Abstract
Economics and other social sciences stem from the same methodological scientific revolution that gave birth to the natural sciences. The natural and social sciences share a commitment to the dialectical process of theory formation on the basis of empirical findings and theory revision to incorporate empirical anomalies. Claims that the subject matter of social and natural sciences differ qualitatively in terms of mathematical formalism, statistical modeling, or reductionism are unconvincing. The notion of a “value-free” character to natural sciences fails historical and critical tests. Natural and social sciences share an ideological component in their representation of the relation between the subject and the external natural and social world. Natural sciences arise from the struggles of human beings with nature in the process of social reproduction, while social sciences arise from the struggles of human beings with each other and with the class divisions social reproduction imposes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Althusser, On Ideology (Verso Books, 2008)
D.K. Foley, Adam's Fallacy: A Guide to Economic Theology (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006)
P. Mirowski, More Heat than Light (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1989)
P. Mirowski, SCIENCE-MART (Harvard University Press, 2011)
T.M. Porter, Rise of statistical thinking, 1820-1900 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986)
S.M. Stigler, History of statistics : the measurement of uncertainty before 1900 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foley, D.K. Can economics be a physical science?. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 225, 3171–3178 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2016-60116-3
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2016-60116-3