Non-classicality of photon added coherent and thermal radiations
- 113 Downloads
Production and analysis of non-Gaussian radiation fields has evinced a lot of attention recently. Simplest way of generating such non-Gaussians is through adding (subtracting) photons to Gaussian fields. Interestingly, when photons are added to classical Gaussian fields, the resulting states exhibit non-classicality. Two important classical Gaussian radiation fields are coherent and thermal states. Here, we study the non-classical features of such states when photons are added to them. Non-classicality of these states shows up in the negativity of the Wigner function. We also work out the entanglement potential, a recently proposed measure of non-classicality for these states. Our analysis reveals that photon added coherent states are non-classical for all seed beam intensities; their non-classicality increases with the addition of more number of photons. Thermal state exhibits non-classicality at all temperatures, when a photon is added; lower the temperature, higher is their non-classicality.
PACS.42.50.Dv Nonclassical states of the electromagnetic field, including entangled photon states; quantum state engineering and measurements 03.65.Wj State reconstruction, quantum tomography 03.67.Mn Entanglement production, characterization, and manipulation
QICS02.10.+t Quantum-Classical Transition 01.30.+r Quantum states and dynamics as a resource for information processing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Quantum Interferometry, edited by F. De Martini et al. (VCH, Weinheim, 1996) Google Scholar
- W. Tittel, G. Ribordy, N. Gisin, Phys. World 11, 41 (1998); E. Knill, R. Laflamme, G. Milburn, Nature 409, 46 (2001) Google Scholar
- V.V. Dodonov, J. Opt. B: Quant. Semiclass. Opt. 4, R1 (2002) Google Scholar
- A.I. Lvovsky, H. Hansen, T. Aichele, O. Benson, J. Mlynek, S. Schiller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 050402 (2001); H. Hansen, T. Aichele, C. Hettich, P. Lodahl, A.I. Lvovsky, J. Mlynek, S. Schiller, Opt. Lett. 26, 1714 (2001); A.I. Lvovsky, J.H. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. A 65, 033830 (2002); A. Zavatta, M. Bellini, P.L. Ramazza, F. Marin, F.T. Arecchi, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19, 1189 (2002); A. Zavatta, S. Viciani, M. Bellini, Phys. Rev. A 70, 053821 (2004); S.A. Babichev, B. Brezger, A.I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 047903 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- M.G.A. Paris, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1615 (1999); P. van Loock, S.L. Braunstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3482 (2000); S. Scheel, L. Knöll, T. Opatrny, D.-G.Welsch, Phys. Rev. A 62, 043803 (2000); M.S. Kim, W. Son, V. Bužek, P.L. Knight, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032323 (2002); X.B. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 66, 024303 (2002); X.B. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 66, 064304 (2002); M.M. Wolf, J. Eisert, M.B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 047904 (2003); J.S. Ivan, N. Mukunda, R. Simon, e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0603255 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- C.T. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 44, R2775 (1991) Google Scholar
- A. Wünsche, V.V. Dodonov, O.V. Man'ko, V.I. Man'ko, Fortschr. Phys. 49, 1117 (2001); P. Marian, T.A. Marian, H. Scutaru, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 153601 (2002); V.V. Dodonov, O.V. Man'ko, V.I. Man'ko, A. Wünsche, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 633 (2000); P. Marian, T.A. Marian, H. Scutaru, Phys. Rev. A 69, 022104 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar