Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 92–97 | Cite as

Family Physicians’ Interventions with Young People in Distress and Their Parents: Managing Confidentiality and Levels of Engagement

  • Nicky Stanley
  • Jill Manthorpe
  • Lesley Gillespie
Original Article



This study aimed to interrogate the decisions and approaches used by family doctors in responding to the needs of young people in distress. The research sought to explore how practitioners balanced young people’s needs for confidentiality and self-determination with their parents’ concerns and needs as caregivers.


Interviews were undertaken with 30 family physicians in the United Kingdom using a semi-structured schedule to elicit reactions to a case scenario.


While family physicians identified the ethical and clinical benefits of patient confidentiality for young adults, a wide range of approaches was adopted with respect to providing feedback and reassurance to parents. Likewise, there were substantial variations in the extent to which clinicians were prepared to adopt a proactive stance to engage a young person who was reluctant to seek help.


These diverging practice examples can be used to inform training programs and offer a means by which the caregiver’s need for information and support can be emphasized in psychiatric and clinical education.


Mental Health Young People National Health Service Mental Health Care Family Physician 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Beresin E, Mellman L: Competencies in psychiatry: the new outcomes-based approach to medical training and education. Harvard Rev of Psychiatry 2002; 10: 185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mental Health Foundation: Bright Futures: Promoting Children and Young People’s Mental Health. London, Mental Health Foundation, 1998Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meltzer H, Gatward R, Goodman R, et al: Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in Great Britain. London, The Stationery Office, 2000Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collishaw S, Maughan B, Goodman R, Pickles A: Time trends in adolescent mental health. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2004; 45: 1350–1362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    British Medical Association: Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Guide for Healthcare Professionals. London, British Medical Association, 2006Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hawton K, Rodham K, Evans E, et al: Deliberate self-harm in adolescents: self report survey in schools in England. Br Med J 2002; 325: 1207–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Institute for Mental Health in England National Suicide Prevention Strategy for England: Annual Report on Progress 2005. London, National Institute for Mental Health in England/Care Services Improvement Partnership, 2006Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Macfarlane A, McPherson A: Primary health care and adolescence. Br Med J 1995; 311: 825–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jacobson L: Identifying students’ mental health problems in primary care settings, in Students Mental Health Needs: Problems and Response. Edited by Stanley N, Manthorpe J. London, Jessica Kingsley, 2002, pp 121–144Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stanley N: Parents’ perspectives on young suicide. Children and Society 2005; 19: 304–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Strauss A, Corbin J: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, Calif., Sage Publications, 1990Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Royal College of General Practitioners and Brook: Confidentiality and Young People: Improving Teenagers’ Uptake of Sexual and Other Health Advice: A Toolkit for General Practice, Primary Care Groups and Trusts. London, Royal College of Practitioners, 2000Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    General Medical Council Confidentiality: Providing and Protecting Information. London, General Medical Council, 2000Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kramer T, Murray E, Iliffe S, et al: Which adolescents attend the GP? Br J General Practice 1997; 47: 327Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gledhill J, Kramer T, Iliffe S, et al: Training general practitioners in the identification and management of adolescent depression within the consultation: a feasibility study. J Adolescence 2003; 26: 245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sanci LA, Coffey CM, Veit FC, et al: Evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational intervention for general practitioners in adolescent health care: randomised controlled trials. Br Med J 2000; 320: 224–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Iliffe S, Gledhill J, da Cunha F, et al: The recognition of adolescent depression in general practice: issues in the acquisition of new skills. Primary Care Psychiatry 2004; 9: 51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jones DW: Myths, Madness and the Family: The Impact of Mental Illness on Families. Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2002Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rapaport J, Bellringer S, Pinfold V, et al: Carers and confidentiality in mental health care: considering the role of the carer’s assessment: a study of service users’, carers’ and practitioners’ views. Health and Soc Care in the Community 2006; 14: 357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laing RD, Esterson A: Sanity, Madness and the Family. London, Tavistock, 1964Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leff J, Vaughan C: Expressed Emotion. London, Guilford, 1985Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kuipers E, Leff J, Lam D: Family Work for Schizophrenia: A Practical Guide, 2nd ed. London, Gaskell Press, 2002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicky Stanley
    • 1
  • Jill Manthorpe
    • 2
  • Lesley Gillespie
    • 3
  1. 1.Social Work DepartmentUniversity of Central LancashirePrestonUK
  2. 2.Social Care Workforce Research UnitKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Health Sciences DepartmentUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations