Skip to main content
Log in

Indirect methods in nuclear astrophysics

  • Review
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

It is well known that measuring cross-sections of thermonuclear reactions at the low energies typical of astrophysical sites is very difficult. This is due to the presence of the Coulomb barrier between the interacting nuclei. For non-explosive scenarios at astrophysical sites, the relevant energies typically span from few tens to few hundreds of keV while the Coulomb barrier is in the order of MeV. The fusion processes then proceed via tunnel effect and their cross-sections are strongly depending on the probability of penetration through the barrier. In a first approximation, this probability is given by the Gamow factor. Owing to the exponential decrease in this factor with energy, the cross-section values of thermonuclear fusion processes in stellar systems often reach values as small as micro- and nanobarn and even lower ones. Neutron-induced reactions, in spite of the absence of Coulomb barrier, are also difficult to measure. Indeed, it is the possible presence of a centrifugal barrier that can hinder the measurement of the values of the cross-sections of these processes. In either cases the cross-sections of astrophysical nuclear processes result in experimental difficulties, due to the low signal-to-noise ratio, that have been a challenge for scientists since the setting of this scientific field: Nuclear Astrophysics. In the last two to three decades, experimental improvements, including the construction of underground laboratories, allowed for the first time the measurement of cross-sections of astrophysical nuclear processes in the relevant energy region for astrophysics. Also, indirect methods were developed. As a general and common feature, using these methods it is possible to relate the features --typically the cross-section-- of a process that is experimentally simpler to measure, although not directly linked to astrophysics, to those of another process that is of interest for this latter field. This didactic paper will briefly describe some of these indirect methods with a special emphasis on Trojan Horse and on its application also to reactions that involve the use of radioactive ion beams and to neutron-induced reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.S. Eddington, Observatory 42, 371 (1919)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. A.S. Eddington, Observatory 43, 341 (1920)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 55, 434 (1939)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. E.M. Burbidge, G.R. Burbidge, W.A. Fowler, F. Hoyle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 547 (1957)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. C.E. Rolfs, W.S. Rodney, Cauldrons in the cosmos: Nuclear Astrophysics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988)

  6. https://doi.org/www.lngs.infn.it/en

  7. C.A. Bertulani, G. Baur, H. Rebel, Nucl. Phys. A 458, 188 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Fermi, Z. Phys. 29, 315 (1924)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Motobayashi, H. Sakurai, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2012, 03C001 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Baur, H. Rebel, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 20, 1 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Baur, Phys. Lett. B 178, 135 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Spitaleri, Proceedings of the Fifth Hadronic Physics Winter Seminar (Folgaria - TN, Italy, World Scientific, Singapore, 1990)

  13. R.E. Tribble, C.A. Bertulani, M. La Cognata, A.M. Mukhamedzhanov, C. Spitaleri, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 106901 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Lattuada, F. Riggi, C. Spitaleri, D. Vinciguerra, Nuovo Cimento A 83, 151 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Zadro et al., Phys. Rev. C 40, 181 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Calvi et al., Phys. Rev. C 41, 1848 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Cherubini et al., Astrophys. J. 457, 855 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Cherubini et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 015805 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Gulino et al., Phys. Rev. C 87, 012801(R) (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. G.F. Chew, G.C. Wick, Phys. Rev. 85, 636 (1952)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Treiman, C. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 140 (1962)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. I.S. Shapiro et al., Nucl. Phys. 61, 353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. G. Baur, S. Typel, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 154, 333 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvio Cherubini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cherubini, S. Indirect methods in nuclear astrophysics. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 391 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2018-12255-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2018-12255-y

Navigation