Research on Chemical Intermediates

, Volume 29, Issue 7–9, pp 817–826 | Cite as

In situ FT-IR studies of NO decomposition on Pt/TiO2 catalyst under UV irradiation

  • B. J. Lee
  • M. C. Kuo
  • S. H. Chien
Full Papers


Photodecomposition of NO on the well-dispersed Pt/TiO2 catalyst under UV irradiation was studied by in situ DRIFT (Diffuse-Reflectance Infrared Fourier-Transform) spectroscopy. 2 wt% Pt/TiO2 catalyst was prepared by photochemical deposition method. The photocatalytic activity of Pt/TiO2 is highly dependent on its pretreatment. Although the catalyst exhibited a highly adsorption capability to NO after hydrogen reduction or thermal evacuation at 500°C, no evidence upon NO decomposition was observed under UV irradiation. While reducing the catalyst at 300°C in the hydrogen flow, it not only exhibited an intense NO adsorption but also conducted a direct decomposition of NO to N2 and O2 under UV irradiation. The hydrogen reduction at 200°C led to a weaker NO adsorption. During UV irradiation, the IR peaks of NO fully disappeared and N2O was formed. It is concluded that the photochemical prepared Pt/TiO2 catalyst after activating at mild reduction conditions is highly active for NO photodecomposition. The effective oxidation states of the active components, the surface structure and the reaction mechanisms will be discussed.


Hydrogen Reduction Adsorption Capability Photocatalytic Decomposition Drift Spectrum Step Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    N. Serpone and E. Pelizzetti, Photocatalysis: Fundamentals and Applications. Wiley, New York, NY (1989).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. H. Chien, K. N. Lu and C. T. Chen, Bull. Inst. Chem. Acad. Sin. 40, 37 (1993).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. P. Fulter and P. R. Griffiths, Am. Lab., 69 (1978).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Tanaka and J. M. White, J. Catal. 79, 81 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. A. Vannice, C. C. Twu and S. H. Moon, J. Catal. 79, 70 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Anpo, M. Yabuta, S. Kodama and Y. Kubokawa, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 59, 259 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Zhang, N. Fujii and Y. Nosaka, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 129, 219 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Kudo, M. Steinberg, A. J. Bard, A. Campion, M. A. Fox, T. E. Mallouk, S. E. Webber and J. M. White, J. Catal. 125, 565 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Yamashita, Y. Ichihashi, M. Anpo, M. Hashimoto, C. Louis and M. Che, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 16041 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of ChemistryAcademia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations