This literature review aims to analyse the costing methodology in economic analyses of primary preventive physical activity programmes. It demonstrates the usability of a recently published theoretical framework in practice, and may serve as a guide for future economic evaluation studies and for decision making.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all relevant studies published before December 2009. All studies were analysed regarding their key economic findings and their costing methodology.
In summary, 18 international economic analyses of primary preventive physical activity programmes were identified. Many of these studies conclude that the investigated intervention provides good value for money compared with alternatives (no intervention, usual care or different programme) or is even cost-saving. Although most studies did provide a description of the cost of the intervention programme, methodological details were often not displayed, and savings resulting from the health effects of the intervention were not always included sufficiently.
This review shows the different costing methodologies used in the current health economic literature and compares them with a theoretical framework. The high variability regarding the costs assessment and the lack of transparency concerning the methods limits the comparability of the results, which points out the need for a handy minimal dataset of cost assessment.
Economics Costs and Cost Analyses Motor Activity Primary prevention Intervention Studies
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The investigation was supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the Competence Network of Obesity Research [Project: MEMORI: Multidisciplinary Early Modification of Obesity Risk (Grant: 01GI0826)]. The authors wish to thank especially R. Leidl and J. John for their valuable support (both at LMU Muenchen - Institute for Health Economics and Health Care Management).
Karmisholt K, Gyntelberg F, Gotzche PC: Physical activity for primary prevention of disease. Systematic reviews of randomised clinical trials.Dan Med Bull 2005, 52: 86–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Gardner MM, Robertson MC, Campbell AJ: Exercise in preventing falls and fall related injuries in older people: a review of randomised controlled trials.Br J Sports Med 2000, 34: 7–17. 10.1136/bjsm.34.1.7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Avenell A, Broom J, Brown TJ, Poobalan A, Aucott L, Stearns SC, Smith WC, Jung RT, Campbell MK, Grant AM: Systematic review of the long-term effects and economic consequences of treatments for obesity and implications for health improvement.Health Technol Assess 2004, 8: iii-iv. 1–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouris-Blazos A, Wahlqvist ML: Health economics of weight management: evidence and cost.Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2007,16(Suppl 1):329–338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hagberg LA, Lindholm L: Is promotion of physical activity a wise use of societal resources? Issues of cost-effectiveness and equity in health.Scand J Med Sci Sports 2005, 15: 304–312. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00415.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Shepard RJ: Current Perspectives on the Economics of Fitness and Sport with Particular Reference to Worksite Programmes.Sports Med 1989, 7: 286–309. 10.2165/00007256-198907050-00002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfenstetter SB, Wenig CM: Economic Evaluation and Transferability of Physical Activity Programmes in Primary Prevention: A Systematic Review.Int J Env Res Public Health 2010, 7: 1622–1648. 10.3390/ijerph7041622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfenstetter S: Conceptual framework for standard economic evaluation of physical activity programmes in primary prevention.Prevention Science 2011. Online First 19 Juli 2011Google Scholar
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG)): Allgemeine Methoden, Entwurf für Version 3.0 vom 15.11.2007 [in German]. In Book Allgemeine Methoden, Entwurf für Version 3.0 vom 15.11.2007 [in German]. City: Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG); 2007. (Editor ed.^eds.)Google Scholar
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.J Clin Epidemiol 2009, 62: 1006–1012. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Smith DH, Gravelle H: The practice of discounting in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions.Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001, 17: 236–243. 10.1017/S0266462300105094CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Graf von der Schulenburg JM, Greiner W, Jost F, Klusen N, Kubin M, Leidl R, Mittendorf T, Rebscher H, Schoeffski O, Vauth C, et al.: German recommendations on health economic evaluation: third and updated version of the Hanover Consensus.Value Health 2008, 11: 539–544. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00301.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE): Guideline Development Methods: Information for National Collaborating Centres and Guideline Developers. In Book Guideline Development Methods: Information for National Collaborating Centres and Guideline Developers. City: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2004. (Editor ed.^eds.)Google Scholar
Dzator JA, Hendrie D, Burke V, Gianguilio N, Gillam HF, Beilin LJ, Houghton S: A randomized trial of interactive group sessions achieved greater improvements in nutrition and physical activity at a tiny increase in cost.J Clin Epidemiol 2004, 57: 610–619. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.10.009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Elley R, Kerse N, Arroll B, Swinburn B, Ashton T, Robinson E: Cost-effectiveness of physical activity counselling in general practice.N Z Med J 2004, 117: U1216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Proper KI, de Bruyne MC, Hildebrandt VH, van der Beek AJ, Meerding WJ, van Mechelen W: Costs, benefits and effectiveness of worksite physical activity counseling from the employer's perspective.Scand J Work Environ Health 2004, 30: 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens W, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M, McArdle D: Cost-effectiveness of a primary care based physical activity intervention in 45–74 year old men and women: a randomised controlled trial.Br J Sports Med 1998, 32: 236–241. 10.1136/bjsm.32.3.236CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Munro JF, Nicholl JP, Brazier JE, Davey R, Cochrane T: Cost effectiveness of a community based exercise programme in over 65 year olds: cluster randomised trial.J Epidemiol Community Health 2004, 58: 1004–1010. 10.1136/jech.2003.014225CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein EA, Troped PJ, Will JC, Palombo R: Cost-effectiveness of a cardiovascular disease risk reduction program aimed at financially vulnerable women: the Massachusetts WISEWOMAN project.J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2002, 11: 519–526. 10.1089/152460902760277877CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Robertson MC, Devlin N, Scuffham P, Gardner MM, Buchner DM, Campbell AJ: Economic evaluation of a community based exercise programme to prevent falls.J Epidemiol Community Health 2001, 55: 600–606. 10.1136/jech.55.8.600CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Robertson MC, Gardner MM, Devlin N, McGee R, Campbell AJ: Effectiveness and economic evaluation of a nurse delivered home exercise programme to prevent falls. 2: Controlled trial in multiple centres.BMJ 2001, 322: 701–704. 10.1136/bmj.322.7288.701CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Robertson MC, Devlin N, Gardner MM, Campbell AJ: Effectiveness and economic evaluation of a nurse delivered home exercise programme to prevent falls. 1: Randomised controlled trial.BMJ 2001, 322: 697–701. 10.1136/bmj.322.7288.697CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Ackermann RT, Williams B, Nguyen HQ, Berke EM, Maciejewski ML, LoGerfo JP: Healthcare cost differences with participation in a community-based group physical activity benefit for medicare managed care health plan members.J Am Geriatr Soc 2008, 56: 1459–1465. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01804.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
The Writing Group for Activity Counselling Trail Research Group: Effects of physical activity counselling in primary care: the Activity Counselling Trial: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA 2001, 286: 677–687. 10.1001/jama.286.6.677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shephard RJ, Corey P, Renzland P, Cox M: The impact of changes in fitness and lifestyle upon health care utilization.Can J Public Health 1983, 74: 51–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Shephard RJ, Corey P, Renzland P, Cox M: The influence of an employee fitness and lifestyle modification program upon medical care costs.Can J Public Health 1982, 73: 259–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Baun WB, Bernacki EJ, Tsai SP: A preliminary investigation: effect of a corporate fitness program on absenteeism and health care cost.J Occup Med 1986, 28: 18–22. 10.1097/00043764-198601000-00007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Ackermann RT, Cheadle A, Sandhu N, Madsen L, Wagner EH, LoGerfo JP: Community exercise program use and changes in healthcare costs for older adults.Am J Prev Med 2003, 25: 232–237. 10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00196-XCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Chen IJ, Chou CL, Yu S, Cheng SP: Health services utilization and cost utility analysis of a walking program for residential community elderly.Nurs Econ 2008, 26: 263–269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Shephard RJ: Long term impact of a fitness programme--the Canada Life Study.Ann Acad Med Singapore 1992, 21: 63–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Sevick MA, Dunn AL, Morrow MS, Marcus BH, Chen GJ, Blair SN: Cost-effectiveness of lifestyle and structured exercise interventions in sedentary adults: results of project ACTIVE.Am J Prev Med 2000, 19: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer W, Rutten F, Koopmanschap M: Costing in economic evaluations. In Economic evaluations in Health Care - Merging theory with practice. Edited by: Drummond MF, McGuire A. Oxford, New York Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
Krauth C, Hessel F, Hansmeier T, Wasem J, Seitz R, Schweikert B: [Empirical standard costs for health economic evaluation in Germany - a proposal by the working group methods in health economic evaluation].Gesundheitswesen 2005, 67: 736–746. 10.1055/s-2005-858698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Gold MR, Russell LB, Siegel JE: Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. 1st edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.Google Scholar
Haycox A: A methodology for estimating the costs and benefits of health promotion.Health Prom Int 1994, 9: 5–11. 10.1093/heapro/9.1.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond MF, Sculpher M, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL: Methods for Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd edition. Oxford, New York Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
Welte R, Feenstra T, Jager H, Leidl R: A decision chart for assessing and improving the transferability of economic evaluation results between countries.PharmacoEcon 2004, 22: 857–876. 10.2165/00019053-200422130-00004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Writing Group for Activity Counselling Trail Research Group: Effects of physical activity counseling in primary care: the Activity Counseling Trial: a randomized controlled trial.The Journal of the American Medical Association 2001, 286: 677–687. 10.1001/jama.286.6.677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.