A Framework for Advanced Video Traces: Evaluating Visual Quality for Video Transmission Over Lossy Networks
- 866 Downloads
Conventional video traces (which characterize the video encoding frame sizes in bits and frame quality in PSNR) are limited to evaluating loss-free video transmission. To evaluate robust video transmission schemes for lossy network transport, generally experiments with actual video are required. To circumvent the need for experiments with actual videos, we propose in this paper an advanced video trace framework. The two main components of this framework are (i) advanced video traces which combine the conventional video traces with a parsimonious set of visual content descriptors, and (ii) quality prediction schemes that based on the visual content descriptors provide an accurate prediction of the quality of the reconstructed video after lossy network transport. We conduct extensive evaluations using a perceptual video quality metric as well as the PSNR in which we compare the visual quality predicted based on the advanced video traces with the visual quality determined from experiments with actual video. We find that the advanced video trace methodology accurately predicts the quality of the reconstructed video after frame losses.
KeywordsVideo Quality Visual Quality Transmission Scheme Video Transmission Prediction Scheme
- 1.Narasimha R, Rao R: Modeling variable bit rate video on wired and wireless networks using discrete-time self-similar systems. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Personal Wireless Communications (ICPWC '02), December 2002, New Delhi, India 290–294.Google Scholar
- 6.Kanjanavapastit A, Mehrpour H: Packet reservation multiple access for multimedia traffic. Proceedings of 10th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON '02), 2002, Singapore 162–166.Google Scholar
- 8.He Z, Chen CW: End-to-end video quality analysis and modeling for video streaming over IP network. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME '02), 2002, Lausanne, Switzerland 1: 853–856.Google Scholar
- 11.Kanumuri S, Cosman P, Reibman AR: A generalized linear model for MPEG-2 packet-loss visibility. Proceedings of 14th International Packet Video Workshop (PV '04), December 2004, Irvine, Calif, USAGoogle Scholar
- 12.Liang YJ, Apostolopoulos JG, Girod B: Analysis of packet loss for compressed video: does burst-length matter? Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '03), April 2003, Hong Kong 5: 684–687.Google Scholar
- 13.Masry M, Hemami SS: Perceived quality metrics for low bit rate compressed video. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '02), 2002, Rochester, NY, USA 3: 49–52.Google Scholar
- 16.ITU-T Recommendation P.910, "Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications ", Recommendations of the ITU, Telecommunication Standardization Sector, approved in September 1999Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.