Advertisement

How does financial performance affect marketing? Studying the marketing-finance relationship from a dynamic perspective

  • Mitchell J. Lovett
  • Jason B. MacDonald
Article

Abstract

In this article, the authors provide a dynamic framework for understanding the relationship between marketing and financial performance. They suggest that firms market to financial markets as well as to consumption markets and that some mixture provides superior long-term performance. The authors discuss the potential pitfalls of overemphasizing one market to the detriment of another and then provide a theoretical model of the factors that influence the extent of marketing to financial markets. This is followed by a discussion of implications for theory, practice, and future research.

Keywords

marketing financial performance market value shareholders stakeholder salience 

References

  1. Agle, Bradley R., Ronald K. Mitchell, and Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld. 1999. “Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience.”Academy of Management Journal 42 (5): 507–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal, Jagdish and Wagner Kamakura. 1995. “The Economic Worth of Celebrity Endorsers: An Event Study Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 59 (2): 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amir, Eli and Baruch Lev. 1996. “Value-Relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Wireless Communication Industry.”Journal of Accounting and Economics 22 (1–3): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anonymous. 1989. “Investor Relations: The Best and the Brightest.”Institutional Investor 23 (9): 58–67.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, Ray and Phillip Brown. 1968. “An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers,”Journal of Accounting Research 6 (Autumn): 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barney, Jay B. 1986. “Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy.”Management Science 32 (10): 1231–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartels, Robert. 1970. “The Identity Crisis in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 38 (4): 74–75.Google Scholar
  8. Bryan, Stephen, Lee Seok Hwang, and Steven Lilien. 2000. “CEO Stock-Based Compensation: An Empirical Analysis of Incentive-Intensity, Relative Mix, and Economic Determinants.”Journal of Business 73 (4): 661–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Day, George and Liam Fahey. 1988. “Valuing Market Strategies.”Journal of Marketing 52 (3): 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickson, Peter R. 1992. “Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality.”Journal of Marketing 56 (1): 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. —. 1996. “The Static and Dynamic Mechanics of Competition: A Comment on Hunt and Morgan’s Comparative Advantage Theory.rdJournal of Marketing 60 (4): 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. —, Paul W. Farris, and Willem J. M. I. Verbeke. 2001. “Dynamic Strategic Thinking.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29 (3): 216–237.Google Scholar
  13. Eccles, Robert G., Robert H. Herz, E. Mary Keegan, and David M. H. Phillips. 2001.The Value Reporting Revolution. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Epstein, Marc J. and Bill Birchard. 2000.Counting What Counts: Turning Corporate Accountability to Competitive Advantage. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  15. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French. 1992. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.”Journal of Finance 47 (2): 427–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gladwell, Malcolm. 2000.The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  17. Graham, Roger C, Jr. and Kristina D. Frankenberger. 2000. “The Contribution of Changes in Advertising Expenditures to Earnings and Market Values.”Journal of Business Research 50 (2): 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gupta, Sunil, Donald R. Lehmann, and Jennifer Ames Stuart. 2004. “Valuing Customers.”Journal of Marketing Research 41 (1): 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haugen, Robert A. 1999.The Inefficient Stock Market. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Henderson, James W. 1988.Obtaining Venture Financing. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  21. Hunt, Shelby D. 1991.Modern Marketing Theory. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.Google Scholar
  22. — and Robert M. Morgan. 1996. “The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions.”Journal of Marketing 60 (4): 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ittner, Christopher and David Larcker. 1998. “Innovations in Performance Management: Trends and Research Implications.”Journal of Management Accounting Research 10: 205–239.Google Scholar
  24. Kaplan, R. and D. Norton. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard—Measures That Drive Performance.”Harvard Business Review 10: 71–79.Google Scholar
  25. Kohli, Ajay K. and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1990. “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implication.”Journal of Marketing 54 (2): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luck, David J. 1969. “Broadening the Concept of Marketing Too Far.”Journal of Marketing 33 (3): 53–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lukas, Bryan A. and O. C. Ferrell. 2000. “The Effect of Market Orientation on Product Innovation.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (2): 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mathur, Lynette Knowles and Ike Mathur. 2000. “An Analysis of the Wealth Effects of Green Marketing Strategies.”Journal of Business Research 50 (2): 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mathur, Lynette Knowles and Ike Mathur. 2000. “An Analysis of the Wealth Effects of Green Marketing Strategies.”Journal of Business Research 50 (2): 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, Merton and Kevin Rock. 1985. “Dividend Policy Under Asymmetric Information.”Journal of Finance 40 (4): 1031–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitchell, Ronald K., Bradley R. Agle, and Donna J. Wood. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.”Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 853–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mizik, Natalie and Robert Jacobson. 2003. “Trading Off Between Value Creation and Value Appropriation: The Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis.”Journal of Marketing 67 (1): 411 -433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Narayanan, Sridhar, Ramarao Desiraju. and Pradeep K. Chintagunta. 2004. “Return on Investment Implications for Pharmaceutical Promotional Expenditures: The Role of Marketing-Mix Interactions.”Journal of Marketing 68 (4): 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neville, Benjamin A., Simon J. Bell, and Gregory Whitwell. 2004. “Stakeholder Salience Revisited: Toward an Actionable Tool for the Management of Stakeholders.”Academy of Management Proceedings 64: D1-D6.Google Scholar
  35. Pauwels, Koen, Jorge Silva-Risso, Shuba Srinivasan, and Dominique M. Hanssens. 2004. “New Products, Sales Promotions, and Firm Value: The Case of the Automobile Industry.”Journal of Marketing 68 (4): 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rust, Roland T, Tim Ambler, Gregory S. Carpenter, V. Kumar, and Rajendra K. Srivastava. 2004. “Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.”Journal of Marketing 68 (4): 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ryan, Harley E., Jr. and Roy A. Wiggins III. 2002. “The Interactions Between R&D Investment Decisions and Compensation Policy.”Financial Management 31 (1): 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spirrison, J. Bradley. 1999. “Webvan Financing Brings Web Grocers Home.”Private Equity Week 6 (31): 1–3.Google Scholar
  39. Srivastava, Rajendra, Tasadduq A. Shervani, and Liam Fahey. 1998. “Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 62 (1): 2–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ——, and — 1999. “Marketing, Business Processes, and Shareholder Value: An Organizationally Embedded View of Marketing Activities and the Discipline of Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 63 (Special Issue): 168–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tam, Pui-Wing. 2001. “Pilot Error: How Palm Tumbled From Star of Tech to Target of Microsoft.”Wall Street Journal, September 7, p. Al.Google Scholar
  42. Warner, Melanie. 2001. “Can Amazon Be Saved?”Fortune 144 (11): 156–158.Google Scholar
  43. Weber, M. 1947.The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  44. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. “A Resource-Based View of the Firm.”Strategic Management Journal 5 (2): 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Woodward, David. 2002. “Making a Drama Out of a Crisis.”Director 55 (10): 58–63.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mitchell J. Lovett
    • 1
  • Jason B. MacDonald
    • 2
  1. 1.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Boise State UniversityBoiseUSA

Personalised recommendations