Advertisement

Are quantum wave packets observable? Sokolov effect: puzzling generation of 2p states in the 2s hydrogen beam passing trough a wide metal slit

  • S. T. Belyaev
Original Paper

Abstract.

The observation of excitation of 2p states in a collimated 2s hydrogen beam passing through a wide metal slit with no direct contacts or electric field applied (Sokolov effect) up to now has had no reasonable explanation. A solution presented in this paper is formulated within the standard quantum-mechanical framework with a consecutive wave packet treatment of the atomic center-of-mass wave function. It is found that a very weak interaction of the beam diffraction halo with the slit, though negligible for center-of-mass motion, coherently affects the intrinsic state of an atom in the beam and efficiently induces \(2s\rightarrow 2p\) transitions. High sensitivity of this interference phenomena may be used to measure transverse coherence length of the beam.

Keywords

Wave Packet Coherence Length Beam Diffraction Intrinsic State Interference Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yu.L. Sokolov, Phys.-Usp. 42, 481 (1999)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu.L. Sokolov, in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Precision Measurements and Fundamental Constants II (Gaithersberg, 1981), p. 135Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu.L. Sokolov, V.P. Yakovlev, Sov. Phys. JETP 56, 7 (1982)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu.L. Sokolov , Nuovo Cim. D 14, 183 (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu.L. Sokolov , Phys. Scripta 49, 86 (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B.B. Kadomtsev, M.B. Kadomtsev, Phys. Scripta 50, 240 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.B. Kadomtsev, Dinamika i Informatsiya [Dynamics and Information] (Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk, Moscow, 1997Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.S. Adams , Phys. Rep. 240, 143 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Atom Interferometry, edited by P.R. Berman (Academic Press, San Diego, 1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshits, The Classical Theory of Fields (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.L. Goldberger, K.M. Watson, Collision Theory (John Wiley, N.Y., London, Sydney, 1964)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G.L. Kotkin, S.I. Polityko, V.G. Serbo, Yad. Fiz. 42, 692, 1925 (1985)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu.L. Sokolov , Eur. Phys. J. D 20, 27 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Nordlander, J.C. Tully, Phys. Rev. B 42, 5564 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S.A. Deutscher, X. Yang, J. Burgdoerfer, Phys. Rev. A 55, 466 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian Research Center "Kurchatov Institute"MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations