Abstract
E. O. Wilson (1974: 54) describes the problem that social organisms pose: “On what bases do we distinguish the extremely modified members of an invertebrate colony from the organs of a metazoan animal?” This framing of the issue has inspired many to look more closely at how groups of organisms form and behave as emergent individuals. The possible existence of “superorganisms” test our best intuitions about what can count and act as genuine biological individuals and how we should study them. As we will discuss, colonies of certain organisms display many of the properties that we usually reserve only to individual organisms. Although there is good reason to believe that many social insects form genuine emergent biological individuals, the conclusion offered here is of a slightly different sort. I will argue that to understand some social insects’ interactions and the emergent traits they give rise to, it may be helpful to shift our understanding from a community-level approach to an ecosystem-level approach. I will argue that viewing certain insect colonies (termites) as parts of ecosystems allows us to better understand some of the adaptations that have emerged from their evolution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aanen DK, Eggleton P, Rouland-Lefevre C, Guldberg-Froslev T, Rosendahl S, Boomsma JJ (2002) The evolution of fungus-growing termites and their mutualistic fungal symbionts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 14887–14892.
Ahmadjian V, Jacobs J (1983) Algal-fungal relationships in lichens: Recognition, synthesis, and development. In: Symbiosis (Goff LJ, ed), 147–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bouchard F (2004) Evolution, Fitness and the Struggle for Persistence. PhD thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Bouchard F (2008) Causal processes, fitness, and the differential persistence of lineages. Philosophy of Science 75: 560–570.
Bouchard F (in press) How ecosystem evolution strengthens the case for functional pluralism. In: Functions: Selection and Mechanism (Huneman P, ed), Springer.
Brandon RN (1990) Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cooper WS (1984) Expected time to extinction and the concept of fundamental fitness. Journal of Theoretical Biology 107: 603–629.
Dangerfield J, McCarthy T, Ellery W (1998) The mound-building termite Macrotermes michaelseni as an ecosystem engineer. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14: 507–520.
Goff L (1982) Symbiosis and parasitism: Another viewpoint. BioScience 32: 255–256.
Gould SJ, Lewontin R (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B 205: 581–598.
Gould SJ, Lloyd EA (1999) Individuality and adaptation across levels of selection: How shall we name and generalize the unit of Darwinism? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96: 11904–11909.
Hamilton A, Smith N, Haber M (2009) Social insects and the individuality thesis: Cohesion and the colony as a selectable individual. In: Organization of Insect Societies: From Genome to Sociocomplexity (Gadau J, Fewell J, ed), 572–589. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Horvath CD (1997) Some questions about identifying Individuals: Failed intuitions about organisms and species. Philosophy of Science 64: 654–668.
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2008) The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. New York: Norton.
Janzen D (1977) What are dandelions and aphids? American Naturalist 111: 586–589.
Lewin R (1982) Symbiosis and parasitism: Definitions and evaluations. BioScience 32: 254–260.
Lüscher M (1961) Air conditioned termite nests. Scientific American 205(1): 138–145.
Mabee PM, Ashburner M, Cronk Q, Gkoutos GV, Haendel M, Segerdell E, Mungall C, Westerfield M (2007) Phenotype ontologies: The bridge between genomics and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22: 345–350.
McShea DW, Venit E (2000) What is a part? In: The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology (Wagner GP, ed), 259–284. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
McShea DW, Venit E (2002) Testing for bias in the evolution of coloniality: A demonstration in cyclostome bryosoans. Paleobiology 28: 308–327.
Odenbaugh J (2007) Seeing the forest and the trees: Realism about communities and ecosystems. Philosophy of Science 74: 628–641.
Paracer S, Ahmadjian V (2000) Symbiosis: An Introduction to Biological Associations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rosenberg A, Bouchard F (2009) Fitness. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 Edition), (Zalta EN, ed), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/fitness.
Saffo MB (1996) Evolution of Symbiosis. BioScience 46: 300–304.
Sanders W (2001) Lichens: The interface between mycology and plant morphology. Bioscience 51: 1025–1036.
Sapp J (1994) Evolution by Association: A History of Symbiosis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sober E (2001) The two faces of fitness. In: Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical, and Political Perspectives (Singh RS, Costas B, Paul DB, Beatty J, eds), 309–321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swenson W, Wilson DS, Elias R (2000) Artificial ecosystem selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 97: 9110–9114.
Thoday JM (1953) Components of fitness. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 7: 96–113.
Turner JS (2000) The Extended Organism: The Physiology of Animal-built Structures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Turner JS (2004) Extended phenotypes and extended organisms. Biology and Philosophy 19: 327–352.
Wilson DS, Sober E (1989) Reviving the superorganism. Journal of Theoretical Biology 136: 337–356.
Wilson EO (1971) The Insect Societies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wilson EO (1974) The perfect societies. Science 184: 54–55.
Wilson J (2007) Biological Individuality: The Identity and Persistence of Living Entities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson RA (2007) The biological notion of individual. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), (Zalta EN, ed), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/biology-individual.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bouchard, F. Understanding Colonial Traits Using Symbiosis Research and Ecosystem Ecology. Biol Theory 4, 240–246 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.240
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.240