Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Colonial Traits Using Symbiosis Research and Ecosystem Ecology

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

E. O. Wilson (1974: 54) describes the problem that social organisms pose: “On what bases do we distinguish the extremely modified members of an invertebrate colony from the organs of a metazoan animal?” This framing of the issue has inspired many to look more closely at how groups of organisms form and behave as emergent individuals. The possible existence of “superorganisms” test our best intuitions about what can count and act as genuine biological individuals and how we should study them. As we will discuss, colonies of certain organisms display many of the properties that we usually reserve only to individual organisms. Although there is good reason to believe that many social insects form genuine emergent biological individuals, the conclusion offered here is of a slightly different sort. I will argue that to understand some social insects’ interactions and the emergent traits they give rise to, it may be helpful to shift our understanding from a community-level approach to an ecosystem-level approach. I will argue that viewing certain insect colonies (termites) as parts of ecosystems allows us to better understand some of the adaptations that have emerged from their evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aanen DK, Eggleton P, Rouland-Lefevre C, Guldberg-Froslev T, Rosendahl S, Boomsma JJ (2002) The evolution of fungus-growing termites and their mutualistic fungal symbionts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 14887–14892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadjian V, Jacobs J (1983) Algal-fungal relationships in lichens: Recognition, synthesis, and development. In: Symbiosis (Goff LJ, ed), 147–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard F (2004) Evolution, Fitness and the Struggle for Persistence. PhD thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard F (2008) Causal processes, fitness, and the differential persistence of lineages. Philosophy of Science 75: 560–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard F (in press) How ecosystem evolution strengthens the case for functional pluralism. In: Functions: Selection and Mechanism (Huneman P, ed), Springer.

  • Brandon RN (1990) Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WS (1984) Expected time to extinction and the concept of fundamental fitness. Journal of Theoretical Biology 107: 603–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dangerfield J, McCarthy T, Ellery W (1998) The mound-building termite Macrotermes michaelseni as an ecosystem engineer. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14: 507–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goff L (1982) Symbiosis and parasitism: Another viewpoint. BioScience 32: 255–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ, Lewontin R (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B 205: 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ, Lloyd EA (1999) Individuality and adaptation across levels of selection: How shall we name and generalize the unit of Darwinism? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96: 11904–11909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton A, Smith N, Haber M (2009) Social insects and the individuality thesis: Cohesion and the colony as a selectable individual. In: Organization of Insect Societies: From Genome to Sociocomplexity (Gadau J, Fewell J, ed), 572–589. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath CD (1997) Some questions about identifying Individuals: Failed intuitions about organisms and species. Philosophy of Science 64: 654–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2008) The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen D (1977) What are dandelions and aphids? American Naturalist 111: 586–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin R (1982) Symbiosis and parasitism: Definitions and evaluations. BioScience 32: 254–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher M (1961) Air conditioned termite nests. Scientific American 205(1): 138–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabee PM, Ashburner M, Cronk Q, Gkoutos GV, Haendel M, Segerdell E, Mungall C, Westerfield M (2007) Phenotype ontologies: The bridge between genomics and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22: 345–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShea DW, Venit E (2000) What is a part? In: The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology (Wagner GP, ed), 259–284. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShea DW, Venit E (2002) Testing for bias in the evolution of coloniality: A demonstration in cyclostome bryosoans. Paleobiology 28: 308–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odenbaugh J (2007) Seeing the forest and the trees: Realism about communities and ecosystems. Philosophy of Science 74: 628–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paracer S, Ahmadjian V (2000) Symbiosis: An Introduction to Biological Associations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg A, Bouchard F (2009) Fitness. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition), (Zalta EN, ed), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/fitness.

  • Saffo MB (1996) Evolution of Symbiosis. BioScience 46: 300–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders W (2001) Lichens: The interface between mycology and plant morphology. Bioscience 51: 1025–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp J (1994) Evolution by Association: A History of Symbiosis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E (2001) The two faces of fitness. In: Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical, and Political Perspectives (Singh RS, Costas B, Paul DB, Beatty J, eds), 309–321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson W, Wilson DS, Elias R (2000) Artificial ecosystem selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 97: 9110–9114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoday JM (1953) Components of fitness. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 7: 96–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JS (2000) The Extended Organism: The Physiology of Animal-built Structures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JS (2004) Extended phenotypes and extended organisms. Biology and Philosophy 19: 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS, Sober E (1989) Reviving the superorganism. Journal of Theoretical Biology 136: 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The Insect Societies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1974) The perfect societies. Science 184: 54–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J (2007) Biological Individuality: The Identity and Persistence of Living Entities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RA (2007) The biological notion of individual. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), (Zalta EN, ed), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/biology-individual.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédéric Bouchard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bouchard, F. Understanding Colonial Traits Using Symbiosis Research and Ecosystem Ecology. Biol Theory 4, 240–246 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.240

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.240

Keywords

Navigation