Advertisement

Accuracy Evaluation for Region Centroid-Based Registration of Fluorescent CLSM Imagery

  • Sang-Chul LeeEmail author
  • Peter Bajcsy
  • Amy Lin
  • Robert Folberg
Open Access
Research Article
  • 678 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Performance Evaluation in Image Processing

Abstract

We present an accuracy evaluation of a semiautomatic registration technique for 3D volume reconstruction from fluorescent confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) imagery. The presented semiautomatic method is designed based on our observations that (a) an accurate point selection is much harder than an accurate region (segment) selection for a human, (b) a centroid selection of any region is less accurate by a human than by a computer, and (c) registration based on structural shape of a region rather than based on intensity-defined point is more robust to noise and to morphological deformation of features across stacks. We applied the method to image mosaicking and image alignment registration steps and evaluated its performance with 20 human subjects on CLSM images with stained blood vessels. Our experimental evaluation showed significant benefits of automation for 3D volume reconstruction in terms of achieved accuracy, consistency of results, and performance time. In addition, the results indicate that the differences between registration accuracy obtained by experts and by novices disappear with the proposed semiautomatic registration technique while the absolute registration accuracy increases.

Keywords

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Accuracy Evaluation Structural Shape Point Selection Accuracy Increase 

References

  1. 1.
    Lee S-C, Bajcsy P: Feature based registration of fluorescent LSCM imagery using region centroids. Medical Imaging, February 2005, San Diego, Calif, USA, Proceedings of the SPIE 5747: 170–181.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Collins CL, Ideker JH, Kurtis KE: Laser scanning confocal microscopy for in situ monitoring of alkali-silica reaction. Journal of Microscopy 2004, 213(2):149–157. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2004.01280.xMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pawley JB: The Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy. Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA; 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zitova B, Flusser J: Image registration methods: a survey. Image and Vision Computing 2003, 21(11):977–1000. 10.1016/S0262-8856(03)00137-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hill DLG, Batchelor PG, Holden M, Hawkes DJ: Medical image registration. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2001, 46(3):R1–R45. 10.1088/0031-9155/46/3/201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown LG: A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Computing Surveys 1992, 24(4):325–376. 10.1145/146370.146374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohen LD, Cohen I: Deformable models for 3-D medical images using finite elements and balloons. Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '92), June 1992, Champaign, Ill, USA 592–598.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goshtasby A: Registration of images with geometric distortions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1988, 26(1):60–64. 10.1109/36.3000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tuohy M, McConchie CA, Knox RB, Szarski L, Arkin A: Computer-assisted three-dimensional reconstruction technology in plant cell image analysis; applications of interactive computer graphics. Journal of Microscopy 1987, 147(1):83–88. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1987.tb02820.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maintz JBA, Viergever MA: A survey of medical image registration. Medical Image Analysis 1998, 2(1):1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nocito A, Kononen J, Kallioniemi OP, Sauter G: Tissue microarrays (TMAs) for high-throughput molecular pathology research. International Journal of Cancer 2001, 94(1):1–5. 10.1002/ijc.1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goshtasby A, Stockman GC, Page CV: A region-based approach to digital image transformation with subpixel accuracy. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1986, 24(3):390–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flusser J, Suk T: A moment-based approach to registration of images with affine geometric distortion. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1994, 32(2):382–387. 10.1109/36.295052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li H, Manjunath BS, Mitra SK: A contour-based approach to multisensor image registration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 1995, 4(3):320–334. 10.1109/83.366480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pratt WK: Correlation techniques of image registration. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 1974, 10(3):353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Viola P, Wells WM III: Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV '95), June 1995, Cambridge, Mass, USA 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hermosillo G, Chefd'Hotel C, Faugeras O: Variational methods for multimodal image matching. International Journal of Computer Vision 2002, 50(3):329–343. 10.1023/A:1020830525823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jungke M, Von Seelenon W, Bielke G, et al.: A system for the diagnostic use of tissue characterizing parameters in NMR-tomography. Proceedings of Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI '87), 1987 39: 471–481.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Montgomery K, Ross MD: Non fiducial, shaped-based registration of biological tissue. Three-Dimensional Microscopy: Image Acquisition and Processing III, January 1996, San Jose, Calif, USA, Proceedings of SPIE 2655: 224–232.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goulden CH: Methods of Statistical Analysis. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1956.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kooper R, Shirk A, Lee S-C, Lin A, Folberg R, Bajcsy P: 3D medical volume reconstruction using Web services. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS '05), July 2005, Orlando, Fla, USA 716.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lee et al. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sang-Chul Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter Bajcsy
    • 1
  • Amy Lin
    • 2
  • Robert Folberg
    • 2
  1. 1.The National Center for Supercomputing ApplicationsUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PathologyThe University of Illinois Cancer Center, University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations