A study on the interactions between coenzyme Q 0 and superoxide anion. Could ubiquinones mimic superoxide dismutase (SOD)?
- 46 Downloads
An electrochemical study was carried out on 1,4-benzoquinone, duroquinone, coenzymes Q 0 and Q 10 in the absence and in the presence of molecular oxygen in aprotic (DMF) and protic (DMF/H2O 95:5 (v/v)) media. Water was added because the investigated reactions are deeply influenced by the presence of protons. Q 0 and Q 10 exhibited a similar electrochemical behaviour. Since Q 0 is more soluble in protic medium than the biologically more important analogue Q 10 , it was chosen as a model for a more detailed investigation. Voltammetric studies of Q 0 carried out in aprotic and protic media in the presence of oxygen showed that, besides simple O2 ·− dismutation, the Q 0 promoted dismutation of O2 ·− should also be considered. Spectroelectrochemical experiments with the same experimental conditions support the electrochemical results, showing that in the presence of superoxide and in aprotic medium semiquinone Q 0 ·− gives rise to a disproportionation equilibrium, while in the presence of water it tends to be reoxidized to the starting Q 0 by OOH·. EPR measurements are also in agreement with these results.
KeywordsRadical Anion Anodic Peak Ubiquinone Voltammetric Study Semiquinone Radical
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.S. Al-Malaika, in C. Booth and C. Price (Eds.), Comprehensive Polymer Science, Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York, 1989, 2, 539; J. Pospisil and P.P. Klemchuk, Oxidation Inhibition in Organic Materials, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, 1989, 1 and 2; B. Halliwell and J.M.C. Gutteridge in Lund (Ed.), Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine,, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993; C.E. Eriksson, and A. Na in F. Corongiu, S. Banni, M.A. Dessi and C. Rice-Evans (Eds.), Free Radicals and Antioxidants in Nutrition, Richelieu Press, 1993, 205–224.Google Scholar
- 8.P. Carloni, E. Damiani, L. Greci, P. Stipa, G. Marrosu, R. Petrucci and A. Trazza, Tetrahedron, 52, 11257 (1996).Google Scholar
- 11.T. Ozawa and A. Hanaki, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 31, 2535 (1983).Google Scholar
- 13.D.A. Stoyanovsky, A.N. Osipov, P.J. Quinn and V.E. Kagan, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 323, 343 91995); H. Nohl, L. Gille and A. V. Kozlov, Free Rad. Biol. Med., 25, 666 (1988); K. Schnurr, M. Hellwing, B. Seidemann, P. Jungblut, H. Kuhn, S.M. Rapoport and T. Schewe, Free Rad. Biol. Med., 20, 11 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.A.A. Frimer Organic Reactions Involving the Superoxide Anion, in S. Patai (Ed.), The Chemistry of Functional Groups. Peroxides, Wiley, New York, 1983, 429.Google Scholar
- 18.G. Merenyi, J. Lind and L. Engman, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 2551 (1994).Google Scholar
- 20.J.M. McCord and I. Fridovich, J. Biol. Chem., 243, 5753 (1968).Google Scholar
- 22.K.B. Ulmschneider and H.B. Stegmann, Semiquinones and Related Species in H. Fischer and K.-H. Hellwege (Eds.), Magnetic Properties of Free radicals. Part dl: Organic Anion Radicals, Landolt-Börnstein Ser. II/9,, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1980.Google Scholar
- 23.R. Andruzzi, A. Trazza, L. Greci and L. Marchetti, Ann. Chim. (Rome), 69, 583 (1979).Google Scholar
- 26.L. Eberson, Electron Transfer Reactions in Organic Chemistry, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1987.Google Scholar
- 27.E. Pellizzetti, E. Mentasti and E. Pramauro, Inorg. Chem., 17, 1988 (1978).Google Scholar