Advertisement

Fixed Point Theory and Applications

, 2011:703938 | Cite as

Coupled Coincidence Point Theorems for Nonlinear Contractions in Partially Ordered Quasi-Metric Spaces with a Q-Function

  • N Hussain
  • MH Shah
  • MA Kutbi
Open Access
Research Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Equilibrium Problems and Fixed Point Theory

Abstract

Using the concept of a mixed g-monotone mapping, we prove some coupled coincidence and coupled common fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractive mappings in partially ordered complete quasi-metric spaces with a Q-function q. The presented theorems are generalizations of the recent coupled fixed point theorems due to Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham (2006), Lakshmikantham and Ćirić (2009) and many others.

Keywords

Equilibrium Problem Fixed Point Theorem Monotone Property Couple Fixed Point Couple Coincidence Point 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

1. Introduction

The Banach contraction principle is the most celebrated fixed point theorem and has been generalized in various directions (cf. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31]). Recently, Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham [8], Nieto and Rodríguez-López [28, 29], Ran and Reurings [30], and Agarwal et al. [1] presented some new results for contractions in partially ordered metric spaces. Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham [8] noted that their theorem can be used to investigate a large class of problems and discussed the existence and uniqueness of solution for a periodic boundary value problem. For more on metric fixed point theory, the reader may consult the book [22].

Recently, Al-Homidan et al. [2] introduced the concept of a Open image in new window -function defined on a quasi-metric space which generalizes the notions of a Open image in new window -function and a Open image in new window -distance and establishes the existence of the solution of equilibrium problem (see also [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]). The aim of this paper is to extend the results of Lakshmikantham and Ćirić [24] for a mixed monotone nonlinear contractive mapping in the setting of partially ordered quasi-metric spaces with a Open image in new window -function Open image in new window . We prove some coupled coincidence and coupled common fixed point theorems for a pair of mappings. Our results extend the recent coupled fixed point theorems due to Lakshmikantham and Ćirić [24] and many others.

Recall that if Open image in new window is a partially ordered set and Open image in new window such that for Open image in new window Open image in new window implies Open image in new window , then a mapping Open image in new window is said to be nondecreasing. Similarly, a nonincreasing mapping is defined. Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham [8] introduced the following notions of a mixed monotone mapping and a coupled fixed point.

Definition 1.1 (Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham [8]).

Let Open image in new window be a partially ordered set and Open image in new window . The mapping Open image in new window is said to have the mixed monotone property if Open image in new window is nondecreasing monotone in its first argument and is nonincreasing monotone in its second argument, that is, for any Open image in new window

Definition 1.2 (Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham [8]).

An element Open image in new window is called a coupled fixed point of the mapping Open image in new window if

The main theoretical result of Lakshmikantham and Ćirić in [24] is the following coupled fixed point theorem.

Theorem 1.3 (Lakshmikantham and Ćirić [24, Theorem Open image in new window ]).

Let Open image in new window be a partially ordered set, and suppose, there is a metric Open image in new window on Open image in new window such that Open image in new window is a complete metric space. Assume there is a function Open image in new window Open image in new window Open image in new window with Open image in new window and Open image in new window for each Open image in new window , and also suppose that Open image in new window and Open image in new window such that Open image in new window has the mixed Open image in new window -monotone property and

for all Open image in new window for which Open image in new window and Open image in new window Suppose that Open image in new window and Open image in new window is continuous and commutes with Open image in new window , and also suppose that either

(a) Open image in new window is continuous or

(b) Open image in new window has the following property:

(i) if  a  nondecreasing  sequence Open image in new window ,then   Open image in new window for all Open image in new window

(ii) if  a  nonincreasing  sequence Open image in new window ,then   Open image in new window for all Open image in new window

If there exists Open image in new window such that
then there exist Open image in new window such that

that is, Open image in new window and Open image in new window have a coupled coincidence.

Definition 1.4.

Let Open image in new window be a nonempty set. A real-valued function Open image in new window is said to be quasi-metric on Open image in new window if

Open image in new window for all Open image in new window

Open image in new window if and only if Open image in new window

Open image in new window for all Open image in new window .

The pair Open image in new window is called a quasi-metric space.

Definition 1.5.

