Adaptive Outlier Rejection in Image Super-resolution
- 1k Downloads
One critical aspect to achieve efficient implementations of image super-resolution is the need for accurate subpixel registration of the input images. The overall performance of super-resolution algorithms is particularly degraded in the presence of persistent outliers, for which registration has failed. To enhance the robustness of processing against this problem, we propose in this paper an integrated adaptive filtering method to reject the outlier image regions. In the process of combining the gradient images due to each low-resolution image, we use adaptive FIR filtering. The coefficients of the FIR filter are updated using the LMS algorithm, which automatically isolates the outlier image regions by decreasing the corresponding coefficients. The adaptation criterion of the LMS estimator is the error between the median of the samples from the LR images and the output of the FIR filter. Through simulated experiments on synthetic images and on real camera images, we show that the proposed technique performs well in the presence of motion outliers. This relatively simple and fast mechanism enables to add robustness in practical implementations of image super-resolution, while still being effective against Gaussian noise in the image formation model.
KeywordsSynthetic Image Adaptation Criterion Fast Mechanism Outlier Rejection Real Camera
- 1.Tsai RY, Huang TS: Multiframe image restoration and registration. In Advances in Computer Vision and Image Processing. Volume 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn, USA; 1984:317–339. chapter 7Google Scholar
- 2.Chaudhuri S (Ed): Super-Resolution Imaging. Kluwer Academic, Boston, Mass, USA; 2001.Google Scholar
- 4.Baker S, Kanade T: Super-resolution optical flow. In Tech. Rep. CMU-RI-TR-99-36. Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA; 1999.Google Scholar
- 11.Zomet A, Rav-Acha A, Peleg S: Robust super-resolution. Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '01), December 2001, Kauai, Hawaii, USA 1: 645–650.Google Scholar
- 13.Trimeche M, Yrjänäinen J: Order filters in super-resolution image reconstruction. Image Processing: Algorithms and Systems II, January 2003, Santa Clara, Calif, USA, Proceedings of SPIE 5014: 190–200.Google Scholar
- 14.Capel D, Zisserman A: Super-resolution from multiple views using learnt image models. Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '01), December 2001, Kauai, Hawaii, USA 2: 627–634.Google Scholar
- 18.Max N: Visualizing Hilbert curves. Proceedings of IEEE Visualization '98, October 1998, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA 447–450, 564.Google Scholar
- 19.Perez A, Kamata S, Kawaguchi E: Peano scanning of arbitrary size images. Proceedings of 11th IAPR-IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR '92), August–September 1992, The Hague, the Netherlands 3: 565–568.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.