombardment is not the weaker the better for the film growth. The degree of ion bombardment should be appropriate.

Defect Density: the Key Characteristic of nc-Si:H Photovoltaic Material

Crystallinity and defect density are both characteristics of nc-Si:H solar cell materials. The former increases with the deposition pressure. In a sense, the latter should keep declining. However, that is not the case. According to the Raman characterization, although the crystallinity increases, the variation of the grain size is very small (4.07~4.50 nm). It indicates that only the number of grains increases not the size of the grains. In these conditions, the volume of grain boundaries rises. It is known that grain boundaries are bulk defects and recombination centers. More grain boundaries will increase the defect density. When the crystallinity rises to a certain level, the negative effect of an increase in grain boundary volume on the defect density overcomes the positive effect of the rising number of grains. Therefore, the defect density does not keep decreasing as the crystallinity grows; on the contrary, it rises after the crystallinity reaches a certain level. This result suggests that nc-Si:H thin films with higher crystallinity do not necessarily have a better quality, which is confirmed by another research group. In recent years, it has been reported that the optimum nc-Si:H layer for solar cells is obtained near the phase transition boundary, i.e., the optimum is obtained just after the a-Si:H-to-nc-Si:H transition. The crystallinity of optimum nc-Si:H layers is not high [28, 29, 30]. Mukhopadhyay et al. have further demonstrated that nc-Si:H layers with high crystallinity, and thus low light-induced degradation, do not produce high-quality solar cells. The stabilized efficiency of cells deposited just after the a-Si:H-to-nc-Si:H transition is higher than the one of cells in which the i-layer has high crystallinity, although the former degrades more than the latter before stabilization [31]. Han et al. have further proven that light-induced degradation of nc-Si:H layer is introduced by the formation of metastable dangling bonds. While the light-induced structural change is a precursor process of metastable dangling bond formation [30]. The metastable dangling bond is one of the defects [32]. Therefore, the key characteristic for high-quality nc-Si:H photovoltaic materials is defect density rather than crystallinity, light stability, or other characteristics.


nc-Si:H thin films were deposited by varying the pressure between 150 and 1050 Pa. The range of deposition pressure is higher than the conventional deposition in the PECVD process. It is found that crystallinity increases and the roughness of the film surfaces decreases with an increase in deposition pressure. The mean grain size d = 4.07~4.50 nm. Furthermore, we focused on the influence of deposition pressure not only on the macroscopic or usual properties of samples but also the defect density and minority carrier lifetime which are more important characteristics. It is found that the defect density of samples firstly decreases then increases when the deposition pressure rises. The defect density reaches its minimum (3.766 × 1016 cm−3) at 450 Pa. It is lower than that of the previous studies on the fabrication of low-defect-density nc-Si:H thin films. This work provides a convenient and effective way of depositing low-defect-density nc-Si:H by PECVD. And we have demonstrated the mechanism about the effect of deposition pressure on the ion bombardment. Moreover, it is proven that the ion bombardment is not the weaker the better for the film growth. The degree of ion bombardment should be appropriate.



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61234005, 11474201, and 11674225).

Availability of Data and Materials

All data are fully available without restriction.

Authors’ Contributions

YWW designed the experiments and finished the sample fabrication and characterizations. HL modified the manuscript. WZS supervised all the projects. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

11671_2018_2641_MOESM1_ESM.docx (25 kb)
Additional file 1: Cations passing through the anode sheath without collision. (DOCX 25 kb)


  1. 1.
    Reddy NP, Gupta R, Agarwal SC (2014) Light induced degradation of amorphous silicon containing nanocrystalline silicon. AIP Adv 4(4):047124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guha S, Yang J, Yan B (2013) High efficiency multi-junction thin film silicon cells incorporating nanocrystalline silicon. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 119:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anutgan T, Anutgan M, Atilgan I (2018) Dual-mechanism modelling of instability in nanocrystalline silicon thin film transistors under prolonged gate-bias stress. Thin Solid Films 651:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martuza MA, Ghanbarzadeh S, Lee CH, Con C, Karim KS (2018) Nanocrystalline silicon lateral MSM photodetector for infrared sensing applications. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 65(2):584–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jadhavar A, Pawbake A, Waykar R, Waman V, Rondiya S, Shinde O et al (2016) Influence of RF power on structural optical and electrical properties of hydrogenated nano-crystalline silicon (nc-Si:H) thin films deposited by PE-CVD. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 27(12):12365–12373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amor SB, Atyaoui M, Bousbih R, Haddadi I, Dimassi W, Ezzaouia H (2014) Effect of substrate temperature on microstructure and optical properties of hydrogenated nanocrystalline Si thin films grown by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Sol Energy 108:126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kondo M (2003) Microcrystalline materials and cells deposited by RF glow discharge. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 78(1–4):543–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo LH, Lin RM (2000) Studies on the formation of microcrystalline silicon with PECVD under low and high working pressure. Thin Solid Films 376:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wen C, Xu H, Liu H, Li Z, Shen W (2013) Passivation of nanocrystalline silicon photovoltaic materials employing a negative substrate bias. Nanotechnology 24(45):455602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chowdhury A, Mukhopadhyay S, Ray S (2008) Fabrication of low defect density nanocrystalline silicon absorber layer and its application in thin-film solar cell. Thin Solid Films 516(20):6858–6862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li Z, Zhang X, Han G (2010) Electrical and optical properties of boron-doped nanocrystalline silicon films deposited by PECVD. Physica Status Solidi (a) 207(1):144–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Filonovich SA, Águas H, Bernacka-Wojcik I, Gaspar C, Vilarigues M, Silva LB et al (2009) Highly conductive p-type nanocrystalline silicon films deposited by RF-PECVD using silane and trimethylboron mixtures at high pressure. Vacuum 83(10):1253–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Achiq A, Rizk R, Gourbilleau F, Madelon R, Garrido B, Pérez Rodríguez A et al (1998) Effects of prior hydrogenation on the structure and properties of thermally nanocrystallized silicon layers. J Applied Physics 83(11):5797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ma D, Liu J, Zhang W (2017) The effect of negative bias on the preparation conditions and structural changes in boron-doped nanocrystalline silicon thin films prepared on PET. J Non-Cryst Solids 475:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chowdhury A, Mukhopadhyay S, Ray S (2009) Fabrication of thin film nanocrystalline silicon solar cell with low light-induced degradation. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 93(5):597–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patra C, Das D. Highly conducting p-type nanocrystalline silicon thin films preparation without additional hydrogen dilution. InAIP Conf Proc 2018;1942:050116Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Droz C, Vallat-Sauvain E, Bailat J, Feitknecht L, Meier J, Shah A (2004) Relationship between Raman crystallinity and open-circuit voltage in microcrystalline silicon solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 81(1):61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pan HB, Ding JN, Cheng GG, Cao BG (2014) Experimental investigation of microstructure and piezoresistive properties of phosphorus-doped hydrogenated nanocrystalline silicon thin hilms prepared by PECVD. Key Eng Mater 609:208–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang H, Wu C, Huang J, Ding R, Zhao Y, Geng X et al (2005) Optical emission spectroscopy investigation on very high frequency plasma and its glow discharge mechanism during the microcrystalline silicon deposition. Thin Solid Films 472(1–2):125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hsieh JH, Liang HC, Setsuhara Y, Li C (2013) Deposition and characterization of a- and μc-Si:H thin films by ICP-CVD system with internal antennas. Surf Coat Technol 231:550–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ram SK, Kroely L, Kasouit S, Bulkin P, Cabarrocas PR (2010) Plasma emission diagnostics during fast deposition of microcrystalline silicon thin films in matrix distributed electron cyclotron resonance plasma CVD system. Physica Status Solidi (c) 7:553–556 NA-NAGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lieberman MA, Lichtenberg AJ (2005) Principles of plasma discharges and materials processing, Second edn. WileyGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lien S-Y, Chang Y-Y, Cho Y-S, Wang J-H, Weng K-W, Chao C-H et al (2011) Characterization of HF-PECVD a-Si:H thin film solar cells by using OES studies. J Non-Cryst Solids 357(1):161–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Amor SB, Bousbih R, Ouertani R, Dimassi W, Ezzaouia H (2014) Correlation between microstructure and properties of hydrogenated Si thin films grown by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition under different hydrogen flow rates. Sol Energy 103:12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shim JH, Im S, Cho NH (2004) Nanostructural features of nc-Si:H thin films prepared by PECVD. Appl Surf Sci 234(1–4):268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Matsuda A, Takai M, Nishimoto T, Kondo M (2003) Control of plasma chemistry for preparing highly stabilized amorphous silicon at high growth rate. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 78(1–4):3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yan B, Yang J, Guha S, Gallagher A (1999) Analysis of plasma properties and deposition of amorphous silicon alloy solar cells using very high frequency glow discharge. Mat Res Soc Symp Proc 557:115–120Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shah AV, Meier J, Vallat-Sauvain E, Wyrsch N, Kroll U, Droz C et al (2003) Material and solar cell research in microcrystalline silicon. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 78(1–4):469–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Meillaud F, Vallat-Sauvain E, Niquille X, Dubey M, Bailat J, Shah A et al (2005) Light-induced degradation of thin film amorphous and microcrystalline silicon solar cells. Conference Record of the Thirty-first IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference. 1412–1415Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Han X, Wang Y, Xue J, Zhao S, Li Y, Geng X (2006) Stability of microcrystalline silicon materials under light soaking. Mater Sci Semicond Process 9(1–3):300–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mukhopadhyay S, Chowdhury A, Ray S (2008) Nanocrystalline silicon: a material for thin film solar cells with better stability. Thin Solid Films 516(20):6824–6828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shimizu K, Tabuchi T, Iida M, Okamoto H (1998) Photoinduced structural change and defect creation in hydrogenated amorphous silicon. J Non-Cryst Solids 227:267–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Artificial Structures and Quantum Control (Ministry of Education), Department of Physics and AstronomyShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations