Consultation-Liaison Psychiatrists on Bioethics Committees: Opportunities for Academic Leadership
This article briefly reviews the history of the relationship between psychiatry and the leadership of ethics committees as a background for examining appropriate educational initiatives to adequately prepare residents and early career psychiatrists to serve as leaders of ethics committees.
A Medline review of literature on psychiatry and ethics committees and consultation as well as recent survey data from the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine indicate that psychosomatic medicine psychiatrists are particularly qualified and interested in serving as chairs of ethics committees. The authors compare knowledge and skills obtained in psychiatric training with the Society for Heath and Human Values and the Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on standards for ethics consultation proposed as core competencies for ethics committee leadership.
Psychiatric residency and fellowship training in psychosomatic medicine can provide the knowledge and skill sets to meet the standards for ethics consultation. Further professional development through pursuit of formal ethics training, advance degrees in bioethics, mentoring, and residency and felloships focus on ethics and enhance competency, confidence, and the skills required for ethics committee leadership.
Academic psychiatrists, particularly those in psychosomatic medicine, have historically made a significant contribution as chairs of ethics committees. Continuation and expansion of this leadership may require interested psychiatrists to obtain additional training in bioethics.
KeywordsAcademic Psychiatry Ethic Education Psychosomatic Medicine Ethic Consultation Bioethic Committee
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 9.Stern T, Fricchione G, Cassem N, et al, eds: Massachusetts General Hospital Handbook of General Hospital Psychiatry. Philadelphia, Mosby, 2004Google Scholar
- 10.APA: The American Psychiatric Textbook of Psychosomatic Medicine. Edited by Levenson J. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2005Google Scholar
- 11.In re Quinlan, 70 NJ 10, 1976, p 647Google Scholar
- 12.Cruzan v. Director Missouri Department of Health, 110 S. Ct, 1990Google Scholar
- 13.Joint Commission for Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: Patient Rights, in 1992 Accreditation Manual for Hospitals. Chicago, 1993Google Scholar
- 14.Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1990, Pub. L, 1990Google Scholar
- 15.Aulison M: Ethics committees and ethics consultation, in Encyclopedia of Bioethics, vol 2. Edited by Post S. New York, Macmillan, 2004, pp 841–853Google Scholar
- 18.Fox E: Ethics Consultation in U.S. Hospitals: A National Study and its Implications, in Annual Meeting of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. Baltimore, 2002Google Scholar
- 19.Robichaud A, Hasenstaub E: Report on Second Ohio Healthcare Ethics Committees Information. BIO Quartlery 2004; 15Google Scholar
- 20.Robichaud A: Preliminary Report on Ohio Ethics Committee Information Project. BIO Quartlery 2002; 12: 6Google Scholar
- 21.Higgins RE, II, Lemke SW: Ethics committees in Southern Baptist related hospitals: survey results and analysis. http://www.nobts.edu/Faculty/ItoR/LemkeSW/Personal/ecsurvey.html#N1
- 22.Schneider P: A study of twelve hospital ethics committees in Eastern South Carolina. JSC Med Assoc 2000; 96: 409–415Google Scholar
- 23.Bourgeois JA, Cohen MA, Geppert CMA: The role of psychosomatic medicine psychitrists in bioethics: a survey study of members of the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. Psychosomatics 2006, in pressGoogle Scholar
- 33.Aulisio MP, Arnold RM, Youngner SJ: Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies: a position paper from the society for health and human values and society for bioethics consultation task force on standards for bioethics consultation. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133: 59–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar