Personal Psychotherapy During Residency Training: A Survey of Psychiatric Residents
- 46 Downloads
The authors investigate current psychiatric residents’ experiences with and opinions about personal psychotherapy.
The authors analyzed survey data from randomly selected students in psychiatric residency training programs during the 2005–2006 academic year.
Approximately one-third of respondents were in psychotherapy. Being in a training program affiliated with a psychoanalytic institute and being further along in training were associated with a greater likelihood of being in therapy. Residents identified financial cost and training demands as the top barriers to pursuing psychotherapy. Psychodynamic psychotherapy was by far the most common type; few residents received cognitive behavior therapy.
A significant minority of psychiatric residents pursue personal psychotherapy, primarily psychodynamic. This number appears to be much smaller than in the past.
KeywordsAcademic Psychiatry Residency Training Training Director Chief Resident Psychiatric Resident
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Residency Review Committee Requirements in General Psychiatry. Available at http://acgme.org/acWebsite/downloads/RRC_progReq/400pr07012007.pdf
- 3.Holt RR, Luborsky L: Personality Patterns of Psychiatrists, vol I. New York, Basic Books, 1958, pp 63–67Google Scholar
- 4.Holt RR, Luborsky L: Personality Patterns of Psychiatrists, vol II. Topeka, Kansas, The Menninger Foundation, 1958, pp 20–27Google Scholar
- 6.Weissman S: American psychiatry in the 21st century: the discipline, its practice, and its work force. Bull Menninger Clinic 1994; 58: 502–518Google Scholar
- 7.Daly KA: Attitudes of the U.S. psychiatry residencies about personal psychotherapy for psychiatry residents. Acad Psychiatry 1998; 22: 223–228Google Scholar
- 8.Weintraub D, Dixon L, Kohlhepp E, et al: Residents in personal psychotherapy: a longitudinal and cross sectional perspective. Acad Psychiatry 1999; 23: 14–19Google Scholar