Advertisement

Programmed discrimination of qbits with added classical information

Quantum Information Regular Article

Abstract

We investigate some properties of programmed quantum-state discriminators with simple programs. Bergou et al. [Phys. Rev. A 73, 062334 (2006)] have considered programmable devices which are supplied with two distinct but unknown program qbits and one data qbit which is certain to be identical to one or other of the program qbits. The task is to discriminate between the first and the second possibility. In this paper, we consider this state-discrimination problem when there is some additional classical information available. We find that in the minimum error discrimination mode, the probability of correct discrimination is increased by each type of classical information. The same is broadly true of unambiguous discrimination, with the chance of success improving when the overlap between the program qbits is reduced.

Keywords

Density Matrix Minimum Error Great Circle North Pole Average Error Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    J.A. Bergou, V. Bužek, E. Feldman, U. Herzog, M. Hillery, Phys. Rev. A 73, 062334 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Morrison, P. Morrison, Charles Babbage’s Papers (Dover Publications, New York, 1962)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Hanneke, J.P. Home, J.D. Jost, J.M. Amini, D. Leibfried, D.J. Wineland, Nature Phys., DOI: 10.1038/nphys1453
  4. 4.
    S.M. Barnett, Quantum Information (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.M. Barnett, S. Croke, Adv. Opt. Photon 1, 238 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.M. Barnett, A. Chefles, I. Jex, Phys. Lett. A 307, 195 (2003)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. Jex, G. Alber, S.M. Barnett, A. Delgado, Fortschr. Phys. 51, 172 (2003)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.A. Nielsen, I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, 1957)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Sedlak, M. Ziman, V. Bužek, M. Hillery, Phys. Rev. A 77, 042304 (2008)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Kleinmann, H. Kampermann, D. Bruß, Phys. Rev. A 72, 032308 (2005)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C.W. Helstrom, Quantum detection and estimation theory (Academic Press, New York, 1976)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.A. Bergou, M. Hillery, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 160501 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EDP Sciences, SIF, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics, Scottish Universities Physics AllianceStrathclyde UniversityGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations