Biological Theory

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 223–227 | Cite as

Adaptation, Exaptation, By-Products, and Spandrels in Evolutionary Explanations of Morality



Moral Judgment Adaptationist Account Biological Theory Moral Rule Evolutionary Explanation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ayala F (2010) The difference of being human: Morality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(2): 9015–9022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson P (1991) The Development and Integration of Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boyd R, Richerson P (2005) The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Darwin C ([1871] 2004) The Descent of Man. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Fitzpatrick W (2008) Morality and evolutionary biology.
  6. Frank R (1988) Passions Within Reason. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  7. Gould S, Lewontin R (1979) The spandrels of San Marco. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205(1161): 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gould S, Vrba E (1982) Exaptation: A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8(1): 4–15.Google Scholar
  9. Griffiths P (2002) What is innateness? The Monist 85(1): 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffiths P, Machery E, Linquist S (2009) The vernacular concept of innateness. Mind and Language 24(5): 605–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hauser M (2006) Moral Minds. New York: Ecco.Google Scholar
  12. Joyce R (2000) Darwinian ethics and error. Biology and Philosophy 15: 713–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joyce R (2006) The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Pinker S, Kalow W, Kalant H, Gould S (1997) Evolutionary psychology: An exchange. New York Review of Books 4: 55–56.Google Scholar
  15. Prinz J (2007a) The Emotional Construction of Morals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Prinz J (2007b) Can moral obligations be empirically discovered? Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31(1): 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prinz J (2008a) Acquired moral truths. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77(1): 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Prinz J (2008b) Is morality innate? In: Moral Psychology, Vol. 1 (Sinnott-Armstrong W, ed), 367–406. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Prinz J (2009) Against moral nativism. In: Stich and His Critics (Bishop M, Murphy D, eds), 167–189. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Ruse M (1998) Taking Darwin Seriously. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  21. Street S (2006) A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories ofvalue. Philosophical Studies 127: 109–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson EO ([1975] 2000) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyAustralian National UniversityActonAustralia

Personalised recommendations