Let Open image in new window be a quasi-metric space. A mapping Open image in new window is called a Open image in new window -function on Open image in new window if the following conditions are satisfied:

for all Open image in new window

if Open image in new window and Open image in new window is a sequence in Open image in new window such that it converges to a point Open image in new window (with respect to the quasi-metric) and Open image in new window for some Open image in new window then Open image in new window ;

for any Open image in new window , there exists Open image in new window such that Open image in new window , and Open image in new window implies that Open image in new window

Remark 1.6 (see [2]).

If Open image in new window is a metric space, and in addition to Open image in new window the following condition is also satisfied:

for any sequence Open image in new window in Open image in new window with Open image in new window and if there exists a sequence Open image in new window in Open image in new window such that Open image in new window then Open image in new window

then a Open image in new window -function is called a Open image in new window -function, introduced by Lin and Du [27]. It has been shown in [27]that every Open image in new window -distance or Open image in new window -function, introduced and studied by Kada et al. [21], is a Open image in new window -function. In fact, if we consider Open image in new window as a metric space and replace Open image in new window by the following condition:

for any Open image in new window , the function Open image in new window is lower semicontinuous,

then a Open image in new window -function is called a Open image in new window -distance on Open image in new window . Several examples of Open image in new window -distance are given in [21]. It is easy to see that if Open image in new window is lower semicontinuous, then Open image in new window holds. Hence, it is obvious that every Open image in new window -function is a Open image in new window -function and every Open image in new window -function is a Open image in new window -function, but the converse assertions do not hold.

Example 1.7 (see [2]).

Then Open image in new window is a Open image in new window -function on Open image in new window However, Open image in new window is neither a Open image in new window -function nor a Open image in new window -function, because Open image in new window is not a metric space.

The following lemma lists some properties of a Open image in new window -function on Open image in new window which are similar to that of a Open image in new window -function (see [21]).

Lemma 1.8 (see [2]).

Let Open image in new window be a Open image in new window -function on Open image in new window Let Open image in new window and Open image in new window be sequences in Open image in new window , and let Open image in new window and Open image in new window be such that they converge to Open image in new window and Open image in new window Then, the following hold:

(1) if Open image in new window and Open image in new window for all Open image in new window , then Open image in new window . In particular, if Open image in new window and Open image in new window , then Open image in new window ;

(2) if Open image in new window and Open image in new window Open image in new window for all Open image in new window , then Open image in new window converges to Open image in new window ;

(3) if Open image in new window for all Open image in new window Open image in new window with Open image in new window , then Open image in new window is a Cauchy sequence;

(4) if Open image in new window for all Open image in new window , then Open image in new window is a Cauchy sequence;

(5) if Open image in new window are Open image in new window -functions on Open image in new window , then Open image in new window Open image in new window is also a Open image in new window -function on Open image in new window .

2. Main Results

Analogous with Definition 1.1, Lakshmikantham and Ćirić [24] introduced the following concept of a mixed Open image in new window -monotone mapping.

Definition 2.1 (Lakshmikantham and Ćirić [24]).

Let Open image in new window be a partially ordered set, and Open image in new window and Open image in new window We say Open image in new window has the mixed Open image in new window -monotone property if Open image in new window is nondecreasing Open image in new window -monotone in its first argument and is nondecreasing Open image in new window -monotone in its second argument, that is, for any Open image in new window

Note that if Open image in new window is the identity mapping, then Definition 2.1 reduces to Definition 1.1.

Definition 2.2 (see [24]).

An element Open image in new window is called a coupled coincidence point of a mapping Open image in new window and Open image in new window if

Definition 2.3 (see [24]).

for all Open image in new window

Following theorem is the main result of this paper.

Theorem 2.4.

Let Open image in new window be a partially ordered complete quasi-metric space with a Open image in new window -function Open image in new window on Open image in new window . Assume that the function Open image in new window is such that
Further, suppose that Open image in new window and Open image in new window are such that Open image in new window has the mixed Open image in new window -monotone property and

for all Open image in new window for which Open image in new window and Open image in new window Suppose that Open image in new window and Open image in new window is continuous and commutes with Open image in new window , and also suppose that either

(a) Open image in new window is continuous or

(b) Open image in new window has the following property:

(i) if  a  nondecreasing  sequence  Open image in new window ,  then  Open image in new window for all Open image in new window

(ii) if  a  nonincreasing  sequence  Open image in new window ,  then   Open image in new window for all Open image in new window

If there exists Open image in new window such that
then there exist Open image in new window such that

that is, Open image in new window and Open image in new window have a coupled coincidence.

Proof.

We will show that
We will use the mathematical induction. Let Open image in new window Since Open image in new window and Open image in new window and as Open image in new window and Open image in new window we have Open image in new window and Open image in new window Thus, (2.9) and (2.10) hold for Open image in new window Suppose now that (2.9) and (2.10) hold for some fixed Open image in new window Then, since Open image in new window and Open image in new window and as Open image in new window has the mixed Open image in new window -monotone property, from (2.8) and (2.9),
and from (2.8) and (2.10),
Now from (2.11) and (2.12), we get
Thus, by the mathematical induction, we conclude that (2.9) and (2.10) hold for all Open image in new window . Therefore,
We show that
Since Open image in new window and Open image in new window from (2.11) and (2.5), we have
Similarly, from (2.11) and (2.5), as Open image in new window and Open image in new window
Adding (2.17) and (2.18), we obtain (2.16). Since Open image in new window for Open image in new window it follows, from (2.16), that
and so, by squeezing, we get
Therefore, by Lemma 1.8, Open image in new window and Open image in new window are Cauchy sequences. Since Open image in new window is complete, there exists Open image in new window such that
and (2.24) combined with the continuity of Open image in new window yields

We now show that Open image in new window and Open image in new window

Case 1.

Suppose that the assumption (a) holds. Taking the limit as Open image in new window in (2.26), and using the continuity of Open image in new window , we get

Case 2.

Suppose that the assumption (b) holds. Let Open image in new window . Now, since Open image in new window is continuous, Open image in new window is nondecreasing with Open image in new window Open image in new window for all Open image in new window , and Open image in new window is nonincreasing with Open image in new window for all Open image in new window , so Open image in new window is nondecreasing, that is,

with Open image in new window , Open image in new window for all Open image in new window .

Therefore, by the triangle inequality and ( ), we have Open image in new window for Open image in new window

Case 3.

This implies that

Case 4.

Also, we have

Hence, by Lemma 1.8, Open image in new window and Open image in new window Thus, Open image in new window and Open image in new window have a coupled coincidence point.

The following example illustrates Theorem 2.4.

Example 2.5.

and Open image in new window , Open image in new window are both continuous on their domains and Open image in new window . Let Open image in new window be such that Open image in new window and Open image in new window There are four possibilities for (2.5) to hold. We first compute expression on the left of (2.5) for these cases:

On the other hand, (in all the above four cases), we have

Thus, Open image in new window satisfies the contraction condition (2.5) of Theorem 2.4. Now, suppose that Open image in new window Open image in new window be, respectively, nondecreasing and nonincreasing sequences such that Open image in new window and Open image in new window , then by Theorem 2.4, Open image in new window and Open image in new window for all Open image in new window

Let Open image in new window Open image in new window Then, this point satisfies the relations

Therefore, by Theorem 2.4, there exists Open image in new window such that Open image in new window and Open image in new window

Corollary 2.6.

Let Open image in new window be a partially ordered complete quasi-metric space with a Open image in new window -function Open image in new window on Open image in new window . Suppose Open image in new window and Open image in new window are such that Open image in new window has the mixed Open image in new window -monotone property and assume that there exists Open image in new window such that

for all Open image in new window for which Open image in new window and Open image in new window Suppose that Open image in new window and Open image in new window is continuous and commutes with Open image in new window , and also suppose that either

(a) Open image in new window is continuous or

(b) Open image in new window has the following properties:

(i) if  a  nondecreasing  sequence Open image in new window , then  Open image in new window for all Open image in new window

(ii) if  a  nonincreasing  sequence Open image in new window , then  Open image in new window for all Open image in new window .

If there exists Open image in new window such that
then there exist Open image in new window such that

that is, Open image in new window and Open image in new window have a coupled coincidence.

Proof.

Taking Open image in new window in Theorem 2.4, we obtain Corollary 2.6.

Now, we will prove the existence and uniqueness theorem of a coupled common fixed point. Note that if Open image in new window is a partially ordered set, then we endow the product Open image in new window with the following partial order:

From Theorem 2.4, it follows that the set Open image in new window of coupled coincidences is nonempty.

Theorem 2.7.

The hypothesis of Theorem 2.4 holds. Suppose that for every Open image in new window there exists a Open image in new window such that Open image in new window is comparable to Open image in new window and Open image in new window Then, Open image in new window and Open image in new window have a unique coupled common fixed point; that is, there exist a unique Open image in new window such that

Proof.

where Open image in new window From this, it follows that, for each Open image in new window ,
Similarly, one can prove that
Thus, Open image in new window is a coupled coincidence point. Then, from (2.55), with Open image in new window and Open image in new window , it follows that Open image in new window and Open image in new window ; that is,
From (2.62) and (2.63),

Therefore, Open image in new window is a coupled common fixed point of Open image in new window and Open image in new window To prove the uniqueness, assume that Open image in new window is another coupled common fixed point. Then, by (2.55), we have Open image in new window and Open image in new window

Corollary 2.8.

Let Open image in new window be a partially ordered complete quasi-metric space with a Open image in new window -function Open image in new window on Open image in new window . Assume that the function Open image in new window Open image in new window Open image in new window is such that Open image in new window for each Open image in new window Let Open image in new window and let Open image in new window be a mapping having the mixed monotone property on Open image in new window and

Also suppose that either

(a) Open image in new window is continuous or

(b) Open image in new window has the following properties:

(i) if a nondecreasing  sequence  Open image in new window , then Open image in new window for all Open image in new window

(ii) if  a  non-increasing  sequence  Open image in new window , then  Open image in new window for all Open image in new window

If there exists Open image in new window such that
then, there exist Open image in new window such that

Furthermore, if Open image in new window are comparable, then Open image in new window that is, Open image in new window

Proof.

Following the proof of Theorem 2.4 with Open image in new window (the identity mapping on Open image in new window ), we get
where Open image in new window Open image in new window , Open image in new window Suppose that (2.69) holds for some fixed Open image in new window Then, by mixed monotone property of Open image in new window
and (2.69) follows. Now from (2.69), (2.65), and properties of Open image in new window we have

where Open image in new window . Hence, by Lemma 1.8, Open image in new window that is, Open image in new window

Corollary 2.9.

Let Open image in new window be a partially ordered complete quasi-metric space with a Open image in new window -function Open image in new window on Open image in new window . Let Open image in new window be a mapping having the mixed monotone property on Open image in new window . Assume that there exists a Open image in new window such that

Also, suppose that either

(a) Open image in new window is continuous or

(b) Open image in new window has the following properties:

(i) if  a  nondecreasing  sequence  Open image in new window , then  Open image in new window for all Open image in new window

(ii) if  a  nonincreasing  sequence  Open image in new window , then  Open image in new window for all Open image in new window

If there exists Open image in new window such that
then, there exist Open image in new window such that

Furthermore, if Open image in new window are comparable, then Open image in new window that is, Open image in new window

Proof.

Taking Open image in new window in Corollary 2.8, we obtain Corollary 2.9.

Remark 2.10.

As an application of fixed point results, the existence of a solution to the equilibrium problem was considered in [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. It would be interesting to solve Ekeland-type variational principle, Ky Fan type best approximation problem and equilibrium problem utilizing recent results on coupled fixed points and coupled coincidence points.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The first and third author are grateful to DSR, King Abdulaziz University for supporting research project no. (3-74/430).

References

  1. 1.
    Agarwal RP, El-Gebeily MA, O'Regan D: Generalized contractions in partially ordered metric spaces. Applicable Analysis 2008,87(1):109–116. 10.1080/00036810701556151MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Homidan S, Ansari QH, Yao J-C: Some generalizations of Ekeland-type variational principle with applications to equilibrium problems and fixed point theory. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2008,69(1):126–139. 10.1016/j.na.2007.05.004MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ansari QH: Vectorial form of Ekeland-type variational principle with applications to vector equilibrium problems and fixed point theory. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2007,334(1):561–575. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.12.076MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ansari QH, Konnov IV, Yao JC: On generalized vector equilibrium problems. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2001,47(1):543–554. 10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00199-7MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ansari QH, Siddiqi AH, Wu SY: Existence and duality of generalized vector equilibrium problems. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2001,259(1):115–126. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7397MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ansari QH, Yao J-C: An existence result for the generalized vector equilibrium problem. Applied Mathematics Letters 1999,12(8):53–56. 10.1016/S0893-9659(99)00121-4MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ansari QH, Yao J-C: A fixed point theorem and its applications to a system of variational inequalities. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society 1999,59(3):433–442. 10.1017/S0004972700033116MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhaskar TG, Lakshmikantham V: Fixed point theorems in partially ordered metric spaces and applications. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2006,65(7):1379–1393. 10.1016/j.na.2005.10.017MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhaskar TG, Lakshmikantham V, Vasundhara Devi J: Monotone iterative technique for functional differential equations with retardation and anticipation. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2007,66(10):2237–2242. 10.1016/j.na.2006.03.013MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boyd DW, Wong JSW: On nonlinear contractions. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1969, 20: 458–464. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1969-0239559-9MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ćirić LjB: A generalization of Banach's contraction principle. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1974,45(2):267–273.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ćirić L: Fixed point theorems for multi-valued contractions in complete metric spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2008,348(1):499–507. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.07.062MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ćirić L, Hussain N, Cakić N: Common fixed points for Ćirić type f -weak contraction with applications. Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen 2010,76(1–2):31–49.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ćirić LjB, Ume JS: Multi-valued non-self-mappings on convex metric spaces. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2005,60(6):1053–1063. 10.1016/j.na.2004.09.057MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gajić L, Rakočević V: Quasicontraction nonself-mappings on convex metric spaces and common fixed point theorems. Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2005, (3):365–375.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guo DJ, Lakshmikantham V: Nonlinear Problems in Abstract Cones, Notes and Reports in Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Volume 5. Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA; 1988:viii+275.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heikkilä S, Lakshmikantham V: Monotone Iterative Techniques for Discontinuous Nonlinear Differential Equations, Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Volume 181. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA; 1994:xii+514.MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hussain N: Common fixed points in best approximation for Banach operator pairs with Ćirić type I -contractions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2008,338(2):1351–1363. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.008MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hussain N, Berinde V, Shafqat N: Common fixed point and approximation results for generalized ϕ -contractions. Fixed Point Theory 2009,10(1):111–124.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hussain N, Khamsi MA: On asymptotic pointwise contractions in metric spaces. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2009,71(10):4423–4429. 10.1016/j.na.2009.02.126MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kada O, Suzuki T, Takahashi W: Nonconvex minimization theorems and fixed point theorems in complete metric spaces. Mathematica Japonica 1996,44(2):381–391.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khamsi MA, Kirk WA: An Introduction to Metric Spaces and Fixed Point Theory, Pure and Applied Mathematics. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA; 2001:x+302.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lakshmikantham V, Bhaskar TG, Vasundhara Devi J: Theory of Set Differential Equations in Metric Spaces. Cambridge Scientific Publishers, Cambridge, UK; 2006:x+204.MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lakshmikantham V, Ćirić L: Coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in partially ordered metric spaces. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 2009,70(12):4341–4349. 10.1016/j.na.2008.09.020MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lakshmikantham V, Köksal S: Monotone Flows and Rapid Convergence for Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Series in Mathematical Analysis and Applications. Volume 7. Taylor & Francis, London, UK; 2003:x+318.MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lakshmikantham V, Vatsala AS: General uniqueness and monotone iterative technique for fractional differential equations. Applied Mathematics Letters 2008,21(8):828–834. 10.1016/j.aml.2007.09.006MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lin L-J, Du W-S: Ekeland's variational principle, minimax theorems and existence of nonconvex equilibria in complete metric spaces. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2006,323(1):360–370. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.10.005MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nieto JJ, Rodríguez-López R: Contractive mapping theorems in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations. Order 2005,22(3):223–239. 10.1007/s11083-005-9018-5MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nieto JJ, Rodríguez-López R: Existence and uniqueness of fixed point in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations. Acta Mathematica Sinica (English Series) 2007,23(12):2205–2212. 10.1007/s10114-005-0769-0MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ran ACM, Reurings MCB: A fixed point theorem in partially ordered sets and some applications to matrix equations. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 2004,132(5):1435–1443. 10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07220-4MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ray BK: On Ciric's fixed point theorem. Fundamenta Mathematicae 1977,94(3):221–229.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© N. Hussain et al. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of Mathematical SciencesLUMS, DHA LahoreLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations