Robust Distant Speech Recognition by Combining Multiple Microphone-Array Processing with Position-Dependent CMN
- 905 Downloads
- 7 Citations
Abstract
We propose robust distant speech recognition by combining multiple microphone-array processing with position-dependent cepstral mean normalization (CMN). In the recognition stage, the system estimates the speaker position and adopts compensation parameters estimated a priori corresponding to the estimated position. Then the system applies CMN to the speech (i.e., position-dependent CMN) and performs speech recognition for each channel. The features obtained from the multiple channels are integrated with the following two types of processings. The first method is to use the maximum vote or the maximum summation likelihood of recognition results from multiple channels to obtain the final result, which is called multiple-decoder processing. The second method is to calculate the output probability of each input at frame level, and a single decoder using these output probabilities is used to perform speech recognition. This is called single-decoder processing, resulting in lower computational cost. We combine the delay-and-sum beamforming with multiple-decoder processing or single-decoder processing, which is termed multiple microphone-array processing. We conducted the experiments of our proposed method using a limited vocabulary (100 words) distant isolated word recognition in a real environment. The proposed multiple microphone-array processing using multiple decoders with position-dependent CMN achieved a 3.2% improvement (50% relative error reduction rate) over the delay-and-sum beamforming with conventional CMN (i.e., the conventional method). The multiple microphone-array processing using a single decoder needs about one-third the computational time of that using multiple decoders without degrading speech recognition performance.
Keywords
Word Recognition Speech Recognition Recognition Performance Multiple Channel Lower Computational CostReferences
- 1.Juang BH, Soong FK: Hands-free telecommunications. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Hands-Free Speech Communication (HSC '01), April 2001, Kyoto, Japan 5–10.Google Scholar
- 2.Omologo M, Matassoni M, Svaizer P, Giuliani D: Experiments of hands-free connected digit recognition using a microphone array. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, December 1997, Santa Barbara, Calif, USA 490–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Hughes TB, Kim H-S, DiBiase JH, Silverman HF: Performance of an HMM speech recognizer using a real-time tracking microphone array as input. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 1999, 7(3):346–349. 10.1109/89.759045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Takiguchi T, Nakamura S, Shikano K: HMM-separation-based speech recognition for a distant moving speaker. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 2001, 9(2):127–140. 10.1109/89.902279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Seltzer ML, Raj B, Stern RM: Likelihood-maximizing beamforming for robust hands-free speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 2004, 12(5):489–498. 10.1109/TSA.2004.832988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Furui S: Cepstral analysis technique for automatic speaker verification. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1981, 29(2):254–272. 10.1109/TASSP.1981.1163530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Liu F, Stern RM, Huang X, Acero A: Efficient cepstral normalization for robust speech recognition. Proceedings of the ARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, March 1993, Princeton, NJ, USA 69–74.Google Scholar
- 8.Kitaoka N, Akahori I, Nakagawa S: Speech recognition under noisy environments using spectral subtraction with smoothing of time direction and real-time cepstral mean normalization. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Hands-Free Speech Communication (HSC '01), April 2001, Kyoto, Japan 159–162.Google Scholar
- 9.Doclo S, Moonen M: Robust adaptive time delay estimation for speaker localization in noisy and reverberant acoustic environments. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2003, 2003(11):1110–1124. 10.1155/S111086570330602XzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 10.Knapp CH, Carter GC: The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delay. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1976, 24(4):320–327. 10.1109/TASSP.1976.1162830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Omologo M, Svaizer P: Acoustic source location in noisy and reverberant environment using CSP analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '96), May 1996, Atlanta, Ga, USA 2: 921–924.Google Scholar
- 12.Wang L, Kitaoka N, Nakagawa S: Robust distant speech recognition based on position dependent CMN using a novel multiple microphone processing technique. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH '05), September 2005, Lisbon, Portugal 2661–2664.Google Scholar
- 13.Van Veen B, Buckley K: Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering. IEEE ASSP Magazine 1988, 5(2):4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Yamada T, Nakamura S, Shikano K: Distant-talking speech recognition based on a 3-D Viterbi search using a microphone array. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 2002, 10(2):48–56. 10.1109/89.985542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Flanagan J, Johnston J, Zahn R, Elko GW: Computer-steered microphone arrays for sound transduction in large rooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1985, 78(5):1508–1518. 10.1121/1.392786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Huang Y, Benesty J, Elko GW, Mersereau RM: Real-time passive source localization: a practical linear-correction least-squares approach. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 2001, 9(8):943–956. 10.1109/89.966097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Brandstein M: A framework for speech source localization using sensor arrays, M.S. thesis. Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; 1995.Google Scholar
- 18.DiBiase J, Silverman H, Brandstein M: Robust localization in reverberant rooms. In Microphone Arrays: Signal Processing Techniques and Applications. Springer, Berlin, Germany; 2001:157–180. chapter 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Raykar V, Yegnanarayana B, Prasanna S, Duraiswami R: Speaker localization using excitation source information in speech. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 2005, 13(5):751–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Bard Y: Nonlinear Parameter Estimation. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA; 1974.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 21.Foy W: Position-location solutions by Taylor-series estimation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 1976, 12(2):187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Wang L, Kitaoka N, Nakagawa S: Distant speech recognition based on position dependent cepstral mean normalization. Proceedings of the 6th IASTED International Conference on Signal and Image Processing (SIP '04), August 2004, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 249–254.Google Scholar
- 23.Wang L, Kitaoka N, Nakagawa S: Robust distant speech recognition based on position dependent CMN. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP '04), October 2004, Jeju Island, Korea 2409–2052.Google Scholar
- 24.Viterbi A: Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1967, 13(2):260–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Omologo M, Svaizer P: Use of the crosspower-spectrum phase in acoustic event location. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 1997, 5(3):288–292. 10.1109/89.568735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Nakagawa S, Hanai K, Yamamoto K, Minematsu N: Comparison of syllable-based HMMs and triphone-based HMMs in Japanese speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, December 1999, Keystone, Colo, USA 393–396.Google Scholar
Copyright information
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.