Advertisement

Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 67–70 | Cite as

Insights about Psychotherapy Training and Curricular Sequencing: Portal of Discovery

  • K. Ramsey McGowen
  • Merry Noel Miller
  • Michael Floyd
  • Barney Miller
  • Brent Coyle
Educational Resource Column

Abstract

Objective

The authors discuss the curricular implications of a research project originally designed to evaluate the instructional strategy of using standardized patients in a psychotherapy training seminar.

Methods

The original project included second-year residents enrolled in an introductory psychotherapy seminar that employed sequential meetings with standardized patients. Residents were videotaped at baseline and at 6 week intervals; these sessions were rated by outside raters, standardized patients, and the residents themselves using two rating scales designed to assess psychotherapy skill. Results of the ratings were used to assess whether the instructional strategy was effective in teaching psychotherapy.

Results

Data were analyzed for group and individual effects. Results of unpaired t tests revealed that as a group resident performance did not improve. Individual effects were examined using regression analysis of individual learning plots. This analysis revealed that residents differed widely in their individual responses to this instructional technique.

Conclusion

These results precipitated a realization about the curriculum. Despite initial disappointment about the apparent limitations of the technique, thoughtful analysis prompted a reinterpretation that led to residency curriculum modification.

Keywords

Academic Psychiatry Standardize Patient Instructional Strategy Acad Psychiatry Instructional Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yager J, Mellman L, Rubin E, et al: The RRC mandate for residency programs to demonstrate psychodynamic psychotherapy competency among residents: a debate. Acad Psychiatry 2005; 29: 339–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ravitz P, Silver I: Advances in psychotherapy education. Can J Psychiatry 2004; 49: 230–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ACGME: ACGME Common Program Requirements in BOLD: Program Requirements for Residency Training in Psychiatry. Available at http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/downloads/RRC_progReq/400pr1104.pdf
  4. 4.
    Mellman LA, Beresin E: Psychotherapy competencies: development and implementation. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 149–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beitman B, Yue D: Learning Psychotherapy, 2nd ed. New York, Norton, 2005Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horvath AO, Greenberg LS: Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. J Couns Psychol 1989; 36: 223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lang F, Harvill L, McCord R, et al: Communication assessment using the Common Ground instrument: psychometric properties. Fam Med 2004; 36: 189–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coyle B, Miller M, McGowen KR: Using standardized patients to teach and learn psychotherapy. Acad Med 1998; 73: 591–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klamen DL, Yudkowsky R: Using standardized patients for formative feedback in an introduction to psychotherapy course. Acad Psychiatry 2002; 26: 168–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Swanson DB, Stillman PL: Use of standardized patients for teaching and assessing clinical skills. Eval Health Prof 1990; 13: 79–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hovarth AO, Bedi RP: The alliance, in Psychotherapy Relationships That Work: Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients. Edited by Norcross JC. New York, Oxford University Press, 2002Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lambert MJ, Barkey DE: Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome, in Psychotherapy Relationships That Work: Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients. Edited by Norcross JC. New York, Oxford University Press, 2002Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prislin MD, Giglio M, Lewis EM, et al: Assessing the acquisition of core clinical skills through the use of serial standardized patient assessments. Acad Med 2000; 75: 480–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Ramsey McGowen
    • 1
  • Merry Noel Miller
    • 1
  • Michael Floyd
    • 2
  • Barney Miller
    • 1
  • Brent Coyle
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesEast Tennessee State UniversityJohnson CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Family MedicineEast Tennessee State UniversityJohnson CityUSA
  3. 3.Blount Memorial HospitalMaryvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations