Biological Theory

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 414–417 | Cite as

Relatedness: Capturing Cohesion in Biological Systems



Biological Theory Theoretical Biology Altruistic Behavior Queen Number Relatedness Asymmetry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alcock J (2005) Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach. 8th ed. Sunderland: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  2. Bartz SH (1979) Evolution of eusociality in termites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 76: 5764–5768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social Evolution in Ants. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dugatkin AL (2006) The Altruism Equation: Seven Scientists Search for the Origin of Goodness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hall BK (1994) Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hamilton W (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Herbers JM (1993) Ecological determinants of queen number in ants. In: Queen Number and Sociality in Insects (Keller L, ed), 262–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hull DL (1989) The Metaphysics of Evolution. Stony Brook: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  9. Maynard Smith J (1964) Group selection and kin selection. Nature 200: 1145–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Spemann H (1915) Zur Geschichte und Kritik des Begriffs der Homologie. In: Allgemeine Biologie (Chun C, Johannsen W, eds), Vol 4: 163–185. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
  11. Templeton A (1989) The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. In: Speciation and Its Consequences (Otte D, Endler JA, eds), 3–27. Sunderland: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  12. Wagner GP (1989) The biological homology concept. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 51–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wake DB (1994) Comparative terminology. Science 265: 268–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wenseleers T, Ratnieks FLW (2006) Eusocial hymenoptera supports relatedness theory. American Naturalist 168: E163–E179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wilson EO (1971) The Insect Societies. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Wright S (1922) Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. American Naturalist 56: 330–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Life Sciences, Center for Social Dynamics and ComplexityArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations