Advertisement

Sample Size Estimation when Comparing More than Two Treatment Groups

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

A large amount of literature has been published on methods for determining sample size and power for clinical trials. Although formulae exist to determine sample size for different designs, in practice the methods are rarely used. Instead, sample size estimates are usually based on simple formulae derived for the comparison of two means or binomial proportions.

This paper describes some useful theory for sample size estimation when comparing more than two treatment groups. Where the theory is not applicable, it is demonstrated that simulation can be used as an alternative approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 189

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. 1.

    Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1987:182.

  2. 2.

    Bland JM. An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 1987:160.

  3. 3.

    Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Chichester: Wiley; 1986:371–376.

  4. 4.

    Frison L, Pocock SJ. Repeated measures in clinical trials: Analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for design. Stat Med. 1992;11:1685–1704.

  5. 5.

    Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials. Chichester: Wiley; 1983:128–229.

  6. 6.

    Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression rating scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134:382–389.

  7. 7.

    Lindley DV, Scott WF. New Cambridge Elementary Statistical Tables. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.

  8. 8.

    Banner NR, Lloyd HM, Hamilton RD, Innes JA, Guz A, Yacoub MH. Cardiopulmonary response to dynamic exercise after heart and combined heart-lung transplanatation. Br Heart J. 1989;61:215–223.

  9. 9.

    Lucki I, Rickeis K, Gesecke MA, Geller A. Differential effects of the anxiolytic drugs, diazepam and buspirone, on memory function. Br J Clin Pharacol. 1987;23:207–211.

  10. 10.

    Rowbotham DJ, Nimmo WS. Effects of cisapride on morphine-induced delay in gastric emptying. Br J Anaesth. 1987;59:536–539.

  11. 11.

    Tatsuta M, Isihi H, Yamamura H, Yamamoto R, Taniguchi H. Enhancement by tetragastrin of experimental induction of gastric epithelium in the duodenum. Gut. 1989;30:311–315.

  12. 12.

    Laubscher NF. Normalizing the noncentral t and F distributions. Ann Math Stat. 1960;31:1105–1112.

  13. 13.

    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977.

  14. 14.

    Ruberg SJ. Dose response studies. Some design considerations. J Biopharma Stat. 1995;5:1–14.

  15. 15.

    Ruberg SJ. Dose response studies. Analysis and interpretation. J Biopharma Stat. 1995;5:15–12.

  16. 16.

    Abelson RP, Tukey JW. Efficient utilisation of non-numerical information in quantitative analysis: General theory and the case of simple order. Ann Math Stat. 1963;34:1347–1369.

  17. 17.

    Yateman N, Skene A. The use of simulation in the design of two cardiovascular survival studies. Stat Med. 1993;12:1365–1372.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Alan Phillips BSc, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phillips, A. Sample Size Estimation when Comparing More than Two Treatment Groups. Ther Innov Regul Sci 32, 193–199 (1998) doi:10.1177/009286159803200127

Download citation

Key Words

  • Sample size
  • Analysis of variance
  • Dose-response
  • Simulation