Advertisement

Biological Theory

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 346–348 | Cite as

Why Evolution Has to Matter to Cognitive Psychology and to Philosophy of Mind

Article

Keywords

Mental Function Biological Theory Dynamic System Theory Mental Causation Brain Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barsalou LW (2005) Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems. In: Building Object Categories (Gershokoff-Stowe L, Rakison D, eds), 389–431. Majwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Clark A (1999) An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Science 3: 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Sousa R (2000) Learning to be natural. In: Being Humans (Roughley R, ed), 287–307. New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  4. de Sousa R (2004). Evolution et rationalité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  5. Dretske F (1981) Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dretske F (1988) Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Millikan R (1984) Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Millikan R (1993) Explanation in biopsychology. In: Mental Causation (Heil J, Mele A, eds), 211–232. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  9. Origgi G, Sperber D (2000) Evolution, communication, and the proper function of language. In: Evolution and the Human Mind: Language, Modularity and Social Cognition (Carruthers P, Chamberlain A, eds), 140–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Papineau D (2003) The Roots of Reason: Philosophical Essays on Rationality, Evolution, and Probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Prinz W (1987) Ideo-motor action. In: Perspectives on Perception and Action (Heuer H, Sanders AF, eds), 47–76. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Prinz W (1990) A common coding approach to perception and action. In: Relationships between Perception and Action (Neumann O, Prinz W, eds), 167–201. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Proust J (1997) Comment l’esprit vient aux betes. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  14. Proust J (2005) Rationality and metacognition in non-human animals. In: Rational Animals? (Hurley S, Nudds M, eds), 247–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Proust J (in press) What is mental function? In: French Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Sperber D (2000) Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In: Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective (Sperber D, ed), 117–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sterelny K (2001) The Evolution of Agency and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Sterelny K (2003) Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Suchman L (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Jean NicodCNRSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations