Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 89–95 | Cite as

The Evolving Academic Health Center: Challenges and Opportunities for Psychiatry

Original Article

Abstract

Objective

Regardless of the outcome of current efforts at healthcare reform, the resources that academic health centers need—to provide care for increasingly complex patient populations, support clinical innovation, grow the clinical enterprise, and carry out their research and teaching missions—are in jeopardy. This article examines the value proposition for psychiatry.

Method

The authors describe areas where academic departments of psychiatry have opportunities to help shape the future of academic health centers in a rapidly-changing healthcare environment and share their experience in leadership roles in academic psychiatry and in consulting to academic health center leaders.

Results

Many academic health centers are reexamining both their mission and their use of available resources. Some are questioning their ability to sustain traditionally low-margin clinical specialties like internal medicine, pediatrics, and psychiatry, where, all too often, clinical revenues alone are insufficient to cover the full cost of caring for the patients they serve.

Conclusion

Academic departments of psychiatry must continually demonstrate their value to the academic health centers’ clinical and academic mission.

Keywords

Deep Brain Stimulation Academic Psychiatry Medical Home Academic Department Service Line 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jaffe S: Health policy brief: key issues in health reform. Health Aff 2009; 20:1–6Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McHugh M, Kang R, Hasnain-Wynia R: Understanding the safety net: inpatient quality of care varies based on how one defines safety-net hospitals. MCRR 2009; 66:590–605PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moody’s Investors Service: Special Comment. Moody’s U.S. Public Finance, Moody’s Not-For-Profit Healthcare Quarterly Review. 3rd quarter 2009. Oct:1-13Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frank RG, Golman HH, McGuire TG: Trends in mental health cost growth: an expanded role for management? Health Aff 2009; 28:649–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dixon K: Perspective: implementing mental health parity: the challenge for health plans. Health Aff 2009; 28:663–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zuvekas SH, Meyerhoefer CD: State variations in the out-of-pocket spending burden for outpatient mental health treatment. Health Aff 2009; 28:713–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharfstein SS, Dickerson FB: Perspective: hospital psychiatry for the twenty-first century. Health Aff 2009; 28:685–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Institute of Medicine: Improving the quality of health care for mental and substance-use conditions. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2006Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kathol RG, Kunkel EJS, Weiner JS, et al: Psychiatrists for medically complex patients: bringing value at the physical health and mental health interface. Psychosomatics 2009; 50:93–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith T, Sederer LI: A new kind of “homelessness” for people with serious mental illnesses? the need for a “mental health home” (letter). Psychiatr Serv 2009; 60:993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nolan L, Regenstein M, Anthony D, et al: Emergency department operations in top-performing safety-net hospitals. New York, The Commonwealth Fund, July 2009Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Galloro V: The urge to merge. Mod Healthcare 2009; 39:1, 6, 7, 16Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sia C, Tonniges TF, Osterhus E, et al: History of the medical home concept. Pediatrics 2004; 113:1473–1478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Un#x00FC;tzer J, Katon WJ, Callahan CM, et al: Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary-care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288:2836–2845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cunningham P: Beyond parity: primary care physicians’ perspectives on access to mental health care. Health Aff 2009; 28:1228Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berenson RA, Bodenheimer T, Pham HH: Specialty-service lines: salvos in the new medical arms race. Health Aff 2006; 25:337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mallon WT: The benefits and challenges of research centers and institutes in academic medicine: findings from six universities and their medical schools. Acad Med 2006; 81:502–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neuropsychology Central: Behavioral Considerations in Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation. Gainesville, FL, Clinical Psychology Associates of North Central Florida, 2002; available at http://www.neuropsychologycentral.com/interface/content/resources/page_material/resources_general_materials_pages/resources_document_pages/behavioral_considerations_in_tbi_rehabilitation.pdf
  19. 19.
    George MS, Sackeim HA, Rush AJ, et al: Vagus nerve stimulation: a new tool for brain research and therapy. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 47:273–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reding MJ, Gardner C, Hainline B, et al: Neuropsychiatric problems interfering with inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1993; 7:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malone DA Jr, Dougherty DD, Rezai AR, et al: Deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 65:267–275PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research: Ranking Tables of NIH Funding to U.S. Medical Schools in 2008. Horse Shoe, NC; available at http://www.brimr.org/NIH_Awards/2008/NIH_Awards_2008.htm
  23. 23.
    Reynolds CF III, Lewis DA, Detre T, et al: The future of psychiatry as clinical neuroscience. Acad Med 2009; 84: 446–450PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Navigant ConsultingBoston
  2. 2.Departments of Psychiatry at Tufts University School of Medicine andTufts Medical CenterBoston

Personalised recommendations