Determining the actual local density of dark matter particles

Young Scientist


Even if dark matter particles were unambiguously discovered in experiments, there is no clear reason to expect that this would resolve the dark matter problem. It is very easy to provide examples of dark matter scenarios (e.g. in supersymmetric models) in which nearly identical detector signals correspond to extremely different relic densities. The density of the discovered particles, therefore, must be determined before their cosmological relevance can be established. In this paper, I present a general method that utilizes both dark matter and hadron collider experimental data (once they become available) to estimate the local density of dark matter particles. These results were obtained in collaboration with Gordon Kane at the University of Michigan.


Experimental Data Field Theory Elementary Particle Dark Matter Quantum Field Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Brhlik, D. J. H. Chung, G. L. Kane, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10, 367 (2001) hep-ph/0005158Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Dda, G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, J. Edsjö, J. Silk, Phys. Rev. D 67, 023505 (2003) hep-ph/0209266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Gondolo et al. , JCAP 0407, 008 (2004) astro-ph/0406204Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. L. Bennett et al. , Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148, 1 (2003) astro-ph/0302207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, K. Griest, Phys. Rept. 267, 195-373 (1996) hep-ph/9506380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Freese, P. Gondolo, H. J. Newberg, Detectability of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles in the Sagittarius Dwarf Tidal Stream, 2003, astro-ph/0309279Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Sikivie, Phys. Lett. B 432, 139-144 (1998) astro-ph/9705038Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Muñoz, Dark Matter Detection in the Light of Recent Experimental Results, 2003, hep-ph/0309346Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. R. Primack, D. Seckel, B. Sadoulet, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 38, 751 (1988)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Ullio, M. Kamionkowski, JHEP 03, 049 (2001) hep-ph/0006183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ATLAS Detector and Physics Performance. Technical Design Report. vol. 2. CERN-LHCC-99-15Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. W. Goodman, E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D 31, 3059 (1985)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Michigan Center for Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations