Abstract
Detecting the significant nodes in multilayer networks is crucial for preventing the large-scale spread of disaster events. However, the existing model can hardly simulate the ubiquitous non-failure cascading effect process in social and economic systems. To solve this problem, first, we propose a mathematical method of constructing a two-layer network model. Then we define the non-failure cascading effect process in the two-layer network. Based on the model and spreading process, we propose a non-failure cascading effect index by using each node’s non-failure cascading affecting in uential degree on the two-layer network. We then applied the detecting model in theoretical two-layer networks. We find there exist significant nodes, and also exist several in uential factors of the interlayer cascading effect process. The detecting model is applied in the two-layer industrial input-output networks between the U.S. and China for testing the validity of the theoretical model. The hybrid network combination is relatively more sensitive to in uential factors; the significant nodes are more prominent in scale-free networks. Our research provides a solution for finding the significant nodes in two-layer social or economic networks based on the non-failure cascading effect process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Andersson, P. Donalek, R. Farmer, N. Hatziargyriou, I. Kamwa, P. Kundur, N. Martins, J. Paserba, P. Pourbeik, J. Sanchez-Gasca, R. Schulz, A. Stankovic, C. Taylor, V. Vittal, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20, 1922 (2005)
A.R. Mian, A. Sufi, Q. J. Econ. 124, 1449 (2009)
Y. Han, C. Guo, S. Ma, D. Song, J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 6, 944 (2018)
D. Helbing, D. Brockmann, T. Chadefaux, K. Donnay, U. Blanke, O. Woolley-Meza, M. Moussaid, A. Johansson, J. Krause, S. Schutte, M. Perc, J. Stat. Phys. 158, 735 (2015)
Y. Demyanyk, O. Van Hemert, Rev. Financial Stud. 24, 1848 (2011)
S.H. Strogatz, Nature 410, 268 (2001)
R. Albert, A.L. Barabasi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002)
M.E.J. Newman, SIAM Rev. 45, 167 (2003)
S. Brin, L. Page, Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst. 30, 107 (1998)
L.Y. Lu, D.B. Chen, X.L. Ren, Q.M. Zhang, Y.C. Zhang, T. Zhou, Phys. Rep. 650, 1 (2016)
S.N. Dorogovtsev, A.V. Goltsev, J.F.F. Mendes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 040601 (2006)
M. Kitsak, L.K. Gallos, S. Havlin, F. Liljeros, L. Muchnik, H.E. Stanley, H.A. Makse, Nat. Phys. 6, 888 (2010)
J.E. Hirsch, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16569 (2005)
Z. Gao, W. Dang, C. Mu, Y. Yang, S. Li, C. Grebogi, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 14, 3982 (2018)
Z.-K. Gao, Q. Cai, Y.-X. Yang, W.-D. Dang, S.-S. Zhang, Sci. Rep. 6, 35622 (2016)
Z.-K. Gao, Y.-X. Yang, Europhys. Lett. 109, 30005 (2015)
L. Lu, T. Zhou, Q.M. Zhang, H.E. Stanley, Nat. Commun. 7, 10168 (2016)
Q. Ji, E. Bouri, D. Roubaud, Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 57, 1 (2018)
B.-Y. Liu, Q. Ji, Y. Fan, Quant. Finance 17, 437 (2017)
M. Jalili, M. Perc, J. Complex Netw. 5, 665 (2017)
B. Podobnik, D. Horvatic, T. Lipic, M. Perc, J.M. Buldu, H.E. Stanley, J.R. Soc, Interface 12, 20150770 (2015)
G. Bianconi, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 3, 034001 (2017)
J.E. Hirsch, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16569 (2005)
C.D. Brummitt, R.M. D’Souza, E.A. Leicht, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, E680 (2012)
S.V. Buldyrev, R. Parshani, G. Paul, H.E. Stanley, S. Havlin, Nature 464, 1025 (2010)
S. Hong, J. Zhu, L.A. Braunstein, T. Zhao, Q. You, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2017, 103208 (2017)
W. Li, A. Bashan, S.V. Buldyrev, H.E. Stanley, S. Havlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 228702 (2012)
L.D. Valdez, M.A. Di Muro, L.A. Braunstein, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2016, 093402 (2016)
D. Vaknin, M.M. Danziger, S. Havlin, New J. Phys. 19, 073037 (2017)
C. Chen, J. He, N. Bliss, H. Tong, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29, 2332 (2017)
L. Jin, X.J. Wang, Z. Yong, J. Lei, J.W. Xiao, Int. J. Mod. Phys. 28, 1750050 (2017)
M.P. Timmer, E. Dietzenbacher, B. Los, R. Stehrer, G.J. de Vries, Rev. Int. Econ. 23, 575 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
An, F., Gao, X., Guan, J. et al. Detecting the significant nodes in two-layer flow networks: an interlayer non-failure cascading effect perspective. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 228, 2475–2490 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2019-800196-2
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2019-800196-2