Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 27–30 | Cite as

Utilizing VA Information Technology to Develop Psychiatric Resident Prescription Profiles

  • Robert Rohrbaugh
  • Daniel G. Federman
  • Lydia Borysiuk
  • Michael Sernyak
Brief Report



Feedback about resident prescription practices allows psychiatry educators to ensure that residents have broad prescribing experience and can facilitate practice-based learning initiatives. The authors report on a procedure utilizing U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs’ computerized pharmacy records to efficiently construct comprehensive individual psychiatric resident prescription practice profiles.


Veterans Affairs information technology provided a methodology to efficiently construct individual and aggregate resident prescription profiles, including cost data. To demonstrate the utility of prescription profiles, individual and aggregate antipsychotic medication prescription profiles were constructed of nine residents working in a Veterans Affairs psychotic disorders clinic.


Developing the individual and aggregate prescription profiles required only 5 hours. The profiles revealed that residents had a restricted range of experience prescribing antipsychotic medications, with some residents not having prescribed all five major atypical agents and the majority having prescribed a limited number of typical agents. The profiles highlighted cost differences among the atypical antipsychotic medications and between the typical and atypical antipsychotic medications.


Prescription profiles facilitate resident education by enabling educators to determine the range of antipsychotic medications residents prescribe. A psychiatric residency program could utilize these prescription profiles to improve resident competency in practice based learning.


Veteran Affair Aripiprazole Academic Psychiatry Ziprasidone Typical Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    ACGME Outcome Project Website: ACGME, General Competencies Definition, Version 1.3, 1999. Available at
  2. 2.
    Orgrinc G, Headrick LA, Mutha S, et al: A framework for teaching medical students and residents about practice-based learning and improvement, synthesized from a literature review. Acad Med 2003; 78: 748–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lough JRM, Murray TS: Audit and summative assessment: a completed audit cycle. Med Educ 2001; 35: 357–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Sullivan PS, Coghill KK, McClain T, et al: Portfolios as a novel approach for residency evaluation. Acad Psychiatry 2002; 26: 173–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keenan CR, Nguyen HH, Srinivasan M: Electronic medical records and their impact on resident and medical student education. Acad Psychiatry 2006; 30: 522–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, et al: Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 1209–1223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lindenmayer JP, Czobor P, Valavka J, et al: Changes in glucose and cholesterol levels in patients with schizophrenia treated with typical and atypical antipsychotics. Am J Psych 2003; 160: 290–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Medical Association: Graduate Medical Education Directory 2005–2006. Chicago, American Medical Association, 2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Rohrbaugh
    • 1
    • 3
  • Daniel G. Federman
    • 2
    • 3
  • Lydia Borysiuk
    • 3
  • Michael Sernyak
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Internal Medicine at YaleNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.VA-Connecticut Healthcare SystemWest HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations