Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 50–53 | Cite as

Adequacy of Psychiatric Training: A Singaporean Perspective

Brief Report

Abstract

Objective

The specialty training program for psychiatry in Singapore is transitioning to a seamless 5-year training program. It is timely to assess the perceived adequacy of current psychiatric specialty training.

Methods

An anonymous survey was sent to all psychiatry trainees and psychiatrists in the public sector to assess the current adequacy and perceived importance of 11 aspects of psychiatric specialist training.

Results

Forty-nine percent of those surveyed (54 of 110) replied. The current adequacy of training was rated lower than the perceived importance of training for all 11 aspects of training. Those aspects of training rated most important were disorder and diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, clinical interview, and treatment skills. Psychiatrists rated most aspects of training as being more important than did trainees except for cultural aspects, research, and basic neuroscience. Psychiatrists rated adequacy of training better than did trainees, except in the aspect of research. The difference between psychiatrists’ and trainees’ ratings for adequacy of psychotherapy treatment knowledge was significant (p<0.05).

Conclusion

There were perceived deficiencies in all 11 aspects of training. Psychiatrists and trainees have different perceptions of adequacy and importance of training.

Keywords

Academic Psychiatry Objective Structure Clinical Examination Acad Psychiatry Specialty Training Psychiatry Training 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chong SA: Mental health in Singapore: a quiet revolution? Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007; 36: 795–796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steg JA, Mann LS, Schwartz RH, et al: Comparison of child psychiatry residents’ and training directors’ perceptions of training for alcohol and substance abuse treatment. Acad Psychiatry 1992; 16: 103–108Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petersen T, Fava M, Alpert JE, et al: Does psychiatry residency training reflect the “real world” of psychiatry practices? A survey of residency graduates. Acad Psychiatry 2007; 31: 281–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ogur B, Hirsh D, Krupat E, et al: The Harvard Medical School-Cambridge integrated clerkship: an innovative model of clinical education. Acad Med 2007; 82: 397–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liston E, Yager J, Strauss GD: Assessment of psychotherapy skills: the problem of interrater agreement. Am J Psychiatry 1981; 138: 1069–1074PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fones CSL, Kua EH, Ng TP, Ko SM: Studying the mental health of a nation: a preliminary report on a population survey in Singapore. Singapore Med J: 1998; 39: 251–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kua EH, Ko SM: Prevalence of dementia among elderly Chinese and Malay residents of Singapore. Int Psychogeriatr 1995; 7: 439–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ng TP, Fones CSL, Kua EH: Preference, need and utilization of mental health services, Singapore National Mental Health Survey. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2003; 37: 613–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kandel ER: A new intellectual framework for psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155: 457–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pek E, Subramaniam M, Vaingankar J, et al: Mental health professionals’ perceived barriers and benefits, and personal concerns in relation to psychiatric research. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008; 37: 738–744PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryNational University Hospital of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations