Calculating dosimetry parameters in brachytherapy using the continuous beta spectrum of Sm-153 in the Monte Carlo simulation approach

Regular Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract.

Calculation of dosimetry parameters by TG-60 approach for beta sources and TG-43 approach for gamma sources can help to design brachytherapy sources. In this work, TG-60 dosimetry parameters are calculated for the Sm-153 brachytherapy seed using the Monte Carlo simulation approach. The continuous beta spectrum of Sm-153 and probability density are applied to simulate the Sm-153 source. Sm-153 is produced by neutron capture during the 152Sm(n,\( \gamma\))153Sm reaction in reactors. The Sm-153 radionuclide decays by beta rays followed by gamma-ray emissions with half-life of 1.928 days. Sm-153 source is simulated in a spherical water phantom to calculate the deposited energy and geometry function in the intended points. The Sm-153 seed consists of 20% samarium, 30% calcium and 50% silicon, in cylindrical shape with density 1.76gr/cm^3. The anisotropy function and radial dose function were calculated at 0-4mm radial distances relative to the seed center and polar angles of 0-90 degrees. The results of this research are compared with the results of Taghdiri et al. (Iran. J. Radiat. Res. 9, 103 (2011)). The final beta spectrum of Sm-153 is not considered in their work. Results show significant relative differences even up to 5 times for anisotropy functions at 0.6, 1 and 2mm distances and some angles. MCNP4C Monte Carlo code is applied in both in the present paper and in the above-mentioned one.

Keywords

Energy Line Monte Carlo Code Anisotropy Function Beta Spectrum Geometry Function 

References

  1. 1.
    B.R. Thomadsen, M.J. Rivard, W.M. Butler, Brachytherapy Physics, 2nd edition (Medical Physics Monograph, 2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Deepa, D. Rao, S. Kailas, K. Venkataramaniah, in Proceedings of the DEA Symposium on Nuclear Physics, Vol. 56 (2011) p. 376Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.M. Bé, V. Chisté, C. Dulieu, E. Browne, C. Baglin, V. Chechev, N. Kuzmenco, R. Helmer, F. Kondev, D. MacMahon, K.B. Lee, Table of Radionuclides, Vol. 3 (BIPM, 2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E.S. Valente, T.P.R. Campos, in Proceedings of the International Nuclear Atlantic Conference, 2007, Vol. 1 (Santos, Brazil, 2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L.B. Nogueira, T.P.R. Campos, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (RJ, Brazil, 2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T.P.R. Campos, J.P.L. Andrade, I.T. Costa, C.H.T. Silva, Prog. Nucl. Energy 50, 757 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I.L.B. junior, T.P.R. Campos, in Proceedings of the International Nuclear Atlantic Conference, 2007 (Santos, SP, Brazil, 2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.E. Grinyer, PhD Thesis, High-precision half-life measurements for superallowed Fermi beta decays, University of Guelph (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Huber, Phys. Rev. C 84, 024617 (2011) 85CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.T.C. Tsao, D.R. Schaart, C.G. Soares, R. Nath, Med. Phys. 34, 4126 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.F. Briesmeister, MCNP ---A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code-Version 4C (Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Taghdiri, M. Sadeghi, S.H. Hosseini, M. Athari, Iran. J. Radiat. Res. 9, 103 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of PhysicsShahrood UniversityShahroodIran

Personalised recommendations