Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consultation-Liaison Psychiatrists on Bioethics Committees: Opportunities for Academic Leadership

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This article briefly reviews the history of the relationship between psychiatry and the leadership of ethics committees as a background for examining appropriate educational initiatives to adequately prepare residents and early career psychiatrists to serve as leaders of ethics committees.

Method

A Medline review of literature on psychiatry and ethics committees and consultation as well as recent survey data from the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine indicate that psychosomatic medicine psychiatrists are particularly qualified and interested in serving as chairs of ethics committees. The authors compare knowledge and skills obtained in psychiatric training with the Society for Heath and Human Values and the Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on standards for ethics consultation proposed as core competencies for ethics committee leadership.

Results

Psychiatric residency and fellowship training in psychosomatic medicine can provide the knowledge and skill sets to meet the standards for ethics consultation. Further professional development through pursuit of formal ethics training, advance degrees in bioethics, mentoring, and residency and felloships focus on ethics and enhance competency, confidence, and the skills required for ethics committee leadership.

Conclusions

Academic psychiatrists, particularly those in psychosomatic medicine, have historically made a significant contribution as chairs of ethics committees. Continuation and expansion of this leadership may require interested psychiatrists to obtain additional training in bioethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schreter RK: Reorganizing departments of psychiatry, hospitals, and medical centers for the 21st century. Psychiatr Serv 1998; 49: 1429–1433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eisen P: Potential for psychiatric leadership in health care. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1986; 20: 107–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen MA: Medical board president: another role for the consultation-liaison psychiatrist. Psychosomatics 1990; 31: 464–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Soltys SM, Wowra SA, Hodo GL: Child psychiatrists as leaders in public mental health systems: two surveys of state mental health departments. Psychiatr Serv 1999; 50: 1591–1595

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ranz JM, Stueve A, Rosenheck S: The role of the psychiatrist as medical director: a survey of psychiatric administrators. Adm Policy Ment Health 2000; 27: 299–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Engel CC Jr: Psychiatrists and the general hospital ethics committee. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1992; 14: 29–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lederberg MS: Making a situational diagnosis: psychiatrists at the interface of psychiatry and ethics in the consultation-liaison setting. Psychosomatics 1997; 38: 327–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leeman CP: Psychiatric consultations and ethics consultations: similarities and differences. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000; 22: 270–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stern T, Fricchione G, Cassem N, et al, eds: Massachusetts General Hospital Handbook of General Hospital Psychiatry. Philadelphia, Mosby, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  10. APA: The American Psychiatric Textbook of Psychosomatic Medicine. Edited by Levenson J. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2005

  11. In re Quinlan, 70 NJ 10, 1976, p 647

  12. Cruzan v. Director Missouri Department of Health, 110 S. Ct, 1990

  13. Joint Commission for Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: Patient Rights, in 1992 Accreditation Manual for Hospitals. Chicago, 1993

  14. Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1990, Pub. L, 1990

  15. Aulison M: Ethics committees and ethics consultation, in Encyclopedia of Bioethics, vol 2. Edited by Post S. New York, Macmillan, 2004, pp 841–853

    Google Scholar 

  16. Youngner SJ, Jackson DL, Coulton C, et al: A national survey of hospital ethics committees. Crit Care Med 1983; 11: 902–905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McGee G, Caplan AL, Spanogle JP, et al: A national study of ethics committees. Am J Bioeth 2001; 1: 60–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fox E: Ethics Consultation in U.S. Hospitals: A National Study and its Implications, in Annual Meeting of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. Baltimore, 2002

  19. Robichaud A, Hasenstaub E: Report on Second Ohio Healthcare Ethics Committees Information. BIO Quartlery 2004; 15

  20. Robichaud A: Preliminary Report on Ohio Ethics Committee Information Project. BIO Quartlery 2002; 12: 6

    Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins RE, II, Lemke SW: Ethics committees in Southern Baptist related hospitals: survey results and analysis. http://www.nobts.edu/Faculty/ItoR/LemkeSW/Personal/ecsurvey.html#N1

  22. Schneider P: A study of twelve hospital ethics committees in Eastern South Carolina. JSC Med Assoc 2000; 96: 409–415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bourgeois JA, Cohen MA, Geppert CMA: The role of psychosomatic medicine psychitrists in bioethics: a survey study of members of the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. Psychosomatics 2006, in press

  24. Leeman CP, Blum J, Lederberg MS: A combined ethics and psychiatric consultation. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2001; 23: 73–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Steinberg MD: Psychiatry and bioethics. An exploration of the relationship. Psychosomatics 1997; 38: 313–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Powell T: Consultation-liaison psychiatry and clinical ethics: representative cases. Psychosomatics 1997; 38: 321–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Youngner SJ: Consultation-liaison psychiatry and clinical ethics: historical parallels and diversions. Psychosomatics 1997; 38: 309–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Perl M, Shelp EE: Sounding board: psychiatric consultation masking moral dilemmas in medicine. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 618–621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Leeman CP: Ethics consultation masking psychiatric issues in medicine. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 1715–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leeman CP, Cohen MA, Parkas V: Should a psychiatrist report a bus driver’s alcohol and drug abuse? An ethical dilemma. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2001; 23: 333–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fletcher JC, Hoffmann DE: Ethics committees: time to experiment with standards. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 335–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hoffmann D, Tarzian A, O’Neil JA: Are ethics committee members competent to consult? J Law Med Ethics 2000; 28: 30–40, 2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Aulisio MP, Arnold RM, Youngner SJ: Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies: a position paper from the society for health and human values and society for bioethics consultation task force on standards for bioethics consultation. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133: 59–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Preisman RC, Steinberg MD, Rummans TA, et al: An annotated bibliography for ethics training in consultation-liaison psychiatry. Psychosomatics 1999; 40: 369–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Turner L: A career in clinical ethics: BMJ career focus. Br Med J 2002; 325: 105

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico, 1501 San Pedro Dr. SE, Albuquerque, NM, 87108, USA

    Cynthia M. A. Geppert M.D., Ph.D. (Assistant Professor, Chief of Consultation Psychiatry and Ethics)

  2. New Mexico Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

    Cynthia M. A. Geppert M.D., Ph.D. (Assistant Professor, Chief of Consultation Psychiatry and Ethics)

  3. AIDS Psychiatry, Albuquerque, USA

    Mary Ann Cohen M.D., F.A.P.M. (Director, Clinical Professor of Psychiatry)

  4. Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA

    Mary Ann Cohen M.D., F.A.P.M. (Director, Clinical Professor of Psychiatry)

Authors
  1. Cynthia M. A. Geppert M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary Ann Cohen M.D., F.A.P.M.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia M. A. Geppert M.D., Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geppert, C.M.A., Cohen, M.A. Consultation-Liaison Psychiatrists on Bioethics Committees: Opportunities for Academic Leadership. Acad Psychiatry 30, 416–421 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.30.5.416

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.30.5.416

Keywords

Search

Navigation