Biological Theory

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 131–133 | Cite as

The Specter of the Past: What the History of Theoretical Biology Means Today



Gene Regulatory Network Stem Cell Research Biological Theory Theoretical Biology Biological Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amundson R (2005) The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjamin W (1969) Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
  3. Beurton P, Falk R, Rheinberger H-J (eds) (2003) The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cassirer E (1950) The Problem of Knowledge. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Davidson E (2006) The Regulatory Genome: Gene Regulatory Networks in Development and Evolution. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Geison G, Laubichler MD (2001) Reflections on the role of organismal and cultural variation in the history of the biological sciences. Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Laubichler M, Hammerstein P, Hagen E (2005) The concept of strategies and John Maynard Smith’s influence on theoretical biology. Biology and Philosophy 20: 1041–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Laubichler M, Rheinberger H-J (2004). Alfred Kühn and developmental evolution. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B, 302B: 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Laubichler M, Maienschein J (eds) (2007) From Embryology to Evo Devo: A History of Developmental Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Maienschein J (2003) Whose View of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Sarton G (1917) An institute forthe history of science and civilization. Science 46: 399–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shapin S (2005) Hyperprofessionalism and the crisis of readership in the history of science. Isis 98: 238–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Life Sciences, Centers for Biology and Society and Social Complexity and DynamicsArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations