Advertisement

Improving a Single Down-Sampled Image Using Probability-Filtering-Based Interpolation and Improved Poisson Maximum A Posteriori Super-Resolution

  • Min-Cheng PanEmail author
Open Access
Research Article
  • 977 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Super-Resolution Imaging: Analysis, Algorithms, and Applications

Abstract

We present a novel hybrid scheme called "hyper-resolution" that integrates image probability-filtering-based interpolation and improved Poisson maximum a posteriori (MAP) super-resolution to respectively enhance high spatial and spatial-frequency resolutions of a single down-sampled image. A new approach to interpolation is proposed for simultaneous image interpolation and smoothing by exploiting the probability filter coupled with a pyramidal decomposition and the Poisson MAP super-resolution is improved with the techniques of edge maps and pseudo-blurring. Simulation results demonstrate that this hyper-resolution scheme substantially improves the quality of a single gray-level, color, or noisy image, respectively.

Keywords

Color Information Technology Quantum Information Noisy Image Hybrid Scheme 

References

  1. 1.
    Chan RH, Chan TF, Shen L, Shen Z: Wavelet algorithms for high-resolution image reconstruction. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2003, 24(4):1408–1432. 10.1137/S1064827500383123MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schultz RR, Stevenson RL: Extraction of high-resolution frames from video sequences. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 1996, 5(6):996–1011. 10.1109/83.503915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elad M, Feuer R: Super-resolution reconstruction of image sequences. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1999, 21(9):817–834. 10.1109/34.790425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hardie RC, Barnard KJ, Armstrong EE: Joint MAP registration and high-resolution image estimation using a sequence of undersampled images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 1997, 6(12):1621–1633. 10.1109/83.650116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu C, Shum H-Y, Zhang C-S: A two-step approach to hallucinating faces: global parametric model and local nonparametric model. Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '01), December 2001, Kauai, Hawaii, USA 1: I-192–I-198.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baker S, Kanade T: Limits on super-resolution and how to break them. Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '00), June 2000, Hilton Head Island, SC, USA 2: 372–379.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hou H, Andrews H: Cubic splines for image interpolation and digital filtering. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1978, 26(6):508–517. 10.1109/TASSP.1978.1163154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jain AK: Fundamentals of Digital image Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA; 1989.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keys R: Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1981, 29(6):1153–1160. 10.1109/TASSP.1981.1163711MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hong KP, Paik JK, Kim HJ, Lee CH: An edge-preserving image interpolation system for a digital camcorder. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 1996, 42(3):279–284. 10.1109/30.536121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gurski GC, Orchard MT, Hull AW: Optimal linear filters for pyramidal decomposition. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '92), March 1992, San Francisco, Calif, USA 4: 633–636.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramstad T, Wang Y, Mitra SK: Efficient image interpolation scheme using hybrid IIR Nyquist filters. Optical Engineering 1992, 31(6):1277–1283. 10.1117/12.56181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carrato S, Ramponi G, Marsi S: A simple edge-sensitive image interpolation filter. Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '96), September 1996, Lausanne, Switzerland 3: 711–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li X, Orchard MT: New edge directed interpolation. Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '00), September 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 2: 311–314.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ayazifar B, Lim JS: PEL-adaptive model-based interpolation of spatially subsampled images. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '92), March 1992, San Francisco, Calif, USA 3: 181–184.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunt BR, Sementilli PJ: Description of a Poisson imagery super-resolution algorithm. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and System I. Volume 25. Edited by: Worrall DM, Biemserfer C, Barnes J. Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, Calif, USA; 1992:196–199.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sementilli PJ, Nadar MS, Hunt BR: Poisson MAP super-resolution estimator with smoothness constraint. Neural and Stochastic Methods in Image and Signal Processing II, July 1993, San Diego, Calif, USA, Proceedings of SPIE 2032: 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lucy LB: An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions. The Astronomical Journal 1974, 79(6):745–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richardson WH: Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1972, 62(1):55–59. 10.1364/JOSA.62.000055MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frieden BR: Restoring with maximum likelihood and maximum entropy. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1972, 62(4):511–518. 10.1364/JOSA.62.000511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sezan MI, Tekalp AM: Iterative image restoration with ringing suppression using themethod of POCS. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '88), April 1988, New York, NY, USA 2: 1300–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pan M-C, Lettington AH: Smoothing images by a probability filter. Proceedings of IEEE International Joint Symposia on Intelligence and Systems (IJSIS '98), May 1998, Rockville, Md, USA 343–346.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pan M-C: A novel blind super-resolution technique based on the improved Poisson maximum a posteriori algorithm. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 2002, 12(6):239–246. 10.1002/ima.10032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Unser M, Aldroubi A, Eden M: B-spline signal processing. I. Theory. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1993, 41(2):821–833. 10.1109/78.193220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee C, Eden M, Unser M: High-quality image resizing using oblique projection operators. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 1998, 7(5):679–692. 10.1109/83.668025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Unser M: Splines: a perfect fit for signal and image processing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 1999, 16(6):22–38. 10.1109/79.799930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kimmel R: Demosaicing: image reconstruction from color CCD samples. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 1999, 8(9):1221–1228. 10.1109/83.784434CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Min-Cheng Pan. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Information EngineeringTung-Nan Institute of TechnologyShenkengTaiwan

Personalised recommendations