Family Physicians’ Interventions with Young People in Distress and Their Parents: Managing Confidentiality and Levels of Engagement
- 56 Downloads
This study aimed to interrogate the decisions and approaches used by family doctors in responding to the needs of young people in distress. The research sought to explore how practitioners balanced young people’s needs for confidentiality and self-determination with their parents’ concerns and needs as caregivers.
Interviews were undertaken with 30 family physicians in the United Kingdom using a semi-structured schedule to elicit reactions to a case scenario.
While family physicians identified the ethical and clinical benefits of patient confidentiality for young adults, a wide range of approaches was adopted with respect to providing feedback and reassurance to parents. Likewise, there were substantial variations in the extent to which clinicians were prepared to adopt a proactive stance to engage a young person who was reluctant to seek help.
These diverging practice examples can be used to inform training programs and offer a means by which the caregiver’s need for information and support can be emphasized in psychiatric and clinical education.
KeywordsMental Health Young People National Health Service Mental Health Care Family Physician
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Mental Health Foundation: Bright Futures: Promoting Children and Young People’s Mental Health. London, Mental Health Foundation, 1998Google Scholar
- 3.Meltzer H, Gatward R, Goodman R, et al: Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in Great Britain. London, The Stationery Office, 2000Google Scholar
- 5.British Medical Association: Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Guide for Healthcare Professionals. London, British Medical Association, 2006Google Scholar
- 7.National Institute for Mental Health in England National Suicide Prevention Strategy for England: Annual Report on Progress 2005. London, National Institute for Mental Health in England/Care Services Improvement Partnership, 2006Google Scholar
- 9.Jacobson L: Identifying students’ mental health problems in primary care settings, in Students Mental Health Needs: Problems and Response. Edited by Stanley N, Manthorpe J. London, Jessica Kingsley, 2002, pp 121–144Google Scholar
- 11.Strauss A, Corbin J: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, Calif., Sage Publications, 1990Google Scholar
- 12.Royal College of General Practitioners and Brook: Confidentiality and Young People: Improving Teenagers’ Uptake of Sexual and Other Health Advice: A Toolkit for General Practice, Primary Care Groups and Trusts. London, Royal College of Practitioners, 2000Google Scholar
- 13.General Medical Council Confidentiality: Providing and Protecting Information. London, General Medical Council, 2000Google Scholar
- 14.Kramer T, Murray E, Iliffe S, et al: Which adolescents attend the GP? Br J General Practice 1997; 47: 327Google Scholar
- 18.Jones DW: Myths, Madness and the Family: The Impact of Mental Illness on Families. Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2002Google Scholar
- 20.Laing RD, Esterson A: Sanity, Madness and the Family. London, Tavistock, 1964Google Scholar
- 21.Leff J, Vaughan C: Expressed Emotion. London, Guilford, 1985Google Scholar
- 22.Kuipers E, Leff J, Lam D: Family Work for Schizophrenia: A Practical Guide, 2nd ed. London, Gaskell Press, 2002Google Scholar